133 votes

Everybody should watch this speech. Everybody would be much better off.

Dr Benjamin Carson's amazing speech on 7th February.

http://youtu.be/PFb6NU1giRA

http://ian56.blogspot.co....



Trending on the Web

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Well then

THAT explains Barack's incomprehensible behavior right there!

"If you want something you've never had before, you have to do something you've never done before." Debra Medina

I have set up @BenCarsonFan99 on twitter

to post any interesting Benjamin Carson related items.

Any suggestions greatly appreciated

"In the end, more than they wanted freedom, they wanted security. They wanted a comfortable life, and they lost it all -- security, comfort, and freedom. When ... the freedom they wished for was freedom from responsibility, then Athens ceased to be free."

Sean Hannity Asks Dr. Benjamin Carson

“Would You Ever Run for President, Sir?” – Video 2/8/13

http://freedomslighthouse.net/

Thanks for this

Let's make him change his mind and launch a political campaign - it would sure shake things up.

He would get National TV exposure so that all sorts of other ideas (the rest of ours) could also be aired.

"In the end, more than they wanted freedom, they wanted security. They wanted a comfortable life, and they lost it all -- security, comfort, and freedom. When ... the freedom they wished for was freedom from responsibility, then Athens ceased to be free."

Yes.

I would support this man fully.

I agree with several of the comments on here

watching Obama's body language is one of the best parts of it.

He is sick to the pit of his stomach that he is getting called out for wrecking America, by an extremely smart person talking common sense.

"In the end, more than they wanted freedom, they wanted security. They wanted a comfortable life, and they lost it all -- security, comfort, and freedom. When ... the freedom they wished for was freedom from responsibility, then Athens ceased to be free."

ytc's picture

"... by an extremely smart person talking common sense." YES.

By an extremely smart, *GENTLE, PEACEFUL & brilliant* person talking common sense.

WOW, thanks Ian56

Great speech. I do think they should rerecord this at a time when obama can stay awake. I did note obama's fake smile several times, and he did not applaud as did others. Dr. Carson has some great ideas, but its hard to believe he said all that without a teleprompter. I really like this guy with his anti PC message.

I suggest we all stay far away from him, I think I see a drone strike in his future.

True about the teleprompter!

People who actually know things like Ron Paul, and university teachers who walk in, sit on the edge of the desk and pour out words of knowledge and passion for an hour, with no notes, are the ones who don't need teleprompters. Odumbo needs one, bad.

Carson's book, Gifted Hands, is worthwhile.

4 branches of government...

I loved it. I don't think the puppet in chief was none to happy.

DR Benjamin Carson for President - WOW what a change for the

better that would be.

Dr Benjamin Carson's amazing speech

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PFb6NU1giRA

Dr Benjamin Carson to form a NEW political party.
Dr Benjamin Carson's new party would undoubtedly take ALL 535 Congressional seats with the platform he would run on.
It would be a MASSIVE improvement to the current policies of either current party.

In his speech he says that more doctors should be involved in politics and there should be less lawyers.
We should be looking for real SOLUTIONS - not scoring cheap political points with partisan politics.
I completely AGREE.
I have a suggestion for his new Treasury Secretary - a medical doctor who practised for over 20 years and who has great ideas for sorting out America's financial and economic mess.

Thank you to Sam @onelife_nofear and @1Marchella for showing Dr Benjamin Carson's speech to me.

I cannot edit the header - I would put this in it - if I could.

"In the end, more than they wanted freedom, they wanted security. They wanted a comfortable life, and they lost it all -- security, comfort, and freedom. When ... the freedom they wished for was freedom from responsibility, then Athens ceased to be free."

ecorob's picture

take that, obomba...

you pos globalist scum!

its 'cos I owe ya, my young friend...
Rockin' the FREE world in Tennessee since 1957!
9/11 Truth.

Great speech...

Reminds me a little bit of Colbert's roast of Bush at the Whitehouse Correspondant's dinner.

It seems Carson was really trying his best to educate the President. Whether or not it had any effect on Obama, I think it was compelling. I think we all should make it a habit to capitalize on opportunities to educate those in power no matter how hopeless it may seem.

