Who is Behind These Anonymous Wordpress Blogs Spreading Sandy Hook Disinformation? You Are Being Made Fools Of.Submitted by Sue4theBillofrights on Wed, 02/06/2013 - 16:46
Taking heed of Max Igan's excellent observation that there seems to be a deliberate and sophisticated campaign to send Sandy Hook speculation in all directions, I have noticed a common feature of string of "new revelations" which keep making Sandy Hook "stranger and stranger," in the words of many of us.
I am talking about many now-debunked stories like the school was never operational, that Adam Lanza died the day before, and now something about an oil pipeline. It is always good to ask questions, but rule number one of journalism is that if a discovery is important enough to be taken seriously, it is important enough to put a name behind the research. An anonymous person going to such and such a public records website or office and reproducing a screen shot of documents, in the era of Photoshop, means absolutely nothing.
What I am trying to say is many people with probing minds are being made fools of by red herrings tossed here and there to the detriment of other very good lines of questioning.
One of the few ways to completely hide source identity on the Internet is a Wordpress blog. Notice that these two do not even have contact information. Wordpress allows user profiles and contact information to be completely hidden. Also notice that these are fairly slick productions.
Note the tag cloud of the first includes "extraterrestrials, drake eliteETs, channeled messages, flying saucers, sirius..." and so forth. Search engines pick up these key words and associate any Sandy Hook questions with them.
In the case of "Adam Lanza died the day before" allegedly taken from the Social Security Death Index, in which screen shots of the record have been posted, any journalist knows that the public document of record in deaths is the state death certificate, signed and notarized by a public officer. Nothing else means squat, and if another source conflicts, that source is wrong.
I write this because we need to start thinking like researchers, as it is clear, as Max Igan says, that we are being subject to a secondary assault designed to make all skeptics look like kooks.
The originator of the "school was never operational" theory, who has a real picture and a real identity, has admirably retracted her speculation after checking with town budget records and doing real research. She writes in an update to the description of the Youtube in which she floated the theory:
"Update: 2/5/13 - I was wrong. I have gone through the Newtown Board of Education minutes and videos from 2010 forward and have found that Sandy Hook was mentioned and was an operating school and was on presentations for budgets. I did find that it had the largest expenditures for the aging building than any other school in Newtown. When I am wrong I say I am."
But that didn't stop anonymous Wordpress blogs like 2012TheBigPicture from continuing to peddle it.
Real live journalist Ben Swann has suggested a real course of action for the public to actually answer questions about Sandy Hook: demand release of the surveillance video. Also, 911 call audio is routinely released, in which the actual caller from the scene of the crime is heard talking with the police dispatcher. Where is it?
There is even a binding White House petition which would require the White House to issue a written response to a demand to release the video. As of now it has a measly 5,000 signatures out of 25,000 required by Feb. 10th. So it looks like the smoke and mirrors are working very well.
Every rabbit hole we go marching down distracts us from efforts to demand these. Any perpetrators of a possible false flag would know this.
There are many questions. The State's Attorney of CT himself has not ruled out further accomplices in Sandy Hook, and has even stated fears for witness safety. Don't fall for anonymous blogs posting the latest "new discovery." As Igan says, that could be part of the plan.
My dear friends who question authority, the backbone of our republic: if the "new revelation" cannot be traced to a real person with a sincere interest in the truth, and linked to true documents, not just screen shots, don't circulate it. Keep questioning.