33 votes

Ann Coulter not supporting Rand 2016, says he just wants to legalize weed and give amnesty for illegals

Trending on the Web

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Political tactics wise...

...she is sending good advice. Siding with the neocons on Amnesty will wreck his chances.

One should always be against the neocons.

Longtime Internet Poster

she is a twit

shes a wanna-be G.O.P. gatekeeper psyop

nuff said

"He's this eccentric Ghandi-Like figure that you cant touch with the normal bribes that people respond to."
the man Doug Wead on DR. RON PAUL

I just can't get over how long it's actually taking

the sheeple to figure out that REAL women don't have Adam's apples...

not that there's anything wrong with it as who among us had any hand or control, in deciding how we were born or look like? but, if your professional schtick is to demonize those born that way, got no respect for ya.

the only word that comes to mind anytime I hear that nasal turd rag?

word that rhymes with aunt.

Predictions in due Time...

"Let it not be said that no one cared, that no one objected once it's realized that our liberties and wealth are in jeopardy." - Dr. Ronald Ernest Paul

Just how ARE you pronouncing

Just how ARE you pronouncing AUNT?

In other words, Ann is

In other words, Ann is supporting herself in 2016, 2017, 2018 ...(u get the picture). After all, she must be ...at one time or another she's publicly supported or opposed almost every major candidate for POTUS including Obama ...that is, if it helped her get on the next talk show. HMMMM, what stupid sh*t can I say today that will help me and my publists with my marketing efforts???

Her M.O is to be the "shock

Her M.O is to be the "shock jock/contrarian" of the (so-called) conservative movement to get her own name out there. Of course, almost none in the media call her on the fact that these continued performances have almost no consistancy and are, in fact, contradictory to previous statements. She's for Ron Paul one minute. For Chrisy Christie the next minute, and against Rand the next. In short, she is and has always been a self promoting media harlet trying to get her next paycheck. Nothing to see here move along.

Why is she the vanguard for traditional, conservative values?

I just find it rather strange that a 50 something year old woman who has never married, never had children, and regularly says some rather obnoxiously un-Christian things tries to spearhead as a culture warrior. And people actually listen to her? I bet she's secretly a dominatrix for Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Glen Beck etc.

This phenomena

This phenomena that you correctly point out with Ann Coulter is right up there with WHY 50 Shades of Grey sells like hot cakes to Baby Boomer Women. I swear that generation has issues.

marijuana, prohibtion and personal freedom

The federal government comes and overrules a state that has legalized marijuana to be used for very sick people. aids and cancer and they are getting some help. Federal government comes in puts people in prison who are sick because they are using it for medical reasons and they have never committed a violent crime. That is how absurd the war on drugs has become. The governments role should not be involved in personal habits. Those rules should protect children who are below the age of making good judgement. So no problem with state laws that would protect children from the use of these drugs. Under the constitution the president and the federal government would not have a say in it. all governments should be out of the marriage question. It is not a state function it is a religious function. There was a time when only churches dealt with marriage and they determined what it was. For 100 years or so ago for health reasons they claimed that the state would protect us if we knew more about our spouses and we did health testing and you had to get a license to get married. The war on drugs which has caused the war on drugs to go up and we treat them as criminals rather than sick people. we have pushed a lot of people into prostitution. Prostitution is related to the mistakes we have made in the drug war. People make bad choices in religion and philosophy but we do not regulate their thinking or their religious beliefs if they are not harming other people. That is why individuals should protect themselves. Governments can not protect them from themselves. It is just impossible otherwise they become just a tyrannical state.


Not sure we'd want her

support at any rate!

"Be kind, for everyone you meet is fighting a hard battle." - Anonymous

Did anyone expect her to

Did anyone expect her to support Rand Paul? She's much more likely to support Lindsey Graham.

You mean LindSHE Sham


She is!

Right, that is.


Why do we care what a pornstar thinks?

EDIT: I just discovered she isn't a porn star! Whats going on?

-quiet engineer

illegal aliens

California is a prime destination for illegal aliens escaping the Arizona crackdown. The word is out that this is a sanctuary state ever since the California Supreme Court overturned the citizen initiative to cut off welfare, medical benefits and public education access to illegals. Mexican illegal immigrants have not only created the largest gangs here, but have also formed radical political organizations such as Aztlan, La Raza, and Mecha intent on fomenting revolution and retaking California. They are also driving many blacks out of the inner cities so they can take over.


Mexicans need to go back

to Mexico!

illegal immigration in California

There is a lot potential crime and racial or social unrest in California. Although large black populations in La are slowly being displaced by Latinos, the potential of a Watts-like riot is still there. Increasingly, it is the militant Latinos that are pushing the envelope of law enforcement tolerance. Population densities exacerbate crime and the Bay Area Metro is fairly dense with 1,100 ppl/sq. mi, but it pales with the 7,068 ppl/sq. mi. in the La basin, which is the most densely populated metro area in the Us. Personal safety is compromised from both sides as crime increases and the ever expanding list of banned weapons threatens your ability to defend yourself. The cost of living is high and housing costs are still to high even after declining one third their boom time values.


