4 votes

(Please Help) Writing Essays/ Articles and Making Videos :)

I just read Michael Nystrom's post: DP Originals - Here's the Plan Guys.

I have been on the fence about this for quite some time. I would certainly love to start a blog (or vlog) online, so I can at least get information out to family. The problem is that I have no idea where to start. I've made videos before, but I wasn't too good at it. (I tend to have A.D.D. Moments).

This is something I would really like to "try". Does anyone here have tips or resources that can help me get started?

I'm still relatively new to the Liberty Movement, so I have mostly been working on my articulation of the issues before taking the next step of source production.



Trending on the Web

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Combining ideas

How many regular people can record their own words and upload a quick sound bite on YouTube and then have those words downloaded, assembled, and then uploaded again as a competitive message to GAIN CURRENCY.

1 Idea:

combined with another idea.

1 Idea (for example):

http://www.infowars.com/next-paul-revere-to-win-100000/

So, taking that idea, and adding this one:

https://www.google.com/search?q=Liberty+Day+Challenge&ie=utf...

I open Google and I type in Liberty Day Challenge

Try it - please.

So...how many people writing very short sound bite scripts of their own, and adding Liberty Day

Liberty Day

Liberty Day

Challenge

Challenge

The British are not coming, they are here.

FAT BOY

Like this:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PxqlXumJL18

"Absurd"

Clips assembled.

July 4th

Our time is now?

End the FED

End the IRS

Bring the Troops Home

Do it?

Do it soon.

Do it on this day.

No more

Not on our watch.

Challenge

Liberty Day

Make it real.

Why wait?

They are crushing their own fraud anyway.

Have a better money in use by Liberty Day.

How many days left?

Etc.

Whatever - I offer - but I'm only one.

Joe

Sony Vegas Movie Studio

Sony Vegas Movie Studio was a good program I once used to splice/edit/add effects and text to video.

It was pretty easy to learn and only cost like $60 for the software. You could probably get a torrent of it.

Tried the Adobe software, it seems kind of complicated, but endless possibilities there. Vegas was simple and fully functional, can slow, speed video, pan, zoom, crop, fade in, fade out.....you name it and somewhat intuitive to do so. You might need a video converter to convert file types of downlaoded video into something Vegas can open and use. Vegas also has good audio controls for sound and makes excellent dvd's or internet videos. Main thing is that it is nice software, cheap, fully functional and simple to use.

ADD moments?

Please explain what you mean by that. Because if by ADD moments you mean attention deficit disorder then the FIRST thing you do is stop telling yourself that crap! That is something "they" instilled in you to control and drug you. Get past that brainwashing first and then you can do ANYTHING YOU WANT! Keep in mind that people that are talented or are artistic are dubbed ADD or ADHD because these people are a threat to the "handlers"! Don't fall for that crap! You don't have a disorder! THEY DO! They are cowards that can't deal with thinking humans! Okay, I am on a tangent and am going to shut up now. It makes my blood boil to hear these terms because the pigs that be made them up as they went in order to control us! However, if you are just using that term lightly, then overlook my post. I just REALLY hate government labels. Sorry I am not more of an inspiration on this subject. Got stuck on ADD.

skippy

Throwing out ideas

I had an idea of creating a few skits, like the Saturday Night Live type skit.

One actor plays the part of a Federal Reserve Dictator, or just call him a criminal.

Another actor is another member of that crime ring and they are discussing their power to purchase anything at any time.

One asks if the other has a number in mind.

"How much money should we steal from all those subjects, slaves, targets, victims, or, ahhhh, what is the word?"

"Federal Tax Payers".

"Yea, them, how much money do we need to steal this time?"

"Well, think about, since we were not able to buy World War III yet, and we just spent as much money as everyone else has if we added all the dollars up in the whole world, doubling that number, and so far World War III is just barely moving along on schedule."

"Right, so that wasn't enough, and it was a lot of money, sure, but it is just zeros, so how about doubling down again, since now there is twice as much money as before."

"I think we need to go triple this time, so how many dollars are out there right now."

Let's see:

http://www.garynorth.com/

That is a good source for starters.

"How many dollars are we at now?"

http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/graph/?s[1][id]=AMBNS
Link not working? How about a tinyurl:

http://tinyurl.com/bzybljq

"Well, lets see, we went from under 400 billion in 1990 to just short of 3 trillion today."

"Fine, make it 6 trillion."

"Right a check for 6 trillion?"

"Did I stutter?"

"No, no, 6 trillion coming up, it was just..."

"Spell it out boy."

"It's just that, well, didn't you just say triple?"

"Oh, yea, right, so make it 9 trillion, write us a big check for 9 trillion my boy, and by the way: who is falling behind in arming up for the Big Show?"

"I don't have the password for that web site."

