23 votes

WOW #2 -All I did is Google "Israel Purim", and this came up...

LOOK!!!

http://postimage.org/image/khwqd6vnn/

...and on mobile Bing search too...

http://postimage.org/image/486kaakzn/

It links to...

http://www.presstv.ir/detail/2013/03/01/291462/israel-celebr...

and my neo-con friend, who refuses to personally investigate that there is NO PROOF of the wreckage of an Americans Airlines 757 on the Pentagon property on that fateful day says; "that only tells me there are a lot of whack jobs on the internet!"

He understands Google, he understands what webhits are...can anyone find out how many hits Dr. Kevin Barnett's article has actually gotten in the past six hours, or, how he got his article to respond FIRST without even using the year "2013" in my search?

Will Google knock it down?



Trending on the Web

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Iranians are experts on Judiaism?

Really? Good lord.

Purim is a tradition to reveal the burnt offerings of the

jewish people in the most godless parts of the book of esther.

The yiddish jews call us haman, not goyim...haman represents the Christian kings compared to the lot of non-jews in all other creeds.

9/11 is a burnt offering perhaps?

kind of reminds me of Larry David pissing on Jesus in his show.

A true flower can not blossom without sunlight and a true man can not live without love.

This dude thinks you are right.

The first four videos in the following Site are quite interesting but lllooong. The guy used to belong to the Church of Satan. He is well versed in dark occult, symbolism, epidemiology, and geom-atria (numerology?). He says that 9/11 was absolutely a burnt offering. He does not go into who done it.
http://www.whatonearthishappening.com/videos

The Jewish people are the perfect scapegoat.

“Why would the Jesuits use their implacable enemy, the Jews, to further their designs for world dominion? The Jesuits never do anything out in the open where they can be exposed. If they are recognized as the culprits, they will be blamed and suffer the consequences, but if they can use someone else as the ‘cause of the world’s problems’, especially an enemy they can destroy in the process, then they have simultaneously accomplished two of their objectives. The Jewish people are the perfect scapegoat. Since the Rothschilds are Jesuit agents operating under a Jewish cover, using them [i.e., the Rothschilds] in forming the Illuminati back in 1776 effectively throws the onus of this conspiracy on the Jews. The Rothschilds are certainly not the only Jesuit agents that operate under a Jewish front.
Bill Hughes (From his book The Enemy Unmasked)

"I do not like the reappearance of the Jesuits...Shall we not have regular swarms of them here, in as many disguises as only a king of the gypsies can assume, dressed as printers, publishers, writers and schoolmasters? If ever there was a body of men who merited eternal damnation on earth and in hell, it is this Society of Loyolas. Nevertheless, we are compelled by our system of religious toleration to offer them an asylum...."
President Thomas Jefferson (The Power and Secret of the Jesuits, Rene Fulop-Miller, 390)

“If you trace up Masonry, through all its Orders, till you come to the grand tip-top head Mason of the World, you will discover that the dread individual and the Chief of the Society of Jesus [i.e., the Superior General of the Jesuit Order] are one and the same person.”
James Parton (American historian)

“My history of the Jesuits is not eloquently written, but it is supported by unquestionable authorities, [and] is very particular and very horrible. Their [the Jesuit Order’s] restoration [in 1814 by Pope Pius VII] is indeed a step toward darkness, cruelty, despotism, [and] death. … I do not like the appearance of the Jesuits. If ever there was a body of men who merited eternal damnation on earth and in hell, it is this Society of [Ignatius de] Loyola.”
John Adams (1735-1826; 2nd President of the United States)

“The war [i.e., the American Civil War of 1861-1865] would never have been possible without the sinister influence of the Jesuits.”
Abraham Lincoln (1809-1865; 16th President of the United States

“It would seem that the Jesuits had had it in mind, from the beginning of the war [the American Civil War of 1861-1865], to find an occasion for the taking off [i.e., the assassination] of Mr. [Abraham] Lincoln.”
Thomas M. Harris (U.S. Army Brigadier General; Author of the book Rome’s Responsibility for the Assassination of Abraham Lincoln)

"It is my opinion that if the liberties of this country, the United States of America are destroyed, it will be by the subtlety of the Roman Catholic Jesuit priests, for they are the most crafty, dangerous enemies to civil and religious liberty. They have instigated MOST of the wars of Europe."
Marquis de LaFayette(1757-1834; French statesman and general who served in under the command of General George Washington during the American Revolutionary War)

