-24 votes

I'm Getting Really Sick of the "Paulites" on Here

I'm Getting Really Sick of the "Paulites" on Here

There are a lot of bandwagon posers on this site who try to claim ownership of the Liberty Truth movement but when a real issue that comes up on this site that is not mainstream news they try to dismiss it as "bad for the movement." Well I have news for you.

Look up the Fairness Doctrine that was repealed by the so called great president Reagan. Guess what. There hasn't been real news on mainstream television for probably over 30 years. We have been bamboozled folks by the government, the banks and the federal reserve to name a few. That is what Ron and Rand Paul are all about. They know what is going on but the genius of their game plan is that they don't come out and state the obvious.

Well now that we have freedom of information with the help of the internet we must look into the issues and sort them out and that means talking about conspiracies and the obvious lies. A conspiracy is just a hidden secret and our government hides many of them. So wake up and read all material even past Ron Paul and the liberty movement. Here is a list of topics and sites you should get familiar with:

Topics;

The Rockefellers
Chemtrails
GMOs / Monsanto
Fluoride
Aspartame
Cancer
Autism
Aids
Phony Wars
Big Pharma
JFK
UFOs
Hemp
Peak Oil
MK Ultra
Underground Cities/Tunnels
The Federal Reserve
HAARP
Tesla
9/11
Secret Societies
Skull and Bones
Illuminati
Jesuits
Bohemian Grove
Rosicrucians
Republican Fascism
Mars
The Moon
The Creature From Jekyll Island
TSA
FEMA camps

etc...

Sites:

www.infowars.com
www.http://lunaticoutpost.com/
http://www.projectcamelot.org/
http://www.intellectualodditiesnetwork.com/
http://beforeitsnews.com/
www.drudgereport.com
http://whatreallyhappened.com/
http://www.naturalnews.com/
http://rense.com/
http://tarpley.net/
http://www.zeitgeistmovie.com/
http://wearechange.org/

People: (look them up and watch them speak on youtube)

Kurt Kallenbach
Alex Jones
G. Edward Griffin
Graham Hancock
Jim Marrs
Jeff Rense
Webster G. Tarpley
Kerry Cassidy
Bill Ryan
Mike Rivero
Aaron McCollum
David Wilcock
Richard Dolan
Jordan Maxwell
Andy Lloyd
A'shayana Deane
Duncan O'Finioan
Steven Greer, Dr.
Sean David Morton
George Green
Nassim Haramein
Richard C. Hoagland

These topics and sites are all part of the movement people. Its time to wake up and end the selective programming caused by this site and its naysayers. Lets get started, most of you have a lot of reading and watching to do. And stay away from the shills like Fox news, CNN, MSNBC Glenn Beck, Jack Hunter and that disgrace to the human race, Ann Coulter.




Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

It's just the type of post in general

that, I believe, people are tired of. "I'm sick of _____."

Looking at the up-side of this thread: I like that you have HEMP in your "list of things you should know about." To me, HEMP is THEE KEY to get this Country to prosper again. Mainly, hemp seed oil to be used for our transportation needs.

I've preached this statistic so many times here but I don't think it can be said enough:

If we use 6% of our farmland to grow HEMP, we no longer need oil from any Country....ever.

If you don't know your rights, you don't have any.

Ummmm....

Why are people down voting this post? I don't get it

Enonesoch

Probably

because of that list he made.

People need to read the post first before giving it a minus

I think they just read the title and give it a minus rating

Pinky...

They aren't really part of the truth movement. Just posers.

I'm really sick of the people

I'm really sick of the people who are posting that they are really sick!

"Sick of being sick!"

- The Damned

WHO IS TO SAY WHAT THE "TRUTH" IS?

QUESTION EVERYTHING

"When the people fear the government, there is tyranny. When the government fears the people, there is liberty."

-Thomas Jefferson

I agree

I agree whole heartedly.

usblues11

fairness doctrine article

from one of your links:
Fairness Doctrine About As Fair as Patriot Act is Patriotic
http://www.infowars.com/articles/ps/fairness_doctrine_as_fai...

Isn't this www.dailypaul.com?

This site was started in support of a politician by people who supported his political philosophy.

If you want to post about anarchy or 9/11 truth or jailing the banksters so be it. But don't you dare attack people for wanting to foster a political movement to change the path of our government and to steer it toward furthering the cause of liberty for ourselves and the world. Everyone has their own concerns and personal causes.

If you don't like when people play politics then don't visit this site because it was and is primarily a site about politics and furthering the cause of liberty in American politics.

Railing against supporting liberty minded politicians on a site dedicated to a liberty supporting politician is a waste of your time.

Post away about 9/11 truth and CIA drug dealing and banksters. I actually enjoy some of it. But don't get pissed of when some people want nothing to do with it. Your attitude goes a long way toward making people uncomfortable in case you hadn't realized that yet.

I'd hope that this place would become a bit more civil and people would just ignore posts they are not interested in instead of attacking each other.

Is this in response to the post?

