***Billionaire Bloomberg 3rd party run***

Bloomberg is on first name basis with the entire israeli government. They come to NY to meet with Bloomer and he goes there to do the same. I imagine they plot the destruction of America... while to our faces they are playing mr nice guy.

I just took a Fox and wiped my Bloomberg lol.

*

This is so either Clinton gets in or he somehow gets it. The Rockefellers must really be worried about the Republican side. There must be a few over there they don't have faith in, or they might just be afraid of Dr.Paul....

He doesn't have a chance. He would take a lil from the right and just a tad of the left. We get the rest. We have the base and the truth on our side. Roboromney can't buy this election what makes you think Bloomboiga can? he is a plant put in play in casse RP won the republican nod or decided to run as a 3rd or 4th party. Remember, the more horses you have in the race... the better your odds.

Don't sweat it. Lincoln won in a four horse race with a lil over 30% of the vote.

death head on his belt buckle

http://raumfahrer.wordpress.com/2007/07/20/schwarzenegger/

"All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent" Thomas Jefferson

Cite a reliable source will ya...not some lamer's blog produced in his parent's basement.

"All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent" Thomas Jefferson

and Dr. Paul could even put in a 4th party run. Even with just the Rep, Dem and Bloomberg, this may very well mean nobody gets 270 electoral votes. In fact, all Bloomberg would have to do is carry a few decent sized states to throw it into chaos.

My understanding of the Constitution is that if no candidate receives 270 electoral votes, the decision is made by the US House of Representatives...that would be Nancy the socialist Pelosi and obviously it's going to the Dems.

So, even if Bloomberg prevented the Dem from winning outright, as long as the Republican didn't get the 270, it's going to the Dems.

has he announced a run?

NWO scum, for sure

we need to discredit him in any way we can, I know the RP people won't budge, but he may detract a lot of people (I imagine they'll be a media orgasm over his arrival)......hopefully he won't attract new voters, he'll just dilute the moron vote...

This could help or hurt......How many new voters can he attract? How many potential RP supporters will he hijack? Will he just split the neocon vote? Will he be pro-war (or maybe anti-war in the manner of Obama, Hillary, and Edwards, ie, pro-war)? I'm sure people will be so focused on the economy it won't matter.

Bloomberg is a serious danger. He will talk a lot about the economy but I don't think he will have the same opinions as Dr. Paul. He will blame SOMEONE ELSE, because I think Rockefeller is starting to fear that he might be blamed. Bloomberg will cook up something or someone ( a group of people? maybe an ethnic group?) to blame for our chaos and suffering, and this will be the most crucial time for the information war. We've got to start waking people up pronto, we don't need another Germany.....I'd hate to see them stick the ravenous sheep on someone.

Bloomberg can spend every penny he has. If he wants our votes he needs to win our hearts and minds. The only way to do that is by giving us back our freedoms, liberties and by being true to the constitution.

We all know Ron Paul is the only one with that message and with the integrity to be true to his word and actually do it.

In any case, it will be interesting. Bloomberg is a long time Democrat, turned Republican (for opportunistic reasons to become mayor) and now Independent.
Bloombarg will look and see who the candidates are: if it is Romney or Huckabee (perhaps also McCain or even his friend and predecessor Rudy Giuliani) and he sees some possibility in the middle and ther eis a possibility to win, he may consider.

The best thing about Dr. Paul is that he ahs soemthing for everyone and can attract votes from right, middle and left (and green!). If Bloomberg stands, and Paul does not become Republican nominee (remember there may well be a brokered Republican convention) and would run as Independent (he cannot run as a third party candidate once he has been Republican candidate, also not good for strategic purpuses to run as Libertarian or Constitutional Party), he may get most votes from Republicans, Independents and soem Democrats. Remember he was against the war, while Clinton, Bloomberg and Giuliani were for the war, and he si against Patriot Act. A third candidate can annouce form beginning of March and the Republican convention will be only in September. If say Bloomberg stands, Hillary the Democratic nominee, and MCCain or Romney the msot R delegates, and especially if the situation in Iraq becomes worse, Paul will be the best one for the Republicans. He is in any case the only one that can beat Hillary. Bloomberg may just split the Democratic vote ( he raised taxes), so in a 4 canidate constellation, Paul will have a good chance to become president.

Paul is also most likely to get the Southern vote - he represents Texas 14, but not from TX - so if it is say 3 New Yorkers: Clinton, Bloomberg and Giuliani, people in the rest of the US may well prefer a non-NY: Paul.

Yes, you actually need a more than two party system in the US. In germany for instance, there are four relevant parties: Christian-Union CDU, like Republicans?
Social-Democrats (like Democrats), the free Democrats (like Libertarians) and the Greens. The FDP gets 8-15 % and can be the necessary coalition partner. it is possible that Paul could start with a new political party after the convention if they republican Party continues with their necon and big govt philosophy and then he could break, otherwise reform the Republican from within.