Joe

I was hoping you would see this thread!

Powerful Political Economy

http://www.dailypaul.com/272757/court-by-passes-congress-and...

bear,

I've started one of five readings of the book project (my goal is 5 readings) and it looks like your additions help greatly in setting the stage and making the book readable (from my biased viewpoint), but I have other things to do and I keep monitoring this forum until I can find a better interactive news source.

This topic is a very competitive, powerful, front line, place on the Liberty versus Legal Crime Power Struggle as many competitors are figuring out ways to use the scarce power available and turn the power supply into a state of abundance.

The same obvious measures of the same Power Struggle, in my opinion, shows up in that link where people are returning to an agricultural mindset, an agrarian society, and I'll drop in there and post a link to the Modular Vertical Farming Unit link.

The link at the top of the page offers another POWER angle of view, a viewpoint that I do not endorse unreservedly (due to nebulous reference to Washington, Lincoln, and F D Roosevelt, but that discussion, or speech, by those people in that link hit on the concept of Power in abundance, and why we as a species aught to figure out how to get from here to there.

If you have time and you check out that link, leave a response, I think there is in that subject matter much in the way of a second discussion book if we are of a mind, on the same page, to be prepared for another book, just in case our first book gains currency, and therefore our first book justifies a sequel.

Here is another link that may be showing up just at the right time:

http://www.dailypaul.com/272784/gumroad-get-paid-for-anythin...

Gaining currency is a measure of power. Again, on the link to the speech by Lyndon Larouch deals with POWER and that video starts out with some interesting news on the current battle against Obama and Bernanke, as those two are identified (accurately in my opinion) as flunkies for the Empire (World Reserve Currency POWER), and that is additional information worthy of note added to the information spoken of later concerning risk and PLANS to avoid those risks. The false capitalists, in my opinion, are going to be shooting that messenger, for the same reason messengers have always be shot, and I prefer to listen to, and employ, the accurate parts of the message, while discarding those parts of the message that are patently false.

No one is perfect (humankind), but the message having to do with power are worth knowing, if not the methods by which that power is gained.

Joe

OK

I'll look at those links and see if I can come up with something competitive to say lol :)

"and I prefer to listen to, and employ, the accurate parts of the message, while discarding those parts of the message that are patently false."

My training is to see red when I see anything false and turn the whole thing down. So, I don't know the difference between true and false messages when mixed in a lot of cases because I have never been interested in some of this stuff. Not knowing how to discern is a big problem for me. Like here, someone gave me this website today to look at: http://www.ihr.org/ I don't know if it is good, bad or mixed. I don't know. Will you look and tell me what you see. (That person also told me to look at the Leuchter Report which denies Auschitz). I am not a holocaust denier. What do you think about the subject. I'll try not to get sidetracked on that, if you can just give me a simple answer, about what you think. I'll go where you are directing me and look there to see if I can come up with anything intelligent :)

I think my dad used to look at Lyndon Larouch's stuff. "False Capitalists" would those be involuntary capitalists?

...

False capitalists

Whenever you are in the shoes of someone seeing RED when you hear the words socialist then you can know what someone thinks when they hear the word capitalist.

Both words are currently false.

Very few people know the VOLUNTARY or genuine versions of either capitalism or socialism, I'd say roughly 1% of the population understand the difference between voluntary capitalism/socialism and involuntary captitalism/socialism

Think of if this way:

Voluntary capitalism means a true free market that is free from all forms of crime as in voluntary capitalism crime just does not pay well.

Voluntary socialism is the study of society and the first thing that is found to be true is that voluntary capitalism works as advertized by people who speak the truth.

Involuntary capitalism is already well represented by the Fascism that is measured very well by all the people who died as a result of the Nazi regime; which was financed by Central Bankers/Wall Street.

Involuntary socialism is already well represented by the Communism that is measure very well by all the people who died as a result of the Bolshevik regime; which was finance by Central Bankers/Wall Street.

One is one thing, the other is not the same thing, and who benefits when anyone confuses any one thing for the other?

http://www.ihr.org/news/weber_ww2_may08.html

I'm going to grab a quote from that to see if it rings true (from the site you linked):

"At the end of the war the United States was the only major nation not shattered in the global conflict. It emerged as the world's preeminent economic, military, and financial power. For the US, the half-century from 1945 to the mid-1990s was an era of spectacular economic growth and unmatched global stature."

That is the most important information I found in that one article on that web site.

The War shifted the World Reserve Currency (fraud and extortion) POWER from England to U.S.A. Inc. (LLC) AS PLANNED.

That moving of the base of operations keeps the victims in the dark.

I call it the reset button. When the computer (The actual productive people) become too powerful (taking over the control of the computer) the operators of Political Economy hit the resent button, which is World War, so as to consume a whole lot of power, and to shift power from those who earn it to those who cause the wars, profit from the wars, and make off like bandits, laughing all the way to their ONE central bank.

