-3 votes

Would "thelastbill" trip you if you were both running from zombies?

Not sure about anybody else here but "thelastbill" is the kind of person who I would not wish to share a foxhole with. Are we here for personal aggrandizement or do we have more honorable intentions? Read below excerpts, taken from a few exchanges yesterday. Note the times, particularly the post where I told "stm" I had no issue with someone else dup posting. "thelastbill" then proceeds to goad me over his post having more views than mine, sheeesh, this after he engages in a simian type of chest beating attempting to intimidate "stm".
reply
Vote up! Vote down!
aw, you didn't need my permission!
Submitted by stm on Tue, 02/05/2013 - 10:24. Permalink
LOL the report's already out there in cyberspace ripe for the picking!
Link it! ;-)
FYI - someone else posted your topic but says it's up on Drudge and I asked the person who wrote it if he/she could delete the duplicate post and have gotten downvoted for writing that!
You originally posted this info and you're post should get the most upvotes and traffic... this is another of my pet peeves. You were quick and on the ball and posted something very important and other people think so, too, but don't check to see if the info has already been posted.
Duplicate posts, not original source... yikes! All my pet peeves arriving at once! LOL Is that the kinda day I'm gonna have?

If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land, it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy.
James Madison
reply
Vote up! +1 Vote down!
Yeah, I saw the dup post
Submitted by Chessienut on Tue, 02/05/2013 - 10:57. Permalink
This aint' about ego, it's about informing each other and if some one else helps to spread the word so be it. My posting wasn't merely about what most of us already knew about Obama's murderous intent, it was more about the media, most notably left leaning rags such as HuffPost, picking up on the story.

If not us than who?
repl

reply
Vote up! +1 Vote down!
Can the cowards who downvoted please explain why
Submitted by stm on Tue, 02/05/2013 - 10:13. Permalink
All I pointed out was that this information has already been posted.
Why do we need multiple posts about the same issue?
Who are the cowards who downvoted without explaining what offended you?

If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land, it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy.
James Madison
reply

Vote up! +2 Vote down!
Cowards? Gfy Come call me
Submitted by thelastbill on Tue, 02/05/2013 - 12:57. Permalink
Cowards? Gfy
Come call me that to my face tough guy.
Try a better title that actually previews what the post is about so people know what you mean.
rep

Vote up! Vote down!
I'm afraid I'm guilty of not assuming
Submitted by Chessienut on Tue, 02/05/2013 - 15:51. Permalink
that I'm dealing with some individuals with a ninth grade mentality. I will endeavor to "dumb down" my titles in the future so you will not feel the need to engage in threatening puffery in the future. Ever notice that the birds that strut around the most puffed up taste the best?

If not us than who?
reply
Vote up! Vote down!
"being outed as the murdering
Submitted by thelastbill on Tue, 02/05/2013 - 17:44. Permalink
"being outed as the murdering pig that he is."
Well, looks like your thread could be about any number of subjects. Mine is specific.
Also, my thread is now the top post and yours is buried.
I guess they deemed mine more fitting to be published than yours.
You mad bro?
reply

Just for your information "thelastbill" my post wasn't about the fact that Obama was killing with drones, we all knew that and that in a nutshell was what your post was about. My post was meant to point out that the MSM is finally reporting upon it. Tough concept for those such as you but for the more enlightened of us it is a very important distinction. Keep up the good work, observing individuals engaged in self fellatio always entertained me.




Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

SOMEONE ON THE INTERNET DISAGREES WITH YOU???

Stop the presses!

Tu ne cede malis sed contra audentior ito

I know, right?

Catfight yesterday, whine about it today....

I wouldn't call it whining

rather I'm pointing out an individual who attempts to intimidate using abbreviated profanities and who seems to think this site is about a sophomoric competition for the most views. I would have done this yesterday after the ignorant posting but I had no access to the internet, sorry to disappoint but it seems some of us exist in the real world to nurture our ego's.

If not us than who?

Are you using the word "disagrees"

in the context of something unpalatable or is it used to describe a difference of opinion? Thanks for the caps, my eyes aren't what they used to be.

If not us than who?

Personal quarrels with other

Personal quarrels with other DPers do not merit their own posts.

Southern Agrarian

This was no quarrel

it was a rather entertaining exchange. The post was meant to demonstrate that there is a certain faction at the DP who are not true liberty seekers, rather they are here to seek a boost for their own deflated ego's. From the looks of the down votes it appears the clic is circling the wagons.

If not us than who?

Or maybe...

They are good people having a bad day. Maybe they are people who have eaten a little red pill, but have not yet managed to choke back any of the BIG red pills.
Maybe the thing to do is to work on learning to disagree, agreeably.
Rarely do I click a thread on the DP that I actually regret, but... the BEST thing to do about REAL trolls is ignore them. ANY RESPONSE is "encouragement." If you can tell by the title that it is "one of those" then do not click the thread. There is a front page section for "most viewed." Do not help "troll threads" make that section, or at least do so with the knowledge that you are now officially part of the problem. If a title sucks you in before you know it is "one of those" then do not comment. That also keeps the post in the "most active" topics at the forum. Worse, it gives the troll the chance to reply and "legitimately" bump their own post.
Now, here I sit, guilty of both charges I just leveled. The difference is, I am not going to get into the middle of your fight, even if you make a post of it. I am going to do my best to give the benefit of the doubt to all involved, and ask you all to learn to agree to disagree, the INSTANT you realize that YOU are not willing to change YOUR views. If you are not here to learn, to exchange ideas and be looking for your OWN incorrect beliefs, and you run into someone just like you but with the opposite beliefs, and then you just butt heads, over and over...
No trolls needed. We can tear our own movement apart with suspicion and intolerance.
Choose love over fear, every time.

This is the article that got my posting privileges revoked:
http://bklim.newsvine.com/_news/2013/05/12/18212165-dr-stan-...

As I stated above, this is not a fight

or a quarrel. I just wish to point out that all are not here with pure motives. Using abbreviated profanities while challenging someone to "say it to my face" and then attempting to gloat over the number of views as opposed to someone else's clearly demonstrates what type of individual, or as I can see by the number of commentators rushing to defend such behavior, individuals, we have lurking about at the DP.

If not us than who?

I'm going to break my rule again

but I won't bump this turd again, no matter what you say.
I do not need you pointing out trolls to me, I am all grown up now. Thank you for the offer.

This is the article that got my posting privileges revoked:
http://bklim.newsvine.com/_news/2013/05/12/18212165-dr-stan-...