Firearms EVENT February 8th! This Friday! 10:00 AM - At "All State Capitals"! Find Your State Here!Submitted by Richard Taylor ... on Tue, 02/05/2013 - 19:43
Next Firearms EVENT FEBRUARY 8th! If you missed the Guns Across America Event, which was a Great Success; You will want to "MARK YOUR CALENDARS AGAIN" for This "NEXT EVENT TO SUPPORT YOUR SECOND AMENDMENT RIGHT"!
Increase the turnout! https://www.facebook.com/events/406312512782872
Let Them Know That Even STATE Constitutions are SUBJECT to the BILL OF RIGHTS!
i.e. RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS, The MEANS to DEFEND, is KNOWN AS THE "FIRST LAW OF NATURE".
Absolute Rights of the Colonists 1772:
In Full: http://www.pacificwestcom.com/oregonpatriotparty/Rights_of_t...
... Samuel Adams:
"...1st. Natural Rights of the Colonists as Men.--
Among the Natural Rights of the Colonists are these First. a Right to Life; Secondly to Liberty; thirdly to Property; together with the Right to support and defend them in the best manner they can--Those are evident Branches of, rather than deductions from the Duty of Self Preservation, commonly called "the first Law of Nature"--
All Men have a Right to remain in a State of Nature as long as they please: And in case of intollerable Oppression, Civil or Religious, to leave the Society they belong to, and enter into another.--
When Men enter into Society, it is by voluntary consent; and they have a right to demand and insist upon the performance of such conditions, And previous limitations as form an equitable "original compact".--
Every natural Right not expressly given up or from the nature of a Social Compact necessarily ceded remains.--
All positive and civil laws, should conform as far as possible, to the Law of natural reason and equity.-- ..."
Now Read This:
Virginia Ratifying Convention 6-16-1788:
In FULL: http://www.pacificwestcom.com/americanpatriotpartynewsletter
George Nicholas: "...But the "COMMON LAW" is "NOT EXCLUDED". There is "NOTHING" in "that paper" (APP Note: referring to the US Constitution being considered) to warrant the assertion.
As to the exclusion of a jury from the vicinage, he has mistaken the fact. The legislature may direct a jury to come from the vicinage. But the gentleman says that, by this Constitution, they have power to make laws to define crimes and prescribe punishments; and that, consequently, we are not free from torture. Treason against the United States is defined in the Constitution, and the forfeiture limited to the life of the person attainted.
Congress have power to define and punish:
a.) piracies and felonies committed on the high seas, and
b.) offenses against the laws of nations;
but they (APP: the federal government, legislature or supreme court) CANNOT DEFINE or PRESCRIBE the PUNISHMENT of "ANY OTHER CRIME WHATEVER", WITHOUT "VIOLATING the CONSTITUTION".
(APP Note: See this also in the Virginia and Kentucky Resolutions - Kentucky Resolutions #2 - This can be no clearer, the federal government and all those officials and citizens who support or allow others to be prosecuted under any "other crimes and punishments" not listed are in DIRECT VIOLATION to the Constitution they claim to uphold.)
If we had no security against torture but our declaration of rights, we might be tortured to-morrow; for it has been repeatedly infringed and disregarded. A bill of rights is only an acknowledgment of the "PREEXISTING CLAIM TO RIGHTS IN THE PEOPLE."
They BELONG TO US AS MUCH as if they had been inserted in the Constitution.
(APP Note: Which they eventually were)
But it is said that, if it be doubtful, the possibility of dispute ought to be precluded. Admitting it was proper for the Convention to have inserted a bill of rights, it is not proper here to propose it as the condition of our accession to the Union. Would you reject this government for its omission, dissolve the Union, and bring miseries on yourselves and posterity? I hope the gentleman does not oppose it on this ground solely. Is there another reason? He said that it is not only the general wish of this state, but all the states, to have a bill of rights. If it be so, where is the difficulty of having this done by way of subsequent amendment? We shall find the other states willing to accord with their own favorite wish.
The gentleman last up says that the power of legislation includes every thing. A general power of legislation does.
But this is a special power of legislation. Therefore, >>>"it does NOT contain that plenitude of power which he imagines".
They (The Federal government) "CANNOT LEGISLATE" in "ANY case" but those "PARTICULARLY ENUMERATED"...."
Pass the word, Re-Post, Get educated and Educate Others!
American Patriot Party.CC