I thought is was actually motivational. Was there railing against liberty minded politicians? I got the sense that the post was intended to broaden one investagatory inclinations by listing some specific topics and specific people who may have a jump start on the research. I personally found nothing hurtful or harmful within the message of this post. Surely we are all here to expand the liberty movement, that is the foundation, is it not necessary to re-evaluate the 'truths' we been told and make sure they are truths for sure. I think it is part of a free mind to be able to reassess the 'known' to pull it apart and sever the false that has slipped in or been accumulated over time. Opinions and assertions of 'truth' have little value, truth is facts, only the facts are important. I, as the poster, also feel there is much to learn about these assertions given to us by authority, they need to be questioned until the facts are revealed. As important as the political side of the liberty movement is, this too is part of the freeing of the mind. We must break the chains imposed upon us by others or ourselves.

Enonesoch

I guess you don't support Ron Paul

I guess you don't support Ron Paul

I agree

You can't hide from the truth. Just because it is politically expedient to pretend 2+2=5 doesn't mean it does.. This movement was founded on truth, principles and ideas. How does an intellectual revolution flourish if ideas are maligned and shamed vs being considered with an open mind. It takes more than courage to wake people up, waking up requires the truth...and where would this community be without a healthy respect for the truth and the courage to proudly stand up to speak it?

Downvote this:

Pot cures cancer.

Simple Facts and Plain Arguments
A common sense take on politics and current events.

http://simplefactsplainarguments.blogspot.com

dont worry bro. most of these

dont worry bro. most of these people downvoting are paid. The other half of the so called truth seekers got lost along the way and found the tv again. keep up the good info.

They are paid? What do you

They are paid? What do you mean paid, as in I work an 8 hour day at my job and get a paycheck. Or get paid to downvote this? Cause I haven't gotten my money to for the downvote, so pay me!!!

"There hasn't been real news

"There hasn't been real news on mainstream television for probably over 30 years."

Actually, as of last week (my data entry is a little behind), there have been more than 9,000 real news stories on mainstream television in the last 30 years. For those who read, the numbers soar -- expect to move into the more than 810,000 range.

MSM version of real news is

MSM version of real news is entertainment fluff. Sure, if you consider what designer dress Mrs. Obama is wearing real news, then I guess you're right. I find more information and intelligent debate on our current state of affairs online than I find on the Tel-a-LIE-vision. It's not called the boob tube for nothing.

Oh, so you're getting muddle

Oh, so you're getting muddle up and confusing "real news" with puff pieces. I can only imagine the fix you're in if you're the sort that gets sucked into the pieces about presidential-wife-wear and can't drag your eyes away to the real-news. I encourage you to refuse to succumb to your metro-sexual tenancies. The real news stuff is there and available to anyone who isn't all fixated on Mrs. Obama's clothes.

The NY Times broke much of the drone program...and...um before the likes of Michelle-wardrobe-junkies were paying attention.

You assume a lot. I don't

You assume a lot. I don't watch the msm or the squawk box, for that matter. My IQ is the better for it. You also assume I am metrosexual, ha, ha I guess I can claim to be the first female described as such. You know what they say about people who assume too much? Don't make me say it.

You might feel content watching through all the fluff pieces, waiting to hear little tid bits and half truths passed off as news,, but, I have better things to do. I have questions that are not even being asked by our information gatekeepers. I want answers. Why isn't nbc reprting on all the "wars" we are involved in? Could it be because GE owns half of that network and recieves millions of dollars in defense contracts every month? Why isn't there more reprting on the sucidial/homicidial effects of certain pharmacueticals? Could it be these monolithic corporations don't want to lose their advertising revenue and kickbacks?

There is a close, on going interlock between big media and corporate america. With a little reseach, one can find media directors who also were former Senators or Representatives in the House such as Sam Nunn (Disney) and William Cohen (Viacom). Board members who served at the FCC such as William Kennard (New York Times) and Dennis FitzSimmons (Tribune Company) showing revolving door relationships with big media and U.S. government officials.

Only 118 people comprise the membership on the boards of director of the ten big media giants. These 118 individuals in turn sit on the corporate boards of 288 national and international corporations. Four of the top 10 media corporations share board director positions with the major defense contractors including:

William Kennard: New York Times, Carlyle Group

Douglas Warner III, GE (NBC), Bechtel

John Bryson: Disney (ABC), Boeing

Alwyn Lewis: Disney (ABC), Halliburton

Douglas McCorkindale: Gannett, Lockheed-Martin.

These ten big media organizations are the main source of news for most Americans. Their corporate ties should require us to continually scrutinize the quality of their news for bias.

Um...OK

If you call that real news.

I refer to it as a diversion to the real issues and propaganda.

Jeeeeeeeeezus. You think that garbage is real? WOW. You have a long journey to go on my friend. You can start with the info I provided below.

When was the last time you saw Brian Williams reporting on the NDAA, Obama's secret kill list and Obama's phony birth certificate?

RT news is more factual than ANY U.S. outlet and its owned by RUSSIA!!!!

Actually, the NY Times was

Actually, the NY Times was one of the first MSM to break the O-kill-list story.

MSM journalists have been killed, raped, jailed, maligned and lauded for their work. How dare you paint with such a broad brush. Shame on you to call the work of folks who have been killed and raped and incarcerated a diversion.

