16 votes

Bill Maher To Liberals In California "You could actually lose me"




Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Cyril's picture

LMAO !

LMAO !

Is it just my impression, or Bill Maher doesn't quite realize that he might very well hear from them shortly something along the lines of:

... "Well, get lost, then.

You're on our list already, anyway."

http://www.dailypaul.com/278882/southern-poverty-law-center-...

Welcome to the club, Bill !

"Cyril" pronounced "see real". I code stuff.

http://Laissez-Faire.Me/Liberty

"To study and not think is a waste. To think and not study is dangerous." -- Confucius

My sister works as an

My sister works as an independent contractor and makes maybe 1% of what Bill Maher does, and she complains about high federal taxes, while living in New Hampshire which doesn't have an income tax. But she keeps pulling the lever for Democrats. Even in the general presidential election, when pro-peace, pro Bill of Rights, fiscally responsible Gary Johnson was on the ballot.

Some people deserve what they get, but sometimes they deserve to get what they force other people to get.

By "lose me" he means:

He'll move away. He doesn't even pretend to oppose the agenda, merely the idea of living in the slumscape his liberal agenda creates.

Liberals? Republicans? Will Rogers on Politics, 1931.

5 minutes. Farce or Folly. Liberals? Democrats? VS Conservatives? Republicans? Bgets? War?unemployment? A man willing & able has got to work.

Disclaimer: Mark Twain (1835-1910-To be continued) is unlicensed. His river pilot's license went delinquent in 1862. Caution advised. Daily Paul

Bill who?

*yawn*

Resist the temptation to feed the trolls.

Well worth time to look. Many paths beckon.

Pursue sound money & honest worth. Sound mind & body with all due respect.

Disclaimer: Mark Twain (1835-1910-To be continued) is unlicensed. His river pilot's license went delinquent in 1862. Caution advised. Daily Paul

so tell us please, Bill

how much is an acceptable percentage to take from the tax payer without consent?

50% too high? how about 40?....30? 20, 10, 5?

The fact of the matter is, that if it's 1%, then it can be 2, then 3, then 4,5,6 or 100%

Slavery is slavery regardless of the percentage.

If you don't want to be a part of society; GTFO.

You're "free" to do a lot of things, including not paying your taxes, but your neighbors have the right to form a government and serve justice. They've fought and died for that right, offering up their lives and treasure, and you have a right to leave.

Go to wherever it is that Anarchists are welcomed into society...

If I could write any law, one of the first would be to make sure Anarchists are free to renounce their citizenship and flee their state and country without penalty. You can opt out, but make sure when you do, you GET OUT! I'm sick to death of listening to Anarchists saying taxation is theft.

You had a chance to debate taxation and the proper role of government, and you were too busy screaming about taxation being theft. Extortion is theft, but those who'll extort you in Anarchy won't even pretend to give a damn what you think, or how it is your society will use collective force to keep the peace.

Molon Labe

.

Molon labe

"come and take it" - No problem whatsoever.

If you won't pay your taxes, justice will be served. No problem. That's what justice is for, using collective force against guys like you who thought they could Molon Labe and destroy what they did't understand.

The rest of us will Molon Labe Freeloader, because you wouldn't GTFO, and you wouldn't let your failed ideology move your feet.

If Voluntarism is what you want, I say voluntarily leave before you face justice.

I think you are on the wrong site

Your ignorance is something to behold.

This is why you fail

"Your ignorance is something to behold."

What am I ignorant of? I'm not ignorant to justice, and YOU won't be either should you not pay your taxes. I know you don't like it, but since all you can do is call taxation theft and people ignorant, I don't see that changing anytime soon.

Molon Labe. Oh that's right, but you need a mob to do your fighting for you. Mob up Captain Stateless and you'll just end up getting used and destroyed.

It really is a loving act to tell you to "get out" rather than "opt out". Somebody telling you to "opt out" and to not pay your taxes doesn't know wtf they're talking about, or else they do, and just want you to face justice for being what you are. (That's called being ignorant and being a Judas Goat)

you fail

It's not a game to me Anarchist.

I LOVE that Anarchists can do nothing except hit that little thumbs down button. It still won't change objective reality or save you from justice if you stop paying your taxes.

Ouch... Anarchists thumbed me down for not accepting Taxation is theft. Perhaps you'd stand some chance if you dropped that kinda crap? There IS taxation that's theft, but trying to paint all taxation as theft makes your opinion irrelevant.

did you even read that link?

.

Yes.

It's still a tax, and like I said, I have no problem taxing society to pay to defend the liberty of those who make up that society.

Freedom, liberty, and their common defense.

In Anarchy, why would I collect your taxes? Screw your taxes. Taxes are theft.

Trouble is... when did any of

Trouble is... when did any of us, even you, give permission for this government to claim ownership to all of this land and the people on it? "GTFO" implies that the land belongs to you. Does a government own land when it forces the previous occupants out by force? Or does it own land when it simply forces people living on it to submit? If the entire planet existed under a single dictatorship, would you be telling people to "GTFOTP" (Get the @#*% off the planet), because the ruler you allowed to own you must own everyone?

Power to the people.

"GTFO implies that the land belongs to you."

IT does. Power to the people. People have a right to form a government. Like I just said, they fought and died offering their lives, treasure, and sacred honor opposing people like you who want to buy and sell collective violence freely so you can play warlord of the flies.

If you have a problem with that, win the debate, but you can't because all you want to do is destroy something you don't have the right to destroy, and should you try, you'll face justice, and not because of some shadowing menace, but because you failed to recognize that people have the right to self determination.

The whole world has agreed that government is better than Anarchy, and since so many people here advocate voluntarism, I say let them put their lives where their ideas left them.

If you won't pay your taxes, either GTFO, win the debate, or pick up a gun tin soldier.

"you failed to recognize that

"you failed to recognize that people have the right to self determination."

By your measure, individuals do not have any right to self determination. Only the collective does.

So people have the right to "self determination" so long as it aligns with the majority of the group... which means they, as individuals, have no right whatsoever to anything, right? Let me ask you... whose rights does the Bill of Rights serve to protect? The "majority's"?

"all you want to do is destroy something you don't have the right to destroy"

Actually... the founders were quite clear that people have the right to destroy any system that no longer serves them.

"IT does. Power to the

"IT does. Power to the people."

So... the collective of "people" own it all? There's a term for that.

Your argument is full of

Your argument is full of contradictions. How are the "people" who form a government different from the warlords you castigate in another post?

All people did not form a government. A few people did. Then they gave themselves "divine" right to rule the rest of us. They even let us "vote" between tweedledum and tweedledee just so we feel like we have a say in the matter. We don't have a say. It is safe to say that your one vote has never swayed an election. When you equate a few people with all people, you are nothing better than a useful idiot.

There is nothing noble or divine about majority rule. It is mob rule writ large. It is a stampede of the masses trampling over the top of any who question or object.

"...people have the right to self determination." Unless, of course, they choose a different path than you and others in your kool-aid government cult have determined as the proper path. Stop being a mindless sycophant for big government power.

Sounds like Anarchy to me. Sucks aye?

"Your argument is full of contradictions. How are the "people" who form a government different from the warlords you castigate in another post?"

They succeed while Anarchists fail.

"When you equate a few people with all people, you are nothing better than a useful idiot. "

There will always be people like you Anarchist. It's not about "all the people". What matters is those willing to fight and defend what they believe in, and the world is living proof that Anarchism loses in the fight against those who chose government.

"There is nothing noble or divine about majority rule. It is mob rule writ large. It is a stampede of the masses trampling over the top of any who question or object."

Sounds like Anarchy to me. Sucks aye?

Democracy sucks too, and as you know, this isn't a Democracy. We can ignore the people who scream about all taxation being theft. They aren't worth listening to, and we have a system worked out to deal with them called justice.

"Unless, of course, they choose a different path than you and others in your kool-aid government cult have determined as the proper path. Stop being a mindless sycophant for big government power."

Like I said: Don't opt out, GET OUT freeloader.

You're free to choose another path, and I suggest you choose a path that leads you far far away. Do it! LEAVE before justice catches up to you.

You are nothing but a thug.

You are nothing but a thug. You apparently believe that might makes right. Nonsense. Your defense of government is immoral and offensive. News flash for you: You are not part of the "we" who determine what rules are made and enforced. You are a sucker for those who want to run your life.

Why do "liberals" have to be pro-taxes in the 1st place?

I'm socially liberal but fiscally conservative.

But unlike Bill Maher I don't pretend one of the two parties/factions represents me.

I think "liberals" are willing to pay taxes for social programs but no one wants their hard earned money to be wasted, no matter who you are.

If liberals are willing to

If liberals are willing to pay for social programs, no force (taxation) is necessary for them to do so. That's what I've never understood about the mindset. If people vote in support of a social program, then the majority of people must support the idea of paying for that program. If the majority of people simply paid willingly for said program, it would flourish.

I can't disagree with much of that but

there is a role in people coming together as a community (like our founders intended) and work towards the good of the people.

What if a small city pooled their money together through taxes and let citizens have free healthcare? That would be "socialism" but on a very local level.

Maybe a small clinic with a network of doctors and nurses paid modestly through deregulation, and detach any medical-industrial-complex ties to the medical center...that would be a good start!

I mean if everyone needs healthcare, then why not take the profit out of it and care for your common man?

If you don't like it, then you don't have to live there.

lol. Bill Maher goes the way of will smith.

50% tax is just ridic. I complain about paying 30%< tax. Luckily my state has no income tax. Although I get dinged pretty good on property tax.

Good, be gone! And, ...

don't let the door slam on your a$$. Either way, you won't be missed.

I was just about to make the same comment.

Hey Maher! Get out of our state and get off the air!