63 votes

OK, so call me a racist and downvote me

Here's a video that names names and tells the truth about who really is in control of the US populace. Even if you don't like the messenger, the message speaks truth. At least watch it before you downvote. If truth makes me a racist fearmonger, then so be it.


Trending on the Web

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

I grew up in the "Segregated South" and I want no part of...

David Duke. This may be the right message but he is absolutely the wrong messenger.

I agree Bob,

but who else is presenting the right message?

Dr. Alan Sabrosky, Dr. Henry Makow, Dr. Paul Craig Roberts,...

Gordon Duff, etc. We have a lot of allies, though we may not agree with them on all issues. Hitler was a green and a vegan; that does not mean I would want Hitler as a spokesperson.

you're a racist and i down

you're a racist and i down voted you. its what you wanted

Only if you were asleep

and it helped to wake you up.

Here's the difference.

Ron Paul supports the Republic, limiting government, and you taking action to take back your government, blames collectivism, socialism, etc. and extolls the founding fathers who took their OWN destiny into their OWN hands and formed their OWN government.

David Duke blame jews. And wants people to believe were it not for jews everything would be ok.

Do you not see the difference between DD and RP? RP is anti-collectivist. DD's premise and solution both are collectivist.

RP believes in the expression of man's higher nature: construction.
DD believes in the basest of man's higher nature: destruction.

Regardless of what you believe about jews, zios, or whatever the hell, you should be ashamed of yourself for buying into just another form of collectivism and high rapidly you were able to be drawn away from RP's message of hope.

Show me where he blames "the jews" in that video.

He is blaming Zionists, which is quite different. Not all jews are Zionists, not all Zionists are jews, and only a collectivist would lump them into the same group. Shame on YOU for buying into collectivism.

I don't know

that he's necessarily against Jews.. though it's clear that he's no fan of the religion. But I don't see that as different than the way certain Christians portray Islam. Or the way monotheists portray atheists (or vice versa for that matter.)

He is staunchly anti-zionist. Which is a subset of a group with varying degrees of influence inside this country that are antithetical to ideals of (in some cases) liberty, libertarianism and conservatism.

Even at that, Zionism in and of itself isn't a problem. There are many schools of thought within zionism. It's a subset of that subset that appears to be the problem: i.e. undue influence of a group of zionist that may have too much (negative) sway over US policies.

which to me, seems perfectly legitimate.

I don't know much about David Duke, the man, but that's what I take away from all this. He may be a terrible dog. I'm not standing up for him, just trying to highlight a difference that appears to be missing in your analysis.

One thing is overlooked

DD is NOT a Libertarian. But you should be focused: under free society with no big taxes, and no foreign aid to all, Jews and Israel will do even better than today. Under free-market capitalism, Jews, on average, will do well based on their personal abilities. Their vast personal wealth will go to Israel rather than to local churches or to welfare of your children via government redistribution. So I suggest you to join national socialists or religious socialists if you want to curb Israel.


That made absolutely no sense.

It made sense to

Harvard, Moscow and Berlin Universities, who for century put hidden quotas on Jewish students.

Why do yo keep saying Jewish,

while I keep saying zionist, as this has nothing to do with Judaists. I know you know the difference, and if not, please look in up, and study. Then we could have discourse, because right now we are talking apples and oranges.

Yep, you got that right

Judaists & zionist are two different things.
I regret I have only one up vote to give.

It is obvious.

Pretending that issue is about defending Palestinian Muslims (who according to Jesus will burn in hell) is bogus. Israeli-Palestinian conflict is about group demands, not individual rights. An honest collectivist would spend equal amount of time defending Palestinians, Basques, Chechens, Kurds, Tibetans, etc. Extending meaning of "Zionist" to more than "supporter of Israel as a Jewish state" is falsification. Since today talking about execution of Jews is not in vogue, anti-Semites try to hit at where they think Jews feel the pain most - their collective (Israel.) Israel has 32 political parties. 3/4 of them are Zionists (from Marxists to Libertarian.) Reagan was Zionist, Jimmy Cater is Zionist, Putin is Zionist, Obama is Zionist - all support Israel as independent state with securable borders. Arabs do not. Oil money, sheer number of muslim countries in UN, and progressive media do the talking.

First a correction,

Muslims do not worship Jmannuel (Jesus), but respect him as a prophet, and to say that they think he will burn in hell is a neo-con lie, used by all agents to denigrate all Muslims.

As an American who puts my country first, I can easily tell when i'm speaking to an agent who puts Isreal first. Once a liberal was one who would be a libertarian today, so definitions change over time, as has the meaning of zionist, from a mere supporter of Israel, to what it is today, and if you don't understand what that definition is, then you need to educate yourself.

My next question to you would be, "Why is a neo-con visiting the Daily Paul?"


THAT WAS TO EASY...THER'S GOT TO BE SOME OTHER'S that pull the the LARGER STRING other than the ZIO...


It is all kosher

But who is actually in charge - Illuminati, Zionists, CFR, Bilderberg or Club of Rome?

I suggest to accept that Jews are superhuman. They control US, EU, Russia, and even Chinese communist party. It is not a simple task to control things if you are mentally focused. USA, for example, cannot control North Korea or Afghanistan. Similarly, you cannot totally control your wife or a relative if you have lots of money and they do not. BUT wait! If Jews control UN, why would not they achieve peace with Arabs on their most favorable terms? Controling Arabs seems to be an easier task than to subdue American soldiers into killing Arabs.

ecorob's picture

I voted you up...

