32 votes

Ann Coulter: "I am more libertarian than most that call themselves libertarian"

Ann Coulter did this interview on Fox today from CPAC 2013. I am just not sure where she has any credibility even as an establishment mouthpiece.

Edit: Here is the youtube



Ann Coulter is one of the loudest cheerleaders for the Police State in this country. She loves The Patriot Act, torture, waterboarding, the war on drugs, murder for resources, warrantless spying, indefinite detention without trial or even charges, and the assassination of foreign heads of state and American citizens.

Coulter is not even a true Republican as she claims because she does not believe that the states should have the power to make their own laws governing social issues and victimless "crimes," as The Tenth Amendment states. She does not believe in free speech or due process. She does not believe in our republican form of government, so how can she be a true Republican? The fact that she flip flopped and supported the most liberal candidate running for president in 2012 proves that she will say anything whether she believes it or not.

Only in the fantasy land of Coulter's mind can someone that wants to use government violence and killing as a tool for social engineering and theft of resources be considered a conservative much less a libertarian.

In her own words, "Screw You"

Coulter's love for torture:


Coulter's approval of wars for oil:


Trending on the Web

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

How cool!

If she's saying "I'm more Libertarian than YOU are!" that most likely means that the definition of "libertarian" has changed in the mass media lexicon. She'd never say this if it meant putting herself forward as a drug-loving hippy. Even if, in front of true libertarians she calls them that, it's now cool to be "libertarian."

Now for the challenge: making sure that these frauds don't ruin the libertarian name!

"Moderation in temper is always a virtue; but moderation in principle is always a vice." -- Thomas Paine

Now for the challenge: making

Now for the challenge: making sure these frauds don't ruin the libertarian name!

Yep. That's something to act and react against. That's where citing sources such as books, articles, essays, speeches, interviews and so forth come in to play.

To be offensive and defensive/reactive on this issue regardless who the neocon is is to do what radio host Jack Hunter did to Glenn Beck on Beck's show recently when Beck in false astonishment (which bordered accusation) brought up libertarianism purity testing, a tactic to excuse himself from not only not defending liberty all his years in media but to excuse himself from advancing tyranny.

What did Hunter do? He replied stating the issue principles, the mental foundation that guides behavior, what Beck probably wants to avoid because principles don't imply, don't hint at, what someone did in relation to what he espouses, principles are what someone did in relation to what he espouses. And if Beck or anyone from his camp argues he didn't do anything, note the following: Beck's espousal of ideas in his years in media wasn't what could be described as mere talk, the talk you and I did and do because it's one to one or one to a small group; Beck's talking obliterated mere talking and solidifies significant influence because of this word which lead to his words reaching many people daily: exchange -- or, to be precise, payment. Beck's words were his doing, they were his work.

For the sake of wiping away any confusion, Beck's doing was for the commonality among all Americans, the something you and I, average Americans, work for so we can better our lives: the fruit of our labor in the form of our country's currency. For the currency you, I and Beck worked for in the years Beck was in the (mainstream) media, you and I worked for ourselves at no one's expense including that of Beck's -- while Beck worked for himself for nothing less than at the expense of you and me, his countrymen. That expense? That we be enslaved or dead.

Returning to Hunter-Beck: For some reason, no one else caught what Hunter did to Beck. Maybe Beck didn't, too. Hunter set Beck up to be exposed for what Beck is, a fraud, a dangerous one at that. Discussion about principles hereafter on Beck's show, if discussed about correctly, should make Beck uncomfortable. When I say discussed correctly, I mean Beck's guest(s) should say words that convey the past such as record, basis, foundation, history and, well, past. This kind of talk, principles discussion with those words, could cause Beck to ignore it, divert from it or play the I'm learning card, the degrees game, hence his "purity test" comment. The purity test comment distracts people from recalling his past, which is needed to show, or expose, him for what he is, an immense contradiction. So it's important the guest be aware of these tactics to return to making and concluding his point. It'll take time to expose Beck on his show, and it should take time because trying to do it soon and fast would backfire. So, be gradual and subtle.

That's how we should treat Ann and any other neocon. We should use Ann's work against her, just what Lysiandad did below. I understand the decision to choose between pitching 50 cents at a delicious butter coated banana nut muffin for a morning snack or onto the used book store counter for one of Ann's books, but the latter is an investment, one that'll keep Ann honest. If Ann isn't the neocon at the moment, then keep honest whoever is. Keep 'em honest and on point.

