8 votes

US Action in Mali is Another Undeclared War by Ron Paul

US Action in Mali is Another Undeclared War
by Rep. Ron Paul, January 29, 2013 antiwar.com

http://original.antiwar.com/paul/2013/01/28/us-action-in-mal...

President Obama last week began his second term by promising that “a decade of war is now ending.” As he spoke, the US military was rapidly working its way into another war, this time in the impoverished African country of Mali. As far as we know, the US is only providing transport and intelligence assistance to France, which initiated the intervention then immediately called Washington for back-up and funding. However, even if US involvement is limited, and, as Defense Secretary Leon Panetta said, US boots on the ground are not being considered “at this time,” this clearly is developing into another war. As usual, the mission is creeping.

Within the first week of French military action in Mali, the promise that it would be a quick operation to put down an Islamic rebel advance toward the capitol was broken. France announced that it would be forced to send in thousands of troops and would need to remain far longer than the few weeks it initially claimed would be necessary.

Media questions as to whether the US has Special Operations forces, drones, or CIA paramilitary units active in Mali are unanswered by the Administration. Congress has asked few questions and demanded few answers from the president. As usual, it was not even consulted. But where does the president get the authority to become a co-combatant in French operations in Mali, even if US troops are not yet overtly involved in the attack?

How did we get to Mali? Blowback and unintended consequences played key roles. When the president decided to use the US military to attack Libya in 2011, Congress was not consulted. The president claimed that UN and NATO authority for the use of US military force were sufficient and even superior to any kind of Congressional declaration. Congress once again relinquished its authority, but also its oversight power, by remaining silent. That meant the difficult questions such as why is the action necessary, what would it entail, and what kind of unintended consequences might we see if the operation does not go exactly as planned, were neither asked nor answered.

When Gaddafi was overthrown in Libya, many fighters from Mali who had lived in Libya and been trained by Gaddafi’s military returned to their home country with sophisticated weapons and a new determination to continue their fight for independence for northern Mali. Thus the France-initiated action against Libya in 2011 led to new violence and instability in Mali that France decided it must also address. Shortly after the French attack on Mali, rebels in Algeria attacked a BP gas facility in retaliation for their government’s decision to allow foreign military to fly over Algerian territory en route to Mali. Thus the action in Mali to solve the crisis created by the prior action in Libya is turning into a new crisis in Algeria. This is the danger of interventionism and, as we saw in Vietnam more than four decades ago, it threatens to drag the US further into the conflict. And Congress is AWOL.

There is a reason why the framers of our Constitution placed the authority to declare war strictly with the Legislative Branch of government. They knew well that kings were all too willing to go to war without the consent of those who would do the killing and dying — and funding. By placing that authority in Congress, the people’s branch of government, they intended to blunt the executive branch’s enthusiasm toward overseas adventurism. The consequences of this steady erosion of our system toward the unitary executive are dire.

http://original.antiwar.com/paul/2013/01/28/us-action-in-mal...



Trending on the Web

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

For Those With Short Memories, Or Lack Of Historical Facts:

This is exactly how the pitiful VietNam war started, that cost Americans 58,000 lives and un-countable destroyed lives.

VietNam was called IndoChina when France was busy provoking a war there{1950's-early 1960.}.
As France pulled out, the Americans stepped in as "Advisors" to the VietNamese who would oppose the spread of a Communist political faction, we were told.

President Kennedy opposed the VietNam escalation, but he was killed in Nov. 1963. The next President, Johnson, quickly escalated American involvement, saying the U.N. approved of escalation.

This war started the "Bankrupting" of America, and the killing of American students from Kent State U.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=01-2pNCZiNk

beesting

Yeah:

Years ago I bought a couple of French rifles.
Never fired, only dropped once.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I love my country
I am appalled by my government

That headline made me laugh a

That headline made me laugh a little.

ANOTHER undeclared war by Ron Paul? jeez, I thought this guy was against that.

End The Fed!
BTC: 1A3JAJwLVG2pz8GLfdgWhcePMtc3ozgWtz

Did someone just discover big Oil in Mali?

Have to ask.

____

"Take hold of the future or the future will take hold of you." -- Patrick Dixon

Mali has large gold deposits.

Germany wants it's gold back from (here's a surprise) France and the US.

Even if they were sure it was nothing but sand

They might still find a reason to invade for Lockheed, Raytheon, Honeywell, Boeing and all the other corporate interests that benefit from increased sales to the government that occur during military interventions. Gotta keep those corporate welfare queens happy.

It sure looks a lot like colonialism all over again, but who knows if it was actually planned that way, or if that's just what always follows military interventions. I'm sure someone somewhere will be happy to sell the Malian's property, which they would have otherwise had to pay a lot more to get.

Thars gold in them thar hills:

It is my understanding that they have decent deposits of gold and I guess since France and the NY fed don't have Germany's gold to give back to them, they will have to steal it from someone else to replace what they have already stolen.
EH, who really knows the full reasons for some of the terrorist (read: Government) actions?
But usually, if you follow the money, you can get close to figuring it out.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I love my country
I am appalled by my government

Gold, and a general population so poor they do not use banks.

Can't have that either. People acted like I was pitching socialism when I posted this, maybe NOW they will understand?
http://www.dailypaul.com/272470/us-action-in-mali-is-another...

Love or fear? Choose again with every breath.