2 votes

The book - "Cracking the Code" (open dscussion)

Is there any truth to stop paying the "Federal Income Tax" legally?

Trending on the Web

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

I seem to recall recently hearing that...

Federal employees which included some IRS agents that are not paying their federal income tax. In the case of the IRS agents; I suspect it is general knowledge that the 16th admendment was not successfully ratified and thus no tax is required to the federal government. What do you all think? Or is there a way of legally processing paperwork to advantagely not have to pay federal income tax that the IRS agents know about.

"First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they attack you, then you win!"

"The belief is worthless if the fear of social and physical punishment overrides the belief."

Keeping Out Of Court * :

* * is the Name of the Game.

First off, “Tax Court” is an in house fiction operating as final available Administrative Procedure(s) within the IRS and Revenue Code ( exclusively ). You'll end up here if you think you can rely on most “Patriot” arguments, or even their own Publications, to generally challenge Jurisdiction or Assessments. Get deep enough and you will find a clear disclaimer that “The casual publications of the IRS are not law”. They can not be relied upon.

Trying to use IRS Code or other Pubs in Federal Court faces two problems. The Court has no cognisance of IR Code. In current Judge-speak “I cannot See that”.

Why? Because it is already specified by disclaimer as above. Nobody tells you going in. Who knows to ask the Judge personally on the Record ?

Additionally :

Judge is not Qualified to hear the case. IRS and DOJ just grabs the nearest Fed Courthouse and runs with whoever is available.

US District Court system has a small cadre of Judges specifically trained ( and “Ordained”, if you will ) to hear tax matters. They are Circuit Riders, going hither and yon like the Priests and Judges of old.

At the defendants behest.

Another little known background situation is the amount of Fed litigation filed. It's really not much. About 1/10 of 1% of “Taxpayers”, last I knew. A number of even the chestiest “Tax Protesters” cave in shortly after being served Process and don't end up in court.

Their unbeatable reputation is very undeserved and simply tough guy posturing . A scare tactic to induce capitulation.

I could go into IRS propaganda since Al Capone, but why? Think for yourselves how many IRS cases are you currently aware of ?

The Constitution is a Trust : http://www.The-Legacy.Info

No Formula Exists To Successfully Challenge the IRS In Court

There cannot be widespread success in challenging the validity of the income tax until judges no longer have the power to uphold their own law.

Look at how words are used to create three different types of law that manipulate perception...

"The Law" dictates the use of government guns. It is also called "case law" or "judge-made" law.

Legislative law is the official law that is indexed by elected "representatives".

Natural law is based on the physics of God (or nature).


So, when we talk about the IRS and income, we must look at three different definitions of income. The difficulty of challenging the IRS is that judges enforce their own version of the supreme law of the land. They make up their own definition of income as they wish. On the other hand, we want to use the desired Supreme law of the land (protection of natural rights).

The only solution is to chip away at the illicit power of judges and bring law closer to the people.

That is why Fair Tax (HR 25) is the best short term solution to chip away at the power because it would eliminate the IRS and, eventually, the 16th Amendment. Over sixty Congressmen have co-sponsored this bill. This is the only short term shot that we have in drastically reducing government. And it would not interfere with the long term goal of a self-governing environment.

An Argument FOR Fair Tax:

Gene Louis
Supporting a Needed Tool for Government Feedback:
A Citizen-Operated Legal System.

Income ?

The definition of “Income” is a red herring. W-2 / 4 and 1040 Series forms are Class 5 Gift and Estate Tax.

Your Social Security Application is designated Form SS-5.
The purpose for that Form is to collect information and to apply for or receive a benefit. It is not “required” for any other reason listed on an OMB Review Form.

It appears YOU are the Estate Asset by and through Birth Registration with attendant SSN. Your Estate “Value” rises with cash flow. As an SSN holder you are in “Expectation” of future benefit.

As a US “Citizen” you are a legal “Incompetent” protected by the 14th Amendment, which We consider to be a Lesser Estate from an American's Estate.

You are also “Bankrupt” and therefore an obvious “Spendthrift” in need of shepherding and possible welfare.

