48 votes

Update, Police in California are so scared they are shooting at anyone they see in blue Nissan truck

It looks like the women in the truck settled for 4.2 million dollars. They should have got more.


What a bunch of chickens.



Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

well... my username should be a tip off

I mostly visit three news sites in a given day.
That's it?
That's it.

Other than that, my own websites and a work related website.
I don't see boobs anywhere except at DP and my own set.

No big deal...

LAPD now going door to door

Footage at a local LA bar just after high noon today.


Patriot Cell #345,168
I don't respond to emails or pm's.
Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution, inevitable.

jrd3820's picture

I was expecting something serious from you

I just got off the phone with a friend who works in Torrence where 2 woman were shot by LAPD because they were in a pick up. It was a somber conversation, I thought your link would be somber also, yet it was not.

Laughing. It's good for the soul.


If true, this will be a serious lawsuit and should be criminal charges against police.

jrd3820's picture


It does look like some lawsuits are on the way.

It's really not funny but if I don't try and find a little humor

in the madness, I'll go nuts myself. Of course that bit of humor had a little anger behind it.

Patriot Cell #345,168
I don't respond to emails or pm's.
Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution, inevitable.

jrd3820's picture

Of course

That is why I laughed (it was more of a smirk) because otherwise it's too heavy sometimes especially when you have friends in that area.

That lawsuit is gonna wipe the City out.

and good riddance.

"First rule of Government Spending: Why build one when you can have 2 at twice the price?"
-S.R. Hadden

i hope he doesn't turn

i hope he doesn't turn himself in to CNN


i think america is falling in

i think america is falling in love with this guy.


WTF is the matter with you?

He's a murderer, he's killed three people, and he says he intends to kill more including the wives and children of the cops he's targeting.

Check out the Laissez-Faire Journal at LFJournal.com

"The State is a gang of thieves writ large." - Murray Rothbard

if you're upset about 3

if you're upset about 3 people, what about the millions that seem to die each decade by the U.S. Military and sanctions imposed by the u.s. gov and state dept.??

Shouldn't you be in your village now crying your lungs out 20 hours a day?

I'll take a page from the White House and The Pentagram

* Collateral Dammage
US Military Says Killing Afghan Children Is Fair Game

* Robert Gibbs Says Anwar al-Awlaki’s Son, Killed By Drone Strike, Needs ‘Far More Responsible Father’



I am one of the biggest opponents of the US Empire...

and that has nothing to do with you praising a murderer.

Why would war overseas, in any way shape or form excuse this man's killing spree? It's a non sequitur.

If you think what this guy is doing is righteous, then you are a piece of work pal.

Consult the Non-Aggression Principle.

He's a murderer, he killed two innocent people simply because they were related to someone he had a grievance with, then he killed an officer who was trying to bring him to justice.

And you think this is righteous?

Check out the Laissez-Faire Journal at LFJournal.com

"The State is a gang of thieves writ large." - Murray Rothbard

"The State is a gang of

"The State is a gang of thieves writ large." - Murray Rothbard

Consult the Non-Aggression Principle


Have you ever even bothered reading Rothbard?

Please tell me how murdering the family members of police officers or murdering someone trying to bring you to justice for those murders is consistent with the Non-Aggression Principle.

Check out the Laissez-Faire Journal at LFJournal.com

"The State is a gang of thieves writ large." - Murray Rothbard

As far as i know he can be

As far as i know he can be president.


Holy Shit!

I thought Police Academy was a comedic film! As it turns out it was a documentary or maybe worse...a training film!

i didn't hear about this guy

i didn't hear about this guy until an hour ago. there is an abc article stating he burned his truck on a mountain. and another article stated it was a black nissan, not a blue nissan.


CNN wants him to turn himself in so he can better give america his message. What a psy-op.

It reminds me of the movie, "Point Break" burning the get-away car.


The Brand...The Make...It doesn't matter to these Pigs

They shot up a honda ridgeline for Fooks sakes

And his is our police force.

And his is our police force. Shoot first ask questions later. Oh yeah THEY should have semi-automatic weapons and the populous they are containing should not......

What a bunch of shit. When oh when my brothers are we going end this?

Are we going to sit by forever while our rights are taken away daily?

Where is our network? Everyone is too afraid because the government can see everything you are doing. Once upon a time we would have collected in secret, now the government can see everything and will pick everyone off one by one. What are we to do? When will we as a nation get fed up? What will finally be the straw the breaks the camels back?

We've already seen the government killing american citizens, running drills to kill americans, stock piling ammunition to kill our brothers. When is enough going to be enough? When will we come together and stop this?

How can we come together when they see everything? They see this obviously..... Are we going ot just continue to take this?

