39 votes

Top 10 employers in the entire world:

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Isn't it a little biased for Fortune to show Chinese state-owned

Companies on their list when not showing the DOD?

itzSteve's picture

#5 on the list is the most interesting...

The National Health Service in the UK is listed at #5 in the world. The UK is a small group of islands. In a couple of years, Obamacare (or whatever they want to officially call it) is going to shoot up to #1 on that list with ease. I mean compare the size difference between the UK and the USA and the number of people they cover.

Thats the first thing that caught my eye as well

Imagine when Obamacare and the DOD take the number 1 and 2 spots how broke we will be.

Can't wait.

When I repeatedly

argued that our endless wars and nations building are done for purpose of permanent gainful employment of millions of Americans instead of "Zionists global plan of domination", I was voted down by our usual haters. But anti-Zionists could not explain our wars in Korea, Vietnam, Kosovo, Somalia, etc with a simple reference to neo-cons or Jews. Many of those wars were driven by Democrats or before neo-cons took power.

Keep in mind that 3.2m is actual Pentagon. If you add other Americans who benefit from wars (CIA, DHS, subcontractors, trade unions at Boeing and Lockheed Martin, etc), the number is in tens of millions. No wonder Hagel was brown nosing Democrats and assured them that he would fight any cuts to pentagon.

All money ends up as wages

so a $700 billion Pentagon budget could pay 14 million people $50,000 a year.

Thats over 10% of all US workers, assuming (wrongly) that no overseas materials or labor are used in military hardware.

Author of Shades of Thomas Paine, a common sense blog with a Libertarian slant.

http://shadesofthomaspaine.blogexec.com

Also author of Stick it to the Man!

http://www.amazon.com/Stick-Man-Richard-Moyer/dp/1484036417

Yes

money was extracted for such wages via tax or inflation - thus capital is reduced and will deminish making of future wealth - consumer products and services.

Products and services produced for Pentagon do not constitute wealth for consumers. Wages are being spent on already produced consumer goods.

Agreed, just sick to think that 10%

of everyone is employed to make useless stuff for blowing things up.

Author of Shades of Thomas Paine, a common sense blog with a Libertarian slant.

http://shadesofthomaspaine.blogexec.com

Also author of Stick it to the Man!

http://www.amazon.com/Stick-Man-Richard-Moyer/dp/1484036417

"benefit from wars" = Broken Window Fallacy

If it's "done for purpose of permanent gainful employment of millions of Americans," then you apparently do not ascribe to the Broken Window Fallacy.

Many would argue this is a misallocation of capital....especially human capital.

Think of all the artists, inventors, entrepreneurs, doctors, and musicians that never were...

You're seen the money spent and things it blew up and bombed, but you're not seeing the innovations from the creators that never were.

I'm a serial entrepreneur and liberty activist from Texas!

www.RevolutionCarBadges.com
www.NonNetwork.com

When a freshly converted

learns new things, the first urge is to parrot with vigor.

You are not mentally forcused. Broken Window applies to society at large. Window repair man DOES benefit. Pentagon, sunbcontractors and trade unions too. Since personal life is short, each of those who benefit use their own freedom of personal choice to promote consuming capital today rather than to maximize it for tomorrow when they are gone.

Are you not too concerned with with the society at large...

"Keep in mind that 3.2m is actual Pentagon. If you add other Americans who benefit from wars (CIA, DHS, subcontractors, trade unions at Boeing and Lockheed Martin, etc), the number is in tens of millions."

Are you not also speaking of the society at large when you "bring tens of millions" into the discussion?

How am I not mentally focused? You're saying that there is a realized gain to the individual, which I don't dispute that gain.

I'm just saying that market gain to the individual is not natural. The market would have allocated resources differently had elites and corporations not used the tool of government to create war and destruction that funnels monies to preferred and approved markets.

I'm a serial entrepreneur and liberty activist from Texas!

www.RevolutionCarBadges.com
www.NonNetwork.com

I am not sure you can stay on the topic

without dancing. Let me paraphrase my original comment - our endless wars and nations building serve interest of people who directly benefit from such wars. Those people constitute the lobby for new wars, engagements or prolonged nations building. Contrary to a popular belief, such a lobby is tens of millions of Americans. Follow the money.

To Rule the Galaxy

... the Empire must have it's Stormtroopers dominating every sector.

Audit the Pentagon!

Is that 2.3 million counting all the soldiers in the Army, Navy, Marines, Air Force? Anyone know of a good recent breakdown of all the DoD employees?

They are proud about it - DoD website

http://www.defense.gov/about/dod101.aspx

"In terms of people and operations, we’re busier than just about all of the nation’s largest private sector companies."

"The Department of Defense has a budget of four hundred nineteen point three billion dollars and more than three million employees; Wal-Mart has a budget of about two hundred twenty-seven billion dollars and employs about one-point-three million people; Exxon-Mobil has a budget of two hundred billion dollars and employs almost ninety-eight thousand; the GM company budget equals one hundred eighty-one billion dollars, it has a workforce of three-hundred sixty-five thousand people; and Ford has a budget of one-hundred sixty billion dollars, and employs three-hundred fifty-four thousand, four hundred people."

"One resists the invasion of armies; one does not resist the invasion of ideas" Victor Hugo

More than 3 million! That's

More than 3 million! That's up from 2.3 million employees. What exactly do all these people do?

mess with your life

.

I use Blue Wave, but don't expect one of THEIR silly taglines.