The Constitution is a Trust : http://www.The-Legacy.Info

"It appears YOU are the

"It appears YOU are the Estate Asset by and through Birth Registration"

There is a distinction between YOU and your BODY. One is property and one is not.

Distinction Between YOU and your BODY :

This can be shown but not particularly useful information. It's a "Theory in/of Law". As such, pure speculation.

The Constitution is a Trust : http://www.The-Legacy.Info

I fail to comprehend how if

I fail to comprehend how if it can be shown it is a theory let alone not particularly useful.

If Not Speculation :

What Else Would it be Please? How would you bring the matter to bear?

My understanding : All Legal Theory, or any Theory of the Case is Speculative. Courts don't consider speculation or hearsay. For every "legal"point one can make another counter point can usually also be made.

The trick is making any argument into statements of fact.

The Constitution is a Trust : http://www.The-Legacy.Info


Unless you want to give up your SS number and stop having "income."


Hear, O Israel: YHUH our God YHUH one. And thou shalt love YHUH thy God with all thine heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy might.

And what is income exactly?

And what is income exactly? If one refers to a "legal" dictionary they would discover the term business has two meanings:

1. That which occupies a man's time with an intent to realize a profit.

2. That which occupies a man's time in the ordinary course of life.

One then must ask what is the definition of profit? Profit is a gain or benefit realized above and beyond costs including the value of labor. For instance ...

If I offer to do work for you I may only seek to exercise a natural and fundamental right to work for the value of my labor where you pay for materials. If I quoted you on behalf of a company I would be seeking a profit above and beyond materials + costs + labor which is gain also known as income.

The courts in their absurd wisdom and logic have decreed a person does not have a basis in their labor but that is a whole conversation in itself.


is not property. Labor is property.


Hear, O Israel: YHUH our God YHUH one. And thou shalt love YHUH thy God with all thine heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy might.



Everything legal is about an intent to profit for a love of money. Don't take my word for it. Get a copy of a "legal" dictionary. They ought to be called business dictionaries.

For instance do you know the word "use" legally means to employ or hire something? It is probably a word you "use" everyday. Employing or hiring something is doing business with an intent to profit. I don't care what word you want to pick. Transporting means transporting persons or property for hire.

The entire legal language is structured around business use. People have been talking about the "use" of citizen titles for quite a while but few listen or appear to grasp it. How do you intend to prevail at anything "legal" with arguments "using" their business language?

There is no way to not pay taxes legally. The legal system is crafted to a precision with only one object in mind which is to deceive you into believing statutes or codes apply to you without evidence. It is the domain of the great deceiver and his mark which governs those who lust for power because they love money.

If you think you do not love money ... prove it by living without.

The only question applicable to tax paying government enablers is would you enable a drug addict? Why then are you a hypocrite and what facts derived from first hand knowledge of something seen or heard do you rely upon to determine any statute or code applies to you or your body?

Not With That Books Advice :

Early on they got some refund checks to brag around, until IRS figured out the flaws.

Didn't take long and followers get real balled up. Do your self a favour and research the author a little.

The Constitution is a Trust : http://www.The-Legacy.Info

Thanks for your imput...


"First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they attack you, then you win!"

"The belief is worthless if the fear of social and physical punishment overrides the belief."

You're Quite Welcome :

Here's a little IRS story from personal observation. Early 1990's California.

An outfit had been offering a “Tax Shelter” revolving around a beef cattle operation. Apparently legit with years of clients and records to prove it.

Once in a while a client would have some tax problems, but nothing directly tied to the cattle operation.

All of a sudden IRS Audit and Collections Divisions began descending on clients and stealing them blind. Word got around. The promoters could say the individuals must have “done something wrong” because they had been operating successfully for years.

After about a year of cherry picking, IRS Criminal Investigation Division dumped on the promoters and the rest of the investors pool was swept into levy and forfeiture land.

Promoters went to Federal Court to face multiple charges revolving around promoting an “Abusive Tax Shelter”. It came out in testimony the IRS had been “aware” of the “illegal” operation for some time and could have pressed charges 10 years earlier.


So why did they wait to prosecute?

Give that some thought.

The Constitution is a Trust : http://www.The-Legacy.Info



"First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they attack you, then you win!"

"The belief is worthless if the fear of social and physical punishment overrides the belief."