21 votes

Biggest Legal Case in American History Moving "Forward"

The United States Supreme Court will hold a conference on February 15th to discuss POTENTIAL cases to hear. One of those to be discussed is Noonan v. Bowen, which is the case brought forth to show that Obama is using illegal documents and is not eligible to be president.

Mainstream Media (aka Propaganda Media) ain't sayin' boo about this case, but it IS moving forward to conference.

It is on the Supreme Court docket:

Couple of interesting things:
(1) It only takes FOUR justices to put the case on the calendar for an actual Supreme Court hearing (which would decide if he is or is not eligible).
(2) Would two of the justices recuse themselves for not being lawfully appointed if four decide to go forward? If so, that means only four of seven would decide the case.

Another interesting point is that it was ROBERTS who put it on the docket. Is he about to do a turnaround after his bogus ruling on health care?

If they vote in favor of scheduling it for a case, expect all hell to break loose!

Watch for false flags. Watch for media spin. Watch for the possible biggest event in American history!

Two weeks and counting ...

Trending on the Web

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

All it takes is one Justice to send the case to Conference.

But it takes four to agree in that Conference to hear the case.

People just pick the Justice that they think will send the case to Conference, so that doesn't tell you anything about whether or not the case will be accepted by the Conference.

There were many cases challenging Obama's status as a Natural Born Citizen which one sympathetic Justice would send to Conference, but in Conference all were rejected. It is clear that he did not meet the definition of Natural Born Citizen because his father was not a US citizen at the time of the birth of little Barry, but apparently for political reasons the Conference refused to accept the cases.

You can't depend on the Supreme Court to uphold the Constitution.

"Bend over and grab your ankles" should be etched in stone at the entrance to every government building and every government office.

Like many, I am not holding my breath, either ... BUT ...

... what a lot of people are overlooking is the fact that the SCOTUS did NOT have to put the case on the docket AT ALL.

THAT is what makes me say ... WTF???

The way it works is, there are thousands of cases each year that are appealed to the SCOTUS. At least one justice has to recommend the case go to conference to be reviewed by all the justices. Only a hundred or so cases are scheduled for conference each year. The VAST MAJORITY of cases are just denied without comment. That is the EASY way out.

But they did NOT do this. So, this case goes to conference. They will ALL talk about this case and the others and they will decide on a few dozen that they will actually hear in the upcoming season. Those will be put on the calendar to be heard sometime over the next few months, with a decision coming over the next several weeks after that.

At the VERY LEAST, we will KNOW FOR CERTAIN that all of the Supreme Court justices KNOW that Barry has engaged in fraud to get where he is.

Sure, they can turn it down once in conference. They need FOUR (not five) justices to put it on the calendar. They could also put it on the calendar and then exonerate Barry 100%.

They could do A LOT of things. BUT, BUT, BUT ... they did NOT have to even let it get this far. And yet, they did.

So, I say ... WTF?

Interesting to hear the crickets chirping from the Mainstream Media (aka Propaganda Media) regarding this case -- only the most important case in our lifetime.

Wait! What??? Beyonce was lip syncing? Hey, I gotta go ...

Obama is our king because he is a subject of the British queen.

She had him installed here as her servant monarch.


Not sure if this is relevant but

I just watched this Video at L LaRouche's website. He was stalking about Federal charges brought against Obama. He would not give the source but for some reason I don't think has anything to do with Orly Taiz because he is talking about Federal Indictments. He claims to have read them and implys this may be the end of Obama. He also said it was coming from a very high authority. If anyone wants to listen to it, here is the link. Its about 70 minutes long.


The justic system has been way way hijacked

We moved in stealth from comon law to Rothschild mafia UCC law.
When supreme court justices are also member of the CFR, ROckerfeller//Rothschild private club that gives orders to the United States of America Corporat installed muppet puppets.

No no story here the same court that brought us A new extorted theft called Boma Care a new tax euphemism to be collected by the IRS corporation.


No Big Deal

The supreme court is on the take. Might as well ask them to judge against themselves. Won't happen. Haven't you read "Nullification"?


A Presidency denied!!


Thank you for informing readers about this interesting development. However, I can't imagine this Supreme Court, or any of its predecessors, since 1937, really issuing any ruling which would be that controversial.

As we saw with many other Court rulings, they more-or-less go along with any program that will firstly enhance Federal power (over either the States or the People), and two, provide precedent for increasing government power--and lessening government responsibility--against the people on either State or Federal levels.

Even if (and it is a huge IF) the High Court rules against President Obama, he already has the statutory authority, validated by many rulings of both this Court and its predecessors, to ignore it!

Will a ruling against the President make a stir? I doubt it. Lord knows, the ruling over the 2000 election, invalidating the Florida electoral college and ceding the Presidency to Bush II didn't!