Wow

#1 and #2 - that really presents a frightening scenario.

I think employer #1 is a

I think employer #1 is a GREAT reason for amendment #2..

Cyril's picture

Spot on. Indeed.

Spot on. Indeed.

"Cyril" pronounced "see real". I code stuff.

http://Laissez-Faire.Me/Liberty

"To study and not think is a waste. To think and not study is dangerous." -- Confucius

Michael Nystrom's picture

Whoa!

I am.

Surprised by both #1 and #2.

My guess before I looked at the list was Walmart. Walmart is the biggest corporate employer.

But...

Considering the DoD is a subset of the US Federal government, wouldn't the federal government be the biggest?

The only way to make sense out of change is to plunge into it, move with it, and join the dance. - Alan Watts

yes and did you notice

further down they listed the US Post Office as a Corporate entity? Odd way to divide things up. Someone has an agenda.

Yep...

On that note, does anyone know where I can find a candy hearts watch with a little plastic band thingy? Oh, never mind. I found one! My niece is going to be so happy!

https://store.usps.com/store/browse/productDetailSingleSku.j...

In the Mailbox Candy Hearts Watch with Plastic Band

Time to remember your Valentine with this cheery In the Mailbox Candy Hearts Watch. The ready-to-ship, Japanese-precision watch evokes Valentine's Day exchanges of candy hearts in elementary school and the innocence of one's first love or gradeschool sweetheart. The watch features the “I Love You” candy hearts from the 2004 “Candy Hearts” Love stamp and a fashion-forward pink plastic band. Easy and convenient to send, it makes the perfect Valentine's Day gift for children or anyone you love.

I'm a serial entrepreneur and liberty activist from Texas!

www.RevolutionCarBadges.com
www.NonNetwork.com

this is obviously spam

Does DP have a spam button somewhere b/c RobHino needs to get his account revoked so we don't start getting tons of spamming in all the threads.

Unfortunately, it's not spam smber2c!

I wish it was, but it's not spam at all. That's a link directly from the USPS website in response to the comment which pointed out that the USPS is a corporation. Click on the link I posted and be amazed at what the USPS is resorting to on their website.

Also, take a look at some of my previous posts! I don't post spam!

:P

I'm a serial entrepreneur and liberty activist from Texas!

www.RevolutionCarBadges.com
www.NonNetwork.com

Made in China?

I had to go into a post office recently. It is a time warp. Everyone working there is old, tired and worn-out. The counters, the floors, the entire place was dirty and worn. I guess that is what an imploding business looks like. Depressing.

"One resists the invasion of armies; one does not resist the invasion of ideas" Victor Hugo

LOL, I guess they have to make money somehow

since we took most of their funding away. Cute watch though!!

The biggest irony?

They are the biggest drags on the economy. The biggest earners for the world economy? Waltons.

Goes to prove Ron correct again.

ps. Nystrom.. what is your opinion on how to unite the grassroots to win? If we dont own it, someone will. Im sick of the GOP and their minions scoring points off of our labor. There has to be a plan we can rally around.

thx.

'Peace is a powerful message.' Ron Paul

Michael Nystrom's picture

Hmmm.. A plan.

Good question. I think I'm the wrong guy to ask. I never planned any of this stuff around the Daily Paul - it all just happened. It was spontaneous. Everyone agreed, pretty much with what Ron Paul said (and if they didn't, I kicked them off the site).

I guess the first question I would ask you is: What does it mean to win?

Ron Paul said during the last campaign that he was running to win. If that is true, I don't think he was running to win the presidency. He also said, "I always win," which is also true, in a sense. He wins because he remains true to himself.

So, step #1 would mean to define winning.

When you say, I'm sick of the GOP and their minions scoring points off of our labor, it reminds me of this old saying I that goes, "You can accomplish anything you want to, as long as you don't care who gets the credit."

I think a lot of infighting takes place not over the end goal, but over who takes the credit. I think that is part of the reason why 2008 was so much more fun - because everyone took the credit. There was this saying that "the people were running for president through Ron Paul. Everyone was free.

2012 was more of a drag because the official campaign wanted to be so much more in control of the message and how it was prevented. That is understandable, because there are a lot of Ron Paul crazies out there (in here). (Mostly out there). And I think that is the reason that Rand has to distance himself somewhat -- because at some point the crazies become a liability.

But to get back to your point, I don't think that winning is an end. Its not like we'll elect Rand Paul, or Judge Nap, and then we can all relax and say, "Phew - glad we're done with that!" Would that it were so easy!

Winning is a process, and the process never ends. So paradoxically, having the GOP and their minions scoring points off our labor is winning. People say, "we want to take over the GOP," but what does that really mean? In the end doesn't it mean that the GOP shares our values and ideas? Doesn't it mean that we infect the GOP with a virus -- something they don't even know hit them?

Anyway, those are just thoughts off the top of my head.

How about you post the question to the group in a thread of its own? I think the first place to start would be to define winning. It would be interesting to hear what others have to say as well. I think we'll get a lot of ideas on a direction from what people say.

I would appreciate it if you would.

Thank you.

The only way to make sense out of change is to plunge into it, move with it, and join the dance. - Alan Watts

The Ends - Employing The Means

In The No

Yes, it's in the reach of firm, deep routes/roots; not arrival upon sedentary superficial destinations of complacency.

http://www.dailypaul.com/comment/1981953

Being There, Michael, you know. ;-)

good question

wonder what the govt total is - and why it isn't included?