9-11 Media Fakery: Did anyone die on 9-11?
http://www.cluesforum.info/

http://www.septemberclues.info/

9-11 Actors:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6aPvJSQtmoE

Pysops.. media.. actors.. propagandists... disinfo agents.. fake videos.. fake photos

oh im sure it had an effect ....

but it probably didnt educate him a bit.

Think for yourself......Question authority...

O's body language is priceless

I love for example when Dr. Carson first mentions education and Rome's military, how King O turns his head down and away.

If men are good, you don't need government; if men are evil or ambivalent, you don't dare have one.

Great Speech!

We need more doctors like him

Dr Carson is extremely clever,

and Obama knows this only too well.

I believe in the freedom to be what we choose to be.

look at the change in obamas face...

when he brings up rome and how we're on the same path.... priceless...
UPDATE: nevermind.... face a lot worse when he brings up taxes HAHAHAHA

Well, it was a nice little speech

Not quite sure how anyone would be much better off having watched it, but I don't feel as if the last 30 mins of my life were completely wasted, just pretty much wasted. The lighthouse joke was good.

Not so sure I want an electronic health care record at birth

At 21.20 ... my question: Is it an internal chip? I don't want one and I don't want my kids to have one. No chips. What if I do not want my health records compiled on to a single record? Too bad? Or is it a voluntary system?

Me either. But I loved the

Me either. But I loved the speech. I think Dr. Carson would agree that healthcare registration at birth could be voluntary, like a personal savings account, and not another federal bureaucracy. Dr. Carson appears to be open minded.

I hope so, but he did not say

...he said everyone in America should have healthcare and the means to the end was 3 things issued aat birth: a Birth Certificate; an Electronic Health Care Record, and a Personal Health Savings Account. That did not sound optional or voluntary to me. So I think the he needs to be asked before I jump on his bandwagon as if he is a proponent of Liberty. This is the first time I have heard him speak, so I may not have all the background I need.

No

It is not a voluntary system. That is the acid test.

Ron Paul is the only one I've ever known to pass the test, all others, so far, fail.

The really troubling thing here is that this fact, that no one but Ron Paul passes the involuntary/voluntary test, measures our future.

Will our future be movements toward Liberty or movements in the opposite direction?

Anything less than a Ron Paul type Federal (not National) solution is still a direction toward less Liberty and the only difference in the movements toward less Liberty is how fast we move away from Liberty.

I know, and I think you know, bear, that I'm speaking the truth, but who understands the truth in America?

Not that guy.

That guy is an obvious Nationalist.

One solution MUST be enforced upon everyone or else - without question.

That is how Counter Revolutionary Forces (my new working English phrase) work in our brains.

We are schooled, taught, even brainwashed, or conditioned, to think in terms of one POWER ruling us, or else, without question, and I'm not talking about God.

This is more of the bait and switch routine stuff.

If spiritual awareness is a real thing, and I know it is, so I'm therefore a potential target, then that awareness of a POWER, that spiritual awareness of a POWER can be falsified and injected into our brains as a counterfeit version exists in tandem with the genuine article.

Instead of asking, OK, what is the right thing to do according to my best ability to understand spiritual awareness, instead of that, these Counter Revolutionary Forces inspire the targeted victims to think otherwise, but similarly, along the lines of having ONE POWER commanding the path to be taken in any case where an individual is ON THE FENCE.

What would Jesus do, to borrow a phrase, is replaced with what am I told to do, to obey, without question?

That my dear bear is the danger before us.

Even the best minds, good people, smart people, doing very good things, are then set on a path that strengthens Man made Laws, and weakens Natural Law, or Common Law, or God's Law, depending upon how thoughtful any individual may be at any given moment.

There is no talk of removing absolute power from the dictator in the dictators throne. There is no talk of the absolutely despicable practice of torturing and murdering innocent people daily. There is only a hint of remedy that suggests a more benevolent future for the abuse of power.

No talk of reverting back from absolute despotism, or Nationalism, to an actual Democratic Federated Republican form of voluntary, competitive, government, whereby one State could be exemplified by this doctors Planned Economy of taking from this person and then "giving" to that person, so as to teach, by example, exactly how well that works in that State, compared to another State that may not MODEL their POWER on the Dictator, Involuntary, Criminal, Model.

