4 votes

Lyndon LaRouche claims Federal Courts indicted Obama - what do you think?

Webcast from Friday. I have only been listening for a few minutes, but it is certainly interesting. I have not paid enough attention to LaRouche to have a full fledged opinion of him. I know the media smeared him as a "kook" and that makes me think he must be a pretty good guy... If this is true, things could get very interesting.


Trending on the Web

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.


Lyndon may be a commie shapeshifter but apparently he speaks the truth.

Chris Indeedski!

Daily Paul cured my abibliophobia.

That guy still around?

Vague memories from a drug induced HS senior year in the 70's...but at least I do remember...

Being recruited by Moonies at my local bookstore
Being recruited by the Mormons
Being recruited by Uncle Sam
Being recruited by Scientologists
Being recruited by 7th Day Adventists
probably a few Objectivists in there somewhere
...and being recruited by Lyndon LaRouche's US Labor Party

I did have enough sense to hold out for the anarcho-capitalists...

LaRouche has been exposed for a long time...

.....over 10 years I think as being a crypto-commie. Totally not credible. Just ignore him.

All he does is create side-shows to help people lose focus on real issues.

I actually had to look up "crypto-commie". LOL!

I actually had to look up "crypto-commie". LOL! Thanks! So he's secretly a communist? I know he's been accused of being a communist in the past. I can say he's definitely not a globalist. This is in-line with his admiration for FDR. FDR had terrible socialist policies which we in large part disagree with, but, he was not a new world order/one world government scumbag.

Talking to openly communist people inside a large and powerful labor union, they hate LaRouche as much as Paul. You may be right about him being a crypto-commie. He did call the sub-prime collapse before it happened though, just like Peter Schiff and others in our camp did.

Thx for expanding my vocabulary, FBI_Exposer Ω™, hehehe! That's awesome.

Repost from a reply I made in 2009.

This was my reply to to the post linked below:

"This Guy Lyndon Larouche......"


Every time he comes up, I type all this out again...
Submitted by Kelldor on Sun, 07/12/2009 - 06:35.

LaRouche points out the problems well. His solutions are not compatible with our message. With that said, I think Ron Paul people should read his stuff, or the stuff of his people, once in a while. I once read an article at EIR (Executive Intelligence Review, a LaRouche site) called "U.S. Mortgage Crisis Can Trigger Collapse Of the Global Casino". It was powerful, and had graphs, chart, etc. I knew about the sub-prime deal WAY before anyone else I knew, because of that article. I called the housing collapse to my friends long before it happened. They called me crazy. Big deal. LaRouche was right.

He wants to take control over the Federal Reserve, nationalize it, and create a 2 tiered credit system of 2% to companies doing infrastructure work to rebuild the country, and 4% to everyone else. He is a huge FDR guy :/

Where he really gets it wrong, is mis-labeling "free-markets" and "free-trade". He HATES the British! He can't stand the British colonialism of the 19th Century, Good! That was the parent of today's globalization. (remember the CFR was spawned from the British RIIA). Those globalists popularized the term "free-trade". What we need to do is teach LaRouche people that what the Globalists advocate is really "WTO Centrally Managed Trade". That is not free-trade. Similarly, we need to teach LaRouche people that you can't have a "free-market economy" if you have a central bank dictating the interest rates and manipulating the money supply causing all of the inflation. That is a centrally managed economy, not a free-market economy.

LaRouche was in the Reagan admin pushing SDI (star wars), and the neo-cons HATED him for it, plus he kept the back channel open with the soviets, helping to avert WW3.

His people are more cult-like towards him than we are towards Ron Paul. He opposes Obama's Nazi health care reform. He HATES Obama!

If you are willing to look with an open mind and learn, there are some good things you can take from his movie "1932, A True History of the United States". Of course, I am not saying I agree with all of it, but I did learn a thing or 2 from this. It is narrated by the guy that played Chikotay from Star Trek Voyager too [Robert Beltran], lol. Anyways, It is really worth watching.