Shall we all buy butt plugs to stretch our asses out for them?

When is enough enough????????

Maybe we shouldn't hide

Maybe we shouldn't hide anymore. Maybe we should just march and see if they try to stop us. Let's see if they attack 1 million American citizens marching on Washington. Would they blow us all up? How would they look then? I propose we march on Washington. I propose we go there and demand some answers. EVERYONE!

How long can we continue with this?

This is no longer a democratic republic....

Democratic and Republic are mutually exclusive.

The USA was NEVER supposed to be a democracy. To the extent that we operate like one, we suffer gravely, and we continue to operate as such only at our peril.

We were formed, and are to be, a Republic.

I'm waiting..........

I'm waiting..........

A whole 7 minutes. As if I'm doing nothing here but

having a conversation with ONLY you, and that I sit at your beck and call to give response.

How rude!

You have your reply below.

If you are so well versed in

If you are so well versed in the matter it should take you less than a minute.

You aren't very

You aren't very intelligent... and I'm sorry. You have to do some research and understand that in order to have a REPUBLIC someone must put those people in power. How do you propose we do so other than electing them?

Did I personally insult you somewhere? Why the ad hominem

attack upon me?

And may I caution you to do your own research more thoroughly? (and I don't question your intelligence in the process) Please read the short document I linked below. Then if you have questions, check his sources. Or do some searching on your own.

Elections ≠ Democracy

I'm not sure where you got that notion.

You can have elections in a Republic, or an Oligarchy as well for example. Witness Iran. You can even have elections in a Monarchy. Yes it is true. Certainly, many dictators were elected, but one would be hard pressed to call their governments "democratic."

Yes you can have mock

Yes you can have mock elections anywhere. What matters is how it functions not what you claim it is. The people's representatives are elected democratically. Everything, in the end falls to the people. Everything. Name one member of the government, besides low level officials who get their jobs via an application, that did not originate with the people. I'll wait.

I don't need some snot nose trying to tell me what kind of government we have. First of all, I never claimed we live in a "democracy" I said we live in a democratic republic, which we do. Now, like I said, name one official in the government who does not originate with the people.

The Supreme Court & all justices on the Federal Bench for that

matter, and the executive department secretaries are all appointed. None are elected. This is true in some states as well.

There are two significant groups for you to try to ignore or dismiss.

(in some countries, secretaries are part of the legislature, in some states, judges and even supreme courts are elected. Each state is still a "republic" though.)

Enough with the personal attacks. I am not a "snot nose" and have not demonstrated such behavior. You can disagree with me, but that doesn't justify attacking me personally. I have not attacked you. Please cease and desist.

Elections do not make a democracy or add a "democratic" element to anything else. Electing representatives has nothing to do with democracy, and in case you didn't notice, "democratic" is that which has the character of a "democracy." You're trying to claim that the adjective form of the word is somehow distinct in meaning from the noun form. That is patently absurd. Any English teacher would beg to differ with you vehemently.

However, if you read the PDF I linked, you will readily see that not only does Madison explain the fallacy you are committing (and did earlier in your foreign ancient government references) but that a Republic, which elects its government as representatives, can make the mistake of behaving as if it were a democracy, thus operating in a democratic fashion, and that this is a very dangerous path.

Yes, we DO to a great extent operate as a "democracy" or maybe as you call it "a democratic republic." But that is NOT what we are on paper, and were never meant to be.

It should not be a form of government or a practice we should strive for or try to preserve as you opined in the original comment I replied to.

It is a vial and destructive form of government and one the Founders guarded against and warned us about.

A "democracy" or a republic that acts like one, is not under the rule of law, but under the rule of the majority. This means no rights for the minority, the smallest of which is the individual. In a democracy, only the will of the majority has any "rights." We are not that bad yet in all cases, but we are pretty darned close. And again, we weren't set up that way and we're not supposed to function that way.

We are to be a republic.

Finally, you bothered to accuse me of disagreeing with the Founders, when it is you, who they disagree with.

No, you are trying to jump on

No, you are trying to jump on some bandwagon that is popular as of late by saying "no we aren't a democracy, and i agree we aren't. We are democratic republic". The word democracy in "democratic republic" is no more nor less important than the republican part. Those leaders are representations of the people who in fact DID vote for them. The didn't get there from a birth right. They didn't get there because one person appointed them. The people voted for them and by proxy those people who you claim did not get where they are because a democratic election is just intellectual dishonesty. Why do you think the presidential elections are so important? The president controls the agencies. But even still, he isn't going to appoint anyone that isn't confirmed by the senate. Senators voted on by the people. That's called a democratic republic.