My hope

I dream RonPaul4Prez2012 is connected to RonPaulRetired2013

In Philly PA RichardKanePA

This is garbage

"Liberty Truth" movement?

Hey, if you want to talk 9/11 "truth," go to sites designed for it. We're way beyond the point of politely asking the hijackers (people who come into this movement to spread their other ideals and attempt to fuse them with Ron Paul, liberty, etc.). We had that polite discussion in 2007. We had it in 2008. We had it in 2010. And we had it in the recent election, even though it was clear that the folks who were still attempting to hijack were well aware of the consequences of their actions and the objections of most in the movement.

I no longer feel compelled to beg and plead that we stay focused. I view the "truthers" as bigger threats than our actual enemies. They inhibit the growth of our movement and refuse to prioritize their support for

So, yes. I WILL insult them, deride them, and publicly distance myself from them. I will make the "schism" very obvious so that people see that not everyone here is an Alex Jones lover or the like. I don't hate people for their other views, but I have zero respect for those who can't draw boundaries.

I take no sides here

because I only seek truth of nature itself and clearly understand that I will never complete the journey. Just felt compelled to say,

Self-evident logic and reason dictates that achieving our objective of returning to the rule of law and growing our influence is not based on divisive actions and exclusions but only by strategic clarity of how we can all work independently to achieve maximum inidividual freedom. There are many strategic aspects that have not been explored at all to date and if we are smarter than the infamous 'them' we would all understand how we could work independently to ensure liberty and justice for all.

IMHO we should find each others discrete strategic advantages and utilize our inherent diverse resources can be tapped into a favorable and prosperous way. It also seems that inherent wisdom and effectiveness will be found in trying define Law itself as in what is Lawful and what is not. If we discuss what is lawful and what is not and why then maybe we can use logic and reason to find our common ground and all of the current events can be taken as what it probably is, another perspective.

Food for thought.

The most powerful Law of Nature is Time. It is finite and we all will run out of it. Use this Law to your advantage, for it offers you infinite possibilities...

I take no sides here

because I only seek truth of nature itself and clearly understand that I will never complete the journey. Just felt compelled to say,

Self-evident logic and reason dictates that achieving our objective of returning to the rule of law and growing our influence is not based on divisive actions and exclusions but only by strategic clarity of how we can all work independently to achieve maximum inidividual freedom. There are many strategic aspects that have not been explored at all to date and if we are smarter than the infamous 'them' we would all understand how we could work independently to ensure liberty and justice for all.

IMHO we should find each others discrete strategic advantages and realize that our inherent diverse resources can be tapped into a favorable and prosperous way. It also seems that inherent wisdom and effectiveness will be found in trying define Law itself as in what is Lawful and what is not. If we discuss what is lawful and what is not and why then maybe we can use logic and reason to find our common ground and all of the current events can be taken as what it probably is, another perspective.

Food for thought.

The most powerful Law of Nature is Time. It is finite and we all will run out of it. Use this Law to your advantage, for it offers you infinite possibilities...

ecorob's picture

Let me know how that works out for you...

OK?

You will find that the 9/11 faithful here (those that KNOW the truth as shown by the undisputed evidence) will outnumber you by about 10 to 1.

We don't throw it up in your face. Newbies just waking up may still bring it up from time to time and we do encourage their growth and knowledge.

You, however, are the stupid looking one in the corner still spouting off your nonsense about 19 Arabs with box cutters and how a plane disintegrated into the Pentagon and into a previously dug out hole in Pennsylvania.

Go ahead, though. Whatever helps to you sleep at night.

But believe me, your insults and lack of knowledge, your puffed up chest proclaiming something out of nothing will get you NO WHERE in a room where the evidence is presented and debated.

That is, unless you have this grand new theory that changes the laws of physics.

Have a nice little day under your mushroom!

its 'cos I owe ya, my young friend...
Rockin' the FREE world in Tennessee since 1957!
9/11 Truth.

Keep spreading the nonsense, ecorob

1. Where did I ever defend the dominant 9/11 narrative? I didn't. I don't engage in liberty activism to debate what happened on that day. If you want to debate it, so be it. I'm not interested. I'm not saying you're wrong. I'm saying it's a losing issue. So enjoy being a loser, or smarten up and find a message that can resonate with voters.

2. If you want to show up at Ron Paul event or other liberty movement activism and spread "trutherism," you're a hijacker.

3. You can spread all the nonsense you want about how you think 90% of the people who frequent this site are "truthers." I not only dispute that, but can confidently assure you that it's irrelevant. Do you know why there's a greater proportion of "truthers" here than there are in the general population? Because people like you have annoyed and frustrated the regular folk who are just trying to live free and not blend their message with your hijacking agenda.

4. By the way, your cocksure manner of declaring that you "KNOW the truth" is one step away from delusion. You ought to just use a capital "T," walk around the streets in sandals spreading your dogma, and make your transformation complete.

Hit the Road Buddy

We don't need paid shills in here. Stay out of my threads...ummmmm kaaayyyyyy?????