Here is the article I referenced above.

U.S. Mortgage Crisis Can Trigger Collapse Of the Global Casino

Here is his latest webcast. He starts off RIPPING on Obama's health care plan as Nazi Eugenics! HAHAHAHA!!!!

I'm not saying we all jump on his bandwagon or anything. I do not agree with some of his positions. I'm just saying he is worth paying attention to. I would say he is a "Protectionist". You can call him a socialist or a commie or whatever, but I think protectionist is most accurate. To him, Obama = Hitler.

EDIT: I am watching the webcast now. He is for putting those companies into bankruptcy, opposes the bailouts, opposes attempts to shut down the farms (food safety modernization act I think is what he is referring to). Ripping on Gov. Arnold. He's cracking jokes on Obama too, LOL! Now he's ripping on the oligarchical systems of Europe, and promoting the reasons for coming here to form a new nation. Promoting the Constitution, and opposing the Bank of England. Now he's saying get rid of the IMF, no more government borrowing from banks, use power of government to create the money and credit.


I'm listening to the webcast linked by Fishyculture above. Not much has changed. There's various threads here on the DP where we've talked about him in years past. Keep in mind that LaRouche has been saying "This President is in deep trouble" for years, yet he still got re-elected. I hope he's right. I haven't heard him mention a specific court case we can look up to verify this info though. I stand by my 2009 assertion that "I do not agree with some of his positions. I'm just saying he is worth paying attention to."

Thanks Fishyculture for the link.

Similar view here

The thing that a supporter of Larouche aught to consider is that Larouche himself claims to support the Federal idea of competitive government, and if so, if that is true that he supports that idea, then why not support it on the level of this country?

This country started out as 13 Sovereign (competitive) Nation States with their own power to tax, or not tax, to defend, or not defend, to make money experiments, or not make money experiments, to join a Union, or not join a Union, to pay their Union dues, or not pay their Union dues, to secede if joined and if the Union becomes despotic, and even to execute the duties spelled out in The Declaration of Independence.

So why would Larouche support a Consolidated Nation State that destroys all the Sovereignty of each State in the voluntary Union which then makes everyone slaves to the One Legal Money Power that runs the One Monopoly of doing anything they want when they want because they say so and they use your stolen earnings to make you obey without question?

Why support that?

Huh, if you say Federation is a good idea, then put your money where your mouth is, and get this country back to a competitive, voluntary, Union of Separate Sovereign Competitive Constitutionally Limited Nation States voluntarily joined into a Democratic Federated Republic like it was under The Articles of Confederation when the Rebels defeated The British.

If Larouche hates the British so much than why does he harken back to the terms of Dictator George Washington who was merely Alexander Hamilton's Dog of War on a leash?


That my dear friends in liberty is this:


Section 4.
The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned.

Under the Articles of Confederation it was still lawful to overthrow a criminal government.

Now, only the criminals with badges can do that stuff.



Are easily scared by economics. I was contacted by a group of them back in my college years. When I explained the mechanics and the moral hazard of the Federal Reserve (long before I heard about Ron Paul), they never called again. They're not bad people--but I think many are confused.

I guess they talked to too

I guess they talked to too many of us, because their policy has changed a bit since then. I was talking to one of them on a street corner a couple years ago and I brought up the Fed. She said that they would also like to abolish it, but her solution was to create some other kind of funny money, controlled by the "representatives."
I laughed.

We had a LaRouche Dem beat

We had a LaRouche Dem beat out an establishment Dem in SW Houston. After the primary the Houston Dem party mailed everyone not to support her and they pulled Party funding from her campaign and easily lost to Pete Olson. Lyndon is kind of like a Bernie Sanders.

Guy looks good for 90.

Southern Agrarian

LaRouche is another cool old dude....

but he is an enemy of the system, so expect lots of downvotes on this post, even though you didn't really say anything you just linked to a webcast.

Chris Indeedski!

Daily Paul cured my abibliophobia.