But I wish you would change the word "jew" to "zionist" as i think it is more appropriate.

its 'cos I owe ya, my young friend...
Rockin' the FREE world in Tennessee since 1957!
9/11 Truth.

How did some of you find RP in the first place?

I am frequently surprised at the level of closed-mindedness here at the DP, where supposed Ron Paul supporters and champions of liberty congregate. Despite witnessing the unfair and misleading treatment of Ron Paul by the media, it seems a lot of people are all too willing to accept this same media's portrayal of D.D. as fair and accurate.

Can anyone refute any of the facts presented in the video? Oh, that's right, you have to WATCH the video in order to have any chance of doing that, yet some people won't watch because of what they think they know about the messenger, and most of these same people probably don't know anything about him that wasn't told to them by the same media that lies to them about Ron Paul. How did they ever find Ron Paul to begin with? Ignorance can be remedied, but one has to be willing to let the truth come in.

The problem with DD

Israel is a political construct (not tribal) that isn't representative of all Jews. I've read convincing articles that say the house of Rothschild was behind the Balfour Declaration, and that the Rothschilds are not even authentic Jews. Considering that (supposedly Jewish) international bankers funded both sides of WWII for profit, it's obvious that they have no allegiance to their race/religion. The creation of Israel smack in the middle of a geographic location full of coveted valuable natural resources made the aggressive foreign policy that followed easier to sell with a built-in excuse to "aid our Jewish allies" and to smear all dissenters as "anti-semitic" (especially coming right after the Holocaust). It's all cynical profit driven politics, it has nothing to do with race or religion.

David Duke mixing good info. with his usual racialist slant isn't impressive to me. He didn't say anything in the video that I didn't already know. Ron Paul didn't write the newsletters and the media knew it; Ron Paul wasn't associated with that Storm Front campaign donor and the media knew it. It didn't stop them from unfairly smearing him and his supporters by association, though. David Duke really was the grand wizard of the KKK however, and a million informative videos can't make that go away. The messenger shot himself in the foot a long time ago and he could do us all a favor by staying off our side.

i watched it

And yes I agree with most of the points made. but there is no denying this guy was an x kkk grand wizard. If the video was created by someone else less controversial there would be more people willing share. Agree or not that is the way it is in this overly politically correct world we live in.

Your not going to call me a zonist messenger cause I won't lick DDs boots are you?


Why would you think I might call you a zionist messenger because you won't lick DD's boots?

sorry, I should have explained more

Some other guy has been trolling a lot of people who disagree with DD being the messenger regarding zionist awareness. I didn't mean you. Apologies.

So this guy was/is a member

So this guy was/is a member of the KKK as well as an active member of StormFront...yeah, guys like this hurt the liberty movement more than they do good.

We should really stick to guys like Judge Nap, Peter Schiff, Tom Woods, Stossel and even Rockwell. Yes, these guys are more mainstream but these are also the people capable of influencing the average sheep.

I'll probably be downvoted for this post but whatever, just my .02.

I agree, now your job

is to get these people to articulate the message of who controls what. Good luck. lol

Not if you upvote the people that talk sense

I always tell people the reason its useful to have a libertarian society is that the racists dont have to hide like they do now. They can come out in the open and be racist and affiliate and if you disagree you can call them on it. I am calling them on it. How can you be a tribalist and a libertarian?


Really well made video... It goes to show how twisted the media is. You don't have to agree with anyone's past associations and ideas, but it's always good to hear the person out. In this video, David Duke makes a compelling case. I just came across this Duke video after watching the first one on the post:
Dr. David Duke - Jewish Racism Against Gentiles (Goyim)

"The sole purpose of non-Jews is to serve Jews. Goyim were born only to serve us. They have no place in the world - only to serve the people of Israel"
- former chief Rabbi of Israel Ovadia Yosef of Israel

Is that true? A bit disturbing I'd say.

9-11 Media Fakery: Did anyone die on 9-11?


9-11 Actors:

Pysops.. media.. actors.. propagandists... disinfo agents.. fake videos.. fake photos

Think that is disturbing,

You should read The Protocols of Zion.

WWI and The Balfour Declaration...

By December 1916, the German, Austria-Hungarian, and Ottoman Turk Alliance have a clear advantage. France has suffered horrible losses. Russia is facing internal Red revolutionary chaos. Britain is under a U-Boat blockade, and not one square inch of German territory is occupied. Germany is now offering generous peace terms. Basically, Kaiser Wilhelm II is willing to just call off the fighting and return to how things were before the war.

This is when the Zionists make their big move to fulfill Herzl's plan to steal Palestine. Chaim Weizman and Nathan Sokolow approach the British with a dirty deal. The Zionists offer to use their international influence to bring America into the war on Britain's side while undermining Germany from within at the same time.

The price that Britain must pay for US entry is to take control of Palestine from the Ottoman Empire and allow the Jews to establish a homeland there.

Though the official declaration of British support for a Jewish homeland will not be made public until November, 1917 (Balfour Declaration), the agreement was in fact reached in December of 1916. Soon after that, Zionist agitated anti-German propaganda was unleashed in the US, while the Zionists and Marxists of Germany begin to undermine Germany's war effort from within.

More on that time period


Anyone who wants a more then what you where taught in school should read the whole timeline ( its worth the time !)

"Great Men Do Not Seek Power, They Have Great Power Thrust Upon Them"