They tell us to call the enemy communists, and if we are told that, then we listen, and we obey, and we do so without question, you know: "just following orders".

They tell us to call the enemy fascists, and we do the same thing, the same routine: blind obedience to falsehood without question.

Now they have a new set of rules after the RESET BUTTON was pushed to make World War II.

They tell us to call the enemy socialists, we see RED on cue.

They tell the other side to call us capitalists, they see RED on cue.

What that link does not mention is the money trail, as the source of funding for World War II was definitively Wall Street as Wall Street and The Central Bank then known as The FED was already "the world's preeminent economic, military, and financial power", not officially, the targets don't get the official notice until after the war.

What that link does not mention is the Wall Street connection, including the connection between I.G. Farben of Germany and Standard Oil of New Jersey - where the Nazi regime was given the POWER to make synthetic oil out of coal to run their military without having to depend upon imported petroleum that Germany did not control.

Germany had a lot of coal.

I.G. Farben needed The Formula that efficiently maps out the process for producing motor fuel out of coal. The deal was made to only allow the Nazi's to make synthetic oil, gasoline, and aviation fuel. No one else on the planet was allowed to make fuel out of coal Patents Pending you know.

"(That person also told me to look at the Leuchter Report which denies Auschitz)"

I am convinced that the Zionist Regime imposed upon the Jews is a continuation of Nazi policy to exterminate the Jews, or anyone, anywhere, that could expose, and thereby threaten, the ONE LEGAL MONEY FRAUD AND EXTORTION POWER.

I was not at Auschwitz but I have a book and a quote that sound, or rings too true, to me:

http://www.amazon.com/The-Crime-Punishment-I-G-Farben/dp/002...

"The construction of I.G. Auschwitz has assured I.G. a unique place in business history. By adopting the theory and practice of Nazi morality, it was able to depart from the conventional economics of slavery in which slaves are traditionally treated as capital equipment to be maintained and serviced for optimum use and depreciated over a normal life span. Instead, I.G. reduced slave labor to a consumable raw material, a human ore from which the mineral of life was systematically extracted. When no usable energy remained, the living dross was shipped to the gassing chambers and cremation furnaces of the extermination center at Birkenau, where the S.S. recycled it into the German war economy – gold teeth for the Reichsbank, hair for mattresses, and fat for soap. Even the moans of the doomed became a work incentive, exhorting the remaining inmates to greater effort.

"Conditions were such that sickness was a pervasive fact of life among the inhabitants of Monowitz. The hospital wards built by I.G. were so inadequate that even the S.S. suggested additional wards be built. I.G. refused because of the cost."

So, sure, many "capitalists" are going to have a need to censor the truth about exactly what we pay for when we use the ONE MONEY.

Joe

Thank you Joe

I appreciate your time here. I think you are a genius. You must have a library in your mind. I will be using some of your words in my response at the other link.

You are reading the book 5 times! You are very disciplined!

It takes one to know one

I think you are a fierce competitor.

No one else could ever do better in your shoes.

Maybe that is why God put you in those shoes?

Joe

These Words:

"I am convinced that the Zionist Regime imposed upon the Jews is a continuation of Nazi policy to exterminate the Jews, or anyone, anywhere, that could expose, and thereby threaten, the ONE LEGAL MONEY FRAUD AND EXTORTION POWER."

Can you explain those words to me. The Zionists are a continuation of the Nazi's to exterminate the Jews (I'm not so worried about the other people in the equation...I realize that we could be on the "list") But what are the Zionists and what Jews are they exterminating?

See, I am opening a can of worms while I am supposed to be concentrating on the LaRouche post. And someone wants me to start this post: http://www.dailypaul.com/272729/should-the-united-states-hav...

and Nystrom wants people to start posts...I think maybe the site may not stay interesting if we don't put up thought provoking stuff.

I think the information in your quote:

""I am convinced that the Zionist Regime imposed upon the Jews is a continuation of Nazi policy to exterminate the Jews, or anyone, anywhere, that could expose, and thereby threaten, the ONE LEGAL MONEY FRAUD AND EXTORTION POWER."

is very thought provoking.

But if one starts too many posts and too many conversations work doesn't get done.

...

Step by grueling step.

"I realize that we could be on the "list") But what are the Zionists and what Jews are they exterminating?"

What appears to me to be common sense has to do with a Power Struggle perspective.

Those who have the One Legal Fraud and Extortion POWER are few in number and they are very efficient at perpetuation their crimes in progress. They know.

Their victims do not know.

That is a balance of power, a check and balance type thing, and it is a balance that is heavily set in place like a scale (Blind lady holding the scale type thing) where the Legal Criminals have a thumb (very large thumb called falsehood) on the scale, so as to tip the balance in their favor.