Discussing principles is the key that unlocks the door that exposes fraud.

Good observation, Redgyl.

School's fine. Just don't let it get in the way of thinking. -Me

Study nature, not books. -Walton Forest Dutton, MD, in his 1916 book whose subject is origin (therefore what all healing methods involve and count on), simple and powerful.

"Lift the skirt, lady, and prove you are what you pretend to be"

Ahem. "Lift the skirt, lady, and prove you are what you pretend to be."

Personally, I'm convinced Coulter is more man than woman. Might explain her fixation with extreme violence using depleted uranium.

"Cowards & idiots can come along for the ride but they gotta sit in the back seat!"

Literal Translation: "Hey!

Literal Translation: "Hey! Please watch my show! I said something controversial Live on-air."

Southern Agrarian

Ann Coulter is more or less

Ann Coulter is more or less an actress posing as a brain. Her modus operandi is to screech and make noise so people will talk about her. She’s good at that, but I generally don’t look to actresses for anything really.

malo periculosam libertatem quam quietum servitium

I am an aristocrat. I love liberty; I hate equality. - John Randolph of Roanoke

Sure Ann.

She's working hard to try to stay relevant.

Resist the temptation to feed the trolls.

Better watch out

Remember how the Tea Party was embraced by neocons looking for a new label? Seems "libertarism" is now popular enough for a hostile takeover.

An attempt by the neocons to

An attempt by the neocons to muddy the meaning of being a libertarian.

That's what they get paid the big bucks for.

How soon many people forget.

gwb: 'miss me yet?'

"What if the American people learn the truth" - Ron Paul

Bill no marbles Mahr, Buck Feck, and now coward Coulter

all think they are libertarian. What a joke. Not a one of them have the slightest clue about the non aggression principal.

Bill Mahr is a statist who to his credit at least has been talking about ending wars. But he still wants gov gun forcing Americans to do what they dont want to do

Buck Feck Glenn Beck, wants to bomb brown people

Coulter, is the worst of this bunch. She is not only a statist like Mahr but she wants to bomb brown people like Beck.

I hope someone publicly sets these morons straight.

When the Reaganites took over...

...all of his former GOP foes became Reaganites overnight.

That Beck and Coulter are trying to rebrand themselves is a very good sign that we are winning. Not that anyone should believe them...

Those three "libertarian" fascists are oxymoronic...

...without the "oxy".

She's a lot more man than

She's a lot more man than most transvestites, that's for sure - and in keeping with the neocon morals.

And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes and our sacred honor.

Coulter doesn't know what he is

She is confused in so many ways.

Cyril's picture

Ann's comments on Islam, Arabs and terrorism

Ann's comments on Islam, Arabs and terrorism

On September 14, 2001, Coulter wrote in her column:

"We should invade their countries, kill their leaders and convert them to Christianity. We weren't punctilious about locating and punishing only Hitler and his top officers. We carpet-bombed German cities; we killed civilians. That's war. And this is war." [1]

One day after the attacks (when death toll estimates were higher than later), Coulter asserted that only Muslims could have been behind the attacks:

"Not all Muslims may be terrorists, but all terrorists are Muslims—at least all terrorists capable of assembling a murderous plot against America that leaves 7,000 people dead in under two hours. [...] More benefits of the plan next week, but the beauty part of the Terrorist Deportation Plan can't wait. There will be two fail-safes: (1) Muslim immigrants who agree to spy on the millions of Muslim citizens unaffected by the deportation order can stay; and (2) any Muslim immigrant who gets a U.S. senator to waive his deportation - by name - gets to stay." [2]


Oh yeah? Seriously, Ann?

Christian here... Sorry, though: I don't have quite the same conception of Christianity as you do, Ann.


See, unlike you, I don't drink blood in my house (or anywhere else for that matter), to begin with.


And now for my question to you on that "terrorism", since you sound like an expert on the topic...

"[...]a murderous plot against America that leaves 7,000 people dead in under two hours"

... and how do you, Ann, call that thing capable of killing 260 millions people without you bothering to bitch about it?

