1 vote

'Americans who communicate with a terrorist put their life in danger'

This is what you hear from those still championing Obama's drone program. I just watched a segment from Morning Joe and Harold Ford Jr. stated that he supports the potential use of lethal force on Americans dining with an enemy combatant.

To quote him: "If you socialize, dine with, spend time with known terrorists who are on a list of those who want to do harm to America, you put yourself at peril.”

Let me repeat that: they believe that if an American is dining or in communication with an enemy combatant that they could be at risk to a drone attack.

So to that end i ask this:

What about Jimmy Dushku and Dennis Rodman?

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/shortcuts/2013/jan/13/jimmy-...
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/world/news/article.cfm?c_id=2&obje...

Forget about men in the Middle East and North Africa hiding under trees, this is a regime that actually is threatening the use of a nuclear weapon.

What does Ford and those with his opinion think about this? Does Obama have the right to send a drone to each of these men? Should Dennis Rodman be fearful of his life? Because the way i understand what Ford said, Dennis Rodman's life is in peril from a drone attack.

I think this is a great example of how scary such a view and such a policy is, especially when you look at how broadly the White House defines an enemy combatant and an imminent threat.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

potential use of lethal force on Americans dining with terrorist

It's called collateral damage.

The law cannot make a wicked person virtuous…God’s grace alone can accomplish such a thing.
Ron Paul - The Revolution

Setting a good example is a far better way to spread ideals than through force of arms. Ron Paul

The correct term is "combatant"

If you engage in any of these activities with a known "target"...

=======
RON PAUL 2012

Thanks

.