The Legal Criminals manage to keep POWER flowing to them, from those who produce that POWER, and then they KNOW how to keep that POWER flowing that way.

The victims don't know.

Some of the victims find out.

When one of the victims find out, that is not so bad, it is one person.

What to do?

What do to?

The Legal Criminals know what to do, they do not have to ask anyone, it is, by now (centuries), a routine.

1. Destroy that person who knows.

Hold on, hold on, one of the Legal Criminals once said to another one.

Isn't there something we aught to consider other than destroying that one person, I mean, really, we may actually learn something from that one guy, so, how about something other than just going out and destroying that guy, or girl?

OK, Mr. Smarty Pants, what do you have in mind?

How about CO-OPTING that one guy and get him to be one of us?

What if he says no?

Then destroy him.

OK, sound good.

In practice, I'm imagining, there are many more ways to skin a cat than crushing people who figure it out, and that is one single person.

What about a group of people who figure it out?

Same thing.

1. Crush them.
2. Co-opt them.

Co-opting can include making the target believe in the Might making Right (crime) perspective, where the target knows that what there doing is evil, and bad, but fun, and profitable, while co-opting also includes making the target believe that their evil deeds are good in a false moral sense, where the victim is deceived into believing such lies as torturing and murdering babies is the only way to save the babies from torture and murder, or that, for an easy to understand (false) example: War is Good for THE Economy.

So:

1.
Crush them.
2.
Co-op them.
2a.
Another evil criminal in the Cabal (a competitive one at that)
2b.
Another dupe turned from the path of Liberty (Righteousness) and onto the path of Legal Crime (deception for fun and profit, with some theft, torture, and mass murder thrown in for good measure: for their own good of course)

"But what are the Zionists and what Jews are they exterminating?"

Because those words are just false fronts used to cover up what is really going on. Zionists are just another flavor of Legal Criminal and Jews are just the specific list of individual people who are targeted because they are worth targeting for some reason, including the reasons that those people on that list have something worth stealing, and those people on that list represent a potential, or present, threat to the Legal Criminals running The Business Psycho.

"Section 4.
The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, SHALL NOT BE QUESTIONED."

That is as naked as evil can be, so it deserves a place in the official law (color of law or Legal Crime) book, let alone a tread on a forum.

"and Nystrom wants people to start posts...I think maybe the site may not stay interesting if we don't put up thought provoking stuff."

The honeymoon of Ron Paul creating a stir (natives were restless) is familiar. A similar thing happened with Ross Perot. Do you see any Ross Perot forums currently gaining currency?

"But if one starts too many posts and too many conversations work doesn't get done."

As naked a confession of absolute evil as is that quote from "our" Constitution is the simple fact that we are using pieces of paper for money whereby those pieces of paper are precise examples of fraud, current crime, in progress.

How stupid can stupid get?

If we feed even more of all God created into World War III, after the next "catalyzing event" (false flag) that is likely to happen soon, then the bar of just how stupid, We The People (targets) can get will be near the bottom.

But, I think it is true, that when a person thinks they have hit bottom, they are typically deceiving themselves, since it is a false bottom, so get ready to rumble.

Joe

And so I did

I couldn't help myself...but no one forced me.

http://www.dailypaul.com/273212/questioning-the-constitution

First time Daily Paul voter

I tried out the up vote button on that one. Thanks

Joe

You mean to tell me

that not once have you voted up any of my posts. Now that is funny. I always vote your posts up. I even spent a while after that Rothbard Menger post I prodded you into voting up your individual comments just so your score wouldn't be down.

And today for the first time, Joe took control of his finger and pushed the up button. No one forced him, not even bear.

I am laughing as I think that is very funny that you have never voted before, but then again, I can probably see the point of not voting.

Thank you for taking that big goose egg away :) That is almost as funny as Joe Slaw.

Something else interesting

http://www.dailypaul.com/272962/islamic-terrorism-is-the-inv... and the link it contains: http://chasvoice.blogspot.com/2013/02/islamic-terrorism-is-i... and the link

Pilger alert! His words scare me. I do not want to believe them though I understand them.

Should I be saving any of your quotes nowadays?

Like this Joe Quote from above:

"As naked a confession of absolute evil as is that quote from "our" Constitution is the simple fact that we are using pieces of paper for money whereby those pieces of paper are precise examples of fraud, current crime, in progress."

I actually think you could take that quote and write a book.

As a matter of fact, I think that about alot of your quotes. And then again, you tell me, you are writing a book.

...

Unfortunately

I can say that it is my fortune to have had your care directed at me. I can think (slightly) in terms of what may be Christian.