What would the future be like in a State, in a Voluntary Union, whereby that State was a sanctuary for the runaway slaves, and not just another slave state of a different color of law?

Thanks bear, for your precious time once again.

Joe

And you for yours!

IMO, this man said some good things but mixed them with error and it concerns me that there was an agenda being worked into his "Christian audience."

Did you notice, everyone applauding except for Obama? Of course I couldn’t see the audience, but as far as what was on camera. I think that picture served to polarize the audience towards the plans Dr. Carson offered as it appeared that Obama was not onboard, therefore meaning his words must be good.

Do you see this post has 100+ up votes? Did people hear the error? I see mostly positive remarks.

...

Speaking of speeches

http://www.fiscalconservatives.com/videos/eZo4hbGJjVI.html

That one is worth something and Ron Paul's exit speech is linked competitively below too.

I'm really working to get the next words to gain currency too:

"Mr. GEORGE MASON. Mr. Chairman, whether the Constitution be good or bad, the present clause clearly discovers that it is a national government, and no longer a Confederation. I mean that clause which gives the first hint of the general government laying direct taxes. The assumption of this power of laying direct taxes does, of itself, entirely change the confederation of the states into one consolidated government. This power, being at discretion, unconfined, and without any kind of control, must carry every thing before it. The very idea of converting what was formerly a confederation to a consolidated government, is totally subversive of every principle which has hitherto governed us. This power is calculated to annihilate totally the state governments. Will the people of this great community submit to be individually taxed by two different and distinct powers? Will they suffer themselves to be doubly harassed? These two concurrent powers cannot exist long together; the one will destroy the other: the general government being paramount to, and in every respect more powerful than the state governments, the latter must give way to the former. Is it to be supposed that one national government will suit so extensive a country, embracing so many climates, and containing inhabitants so very different in manners, habits, and customs? It is ascertained, by history, that there never was a government over a very extensive country without destroying the liberties of the people: history also, supported by the opinions of the best writers, shows us that monarchy may suit a large territory, and despotic governments ever so extensive a country, but that popular governments can only exist in small territories. Is there a single example, on the face of the earth, to support a contrary opinion? Where is there one exception to this general rule? Was there ever an instance of a general national government extending over so extensive a country, abounding in such a variety of climates, &c., where the people retained their liberty? I solemnly declare that no man is a greater friend to a firm union of the American states than I am; but, sir, if this great end can be obtained without hazarding the rights of the people, why should we recur to such dangerous principles? Requisitions have been often refused, sometimes from an impossibility of complying with them; often from that great variety of circumstances which retards the collection of moneys; and perhaps sometimes from a wilful design of procrastinating. But why shall we give up to the national government this power, so dangerous in its nature, and for which its members will not have sufficient information? Is it not well known that what would be a proper tax in one state would be grievous in another? The gentleman who hath favored us with a eulogium in favor of this system, must, after all the encomiums he has been pleased to bestow upon it, acknowledge that our federal representatives must be unacquainted with the situation of their constituents. Sixty-five members cannot possibly know the situation and circumstances of all the inhabitants of this immense continent. When a certain sum comes to be taxed, and the mode of levying to be fixed, they will lay the tax on that article which will be most productive and easiest in the collection, without consulting the real circumstances or convenience of a country, with which, in fact, they cannot be sufficiently acquainted."

Context?

Joe

Yes, that speech, is the one necessary for all to hear.

Because that speech speaks of that which still allows voluntarism in this nation. It is the 2nd Gun Control Speech you have given me. Did you watch the whole hearing? I have appreciated both of the links you have given me.

IMO they will not be able to conduct involuntary national health care and death panels as long as guns are readily available.

Context: The Con Con.

"The assumption of this power of laying direct taxes does, of itself, entirely change the confederation of the states into one consolidated government." - George Mason

also in context: http://www.dailypaul.com/comment/2946606:

"Stop paying (whatever power is fueling Legal Crime) the best liars (and pedophiles, rapists, torturers, and serial killers, sociopaths, psychopaths, frauds, extortionists, and mass murderers) so much for doing such a good job and what happens?

Rand Paul is elected and he wants to wipe Iran off the map?

So...