"The public is practically unaware of the overwhelming responsibility carried by the Vatican and its Jesuits in the starting of the two world wars – a situation which may be explained in part by the gigantic finances at the disposition of the Vatican and its Jesuits, giving them power in so many spheres, especially since the last conflict."
Edmond Paris (Author of the book The Secret History of the Jesuits)

"[The Jesuits] are the deadly enemies of civil and religious liberty."
R. W. Thompson (Ex-Secretary, American Navy)

"The Jesuits are a MILITARY organization, not a religious order. Their chief is a general of an army, not the mere father abbot of a monastery. And the aim of this organization is power – power in its most despotic exercise – absolute power, universal power, power to control the world by the volition of a single man [i.e., the Black Pope, the Superior General of the Jesuits]. Jesuitism is the most absolute of despotisms [sic] – and at the same time the greatest and most enormous of abuses…"
Napoleon I (i.e., Napoleon Bonaparte; 1769-1821; emperor of the French)

"Between 1555 and 1931 the Society of Jesus [i.e., the Jesuit Order] was expelled from at least 83 countries, city states and cities, for engaging in political intrigue and subversion plots against the welfare of the State, according to the records of a Jesuit priest of repute [Thomas J. Campbell]. …Practically every instance of expulsion was for political intrigue, political infiltration, political subversion, and inciting to political insurrection." (1987)
J.E.C. Shepherd (Canadian historian)

“It is impossible to read Elizabethan history [i.e., the history surrounding Queen Elizabeth I of England; queen: 1558-1603] except in the context of an army of Jesuits, masters of deceit, treachery, treason, infiltration, subversion, assassination, insurrection, civil war and coercion, plotting for the good of the papacy, and the defeat of all the Pope’s foes anywhere in the world.” (1987)
J.E.C. Shepherd (Canadian historian)

“The Jesuit Order at last reached the pinnacle of its power and prestige in the early eighteenth century [i.e., the early 1700s]. It had become more influential and more wealthy than any other organization in the world. It held a position in world affairs that no oath-bound group of men has ever held before or since… ‘Nearly all the Kings and Sovereigns of Europe had only Jesuits as directors of their consciences [i.e., as confessor-priests], so that the whole of Europe appeared to be governed by Jesuits only.’” (1927; using a short quote by Jesuit Cordara)
Boyd Barrett (Ex-Jesuit)

“[Jesuit Adam] Weishaupt established the [modern version of the] Illuminati specifically to be a front organization behind which the Jesuits could hide. After being [formally] abolished by [Pope] Clement XIV in 1773, the Jesuits used the Illuminati and other organizations to carry out their operations. Thus, the front organizations would be blamed for the trouble caused by the Jesuits.”
Bill Hughes (Author of The Secret Terrorists and The Enemy Unmasked)

“[Jesuit-trained Illuminist Adam] Weishaupt and his fellow Jesuits cut off the income to the Vatican by launching and leading the French Revolution; by directing Napoleon’s conquest of Catholic Europe; [and] …by eventually having Napoleon throw Pope Pius VII in jail at Avignon until he agreed, as the price for his release, to reestablish the Jesuit Order. This Jesuit war on the Vatican was terminated by the Congress of Vienna and by the secret, 1822 Treaty of Verona.”
Emanuel M. Josephson (American physician and historian)

Red Mass Pics
http://www.spirituallysmart.com/redmasspics.html

Your Soul Is Owned By The Vatican - Santos Bonacci
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9plu2MNiqrY

The Secrets of the Jesuits (Jim Arrabito)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O8HUVYDLV_Y

Eric Phelps on the Jesuits
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7uU3Ddp6u0o

Vatican Assassins
http://www.vaticanassassins.org/

ROMAN EMPIRE rules today 1
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4YsFkDWa_XY

ROMAN EMPIRE rules today 2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L6l9jU5_7Mw

huh?

One or Two retarded parents made an insensitive costume.... why does that mean we should re-open the investigation of 9/11?
Their are reasons to do so but this is not one of them.

LOL..you trust an article by

LOL..you trust an article by Press TV?

"Press TV is a 24-hour English language news network owned by the state-owned media corporation Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting (IRIB)."

Support Rand, Amash & other liberty candidates? Check out: http://www.LibertyConservatives.com/

More than I trust our main stream media!

I know that everything they broadcast is lying propaganda.

My comment is completely

My comment is completely unrelated to the issue of this discussion, but about trusting Press TV...

Are you implying that we should only trust news networks owned or operated within the US?

Reason I say this is because there was a time when I trusted Fox News. I believed all of the "spin stops here" hype. That was until I saw with my own eyes Fox manipulating the news. One was the replay of a debate in '08... they asked the loaded question to Ron Paul but instead of continuing with his answer that he knocked out of the ballpark (as actually happened during the debate) they cut to commercial & returned having skipped his answer. They blatantly cut it out, but say the spin stops there... whatever. Then during his speech at CPAC... Ron Paul was cheered & applauded, so Fox instead aired the audience from a different speech the year prior, just to make RP look bad and as if the crowd at CPAC disliked him. Only knew about that one because the video was posted online before Fox edited it & aired their manipulated version.

It has nothing to do with what nation the news operates out of, because it is not as if US media is much better. Our news media is probably just as manipulative & untrustworthy.

It's the truth that matters, not the nation that the news comes from.

...

TRUST???????

If any "Tom, Dick, or Harry" common American citizen wants to Google what "Purim" is, these WORDS(which convey a sentiment} come up in the Google search; Israel did 9/11 to the United States ...

Is Iran attacking/hijacking our internet? Making themselves look like 9/11 truthers, baiting a pre-emptive strike?

What are YOU saying?

Iran is soooooooo smart, they KNOW Americans are curious about this Jewish holiday; that they planted this story as an act of cyber-warfare to spread 9/11 truth within our borders???

Iran, Really?.....

How old are the trolls they hire nowadays. We actually caught three Mossad agents openly celebrating after the towers fell, then let them go. You can't make this shit up. People will believe anything on the news because it is suppsed to be true. Good thing most are now online after getting duped too many times. New lessons here too. I suggest learning the Trivium or another method of critical thinking. Then not only will more of us not fall for the lies but will be able to point to why it is not creditable, calmly and intelligently. If we stay emotionally engaged when we are trying to fact check , we get all flustered and discredit ourselves. The war is for minds ....don't loose your credibility so predictably. LOVE

...in context...

...my response was to the perceived mocking tone of one accusing me of being presumably ignorant in that I was trusting a story from Iranian-owned state media.

In total, the thread itself simply documents the interesting results of a simple Google/Bing search about the current Jewish holiday...

All this Iran talk is irrelevant IMO

A word like, Iran, is powerful

Don't bring it up if it is "irrelevant". People are actually reading your comments so please, bring relevance.

Careful..

As much as certain conclusions have led me to believe that 911 was a controlled collapse false flag operation, Attacking the Jew's holiday with such little backing info really just seems like a trap. The headlines will only read "DP bloggers attack Jewish holiday, more internet censorship needed"...

I'd like to see more info on this hear say holiday but it is a straw man argument at best from mainstream's pov. That picture could be from any time place person, for a different event.

Skeptical and careful not to blow my credibility.

It is a good sign that 911 info is getting out there to the point that trolls are reverting to this level of sneaky back door attacks. Keep putting out good info, not this ....

true

but google "all the proof in the world", and consider it.

"If this mischievous financial policy [greenbacks], which has its origin in North America, should become endurated down to a fixture, then that government will furnish its own money without cost. It will pay off its debts and be without debts. It will hav

Careful with demonizing an

Careful with demonizing an entire country of people based on stuff like this. How do you know they arent actors like the ones from Sandy Hook? Even if this is real, pictures and "opinions" do not matter. Let them believe what they want. We should not be involved in "entangling alliances" with any country. Its that simple.

I can tell this is an organized troll release

Look at all the down votes to a very logical liberty conscious comment. Realize, these trolls get their orders daily and they are told to support certain red herrings unilaterally. Let's continue to expose them. We are witnessing the birth of the new press and the Money monster's attempt to control it . The votes down often represent important views attempting to be smeared by an organized group of paid shills. Nothing new.

Well, I down voted the topic

Well, I down voted the topic post. Hopefully, others will too.

thank God

there are a few libertarians out there that won't fall for every discrediting Sandy Hoax out there. Just because you're right don't throw away your credibility by fighting every curve ball they throw down the pike. Sheesh!

Your friend will only learn from himself, which is to say he

will never learn from information, but only the credit of himself and his creditors... with credit comes control and your friend's a butthole.

sorry to say it but you have to create an event (make it funny/dress up and release a banner with ballons or streak with pamphlets) that shocks the social environment into researching for themselves... if you speak to them one by one you will find yourself stranded on kook island.

A true flower can not blossom without sunlight and a true man can not live without love.

That's pretty crazy what came

That's pretty crazy what came up.
But there is alot of evidence that an American Airlines 757 hit the Pentagon. I could repost links but why? I have before and some choose to discredit everything anyway. But there were 757 parts found and dna evidence of many passengers.

