98 votes

Explosive Exchange at Gun Hearing Between Ted Cruz and Dianne Feinstein

Via the Weekly Standard:

http://youtu.be/NYI3MEhegvQ

"The question that I would pose to the senior senator from California is," said Cruz to Feinstein, "Would she deem it consistent with the Bill of Rights for Congress to engage in the same endeavor that we are contemplating doing with the Second Amendment in the context of the First or Fourth Amendment, namely, would she consider it constitutional for Congress to specify that the First Amendment shall apply only to the following books and shall not apply to the books that Congress has deemed outside the protection of the Bill of Rights?

Likewise, would she think that the Fourth Amendment's protection against searches and seizures could properly apply only to the following specified individuals and not to the individuals that Congress has deemed outside the protection of the Bill of Rights?

"I'm not a sixth grader," said Feinstein.

Continue reading at: http://www.weeklystandard...



Trending on the Web

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
ecorob's picture

We see the enemy before us...

These dinosaurs; Feinschtein, cronyn, shumer, and their ilk are the REASON America (you and I) are hated throughout the world and they are THE NUMBER ONE REASON why this country has/is failing.

Vote these whores out!

its 'cos I owe ya, my young friend...
Rockin' the FREE world in Tennessee since 1957!
9/11 Truth.

"None of these rights is absolute."

Right - "A power, privilege, or immunity guaranteed..."

(From Black's 5th)

I believe he's talking about UNguaranteed employee privileges, not rights. WAKE UP people... if you don't WORK THERE these statutory REGULATIONS DO NOT APPLY TO YOU!

This is why they are NOT TRYING TO AMEND the constitution!

Debbie's picture

Nice job, Sen. Cruz - when you pointed out that the Senior

Senator from California was no doubt sincere and passionate in her views but had not answered your question, that really set her off . . .

Debbie

I disagree.

I think he should have cut her off within 30 seconds and said "Hold on a minute senator... we're not going to do this. If you're going to avoid my questions by pulling on the emotional heart strings of this panel I'm going to hold my questions and simply hold you in contempt of both the constitution and this committee.

Then I'm going to accuse you of treason for even introducing this bill and you can try those tactics on an independent prosecutor to see how they work.

Now I'm going to ask you one more time here and I better get a yes or no answer. Do you believe your Bill infringes on the 2nd amendment or don't you?"

(In truth... her bill DOES NOT infringe on the 2nd amendment. In fact it has NO EFFECT ON IT WHATSOEVER. - The bill is to restrict GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEE OWNERSHIP OF FIREARMS.)

US Citizens are GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES.

The right of the "people" to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. It does not say that "citizens of the United States" are guaranteed any right or privilege to bear arms.

http://www.dailypaul.com/268762/us-citizens-have-no-constitu...

Debbie's picture

"None of these rights are absolute!" Sen. Dick Durban. So,

they don't really mean anything then . . . and Feinstein: don't you get uppity with me and lecture me on the Constitution, I've read it and I'm schooled in it, except it doesn't apply here . . .

Debbie

Dick Durbin: PUBLIC ENEMY

The end of the video had Dick Durbin, D., IL, speaking in order to obfuscate the Consuitution.
A simple search of 'Richard Durbin' found a Wikipedia entry about this person, Within it is the root of what drives him. You might not like to hear or read this truth, but it is essential to realize WHO (or rather WHAT) is currently controlling Congress.
Cut-and pasted from Wikipedia:
In 1982, Durbin won the Democratic nomination for the now-eliminated 20th congressional district, which included most of Springfield. He scored a huge upset, defeating 22-year incumbent Paul Findley. As part of the decennial redistricting process, Findley's district had been redrawn to include more Democrats. Durbin's campaign emphasized unemployment and financial difficulties facing farmers, and told voters that electing him would send "a message to Washington and to President Reagan that our economic policies are not working." Durbin benefited from donations by pro-Israel groups from around the United States, in particular, concentrated support from AIPAC,[3] that had been angered by Findley's support for an American policy of a more equal treatment of the Palestinians by the Israelis.[4] Ultimately, Findley raised more money than Durbin, $582,793 to $417,635 in the year prior to the election. Durbin was reelected six times, rarely facing serious opposition, and winning more than 55% of the vote in each election except 1994.

IN PARTICULAR, AIPAC.
AIPAC!
American/Isreali Political Action Committee
The SAME ones that are in control of the SPLC
Southern Poverty Law Center
That keep harping about 'militias' and 'white people with guns'
LINK:
http://www.splcenter.org/get-informed/news/splc-report-numbe...

