Open letter to Glenn Beck; Welcome to the rEVOLution

We just had a conversation and apparently you didn't absorb too much of it.

If you had, you may well understand that "inside job" is a vague term used by Fox and others without definition. Its another pejorative the same as "truther", "conspiracy theorist", and other concepts you repeat without knowing where they came from or why they were coined in the first place.

You then try and throw down "was it an inside job or not". Once again not realizing you are using an establishment term meant to discredit one who argues against it.

I am not looking to have a conversation with you on someone else's terms, coined to preserve an agenda, of which you are ill-prepared and ill-researched to discuss.

But, if you really want to continue to find a way out of the mess you created, and you are able to provide a detailed definition of what you mean by "inside job", I can try and answer your currently meaningless question.

If you are relying on the context used in a Fox debate..then we can just let it go right here. But if you have any original though on what you mean by it....then by all means....define it...and we can continue on with the "conversation".

In the end...it seems you are afraid of the truth or at least what you do not understand. It seems that you are comfortable having your language and reality defined by others (why else use loaded terms that cannot be called plain or truthful). You haven't done the research. And name calling doesn't count on the score sheet of debate. I only wish i could call your input a speech, but, a speech needs to have a point.

In the end....i wish you wouldnt call people who disagree with you names coined by the CIA, the Mass Media, and others who have an obvious need to maintain the status quo. I would imagine that both being members here we have a lot more in common than differences.

So define "inside job" with some critical thinking...or just let it go and agree that disagreeing on 911 doesnt mean we are enemies.

I understand that he did not write that book.

The nice lady at the precinct meeting yesterday purchased that book. I told her that I did not read that book, but showed her my flyers on Agenda 21, Justin Amash, and a few presidential comparison sheets which explained their positions. Her husband is on the board and holds elected office. She and I spoke for about an hour. She believes gb is like Moses, who is one of the most honest persons alive. She campaigned for bush not once, but twice. I chuckled calling her a 'neocon'. More into the conversation, she informed me that she wept when romney lost, but can not stand Ron Paul. It was 30 minutes into the conversation when she told she wept, at which point I accused her of being a democrat. The look on her face was precious and one that I will not forget.

Her husband overheard and entered into our conversation. He remembers me from high school and knows my popularity in town, and knows just how blunt I can be. I informed him that if he did not hold true to core values and the Golden Rule, he will have me to contend with next election. He explained how the republican party must move to the center and even left if they were to remain 'in power'. I told him that 'his' republican party is dying, and that I will see it through to the end. Toward the end of the conversation he asked me to run for school board, handed me a petition form, and gave me his cell phone number.

Before I even offered the lady the flyers, she had already cleared a spot on the table, took them from me and placed them there.

When you slouch and give an inch they take a mile. When you stand tall and firm, they listen.