And again I do not rule out Mossad or CIA/FBI involvement, actually think that is most likely, but not buying the different planes theories.

30 eyewitness' testimony?

Wanna watch? I didn't think so.... The free will know what you are paid not to know.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j5FhQc-LJ-o

Look it's not like I don't

Look it's not like I don't know the claims pal, I used to believe the same. Then I researched ALL the evidence, and the evidence kills the different plane theories. It doesn't even make sense to have used other planes, missile, etc. There IS evidence of AA 757, but there IS NOT evidence of anything else, only unprovable claims made. I mean what do you think it was? And what is the best evidence that makes you believe that?

Here's a small list of resources of evidence that makes me believe it was the AA 757. It can be summed up as the plane parts, passenger dna evidence, and multiple eyewitness testimonies (which Idk why you say 30 because there are more than 30). Not to mention the fact that even in an inside job scenario the gov't modus operandi is to infiltrate a group with undercover intelligence and put them up to and help them commit the acts, like with OKC bombing and WTC 1993.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t1wQ2BJsgx0

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YTNRkb7AaQk

https://sites.google.com/site/wtc7lies/911pentagonflight77ev...

http://www.911myths.com/index.php/American_Airlines_Flight_77

Nope

last time I checked airplanes had wings and top rudders. no evidence of either of these at the Pentagon, sorry to insult you at your workplace. The plane that was Identified at the pentagon could not and did not hit it. Period.

You are hilarious, sad but

You are hilarious, sad but hilarious.
I mean you basically declare that you have your mind made up and no amount of evidence to the contrary will change it. That's a sure sign of a reasonable and intelligent person......right? lol
So you must have some really strong evidence to be so sure, let's see it. Surely it's not just that one documentary.

What DID hit the Pentagon? What's the proof/evidence you have of it?

Where is AA flight 77 then, where'd it go?

How do you dismiss all the evidence? The AA 757 plane parts, the eyewitnesses, or the passenger dna found at the scene? I mean was it all planted and everybody there at the scene, and everybody that investigated and cleaned it up were in on it too, is that your claim?

If you have as strong a case as you suggest, then it should be easy to set me straight.

watch this

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j5FhQc-LJ-o

Laughing at me and asking for extraneous info is the trademark of a pro. I have to keep parting your hair at your job but please start working for the good of humanity. Your bosses are just gonna kick you to the curb in the end or worse. Read history! you don't get to be saved. Help yourself and start sharing the truth or get out the way!! LOVE

Check this out, specifically

Check this out, specifically about the documentary you link to. And read the comment the author of the article left at the very bottom of the page. To me he nails it, I am sure you'll say he's a co-worker lol.
http://scienceof911.com.au/pentagon/rebutting-cit/

Nope

I'm done with you, Tiger. There were no eye witnesses who saw the plane actually hit, they all dove for cover, then watched the fireball in horror, most could not see the Pentagon proper from their point. Watch the damn documentary. Did you miss the part where the cab driver with the mysterious broken windshield confesses? Brilliant!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j5FhQc-LJ-o

A must see

who is the comment by.... Name?

Go ahead and paste it here for all to read. I didn't state any specific conclusions nor did the video..... the only thing the video shows is that things could not have happened the way the gov insists they did. Half the people interviewed in this documentary believe the gov explanation. So Stop misquoting me, Tiger.

I knew you wouldn't answer

I knew you wouldn't answer any of my questions again, because you can't. Not with anything credible obviously, or you would just do it. I seen your link to the one documentary in your first comment, that's why I asked if that was all you had and apparently it is. I mean you can't even articulate what specifically in the documentary is the evidence that you believe makes your case.

And let me get this straight, even though I state that I believe 9/11 was most likely instigated by the CIA or Mossad or both, and carried out like other operations they have performed. And I also don't rule out demolition at the WTC, especially building 7. But since I don't believe the theory you in particular hold to about the planes used, because the story doesn't make sense and the evidence is not there to support it, then I must be "working" for them. What kind of sense does that make?

I take your personal insults and claims like I take my child calling me a meanie when I punish them. Not addressing the issues presented and instead attacking the presenter is always what those who cannot defend their arguments turn to.

Yo, DUDE!

What part of PLANES HAVE WINGS, don't you understand. No Plane, or plane wings, hit the fucking pentagon. GOD! We know what airplane crashes look like. There was no real evidence of one at the pentagon. Did you watch the video??