What's in it for them? Have proof?
Like this article? Get DP delivered to your inbox daily. Subscribe here:
"They're going to try to hang Congressman Paul" -Ex-CIA Chief
This show was abruptly CANCELLED after this, despite being high in the ratings.
"Do you live in a FREE country? Don't be so sure." -Napolitano
http://www.mediafire.com/?s4snpbpsts5b3 - Thx sovereignjanice
The Press corps
The MainStream Pundits afraid of being seen as less and less relevant
The Establishment Players
That's what they were afraid of.
Netflix/YouTube "Brian Regan"; Silly, Feel-Good Stand Up Comedy. Know Any Others?
Media CEO's sit on a ton of subsidized company boards and hold substantial stock of mega corps like banks and defense companies.
Also many companies advertise through commercials on the channels and those companies have a vested interest in keeping the subsidies/regulations flowing..(ie Kraft foods)
just look at warren buffet and berkshire hathaways subsidiary's
or fred hassan who is a former CEO of time warner who still sits on the board.
"Hassan joined Pharmacia & Upjohn in May 1997 as chief executive officer and in February 2001 he was named Chairman of the Board of Pharmacia after the merger with Monsanto Company."
or jeff zucker, recent CEO of CNN and him being vice chairman of GE
(any wonder why the media isn't reporting that GE paid NO TAXES for years)
Tools of war are not always obvious. The worst weapon is an idea planted in the mind of man. Prejudices can kill, suspicion can destroy, and a thoughtless, frightened search for a scapegoat has an everlasting fallout all of its own.
Please do your own research, I feel it is important to prove things to yourself. If you decide to take my advice, you will find that our media ownership is consolidated to an extreme extent. An illusion of choice, the illusion of variety. One can also link these large corporations, our information gatekeepers, to their parent companies or subsidiary companies that are invested in the perpetual war machine. All one has to do is follow the money. For example, Why would GE, forty nine percent owner of nbc, report on the war(s) when they have government contracts to cash in on? Or, do you think these monolithic corporations would want to risk millions of dollars in advertising revenue by reporting on the harmful effects of the pharmaceutical industry on their nightly news channel? They wouldn't, and they don't.
Now why would the media be complicit in bashing, marginalizing, mocking and out right ignoring Ron Paul, you ask? Could it be because Paul was calling for an end to the gravy train? He was calling for the end of the federal reserve. He was calling for an end to all the conflicting interests, the special interests. You have heard of that revolving door in DC, right?
For some reason I can't edit my comment. I just reread it, and I would like to rephrase, Please do your own research, I feel it is important to prove things to yourself....sounds so bossy without the please :)
corporatism - a symbiotic relationship between big government and monopolies. Since our corporatism is a two-party system (rather than Mussolini one party fascism), big labor is added to the mix for election purposes.
The most important thing to understand, however, is that under corporatism ("mixed economy" or fascism), tyranny of the government always has the upper hand. Thus, affirmative-action recipients (75% of eligible voters: women + gays + some ethnic men) and unionized white men is the Upper hand.
With 55 million Mexicans coming (11m + 11m future wives + 33m future kids; I do not count another 25m close relatives who will join later via family unification), do not expect more freedom.
I agree. However, I feel we under the illusion of having a two party system. I feel the "two" parties are working as one, most of the draconian legislation being enacted is passed with bipartisan support. Soft fascism?
From their viewpoint he is a sinner.
Media, like our politicians, simply reflect the will of the people. Since only 150,000 wrote RP in and 2% supported Libertarian Party, it was not a special secret agenda or electronic voting machines that make media anti-Paul. For the USA government, however, another force (besides lobbying and voting power of the people) is crucial - personal interest of government workers to keep permanent gainful employment via taxpayer money or inflation. Their tool is a passive agression and manipulation via government agencies (like CIA, Pentagon, Education Department, etc.) Those are true anti-Paul.
The media tells the people what their "will" is. Perfect example was on Super Tuesday in 2008. My local newspaper, and every paper that uses Associated Press, had a big 2-page spread with primary candidates and their positions. Guess what, no Ron Paul. They even included a couple that had dropped out (Guiulliani and Thompson I believe). The Associated Press was actively keeping Ron Paul's lone anti-war position secret from the Sheeple.
"In the beginning of a change the patriot is a scarce man, and brave, and hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a patriot."--Mark Twain
Because the media is owned by the people that don't want Ron Paul president.
The media is an industry comprised of multiple companies. What evidence is there that indicates they are are on the same team?
Simple answer for simple people.
It's amazing that so many people still think what they see on corporate media is independent, impartial, hard working state of the art investigative reporting ... on our side!
Telling us "how things really are" - and keeping us informed.
Wow. Hard to believe, I know. But they still assume that, while knowing nothing about who actually owns these networks.
Could be some of the talking heads in corp. tv media did too, but saying so would have cost them their jobs. Corp. media relies on big advertising dollars from other establishment corporations who felt threatened by RP, probably because of his well-known reputation as the only politician who couldn't be bought. They want someone who will "play ball" like a george bush or obama who'd fill the top admin. and treasury positions with Haliburton CEOs, Goldman Sachs people, and their own lobbyists.
we can march right back out.
Ron Paul 2012: Restore America Now 7 minute film collection: speeches against the Federal Reserve & its mischief. 3 decades of Ron Paul's mighty quest. Approximately 450,000 views.
Disclaimer: Mark Twain (1835-1910-To be continued) is unlicensed. His river pilot's license went delinquent in 1862. Caution advised. Daily Paul ☑
Ron Paul wanted no corporate money, and that's what MSM wants, $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$.
STAND WITH RAND 2016
THE JEWISH MEDIA BLACKOUT OF RON PAUL’S CAMPAIGN
By Brother Nathanael Kapner - Copyright Â© 2007
All Articles May Be Reproduced Only With Authorship & Link To Real Jew News
Cross-reference military contractors and those who own the Networks. There is a reason CBS gave Dr. Paul 89 seconds out of 90 minutes in a foreign policy debate.
"To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize."
Check it out.
its 'cos I owe ya, my young friend...
Rockin' the FREE world in Tennessee since 1957!
Defeat CORKER! Bailed out the banks. In training to steal more.
Defeat ALEXANDER! Career traitor! Handsomely rich in a poor Nation.
How about he can't be blackmailed, controlled and he wants to follow the Constitution in its original intent..He is honorable THEY are not..
Ron Paul, for the most part, is everything THEY ARE NOT!!
He is a GOOD and decent man - THEY ARE ROTTEN!!
Ron is a mans man - Dana Bash is a little spoiled "B*TCH!
Want DP delivered to your inbox daily? Subscribe here: