2 votes

Obama's 'Second-Term Blues' Have Begun

Last Wednesday marked the anniversary of President Clinton's historic pronouncement, in the 1996 State of the Union, that "the era of big government is over." "Not by a long shot," President Obama seemed to say in his second inaugural last week.

It was "a surprisingly liberal speech" remarked MSNBC's Chris Hayes: Obama warned us we were in for a "long and sometimes difficult" march toward "sustainable energy sources" and—because this president "reject[s] the belief that America must choose between caring for the generation that built this country and investing in the generation that will build its future"—perhaps a presidential war on math.

Maybe it's the era of "collective action." "Preserving our individual freedoms ultimately requires collective action," Obama insisted—but given his frequent, first-term recourse to government-by-fiat, you could translate that to "expanding my administration's power requires unilateral action."

Obama put it more delicately in an exclusive interview with the New Republic last week, allowing that "a judicious use of executive power can move the argument forward or solve problems that are of immediate enough import that we can't afford not to do it."

On Friday, in Canning v. NLRB the D.C. Circuit begged to differ. Obama had violated the Constitution with recess appointments of three members of the National Labor Relations Board, the court held.

In a tart reprimand, Chief Judge David Sentelle wrote that the president's attempted end-run around the Senate confirmation process, "would demolish the checks and balances inherent in the advice-and-consent requirement, giving the President free rein to appoint his desired nominees at any time he pleases," on the "weekend," over "lunch," or even, as in this case, "when the Senate is in session and he is merely displeased with its inaction. This cannot be the law."

read more:

http://reason.com/archives/2013/01/29/obamas-second-term-blu...



Trending on the Web

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Key phrases he uses

"Preserving our individual freedoms ultimately requires collective action,"

BUT But Communism goes with collectivism and there are no individual freedoms in communism but he uses a mind game to LINK the two - collectivism and individual freedom. No such thing.

"a judicious use of executive power can move the argument forward or solve problems that are of immediate enough import that we can't afford not to do it."

Well this clearly means he wants to rule as a king or dictator using executive orders. More communism and dictatorship.

Surely people are starting to see the mind word games he uses.