Example (for your considered opinion):

If we mere humans do not really know time, or anything God created, then our actions could cause our unique place in our unique world to unfold our own, unique, way.

Each decision we make moves the self we are in that direction.

There may also be, because we don't really know time, or anything really, compared to what God knows, and his son too, so there may also be another us, another self that goes on the path we choose otherwise, a path that is determined by a choice made by a self that made a worse choice then the self we are in, the real me, I make this choice, and I go this way.

My other self, every choice, a different choice, not me, but the other me making another choice, goes that way, not the way I go, each choice, each moment of decision, one way, or the other.

So, thinking that way, I'm in control.

I had better make the right choices.

Does that sound similar to someone being Christian?

Oh, as to the "news" (competitive) offered by John Pilger.

Unfortunately that all sound too accurate, too true, and in fact: reality.

Joe

The Granger BUTTING IN

That is THE CUTEST puppy. It's adorable!! Puppy LOVE from me http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JMrcnqKSbw8

Hi Granger!

That is a picture of Precious. She was my Yorkie. She was my Puppy Love! She passed from old age a few years ago.

Donnie Osmond lol...here this came up next to it

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wJYSu2OVCGM :)

My room used to be smattered with the posters lol :)

ha ha reminds me of Saturday Morning Cartoons...

didn't they have their own show? I think I was 5 :)

Look at this:

http://www.dailypaul.com/272915/thank-you-from-the-daily-pau...

"I don’t know what the future holds, for the Daily Paul, for myself, or the three patriots that help me keep the site going. Even if the fundraiser were to fill, it would only buy six more months of time at most. Since it seems unlikely to be filled, it just means less time. What does it mean? It means it is time for a change. And if these are the last few months of the Daily Paul, it brings on a sense of adventure and excitement. For there is nothing like the presence of death to bring on a clarity of focus on the present. And there is nothing like necessity to birth invention."

I'd still be going crazy if someone named Josf didn't help me on the DP with all of my grueling. It is very hard to keep my mind from reverting back to that which I know not to be true. I think my questions are evidence. Eventually though, information does sink in. Thank you again.

...

Keep an eye out.

Adaptation is required, life is a process.

I've gone through the book once, it looks very good to me, a few changes, and I'll send it back, but I want to go through 5 times.

I like the number 5, it has been my number since I was 5 years old, a long story.

Let me know if you find a new place to connect to people who desire discussion as a way of improving perspective and I'll tag along if you want, and I can do the same.

Thank you so much, there is no way I can repay you - ever.

Joe

Likewise my friend,

"Let me know if you find a new place to connect to people who desire discussion as a way of improving perspective and I'll tag along if you want, and I can do the same.

Thank you so much, there is no way I can repay you - ever."

I am hoping maybe that fundraising may continue as well as this site. I've upgraded my subscription to Premium at $10 a month. $120 a year...that is a lot Jeff says, but he did it for my birthday. That was kind of him.

You have not been censored here, right?

I think the forum host is generous to allow all the bickering and wild ideas that go on here, not speaking of you and me, but just the atmosphere. It is feels free and generous and I like it. It does not feel stiff here, and the people here, I think we are all nut cases, there are some geniuses though!

Michael Nystrom said we were a fringe site. I think that is true. I am on the fringe most of the time in life. Not much like other people. I like deep conversations, most people don't know what to say back to me.

...

A No Censorshp Zone

"You have not been censored here, right?"

Right, and the list of places I have been censored is long.

Libertarian Party
Jury Duty
Prison Planet Forum
Free State Project Forum
Real News Forum
Fully Informed Jury Association Forum
John Birch Society
United We Stand
NRA
Mises Institute Austrian Economics Forum
A paid for English writing course

Not in that order, and not only those places, there is a correlation between censorship and a term called peer pressure that works at various levels of POWER whereby people are censoring people.

Specific cases can be easily documented and that is why I started my own Forum in 2005, so as to begin to document my experiences on this path. I cut and pasted some of the exchanges that were being published on the Prison Planet, Austrian Economics, and Real News forums, so as to have a record of what happens, and then anyone can go back and see what happened that led to censorship.

Here there are software problems that may have no other intent than "collective" censorship, whereby a program is invented, produced, and then employed to accurately identify SPAM (requiring much in the way of accurately identifying exactly what that term means) and remove SPAM from the Forum Web Page. Turn on that program and it works the way it works and it may not work exactly as it was intended to work, or it may work better than expected.

Here, this forum, there is no obvious, overt, censorship. That is easy to see, one day I can publish, the next I can't, or one day my work is published, and then next day all my work is no longer published: no longer accessible to anyone else.

Sent down the memory hole, erased from history, etc.

Not here.

"Michael Nystrom said we were a fringe site. I think that is true. I am on the fringe most of the time in life. Not much like other people. I like deep conversations, most people don't know what to say back to me."

