10 votes

A Good Example of What We Are Up Against

I have been going back and forth with a liberal for two days on this Youtube thread.lol
I think this is a good example of what we are up against.
My posts are edthewaterguy.
Please feel free to help me enlighten this person.


Trending on the Web

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Well, Silverismoney, I and a few others

have tried. But that woman reminds me of the cartoon of a robot repeatedly bouncing off of a steel wall, because it's programming says there is an opening there. Some people will never learn, they have been programmed too well with falsehoods.

Yeah right.lol

Oh well we tried,I guess some people are just unreachable.
Thanks to all of you who tried to help her.

I just threw in a comment for you.

I happen to agree with you and not Judy***. So don't think my comment was against you. It probably will just make things worse, but you never know!

I guess Ronald Reagan was

I guess Ronald Reagan was right when he said “It isn't so much that liberals are ignorant. It's just that they know so many things that aren't so.”
Now I can really uderstand how difficult it is to get through to them.Very annoying and frustrating.

Cyril's picture

Thanks, but no thanks. I had DOUBLE DOSE already.

Dear OP :

I mean no offense, I'm just being very frank...

I had my DOUBLE DOSE already arguing with GROSS STATISTS and/or USEFUL IDIOTS who are STILL pushing for more big government.

I have done it on TWO CONTINENTS already, ever since the early '90s. I am close TO GAGGING IMMEDIATELY on sight by now, when faced with BRAINDEADS who can't read and use THEIR eyes, THEIR ears, and THINK BY AND FOR themselves.

And that'd be FOR A FREAKING CHANGE, DAMN IT. Because besides parroting about the pseudo-"good" of what's been debunked more than 150 years ago already (see link below)... they ARE INCAPABLE of doing anything else.

Or they don't try, anyway.

Oh, yes, something they can do: find always new ways to justify STEALING YOUR MONEY - at gun point, otherwise, that's not fun - FOR THEIR PLANS.

But, never mind if you like them or not. Never mind they don't provide any evidence they make sense, either.

So... sorry...

I AM REAAAAAALLY FED UP with trying to "save" those. So, IT IS OVER, AFAIC.

They can go to HELL or to FEMA camps, for what I care. I won't shed A SINGLE TEAR about THEIR misfortune.

Time is running out. I'm willing to spend time with those who are undecided or the indifferent. That's all.

As for the convicted statists, socialists: the TIME IS OVER.

Seriously, who STILL wants to wake up these RETARDS AND/OR FUTURE CRIMINALS IN OFFICES :



Uncompassionate? Nope. Jesus taught us to use our time and energy wisely with some people:

Mark 4:3-9.

But, if YOU still care about those, well, you can always drop them a line about Frederic Bastiat.

Do you think they have enough of a brain left functioning to type the URL in ? Hopefully, that's short enough:


'Hope this helps,

"Cyril" pronounced "see real". I code stuff.


"To study and not think is a waste. To think and not study is dangerous." -- Confucius

ecorob's picture

thom hartman is an arrogant, condescending, pompous...


and he can kiss mine...

screw thom hartman!

its 'cos I owe ya, my young friend...
Rockin' the FREE world in Tennessee since 1957!
9/11 Truth.


This guy misses the first pitch. He agrees that a child has an absolute right to food, clothing and a home. That is false in my world of liberty. No child (because I have none) has a right to my food, my clothing or my home. When you start from that premise, the entire argument disappears. I will concede that a state, county or local government has the authority to establish systems or laws to care for children in need and I have the right to accept, fight or vote with my feet on the issue. However, the federal government does not have the authority to give anyone, young or old, the absolute right to food, clothing and shelter, then force the burden on the back of an entire nation... and BTW, I am a compassionate person, by choice, and I like it that way.

"You are not what you think you are, but what you think............. you are".
-Earl Nightingale

ecorob's picture

A new born child has NO right to food and clothing...

Their parents, however, have an OBLIGATION to food, clothe, and shelter them.

The child, like their parents, have natural born rights to be free to pursue the fruits of liberty.

its 'cos I owe ya, my young friend...
Rockin' the FREE world in Tennessee since 1957!
9/11 Truth.

Does that include ...

"Their parents, however, have an OBLIGATION to food, clothe, and shelter them."

Does that include the obligation to place any baby with a name like Moses they can not protect in a Nile like river?

here's your trouble

"Yes, you are. By attacking the govt you are defending the corporations. The govt is all there is to protect us from the corporations. Sorry, you need to read up about how life was for the average person in the 1800s. Yeah, lots of "freedom", and lots of suffering too."

(I literally laughed out loud at this comment)

She isn't aware that the government is the parent company of the corporations she's worried about.

She is expecting the fox to guard her chickens.

Her problem seems to be that she has no grasp of the facts of her situation.

And herin lies the problem

And herin lies the problem with 99.9% of all liberals logic....

A nation of sheep breeds a government of wolves.


That is definitely a record thread for me.LOL

have her check the corp reports

look for the cross-pollination between govt and big corp - she'll never look for the real hidden truth, but you could at least show her the stuff that's wide out in the open. Like the revolving door between the Fed and Treasury.

However, she may not know that the Fed is one one of those "big corps" she fears. This one is definitely in a cocoon.