11 votes

Clinton emails hacked and being released

Armed with confidential memos to Hillary Clinton that were stolen from the e-mail account of a former White House aide, a hacker has distributed some of the documents to a wide array of congressional aides, political figures, and journalists worldwide.

In a series of weekend e-mail blasts, the hacker known as “Guccifer” disseminated four recent memos to Clinton from Sidney Blumenthal, a longtime confidant of the former Secretary of State.

Read more



Trending on the Web

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

I call bullchit

Just some crap to promote this guy's site. Advise putting that website in the "bullchit" column. Oh what? Lookie here right in plain sight?

© 2013 TheSmokingGun.com
is part of Adult Swim and the
Turner-SI Digital Network.
All Rights Reserved.

Any questions? Every commenter below ought to be ashamed of themselves except 2 of them. 2 out of 8 people actually sourced the information which took me about two minutes. The rest seem to accept it as fact.

You all know LAME stream media is BS why do you believe anything you read on a website without doing your due-diligence?

Given that politicians are

Given that politicians are happy to have the NSA read our emails it's only fair that we should be able to read theirs.

Careful!

Guccifer might just be the new posterboy for whatever new internet censorship atempt these snakes try to save their skins. We keep the net and ourselves (kinda) free .... we will win. They cannot operate without secrecy, and or controlled press. Period.

Lame... Where's the

Lame... Where's the beef???
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ug75diEyiA0

“Any man who thinks he can be happy and prosperous by letting the government take care of him better take a closer look at the American Indian.” ― Henry Ford.

Okay

every commenter except you. Good job.

Just another of many examples of how incompetent she is/was.

She can't even manage to keep her own email safe and she is the Secretary of State for goodness sake with hundreds of uniformed DSS agents at her disposal.

I bet she keeps her password simple and writes it on the bottom of her laptop.

If she has dual-factor authentication she probably ordered it disabled because she was too stupid to manage and logon using changing codes.

You know she probably has some IT guy working for her who's sole/primary responsibility is to help her login to her PC and work around the standard authentication and encryption required by the job.

You mis-read. Didn't hack

You mis-read. Didn't hack her's hack Blumenthal's...

“Any man who thinks he can be happy and prosperous by letting the government take care of him better take a closer look at the American Indian.” ― Henry Ford.

She has been proven incompetent too.

.

We shall

see who, out of the supposed host of people and places Guccifer sent the memos, will have the cajones to release the contents.

When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign: that the dunces are all in confederacy against him. ~J. Swift

Either Or

Either this hacker has some very very damaging info derived from these emails, or, it is a setup of some sort to bring on more internet control.

Basically a sort of

Basically a sort of interesting story about a hacker, but no evidence whatsoever proving he hacked Clinton's email. Where was the proof? Why didn't the guy release that stuff to Wikileaks?

Cyril's picture

Also, I'd remark that nobody really needs a hacker

Also, I'd remark that nobody really needs a hacker to dig up more nasty stuff about the sociopaths and psychopaths in charge in the USA over the last couple decades. Private correspondences or not.

It's in plain view:

http://youtu.be/Fgcd1ghag5Y

http://youtu.be/FbIX1CP9qr4

Etc, etc.

"Cyril" pronounced "see real". I code stuff.

http://Laissez-Faire.Me/Liberty

"To study and not think is a waste. To think and not study is dangerous." -- Confucius

Excellent CRITICAL thinking.

Okay you are exonerated from my chastising comment above.

Probably because wikileaks is a honeypot

That draws well-intentioned whistleblowers in to slaughter - and anything of real significance is never to be seen.

If true (and you've provided

If true (and you've provided no evidence supporting this accusation), then where is the "next" Wikileaks? You know, the next in line that inevitably pops up in response to a crackdown?