YES, the SAME ONES that have promoted 'political correctness', and are in charge of the NEA...

In order to solve the problem, the first step is to CORRECTLY IDENTIFY the problem.
Zionists are not of a specific race or religion (90% are actually athiests, deists, or from 'other' backgrounds, and a large percentage are NOT CAUCASIAN), so any racially-motivated slurs against this argumentative FACT cannot be logically waged.

To kill a snake, you must cut off its' head. Your enemy also knows this fact. the HEAD LAW is the SUPREME law (CONSTITUTION), and their unwavering and undying GOAL is to KILL YOU ('WE THE PEOPLE of the United States').
Feinstien is a stupid, greedy, manipulated MERE woman (soon to be 'useless eater', but NOW a 'USEFUL TOOL'), but DURBIN is 'a man with a plan', and there is NO DOUBT that he controls her.
You really should study the classics, like 'The 47 Communist Planks For The Overthrow Of America', to gain understanding.
Ted Cruz is young and inexperienced (AND ALONE), and does not understand the barbaric and totalitarian nature of his ravenous and wholly evil enemies that occupy the seats of 'power and control' within the CURRENT 'United States, Incorporated'. He shall surely learn, either by THEIR hands, or by his OWN studies.

Good luck.

I AM
MONTGOMERY SCOTT

Rifles and Hollow Points

Cruz should have asked Feinsteiner why DHS needs 7,000 "assault" rifles and millions of rounds of designed-to-kill hollow points bullets.

http://www.tpnn.com/after-purchasing-4-5-million-hollow-poin...

He should have went on the attack

Calling her out on "assault rifles" "imploding bullets" "dismemberment" and all the other ridiculous shit she said.

"Timid men prefer the calm of despotism to the tempestuous sea of liberty."

Click Here To See The Candidates On The Record

that wasn't an explosive exchange, but this would be

Cruz: Mr Chairman… if I may just pose a few simple questions to the senior senator from California… Senator Feinstein, would you agree that our Declaration of Independence set out our founding principles? That all men are creator equal?
Feinstein: (would hopefully say) Yes
Cruz: Would you also agree that it set out our founding principle that we are endowed by our Creator with certain unalienable rights and that AMONG (Cruz would stress ‘among’) these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness?
Feinstein: (would hopefully say) Yes
Cruz: Would you also agree with our founding principle that in order to secure God-given/Natural rights, governments are instituted among men and derive its just powers from the consent of the governed?
Feinstein: (would hopefully say) Yes
Cruz: It would then follow, Senator Feinstein, that you would agree with our founding principle that whenever any form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and when any Government exhibits a long train of abuses and usurpations, and I can cite many pieces of legislation whereby our Government has abrogated our rights and stepped beyond its enumerated powers, it is the people’s right and duty to throw off such a despotic Government. Senator Feinstein, it is for this very reason that we have the 2nd Amendment. Yet you seem to side with George III, who engaged in many attempts to disarming the People. Are you, Senator Fenstein, agreeing with George III, that he was correct for trying to disarm the people and that our founders had no right to engage in our War of Independence from a tyrannical force?

If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land, it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy.
James Madison

But

The second amendment is not part of NATURAL individual rights. And individual rights do not naturally extend beyond private property. Bill of Rights, in general, was advocated by ANTI-FEDERALIST PAPER authors and not by the founding fathers.

Ummm, many of the founding

Ummm, many of the founding fathers were Anti-Federalists. Wake up! The Federalists won and we lost!!!

"It is difficult to free fools from the chains they revere".
--Voltaire

It's hard not to be a menace to society when half the population is happy on their knees. - unknown

The right to defend yourself isn't natural????

What is it then? Something granted by a king or tyrant or government?
(I know, they're all the same thing!)

If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land, it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy.
James Madison

Natural laws apply only to private property

not public property. Public property must be regulated. Therefore, carrying guns in public places IS protected by the 2nd Amendment (but that is not natural individual rights.) The limit on weapons (say the right to possess tanks, mines or stinger on private property) should be in accordance with ACTUAL daily threat you might face. I would allow further debate whether the government can put a limitation on you torturing your own animals on your own property....

I've had my eye on that guy.

