0 votes

What Did Holder's Response Really Mean?

This is a perceptive article. Notice also that Holder specifically named drones--leaving any other chosen method of elimination within bounds.

http://www.lewrockwell.com/blog/lewrw/archives/133455.html

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

*What he meant*

Holder:

But any other means, including Apache Helicopter hovering 5 miles away may be used, or potentially tactical nuclear weapons, aside from the obvious sniper and similar methods.

Blah.

What he really said was, Yes the president does have

the authority to use a weaponized drone to kill an American "believed" to be in in combat on American soil. All others would require a different method of execution such as police, SWAT, DHS, CIA, UN, etc. etc.

Looks like it time to quit playing my Mortal Combat video game.

"A vote for the lesser of two evils is a vote to keep things the same", Buckminster Fuller..
A choice for liberty is always a choice for liberty.