Many places on this thing we call The Internet are NODES, or junctions, or connecting points, or terminals, where a specific path taken by someone terminates at this point, for a specific amount of time, and then a new path is taken from this point by that individual.

Thinking in terms of electric circuits in a device that is created by a power that has a specific design in mind, and this creation works this way, once it is turned on, this is how this creation works, so this individual is flowing this way, goes here, then goes there, and so this NODE is like a transistor.

A transistor is a switch.

This is a switching station like those at railroad switching stations.

The IRS and The FED, and The U.S. Military are switching stations.

Who forces anyone to find this forum and then use this forum to switch from one path to another path?

That is a trick question.

A test.

Let me know what competitive answers you can invent for that trick question - please.

Joe

Contemplating...and now Answering

We've been at basketball all day today so I have just returned and found your trick question. I am contemplating and will hopefully have an answer soon!

BACK:

Of course in the true genius of Joe, he asks for answer S. Not just an answer singular. And because bear thinks in black and white, she considers a single answer sufficient, so bear is trying to think in terms of multiple answers...in order to be competitive. However, Joe said this was a "trick" question...so bear may not be able to give a trick answer.
--------------------
“Who forces anyone to find this forum and then use this forum to switch from one path to another path?
That is a trick question.
A test.
Let me know what competitive answers you can invent for that trick question - please.”
-------------------
The question:

1.“who forces”

2. and bear consideres a second question …can anyone be forced?

A. Criminals resort to involuntary force, deceit and threats of violence.

Considering circuitry and switches which open and close and change paths…perhaps censorship, in a way, forces people to use this forum…as in the case of Joe…sure other forums could be used, but circuits in the form of

“Libertarian Party
Jury Duty
Prison Planet Forum
Free State Project Forum
Real News Forum
Fully Informed Jury Association Forum
John Birch Society
United We Stand
NRA
Mises Institute Austrian Economics Forum
A paid for English writing course”

closed, so Joe’s power was forced toward a course of least resistance which was found here in this forum where the atmosphere is uncensored to a certain extent, if one plays by the general rules. Those willing to play by those same rules end up here at this place of least resistance where the atmosphere is relaxed.

B. The criminals forced us here in the form of Legal Criminal Power monopolizing our Liberty so we, having seen and seeking the light of liberty, flock together.

C. Perhaps those of us here are of the same type of power…not nuclear, not solar, not electric, not hydro, but something the same so our shared power does not separate like oil and water, but is rather cohesive to certain extents. And then again, here in this forum, there are ID’s I never talk to, ID’s that never talk to me, and ID’s I have no interest in talking to for some reason or another, while there are others that I am naturally drawn to for some strange reason, so perhaps there are different types of power within this forum that attract rather than repel.

D. But truly, the only one that can log onto this forum with my fingers is me. And it is my choice and no one forces me to make this choice.

E. However, if this forum closes due to lack of funds, the choice will no longer be mine, but it will be a consensus of the power resident here as to whether there is a course of least resistance; i.e. one with no financial requirements or one with enough power that it does not require financial assistance from participants.

F. I suppose in a sense the Criminals who stole the Election could divert power from here because advertisers no longer put their money at risk on a forum celebrating a losing candidate.

G. Follow the money and you can find the power source that can force.

...

That is impressive!

The "tricky" part was more of a fun game type thing to see if you catch the sentence before the question and use that sentence to answer the question.

You did that and so much more, so not only did you pass the test (tricky part) you invented a creative new answer.

Now, this is more than just enjoyable for me since I have just completed the second round of the book so my mind was working on those ideas in my sleep, mixed with this tricky question, and upon waking up I had new things to add to the "transistor" concept in the circuit.

Your multiple competitive answers cover a very large amount of all the possible answers within most of the situations occurring among the human beings (those creations of God that are we human beings) with few exceptions. Your workable answer inspired me to think about the few people who may be paid to troll here on this forum by some of the Legal Criminals who are hired to "destabilize" anything that threatens the Myopic Viewpoint (obey without question).

"And then again, here in this forum, there are ID’s I never talk to, ID’s that never talk to me, and ID’s I have no interest in talking to for some reason or another, while there are others that I am naturally drawn to for some strange reason, so perhaps there are different types of power within this forum that attract rather than repel."

I am also noting that the most Christian answer appears to be also the most Liberty minded answer (in my opinion):

"D. But truly, the only one that can log onto this forum with my fingers is me. And it is my choice and no one forces me to make this choice."

The Legal Criminals, were they not capable of inventing, producing, and effectively getting away with the crime of fraud (deceit), and extortion (threats and violence), force us here, and that was the tricky part. This is a Global access Node on a Network covering that planet called Earth: access to almost all the human beings in real time.

That is new stuff - relatively speaking.

