Home » Forums » Politics, General + Law(s)
9 votes

Delete please

Submitted by AmeriRock on Sat, 03/02/2013 - 17:26
in

Delete please, I do not like being accused of purposely misleading people.


Like this article? Get DP delivered to your inbox daily. Subscribe here:

E-mail address:  

»

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Who edited my post?

Submitted by AmeriRock on Sun, 03/03/2013 - 00:04.

The title is did not have the (unloaded) in it when I made it.

—

Please delete my account Due to Mr.Nystom rewriting one of my post under my name.

Michael Nystrom's picture

I did

Submitted by Michael Nystrom on Sun, 03/03/2013 - 00:11.

Because the title as you had it (Utah Passes HB 0076 !) was misleading.

1) Utah did not pass the law - the bill passed the House of Representatives. It did not pass the Senate, nor was it signed into law by the governor.

2) It doesn't allow for concealed carry, as you excitedly said, it only allows for it if the gun is unloaded.

I changed the title to put it on the front page. You can write whatever you want, but if it is blatantly misleading, I'm not going to put misleading info on the front page.

—
www.supportsnowden.org | It is no measure of health to be well adjusted to a profoundly sick society. - Krishnamurti.

ha,

Submitted by adap2k on Sun, 03/03/2013 - 01:41.

ha, aint the net grand !

—

.

http://twitter.com/12160mhz
.

Lame!

Submitted by AmeriRock on Sun, 03/03/2013 - 00:59.

Lame!

—

Please delete my account Due to Mr.Nystom rewriting one of my post under my name.

the owner of the site puts ur

Submitted by BILL3 on Sun, 03/03/2013 - 01:13.

the owner of the site puts ur post on front page, makes a few minor edits for accuracy.. and u call it lame? must be times like these that nystrom gets the urge to shut it all down to avoid looking like he runs a site full of complete buffoons.

—

https://twitter.com/MenckensGhost

Yes, deliberately misleading

Submitted by Velveeta Underground on Sun, 03/03/2013 - 01:06.

Yes, deliberately misleading titles are lame.

—

www.gunowners.org

My Hell

Submitted by AmeriRock on Sun, 03/03/2013 - 01:26.

you people are like a mob, I never meant to mislead I simply read it wrong which is why I am asking to delete it, I am in fact deleting my entire account if possible, I simply cant be on here with people like this anymore, What happened to the dailypaul as it used to be when I started a year and 6 months ago, people used to be friendly on here.

—

Please delete my account Due to Mr.Nystom rewriting one of my post under my name.

Ask your physician...

Submitted by weebles on Sun, 03/03/2013 - 02:01.

if medical marijuana may be right for you. :)

Nystrom thought your post was important enough to go on the front page. I don't get what you are upset about. Even the best editorialists and journalists make mistakes. That's why there are editors.

Nobody thinks you are stupid or are intentionally trying to mislead anybody...

—

.
~wobbles but doesn't fall down~

Utah seems like it is very

Submitted by grover on Sat, 03/02/2013 - 23:42.

Utah seems like it is very pro second amendment, but how does it stand on other issues like marijuana/hemp, same sex marriage, taxation, and other liberty topics?

—

http://www.pressbomb.com

Utah has a conservative house,

Submitted by visible51 on Sun, 03/03/2013 - 01:09.

But the senate & Governor are more neocon progresives - trotskyites mentality.

—

____

"Take hold of the future or the future will take hold of you." -- Patrick Dixon

Same sex marriage

Submitted by Deepblack on Sat, 03/02/2013 - 23:48.

is not a Liberty issue. If two perverts want to get married they don't need the states permission (license).

What are you, straight-edge?

Submitted by Velveeta Underground on Sun, 03/03/2013 - 01:07.

What are you, straight-edge?

—

www.gunowners.org

Unloaded?

Submitted by mbennett on Sat, 03/02/2013 - 23:42.

Isn't that about as useful as taking a shower with a raincoat on?

The Unloaded part

Submitted by AmeriRock on Sun, 03/03/2013 - 00:00.

Means you cant have one in the chamber, But the clip can be in.

—

Please delete my account Due to Mr.Nystom rewriting one of my post under my name.

Yep.. sounds like they went for 2nd amendment symbolism

Submitted by rp4pres on Sat, 03/02/2013 - 23:51.

over substance.

—

Patriot Cell #345,168
I don't respond to emails or pm's.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&feature=endscreen&v=qo8CmO...
Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution, inevitable.

If IL

Submitted by FreedomIsAbsolute on Sat, 03/02/2013 - 22:48.

doesn't pass a cc law soon they will have constitutional carry in as soon as 3 months + a few days. But why would they allow people to only carry unloaded? Make zero sense.

—

“When a well-packaged web of lies has been sold gradually to the masses over generations, the truth will seem utterly preposterous and its speaker a raving lunatic.” – Dresden James

Self-deleted post

Submitted by Velveeta Underground on Sun, 03/03/2013 - 01:11.

I removed my own post due to the misleading title of this thread.

—

www.gunowners.org

Wow!

Submitted by IN Sculptor for... on Sat, 03/02/2013 - 22:43.

I'll drink to Utah tonight!

what good does it do you

Submitted by SIERRAHPBT on Sat, 03/02/2013 - 22:42.

what good does it do you unloaded?

—

Oh how I wonder, oh how I worry
And I would dearly like to know
How all this squander of earthly plunder
will leave us anything to show

Tough question. I suppose if

Submitted by Duane Vick on Sat, 03/02/2013 - 23:11.

Tough question.

I suppose if you didn't want to open carry, you could carry your firearm without the magazine in it and then keep the loaded magazine elsewhere on your body. If needed, you can pull the gun out, insert magazine and chamber a round and be ready to go. It's not a perfect solution since anything that doesn't respect the full status of the 2nd Amendment is still a restriction on our rights, but it opens up options to people.

—

________________________________________

You have never taken a

Submitted by SIERRAHPBT on Sun, 03/03/2013 - 01:48.

You have never taken a serious combat pistol course I can tell. Unloaded all that is -is a paper weight. defeats the purpose to have an unloaded gun. better off to carry a knife. ever hear of the 21 feet rule? look it up.

—

Oh how I wonder, oh how I worry
And I would dearly like to know
How all this squander of earthly plunder
will leave us anything to show

Just wondering...so suppose

Submitted by Victoria on Sun, 03/03/2013 - 00:05.

Just wondering...so suppose you are at the gas station with your unloaded concealed weapon and a bad guy comes in. You then load your firearm and use it against the bad guy. Are you violating the law and can you be punished?

One Step at a Time

Submitted by t0mmy on Sat, 03/02/2013 - 23:05.

Carrying a gun unloaded is the first step. After it's demonstrated to be so good then it's more likely to have everyone accept guns to be concealed AND loaded. Some people just have to be spoon fed the 2nd Amendment, it's irritating, but we'll keep at it. Whatever it takes, our rights will come back to us in full force.