BOMBSHELL: Behind-the-Scenes Corruption at United States Supreme CourtSubmitted by TommyPaine on Sun, 02/10/2013 - 15:46
By this time next week, the United States Supreme Court *should* have held a conference regarding whether or not they will hear a case that involves Obama's eligibility.
In Orly Taitz' (the attorney's) briefing, she makes an allegation that is a BOMBSHELL.
She alleges that over the past few years, as court challenges regarding Obama's eligibility have been working their way through the system, court clerks within the U.S. Supreme Court have been tossing out Obama eligibility cases WITHOUT THE KNOWLEDGE OF THE SUPREME COURT JUSTICES!
Here is a quote from her brief to the court:
"Previously a case Lightfoot v Bowen 084524 by the same attorney Taitz was deleted from the docket of the Supreme Court on inauguration day January 21, 2008 [sic -- she means 2009], ostensibly to give an impression that there are no more challenges to Obama’s legitimacy. Only after the enormous pressure from the public, media, state representatives and sworn affidavits from attorneys the case was reentered in the public docket. Clerk in charge for STAYs Danny Bickle repeatedly made incorrect statements claiming that all files were deleted due to some type of computer malfunction, which was not the case. Later, in March of 2009 during a meeting with attorneys and book signing in Los Angeles Taitz was able to discuss the case with Justice Scalia, who was absolutely clueless that the case even existed, even though according to the docket he was a part of the conference of justices who denied that case dealing with the legitimacy of the U.S. President and he voted to deny that case. One can believe that a judge would forget a case about some trivial dispute, but not a case dealing with the U.S. Presidency he supposedly discussed in conference only a month and a half earlier. It is clear that the case Lightfoot v Bowen was decided by the clerks, the names of the justices were printed on the order when the justices had no clue the case even existed. In a case at hand dealing with the usurpation of the U.S. Presidency this is high treason, for which guilty parties should be getting a life in prison or death penalty and the nation is entitled to know who these people are."
Here is her brief in full: