1 vote

Five examples of things covered up by false charges of racism

This post contains examples of how to use charges of racism to cover up the worst sort of crimes. Five recent news articles about “things that never happen” are included. Ron Paul is an anti-Semite (who is actually a Federal Reserve detractor and not a racist at all, is an example everyone on this forum is familiar with). Racism! Bigotry! The worse sort of thinking! Don’t listen to that!

Hitler was alleged to have used similar techniques, called the big lie, to cover up charges of crimes he was committing – you simply say they are lies of your political enemies, and something like that cannot possibly happen – and then people are suppose to believe it. Similar denials of the worst sort of scandals can be found in any type of man made, worldly institution or religion. Wrong doing and wickedness is not unique to one part of mankind.

The five examples below are of the big lie technique being used to cover up Jewish racism and are all examples from the last 10 years or so, and all are typically things that have in the past been denied by some with statements like “A Jewish person could never do such a thing – no Jew would”, “these are the lies of our political enemies – ala Hitler”, etc. Since when does being a member of a race mean crimes can never occur?

I've included stories about pedophile behavior and child abuse from Judaism, witchcraft by Rabbis following the Cabala, Ritualistic murder, Jewish censorship and slander of a famous person, and racist and religious bigotry in Israel. All are relatively recent examples from mainstream media, and most of it seems to stem from Judaism and particularly Rabbis – 1st article is a story about a particular Rabbi, the 2nd is a group of Rabbis performing an occult spell, the 3rd stems from a murder by a Rabbi, the 4th are Jews being egged on by Rabbis, etc. The last article you could just attribute to traitorous behavior of the worst degree.


1. Circumcision herpes Rabbi Story, September 2, 2012.

You might be told that Judaism would never support pedophile rapes of kids, and here is a story where a Rabbi is giving babies herpes because his method of circumcision children is to chew their penis off apparently.

It seems as bad or worse than any of the statements I ever heard about Judaism supporting sex with babies – which BTW is true, the Talmud says in many places sex with babies under the age of three is ok.

While it is true that many other institutes have been found to be involved in pedophile behavior, all of which is despicable– such as the Roman Catholic scandal, it isn't part of their doctrine to rape little kids (although I am opposed to many of their doctrines, they don’t have a “rape kids” doctrine). Judaism on the other hand DOES have a rape kids doctrine. It's in the Talmud. It seems worse.

2. Judaic ritualistic murder spell in graveyard, June 26, 2005.

I kept on hearing as I was growing up that this or that particular allegation or account couldn't possibly be true because it involves rabbis meeting in secret in a graveyard, "which they would never do", and so it’s obvious made up.

Then I read the news article linked above where a bunch of prominent Rabbis are meeting in secret in a graveyard, in Israel, to cast a Caballistic occultic death spell?!!! So here Rabbis are doing “that which they would never do”. Close your eyes, and repeat after me --

This group seems to have killed their last prime minister by assassination after casting one of these “spells”. And this prime minister mentioned in the above article was apparently poisoned after this article was published. (Jewish witchcraft rituals = assassination apparently). So that's two assassinations of high ranking Israel officials by other Jews, hardly harmless.

The paper, WND, is known as being extremely pro-Israel and neocon centered. WND participated in it – ““We are making what we have done public now because you are not supposed to curse a deaf person. You can’t curse someone who doesn't know what you did and can’t hear you”. Publication is apparently part of the cursing, and oddly again, not supernatural.

This one totally disgusted me, not just because of what they did, but because WND pretends to be completely against the occult, and here, they are for it and helping.

3. Censorship of books about Judaism, June 6, 2001.
Sir Richard Francis Burton: was there a literary crime after his death?
On killing your own children – from the Talmud:

I first became aware of this on two fronts. I researched Richard Burton because he was a character in a famous science fiction book – (Riverworld). I also came across it in a different direction researching the occult – since all roads in western witchcraft seem to be entwined with Jewish witchcraft (Although it certainly is true that things like human sacrifice have existed in all societies (but “a Jewish person would never do that” sic).

Richard Burton was a famous explorer and writer of the Arabian Nights. Was the first white man to enter Mecca, He had consular duties with the British empire. Explorer. Considered too descriptive and frank by some. Libertine, probably a precursor to modern anthropologists. Expert in strange religions and sexual rituals.

One of his books was called The Jew, the Gypsy and El Islam. It wasn't written specifically about Jews, but it was censored because he wrote about a ritualistic murder of a priest by a Jewish Rabbi. He was in the best possible position in the world to write about it. He was a consular in Damascus. He was a famous explorer. He was an expert in strange oriental rituals already. He as widely known as being truthful, but a little too frank (and he probably wasn't someone of my political stripe – too liberal). But he’s credible. In a good position to write about this.

