57 votes

Police Targets Depicting Young Mother on Playground With Child etc...What the F*?

Wow check this out WTF is going on here??

A company called "Law Enforcement Targets Inc." Has a series of targets under the category of "NO MORE HESITATION"

Here is a list of the scenario targets:

hostile pregnant woman in a nursery
Older man holding a shotgun.
hostile older man in his home holding a shotgun
hostile older woman in her home.
hostile young mother surrounded by childred on a playground.
hostile school aged girl on street.
very young boy holding a real gun.

These are not even silhouette targets either these are live color photos of real people. Is there any doubt what they are training for anymore folks? This company would not be offering these to LE if there was no market for them. Wish we could find out what agencies have bought them we could blow the doors off the government ramping up for civil war... I am thoroughly disgusted... This needs to go viral. And if anyone knows any way to find out what agencies are buying them that would be a bombshell!


Trending on the Web

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Company got 2 million from DHS.

And as the lady on the phone pointed out (in a related thread) they do not sell guns or ammo. They got 2 million for those vile targets.
Any more questions about why they are buying up all that ammo, and trying to disarm us?

Love or fear? Choose again with every breath.

Wow. Crazy. Looks like the

Wow. Crazy.
Looks like the site is getting hammered. Slow to load.

They took them down

They took them down from the No Hesitation page, BUT...

They are still on the New Targets page and can still be viewed and purchased.


I was going to cry "chicken little"

I was going to say people are overreacting because they use targets like this in tactical combat training for people you aren't supposed to shoot. But then I clicked on the link.

It had a photo of a pregnant woman standing there in full color with this information:

"No More Hesitation Targets were designed to give officers the experience of dealing with deadly force shooting scenarios with subjects that are not the norm during training.No More Hesitation faded background enhances the isolation and is meant to help the transition for officers who are faced with these highly unusal targets for the first time."

Why is almost

Every person on those targets white,what are the chances of that is this also part of the conditioning?


Infowars ran a story on it

Awesome looks like this has

Awesome looks like this has gone viral! hopefully it will wake up a bunch more of the people!

End The Fat
70 pounds lost and counting! Get in shape for the revolution!

Get Prepared!

"Law Enforcement Tragets"

...would logically imply that the target "threat" images reflect pictures of various uniformed law enforcement personnel from different agencies. They should live up to their company name. Sales of those types of targets are likely to trend higher amongst civilians down the road.

They can run but not hide...

Their site is down, or pulled?

It's not down it is just

It's not down it is just overwhelmed with traffic meaning this is going viral! I got to the front page after a while and several server busy errors but cannot get to the particular target page yet. Reason magazine picked it up as a poster below posted good for them and for saving the photos in case they actually do take it down. The fact they they claim billions of dollars in contracts with the feds and try to justify that "No Hesitation" Series just ices the cake!

End The Fat
70 pounds lost and counting! Get in shape for the revolution!

Get Prepared!

Ive been able to get to their

Ive been able to get to their main page but no farther.

I bet their servers are being overloaded.

Or the feds are shutting it down


no they cant handle the infowars/dailypaul traffic haha


"He's this eccentric Ghandi-Like figure that you cant touch with the normal bribes that people respond to."
the man Doug Wead on DR. RON PAUL

Reason just picked it up

Reason.com just picked it up http://reason.com/blog/2013/02/19/is-your-local-police-depar... This company has landed $5.5 million worth of contracts with the federal government!!

What would happen if there

What would happen if there was a company that sold targets that depicted cops and members of the military?

LOL! Why not a Barack "Banker Bitch" Obama target?

Now THAT would evoke a response from the terrorist federal law enforcement sector.... Of course it's no problem to have civilians as targets, but the drone-wielding Terrorist in Chief--different story!

What would the Founders do?

I was thinking the same thing

This is perverse. There is no excuse for it.

Know me, and you will know of the men and women that forged my soul.

Rampant INjustice v2

somebody ought to post this video in a separate article by itself.
Police Raids on small to medium business owners by ParaMilitary style Fed Agents.

Rampant INjustice v2

Thankyou so much for this.

We will make sure and support these local Arkansas businesses! Spreading the word.

Christians should not be warmongers! http://www.lewrockwell.com/vance/vance87.html

this is terrible--

terrible . . .


it's hard to be awake; it's easier to dream--

A friend on my facebood wrote this:

I wrote them because this made me sick. i asked them if they will be coming out with a Islamic version featuring a Christian with a Bible or a Chinese version with a woman with a baby.

If you will notice

in the product description here


that the company cannot even spell children correctly.

Perhaps not that unusual in the dumbed down world of 'we' as the enemy.

This is part of the continued Israelization of law enforcement and gives new meaning to "we are all Palestinians now."

good catch


All tactical shooting

All tactical shooting training (and NRA sponsored shooting competitions) involve positive and negative target aquisition.

Targets of non aggressive subjects are intertwined with aggressive targets as part of the testing.

Much like video games where points are deducted for "shooting the good guys", hitting a non aggressive target is the handled the same way.

I would not read too much sinister stuff into this, as every person that exercises their 2nd Amendment rights to protect their home and property would benefit from this type of hands on training.

Selling these types of targets to ensure proper training in firearms handling is not evil.

I appreciate your perspective, but sorry,

they clearly refer to the people in the targets as "threats", not non-aggressive subjects:

Non-traditional threat dipicting a very young boy holding a real gun. Designed to prepare officers for the worst possible situation. Background is faded further ... and highlighting the threat. [Boy with gun is highlighted.]

Plus, the series of targets is called "No More Hesitation".

I freely admit: I have no LE training. But this is just intuitively and psychologically really BAD.

Could you please tell us, then, how an instructor would explain / guide a trainee through such a scenario?

Thanks in advance.

What would the Founders do?

Bingo! Yeah kids and pregnant

Bingo! Yeah kids and pregnant ladies pointing a gun directly at you are considered the good guys... Yeah nothing to see here... Sigh! Who does this guy think he is kidding...

End The Fat
70 pounds lost and counting! Get in shape for the revolution!

Get Prepared!

This company is a terrorist organization!

Plain and simple.

I wish I had the power to order a drone strike on their production facility!

Seriously, the ACLU or somebody ought to file a suit against these motherf*ckers. They need a dose of BAD press, like pronto!

What would the Founders do?

This is beyond sick.


This little boy is smiling. This simulates a scenario where a little boy thinks he has a toy, and the officers are being trained to kill him.

Love or fear? Choose again with every breath.


No one is off limits in a war zone, and that's where we are headed. The attesting signs and wonders are multiplying.

It's almost as though...

They want to setup situations where everyone with a gun is considered dangerous criminals. Those "no hesitations" posters seem to be quite benign--none of them mean harm but, yes, they all have guns. (Most holding them with poor form.) It's as though collateral damage is intended, because someone dared protect their own lives with a gun.

"highligting and highlighting"

"Background is faded further highligting and highlighting the threat."

I've given up on being a grammar and spelling cop long ago but I'll make an exception in this case -

You wall donut no houw too spel to gud dew ewe? Dorx.

Chris Indeedski!

Daily Paul cured my abibliophobia.