Yeah, what name do you have for that, EXPERT Ann? Here's a hint:


Anyway, based on YOUR prior writings, I DO have another name for you, "Ann":

S I C K O - P S Y C H O - M O R O N.

How's that, now? Still willing to play the game of name calling?

See? I can, too.


[1] http://web.archive.org/web/20010914225811/http://www.nationa...

[2] http://www.jewishworldreview.com/cols/coulter092801.asp

"Cyril" pronounced "see real". I code stuff.


"To study and not think is a waste. To think and not study is dangerous." -- Confucius

Reminds me of one of my favorite quotes!

"In the beginning of a change the patriot is a scarce man, and brave, and hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a patriot."
- Mark Twain

Just 3 Weeks Ago

Ann Coulter calls libertarians a bunch of "pussies". Now she claims to be a libertarian. Who needs drugs when real-life is so freakin surreal?


Cyril's picture

Indeed !

Indeed !

"Cyril" pronounced "see real". I code stuff.


"To study and not think is a waste. To think and not study is dangerous." -- Confucius


If being libertarian meant looking like a melted Barbie with an Adams-apple whose business cards read "political commentator" that feels compelled to regurgitate notecard talking points in varying octaves of raspy outbursts.

Otherwise, she's just peddling her next book, which is just her last book with the chapters rearranged.

Ann's arch nemesis

I can't get over how much I love that big red button.

Ann Coulter, like most pundits, is an act. She is payed the big bucks to put on her alter-ego and do the bidding of TPTB. HeShe is genius. I am sure she believes very little of what comes out of her mouth. What she did in the clip was really clever - bad for us, but ingenious.

All of these pundits that talk the despicable nonsense are acts. The more egregious they are, the better actor they are.

On a positive note we have the truth on our side.

jrd3820's picture

The Red Button

That is how I feel about the button sometimes lol

You are right, it was not genuine, I feel like most of them are not genuine. Coulter is no more or less genuine than most of the people recently masquerading as libertarians, but the idea that some are acceptable and others are not confuses me.

Ha! Keep a-pushin'. Your comment are always great.

I totally agree. It's that double standard thing. She used to bother me far more than even O'Rielly or Beck I think because of the fact that a women is supposed to be more compassionate. It bothered me that she bothered me. Then I figured out they were all acting and I started being intrigued by her. Now I think she's pure genius.

Cyril's picture

LOL ! :D

LOL ! :D

"Cyril" pronounced "see real". I code stuff.


"To study and not think is a waste. To think and not study is dangerous." -- Confucius

will anyone read this whom is tech saavy enough to establish

Coulter as the definition of "the chunks of vomit mixed with bile and stomach lining that many are conditioned to swallow even when all reason and or your your body reject" save us dan savage " you're our only hope".

Aaron Russo, Nikola Tesla, Ron Paul, I'm jus' sayin'

She Ain't Libertarian

She's an overpaid talking head that reads her script. The bought out editors and producers thought it best to script their girl into being libertarian.

With the establishment losing their grip, they'll try hard to become the new "libertarian" leaders. Anything to stay relevant.

Here they come...

Ann Coulter just like Glenn Beck and others are jumping on the Libertarian bandwagon.

Ron paul started the party but these clowns are not invited. F them.

Even more will follow now that Rand's filibuster went viral but don't be fooled by these money grubbing posers.

I guess it's our job to

I guess it's our job to criticize and ignore them, because TV-people won't do it.

Libertarian Ann Coulter

Hee, hee. Oh, boy. Now if that claim isn't a whopper, I don't know what is. Regardless, let us invite her to be a member of the Daily Paul, the website of libertarian consciousness whose evidence is that overwhelming our commentaries and arguments are based on the nonaggression principle.

If she can debate us for a year showing she understands freedom, her claim -- albeit corrected to, I'm a libertarian -- can be considered. If she can debate us for a year showing she understands freedom and take what she learns about freedom to the air waves and to her books and articles, then her claim will be credible.

Your move, Ann.

School's fine. Just don't let it get in the way of thinking. -Me

Study nature, not books. -Walton Forest Dutton, MD, in his 1916 book whose subject is origin (therefore what all healing methods involve and count on), simple and powerful.

ipso facto "I am more of a _unt than anne


Aaron Russo, Nikola Tesla, Ron Paul, I'm jus' sayin'

I totally see that in you.

I totally see that in you.