I should think that would have been more controversial than Obama being the President because of false, or even forged, papers.


"The worst thing that can happen to a good cause is not to be attacked successfully, it is to be defended badly". F. Bastiat

"First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, finally they attack you, and then you win"! Mohandas Gandhi

Can anyone even

Imagine Biden as president? I am laughing just thinking about it.

Maybe too soon to comment since it is only potential

But either way this should be big, even if they declare Obama 100% made in the U.S.A. that will at least let us know just how far gone the SC is.

If Obama is ousted by this...

If Obama is ousted by this then TS will HTF. Can you imagine how many angry mobs will rampage the US when Biden takes his place?

Thats right

The SC won't touch this, for that very same reason.

The biggest problem with this is


The same thing happened in the Roman Empire after the death of Nero. A non-Roman citizen became emperor, and thus precedent was set.

For all you students of legal history out there.

If John Roberts doesn't punt this case to begin with. Considering his vote on Obamacare I doubt this goes anywhere.

On the plus side, if the case goes forward and they take the precedent route, Arnold Schwarzenegger would be eligible to run in 2016 hah!

Up to now, the biggest decision was against Nixon inre the Whitehouse tapes, in my opinion.

Interesting. But as far as

Interesting. But as far as Arnold is concerned, I think his political career tanked with his illegitimate child scandal. Although it does seem that just about anything gets a pass nowadays.

Arnholt would be voted in in a minute.

He would just have to say "I'm going to 'terminate' unemployment". Can you imagine the campaign ads? Hollywood would have a field day!

Obedience to God is resistance to tyrants.



When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign: that the dunces are all in confederacy against him. ~J. Swift

The ObomaCare case was ill contructed,

Doomed to fail out to the gate.

Claim a right violated in fact.

Then they judge on the facts.

Free includes debt-free!

I've been following these

I've been following these cases since 2008, mostly for the historical significance. This one is mostly about the possibility Obama is using a fraudulent social security number and other evidence of alleged illegal activity in becoming the president. It's very interesting. I have seen the various cases shut down one by one, with no legal standing as the main reason. I'm surprised this is being looked at, at all. I also am not holding my breath. I happened to be reading the posts on Dr. Taitz' website the day she found out that Obama's social security number could be fraudulent. I was watching the posts coming on live and couldn't believe what I was reading. Dr. Taitz grew up in Communist Soviet Union (Moldavia) and immigrated to Israel after the fall of the U.S.S.R. I've heard her talk about how she recognizes totalitarians immediately because she grew up in it. I remember her giving an interview one day and saying to Obama indirectly in it, "I know who you are." She met her husband in Israel and they both immigrated to the U.S. She took advantage of the opportunities in this country and became not only a real estate agent and dentist but an attorney as well. Some in the media ridiculed her for this but when you think about, why would it be a bad thing? She grew up in a place that did not have the same opportunities as here and she did what she wanted to. I find it admirable. I wish her the best and hope something comes of this. I heard Dr. Paul talk about the ineligibility issue several years ago and he said that because the founders did not specifically put in the Constitution exactly what "natural born citizen" meant, that issue was probably a moot one. But the case this time is much more in detail with alleged crimes being committed; not just about a birth certificate. Dr. Taitz has been trying to get Obama's files opened since 2008 on not only the certificate but information about what college funding Obama received at Columbia (such as scholarships or loans for foreign students). Read into her cases and the information is fascinating.

Obama IS using a stolen SS#.

Obama IS using a stolen SS#. His number originally belonged to Harry Bounel, born 1890 Russia who became a naturalized US citizen. I've proven it with FOIA requests. My evidence is now in the hands of Mike Zullo, the lead investigator in Arpaio's cold case posse.

Blessings )o(

Oh and I forgot to

Oh and I forgot to add.....watch for distractions in the mainstream media news the week of this case. Everytime one of these cases gets higher up the totem pole, I've noticed a big story starts to hit the news and you won't hear anything about these. Just FYI.

this happened with Orly Taitz's recent case

I forget what the distraction was, but on the same day or very close some big type of media distraction happened. Hope someone else has a better memory than me. I was scanning the Taitz website but there was nothing on it about the peculiar coincidence.

Don't hold your breath


I regretfully inform you that

I regretfully inform you that the SCOUS does not care about truth or justice and this case will be shot down and never see the light of day, you can take that to the bank! Unless they hear it only to clear Obama completely!

TwelveOhOne's picture

"Take it to the bank?"

Why would I want to allow a third party control of my property? :)

I love you. I'm sorry. Please forgive me. Thank you.
http://fija.org - Fully Informed Jury Association
http://jsjinc.net - Jin Shin Jyutsu (energy healing)


I agree. We are stuck with this guy. We can always hope though.

Our constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.

John Adams