He's a STATIST tool... the only question is if he's getting paid to do it or not. It's either that or he has a vested interest in the status quo. Strictly here to provide disinformation and cloud up the issue so people have a more difficult time getting to the truth.

It's just business. Nothing moral.

Thanks for the head's up

I couldn't believe what I read. And s/he has the nerve to call itself 'libertyfirst' - another obvious obfuscation of its true intent.

If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land, it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy.
James Madison

STARVE

statist troll!

For making false

allegation out of personal resentment is lame and unbecoming. Please pinpoint your "grievances" and I will debunk you in no time.

Constitution, Or Declaration?

The Declaration Of Independence spells it out quite clearly.

THIS document is what caused the Constitution to be written (13 years later), and the Constitution includes a section that allows for this, as well as the 'Articles Of Confederation', in it's entirety, to be invoked as a permanent part of the Supreme Law.

DISPUTED 'NATURAL LAW' section:
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. That to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.
You must really HATE this one:
This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.
AND ALL TREATIES MADE. OR WHICH SHALL BE MADE, UNDER THE AUTHORITY OF THE UNITED STATES, SHALL BE THE SUPREME LAW OF THE LAND;...
SO, the Declaration Of Independence AND the Articles Of Confederation REALLY ARE included in this CONSTITUTION, BY LAW.
BUT...
BUT?
BUTT!

I AM
MONTGOMERY SCOTT

ecorob's picture

Ba-BOOM!

Cut. Print it. Fade to black. End of story. Next question.

its 'cos I owe ya, my young friend...
Rockin' the FREE world in Tennessee since 1957!
9/11 Truth.

While this video is good, and

While this video is good, and Cruz will be helpful in the Senate, be mindful that he is bought and paid for by Goldman Sachs, and most of his views are hardly libertarian.

Oh...

NATURALLY, you have links and details that allow credibility to your claim.
NO, you most likely DO NOT.

I AM
MONTGOMERY SCOTT

As far as Goldman Sachs goes:

As far as Goldman Sachs goes: http://www.opensecrets.org/orgs/recips.php?cycle=2012&id=D00... Now I'm not one to blow up whenever I see that Goldman Sachs donated to a particular candidate, but I don't think you can just ignore that they did.
And as far as not libertarian views: While I personally don't agree with gay marriage, I won't force my view on others, as Ted would do: http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd... . This article mentions what I meant. http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd... .

I met the guy last year, and didn't really care for his 'Anyone But Obama' attitude after I asked who he would support in 12.

I guess your gibberish meant

that open support for Israel is against Libertarian idea. Right? Interesting how siding with particular group in the group-demand conflict can place one man as Libertarian and another as anti-Libertarian. But hate usually fogs the mind.

well yeah

since israel is an illegal state built on stolen land and has an apartheid regime based on race against the native population, yes, open support for such a state is not libertarian.

inb4 you yell "antisemitic"

.ro

??? I don't remember saying

???
I don't remember saying that...

INTERESTING Take!

Siding with JERUSALEM has become evil, while siding with ZIONISTS who control the 'ISRAEL' and the D.C. and N.Y. and LONDON and MOSCOW and BRUSSELS MIC cabals of power is, naturally, GOOD.

I AM
MONTGOMERY SCOTT

Can you

control your wife or relatives? Can USA control North Korea, Afganistan or Karzai? With reason replaced by emotions (typically found in countries like Turkey, UK, France and Ukraine) you make empty statements. If Jews can kill god and control everybody, why cannot they control your mother?

I voted 3 times for Cruz

The guy is like ICE. Cold and calculated, he did'nt flinch or stutter. It was a "you can't handle the truth" moment from Diane Frankenstein

THREE Times?

When I hit myself on the head, I usually stop after the FIRST time.
REALLY?
You voted for him THREE TIMES.
Either you are lying, or you are stupid for stating that he was 'like ice' (or, I misunderstand this comment by you).
Fien-SHTEIN is an ICY female dog, but Cruz is not cold at all. His question seemed to be well-thought-out, but not delivered correctly; as it gave his enemies too many options to obfuscate the LAW.
Perhaps you are expressing an older American English transliteration of the usage of words, in stating that he was 'like ICE'. 'Cool as a Cucumber', or shortened to 'COOL', have been popular in the past 4 decades or so.
NAW, I don't want RAND.
I want RAND'S DAD!
The OLDEST ELECTED PRESIDENT, as of 2016, will be RON PAUL! Now THAT would be really COOL!

I AM
MONTGOMERY SCOTT