We are pioneers.

I really like your grasp of the concept of the path of least resistance too, that is a huge advantage in knowing, in my opinion, and you can see it clearly - as measured by one of your fiends in Liberty: me.

Here is the thing I woke up with this morning on transistors:

A transistor circuit can be more than just an on or off switch, so you can begin to think in terms that are no longer so Myopic as in Either/or Black/White, and a transistor works this way when added to another transistor in series (or parallel but that complicates the concept on a path not relevant to this CURRENT concern/idea/perspective/measure).

Transistors in series circuits can be arranged to switch power on various paths based upon if/then.

If this is the case, then that is the path, no longer only either on or off, and that is a measure of creativity.

Transistors ask questions, in that way of looking at that creative design.

So here on The Daily Paul the NODE is asking questions.

Like this:

If you think that there are good people in politics, then look at this person named Ron Paul: go here, here, and here.

Google is a very creative, competitive, example of the transistor NODE on the Network. Type in Ron Paul.

I found the fourth from the top of PATHS listed to be a PATH to this forum. I went down that path and it loaded the Most Viewed Post page.

If the power (you, me, anyone) asks the question Ron Paul, then, the power can arrive here on this forum.

If the power asks "What is on this Forum here?", then they get The Most Viewed Posts.

On and on.

Not just Obey (black) or Obey (White) which is not a choice because it is a false choice, it is the same path, it is the Myopic path, having nothing to do with internal power to choose.

The person starting this Forum didn't (I'm assuming) get an order in the mail that said: Start The Daily Paul Forum or else your life will be terminated with a 10 year sentence to the Gulag.

Creating this forum was a powerful thing to do for reasons that may or may not be apparent to any person in command of their own power of moral judgement?

Note the question mark, and thanks for the creative effort to respond in such an artistic manner, it was an answer worthy of quotations!

"D. But truly, the only one that can log onto this forum with my fingers is me. And it is my choice and no one forces me to make this choice."

To me you are shouting up at anyone who cares to listen as if saying I am standing on the EARTH and I stand for Liberty, God, Jesus, my Family, and I!

I'm guessing.

Joe

Black and White

"Creating this forum was a powerful thing to do for reasons that may or may not be apparent to any person in command of their own power of moral judgement?"

I do not think the creator of this forum will ever be able to fathom the impact this forum has had. If the impact on me that this opportunity to interact is in any way duplicated in other ID's the ripple effects are limitless. You and I have both found that we are not crazy! That stabilizing effect in my life alone is appreciated by me and then those I impact thru my life are impacted. Who can ever measure the power that has been imparted?
----------------
"Not just Obey (black) or Obey (White) which is not a choice because it is a false choice, it is the same path, it is the Myopic path, having nothing to do with internal power to choose."

I do not think to obey or not to obey is a false choice. Obedience is a choice, and it can be a hard choice.. God demands and deserves obedience and provides the power to obey.

• Joshua 24:15 KJV
And if it seem evil unto you to serve the LORD, choose you this day whom ye will serve ; whether the gods which your fathers served that were on the other side of the flood, or the gods of the Amorites, in whose land ye dwell : but as for me and my house, we will serve the LORD.

Look 7 pages on the word obey: http://www.biblestudytools.com/search/?q=obey&c=&t=kjv&ps=10...

We obey either God or the Devil.

• Romans 6:16 KJV
Know ye not, that to whom ye yield yourselves servants to obey, his servants ye are to whom ye obey ; whether of sin unto death, or of obedience unto righteousness?

And we serve who ever we obey. So we either have God for Master or the Devil for Master. It is a choice, and it is not grey.

Jesus said:
• John 14:15 KJV
If ye love me, keep my commandments.

http://www.biblestudytools.com/kjv/john/14-audio.html

John 15:12 KJV
This is my commandment, That ye love one another, as I have loved you.

...

Cutting in

"I do not think to obey or not to obey is a false choice."

I hold up my hand at that point and ask for a moment of clarification.

The obedience I was speaking about had to do with man-kind enforcing Might Makes Right upon their fellow man-kind. I should have understood that your viewpoint would not discriminate the difference between the real, genuine, authority (natural, common, or God's) and the man-kind upon man-kind counterfeit version of Black and White, go or no go, obey or suffer, which I did not explain in the last set of words I offered in discussion.

So, I see a need to back track, and add to the symbols of English words, to avoid miscommunication:

"Not just Obey (black) or Obey (White) which is not a choice because it is a false choice, it is the same path, it is the Myopic path, having nothing to do with internal power to choose."

I was making reference to this (for one example):

http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/charters/constitution_amend...

Section 4.
The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned.