Don't pay him either." -Joe Kelley

I listened to Dr. Carson last night. As far as I can remember the 2nd amendment was not mentioned. I may have forgotten.

A free people can only afford to make this mistake once: http://www.fiscalconservatives.com/videos/eZo4hbGJjVI.html at time 4:55...

We are in grave danger, IMO.

...

We as individuals.

We as a family.

We as a in spirit.

We as a business.

We as a city.

We as a county.

We as a State.

We as a Voluntary Union of States.

We as a species of being walking the Earth are in danger.

Those Revolutionary Forces that reject all attempts to torture or be tortured, murder or be murdered, for any reason are Revolutionary Forces.

So why listen to, and then adopt these Counter Revolutionary Forces that find every excuse to keep the money, and the power, flowing to the criminals who pardon themselves for every conceivable crime ever to have been committed by the worst examples of our species and even more money for new and worse crimes?

How can someone ever take any small look into Waco and not realize immediately that the criminals have taken over completely.

How about these 2 cases:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UT5MY3C86bk

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ktLeb14FoUk

One look at how far those victims traveled from being victims to any semblance of justice, in any true meaning of the word, proves the case.

So why the silence, why NOT the outrage?

Why are people not doing this:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NHwo43xQauM

We are lulled into powerlessness by those Counter-Revolutionary-Forces in between our ears.

When someone is mathematically documenting their Fraud and Extortion crimes publicly, claiming that they (who are criminals) are lending money (which is legal power) to their victims (anyone using Dollars) and claiming also to be empowered to put their victims in jail (student loan defaults) for failure to pay back the money they claim was borrowed from them, while they are the ones also claiming to be "backing their money on the Good Faith and Credit of the American People", then the Dupes here, look around, are going to get what they deserve.

We don't, anyone who knows better, who is working to turn this thing around, and NOT HALF MEASURES, but turn it around, do not deserve what is on the horizon, because we have not allowed the enemy, the Counter-Revolutionary-Forces, into our minds, or if those Counter-Revolutionary-Forces were, unfortunately, in our minds, we drove those Counter-Revolutionary-Forces out.

Liberty or YOU are dead, so get the hell out of my way.

What if, as a point to ponder, the East Coast is currently being bombarded with Weather Modifying Weapons to soften it up for an armed Invasion, to then gain a foothold onto this Country proper?

I don't care if the uniforms of the invaders are blue or red, the concept is real, as the pedophiles, sociopaths, and the like, already occupy Washington D.C. and Wall Street, but you know those worst of the worst must be growing nervous, as Fat Boy is defeated by Revolutionary Forces, and their "witnesses" in their "hearings" are not reading from their Counter-Revolutionary-Forces script.

So what is a California to do if the Red Coats, or whatever, take over Massachusetts, Connecticut, Rhode Island, New York, New Jersey, Maryland, and parts of Pennsylvania?

OH, Joe, you are such a dramatist, and so funny.

The criminals took over in 1788. They made Slavery Legal. How much proof does a Man, or Woman need, they could not occupy all the towns in this land of Revolutionary Forces, so they have been working on our brains for 200 plus years, creating an army of Pod People, and yet these Revolutionary Forces remain too powerful for them to CRUSH.

Now what?

Hold onto your hat?

I think people had better wise up sooner.

Joe

Sometimes it is easier to say “We” than it is to say “I”

But then sometimes “We” is better than I.

Watched the links. I was familiar with most of them. Sobering…almost to tears…but I am past those nowadays. I had to look to see if Ted Gunderson was telling the truth. I hear you use those words in reference to government (criminals) all the time, but I never really think about what they mean. It is too much

We spent the day attending 4 basketball games. Mush between the ears when children are being trafficked. Too busy being busy.

...

Bravo!! Well said

Breaking the collectivist, "counter revolutionary" programming can be hard, but I think it's the key to really understanding the situation we face.

You don't think it would massively shake things up if

EVERY American listened to that speech?

We might even get a REAL discussion going amongst countless millions of Americans about how to change things for the better instead of more of the same and America's economic, strategic and moral death spiral.

"In the end, more than they wanted freedom, they wanted security. They wanted a comfortable life, and they lost it all -- security, comfort, and freedom. When ... the freedom they wished for was freedom from responsibility, then Athens ceased to be free."