Some Jewish groups censored the book. Some people think he and his wife may have been murdered over it. That there were attempts to obtain it before it disappeared. The censored book is missing the parts about ritualistic murder – and the published book says they are in an appendix to be published later. This turned out to be false apparently, the publisher removed them and it was part of the flow of the book originally not removed to an appendix. By 1909, the “Board of Deputies of British Jews” had finally seized the manuscript in a scurrilous lawsuit. And there it remained in secret, “not really existing”, until it reappeared in 2001 at an auction from the Jewish organization that held it!

So much for not really existing all that time. This is one of onerous cases of censorship of our times, and it impugns the character of one of the great English explorers. It should be noted that we still have many of the original witness statements of the ritualistic murder – and there is no doubt that that is what happened – the witnesses collaborated the same facts independently of each other.

So a great Explorer who was the consular of Damascus, has to be impugned and his book censored because “No jew would ever commit a ritualistic murder”. Every other race has at one time or another, but no Jewish person can ever??. The old testament is filled with examples of Jewish people doing that - and God condemning them for it. Also, btw - the original murder was covered up in part by a Rothschild. It seems likely that the Rothschild’s were also responsible for covering up the book that came out later.

4. Spitting on priests, getting rid of New Testament, November 04, 2011.
Ultra-Orthodox spitting attacks on Old City clergymen becoming daily

Israel is certainly not a western style democracy. They discriminate against others by race and religion – which is not western style government. Over half of them are formerly from the Soviet Union, and Israel has been at least as much a socialist country as a western one – with internal inflation on banana republic levels in the 80s.

This article shows that they don’t just mistreat Arabs. A Jewish ACLU member was quoted when this came out, that he was totally opposed to this (as a liberal Jew). Same guy wrote in one of his books a few years before that they needed to get rid of the New Testament. So the book burnings and spitting attacks, and other forms of racial and religious discrimination in Israel is not just orthodox Jews.

5. Office of Special Plans and Anthrax attacks, September 11, 2001 onward.
(New York Times, Marueen Dowd, Sept 15, 2012 – Dowd is a democrat).

You can research this as much as you want, and it boils down to one thing: So many people got caught spying for Israel and making up information in the office of special plans in various scandals – and you can spend weeks following this in old news stories, researching every person, that you can come to no other conclusion than the office of special plans was an Israel spy ring.

The anthrax attacks changed the narrative of the 9-11 attacks from “they attacked us” to “they attacked us and Israel” – see the actual note linked above. This is entirely in keeping with the statement by the Project for the New American Century made before the attacks about needing something like pearl harbor to further their own plans. And regardless of whether you believe 9-11 was caused by the same people, or used after the fact, the anthrax attacks did not come from Arabs. They came from traitors in our own government, as we now know (See Glen Greenwald articles over the years at Saloon for instance).

And the anthrax used in those attacks could not have been made in a week after the attack to take advantage of the 9-11 attack. News articles said at the time it would take at least a year to make. So it required PRIOR KNOWLEDGE of the 9-11 attacks, and it came from our own government labs.

Trending on the Web

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Can't help seeing an AP story

Can't help seeing an AP story right now is trying to link inforwars to terrorists and the "protocols of the elders of zion"!??!. You know the entire story line in the media is completely without merit when you see charges like that, so I thought I'd bump this thread.

The primary way the protocols of the elders of Zion has been debunked in the past is the claim that "a bunch of Jewish elders would never meet in a graveyard to plan something"! So it is clearly false!

However, one of the recent news stories above has Jewish elders meeting in a graveyard. Yes, weird, but we're dealing with a bunch of satanists.

I do not believe the protocols of the elders of Zion is accurate. However, the way it was usually discredited in the past is not true. Kaballah practicing Jews really do meet in graveyards. They plotted two different assassinations of Israel leaders in them according to the above.

And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes and our sacred honor.


This is by far the stupidest thing I have ever seen on the dailypaul. It seems like it was written by a fourth grader. Poster needs to grow up and focus on things that occur in reality.

Which of the links to major

Which of the links to major newspaper articles from the last ten years are you decrying?

They are *all* centered around articles from 2001 and on. They are reported facts from major media outlets. I didn't write them. They aren't on someone's blog.

If you want to call the New York Times, the New York Post, a paper from Israel, the Worldnetdaily, etc, as writers of "bad things that sound like fourth graders", why?

And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes and our sacred honor.

ecorob's picture

Knowledge is Power. Grow strong, my friends.

Attack the messenger never gets old, does it?

its 'cos I owe ya, my young friend...
Rockin' the FREE world in Tennessee since 1957!
9/11 Truth.

Actually, this is an

Actually, this is an improvement. They use to send in people to mark posts down for various posters and all sorts of topics on Daily Paul, but that became too obvious to many people, so they try to maintain equilibrium - at zero - marginalization. The goal is to *not* (directly) attack the messenger, now.

On Daily Paul, what you need to watch for is posts with high volume of readers ups and downs, which somehow comes out exactly equal. Not likely of course, but from one point of view, better than making it too obvious.

Of course, any thread that is well researched on any topic that contains information that is usually censored - will get upvoted by information junkies. So if the only reason for a downvote is censorship - and it's a liberty loving site, something is wrong.

And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes and our sacred honor.