That is the Black or White false choice intended to be conveyed without miscommunication, and without confusing that Obey or Obey without question False Choice with any other concept, or reality, such as Natural Law (you stare at the sun and you will be held accountable for staring at the sun), or common law, or God's Law.

"And we serve who ever we obey. So we either have God for Master or the Devil for Master. It is a choice, and it is not grey."

To me, and I hope to you some day, there is an automatic understanding gained through training, to avoid confusing False with Genuine authority. I try not to do so, and so I don't always assume that someone else does not do so too. I was not making references (Black and White) with clear, unmistakable, real, genuine, actual, accurate, meaningful, productive, moral, life sustaining, authority, at all. My references had to do with a person, which is a power, finding a fork in the road, and a sign that says run as fast as you can to glory (and this path is The Crusades, The Inquisition, End Times, World War III), and another path that says run as fast as you can to glory (and this path is Civil War, Crime made legal, violent rebellion, total destruction as fast as possible too), and therefore the author of the two signs are authorities of destruction, the one, and the same, the only, the myopic, blind obedience to falsehood without question. At that fork in the road, the travelers are being divided, and the two paths momentarily spread apart, because that is what the authority writing the signs has constructed, and then the paths converge into a hell on earth.

Obey

That is the context of my Black and White words: not to be confused with a life sustaining authority that says: "If you stare at the sun, you will injure your power to see."

Common sense stuff.

I'm not attacking the return to scripture, as I rather like scripture, I'm just saying: "I didn't mean to confuse real authority with false authority, and in fact my intent was to point out how false authority is exactly what it is, not what it is not."

A path in the road that is either/or, can be compared in this way to a transistor that is if/then.

If the signs in that fork in the road lead to the same false glory which is accurately measurable as being two roads that lead to the same destruction, then, invent a better path.

If/then, in that case, is measurably more creative than either/or.

That was the intended point.

"We obey either God or the Devil."

And if we obey God, then we aught not keep sending our power to false Gods in the form of "Federal Reserve Notes" on "Tax Returns" and children, the next generation, in uniforms to "Spread Democracy (lies, torture, and mass murder)" - it seems to me.

John 15:12 KJV
This is my commandment, That ye love one another, as I have loved you.

Joe

Oh

You see, I automatically go to the: this is wrong choice. Never considering that there is a right way to look at the words, or if there is a right way, then I must point out the wrong way. I wonder why I am like that. But I am. I always do that...pointing out the wrong instead of looking at what could be right about something.

I want to give you these words that I find intriguing. I did not pick up on them until the last couple of months when Jeff mentioned them in a sermon. They have to do with taxes...rendering to Caesar, and they come from the Son of God. I am pointing out the words “Lest we should offend them.”

• Matthew 17:27 KJV
Notwithstanding, lest we should offend them, go thou to the sea, and cast an hook, and take up the fish that first cometh up; and when thou hast opened his mouth, thou shalt find a piece of money: that take, and give unto them for me and thee.

Context is interesting:

Matthew 17:24 And when they were come to Capernaum, they that received tribute money came to Peter, and said, Doth not your master pay tribute? 25 He saith , Yes. And when he was come into the house, Jesus prevented him, saying, What thinkest thou, Simon? of whom do the kings of the earth take custom or tribute? of their own children, or of strangers? 26 Peter saith unto him, Of strangers. Jesus saith unto him, Then are the children free. 27 Notwithstanding, lest we should offend them, go thou to the sea, and cast an hook, and take up the fish that first cometh up ; and when thou hast opened his mouth, thou shalt find a piece of money: that take , and give unto them for me and thee.

At the fork in the road where both choices lead to the same choice, perhaps the path of least resistance is better? “Lest we offend them.” I don’t know I am tossing this out there for your thoughts. Also wanting to know, should I go back to the LaRouche post? I seem to have burried it, but will access it because I am thinking you want to have discussion there. You had something in mind that may lead to a 2nd book.

And you did not answer my question about whether I should save Joe quotes that strike me. I should know better than to ask because you usually will not tell me what I should do. So, I am going to save them so they are saved. Not because they need to be used for a book. I think they are significant words and if they are left in verbiage on this forum the will be in the abyss and hard to find if for some reason someone should ever want to look at them again. But I do want you to tell me if you want me to go back to the LaRouche post so I can be ont he same page with ideas you may have.

It has been said by those that think about this kind of thing that perhaps Jesus purchased the nails with that tax money that were used to hand him upon that Roman cross.

Jesus did not die for not paying taxes. Jesus died to reconcile us to God.

• 1 Peter 3:18 KJV
For Christ also hath once suffered for sins, the just for the unjust, that he might bring us to God, being put to death in the flesh, but quickened by the Spirit:

2 Corinthians 5:20 KJV
Now then we are ambassadors for Christ, as though God did beseech you by us: we pray you in Christ's stead, be ye reconciled to God.

...