Buh-bye Ann

Even the conservatives/neocons aren't listening to you anymore. Hope you enjoyed the ride.

"Make the lie big, make it simple, keep saying it, and eventually they will believe it." -- Joseph Goebbels

Sad . . .

Sadly . . . she's either corrupt or dumb. Either way, she really seems to hate it that people might be free.


She can be both...

...corrupt and dumb; and, she is.


Both has my vote, too.

Ron Paul convert from the Heart of Dixie

She's Not Even Correct

Yeah it's not like he wants to cut government spending or anything. It's not like he wants to protect gun rights. Ensure constitutional fidelity. Nah, just pot and illegals.

What an idiot Coulter is.

Legalizing Weed/Hemp is a good thing

The drug war isn't getting us anywhere.

She's a buffoon.

Rand will lose the transvestite vote

Since their role model is not supporting him.

Natural Order

After reading that comment

After reading that comment online I contacted the person who posted this comment who lives in the suburbs of Houston Texas and went to the suburbs of Houston Texas and talked to the illegal immigrants there and observed them doing what he said they were doing and by talking to them and observing them I learned exactly what he said in that comment online. That is how I know for sure it is true. I verified the facts for myself. The problem is that massive immigration destroys identity. You need to get rid of the subsidies. We subsidize illegal immigration. We reward it with easy citizenship either birthright or amnesty. We Force our states and our local communities to pay for the healthcare and pay for education. Why wouldn’t they bring their families. We wouldn’t have so many illegal immigrants there if they didn’t know they were going to get amnesty. You promise them amnesty. You promise them no sweat you can get medical care, free education, automatic citizenship, food stamps, and social security you are going to get more of it. We could be much more generous with our immigration. We do not need illegal immigration. We don’t need to reward people who get in front of the line. There is a lot of jobs here that go missing, and some of the workers that come over here provide a great service but I would like to get it out of the area of illegality, and providing a free service. We have always had workers come to this country but they have to be legal. We have to deal with the welfare state. We cant allow the illegal immigrants to qualify for social security after working here for 18 months. We just flat out cant afford it. People are hurting they cant keep up, with paying their bills. When they see people in line using food stamps, they’ll be in the emergency rooms, they will demand bilingual education in the schools, and the costs are going up, school taxes go up. We should get rid of the incentives and work for a real solution which means you do it legally and you have a healthy economy, and we would probably have a lot of people come in back and forth working in this country. There was a time when we had just workers coming back and forth. That was when they didn’t expect to get easy amnesty. Because of our economic conditions we do need workers, but if we had a truly free market economy the illegal immigrants would not be the scapegoat. We would probably need them and they would be acceptable. But because of economic conditions they have become the scapegoat. You cant solve this problem of illegal immigration as long as you have the runaway welfare state, excessive spending and the wiping out of the middle class through inflation because that is what directs the hostility is people are hurting. And then when we have all these mandates on the hospitals and on our schools and no wonder the incentives are there. The incentive for a lot of our people not to work because they can get welfare, and then there is a lot of incentive because they know they are going to get amnesty. They gave it to the illegals in the 80s. And they put mandates on the states to compel them to have medical care. Then you say that is compassion. But what happens if the hospital closes, and then the people here in this country dont get medical care. Our hospitals are literally closing in Texas because they cant afford the free healthcare, and the free education. So you cant divorce it from the economics. You have to get rid of the incentives. No amnesty, and no sourced benefits because obviously they will bring their families, and it just wont work if you try to see this in a vacuum and you have to deal with it as a whole, as an economic issue as well. If they come for welfare benefits then you know they are illegal then yes deny them the benefits and if they commit a crime send them home. When you know they are there. Today in many cities you are not allowed to ask their immigrant status. You know it might be on the forum. The policeman told me dont ask that question. Well they cant ask that question to find out if they are illegal. It would be breaking the law they are arrested. It is politically incorrect to ask a person their immigrant status because that would say well if you are breaking the law maybe you should go home. I get a little worried when we talk about the tamper proof id for illegals who are immigrants because how do you do that. Anyone who is a immigrant or looks like an immigrant would have to have an id and then you cant discriminate so everybody is going to have an id. I think it is opening the door for the national id. We should be very careful about that. Fortunately our foreign policy has been designed to spend money and making our efforts protecting borders between North and South Korea between Syria and Iraq i dont think we should be involved in. Besides you know some of our border gaurds are out in iraq, I think they would be better of on our borders you know protecting our borders not in iraq so yes I think we have to deal with it if we dont deal with it carefully yeah we are going to lose some votes on it but quite frankly the law is the law and we should enforce the law.


Cultural conflicts will always be with us

They only become a serious threat to national solidarity when they combine within a single social welfare state that pits various ethnic groups against one another in the pursuit of their share of the productive pie. Even the Us has moved in that dangerous direction. When Cultural differences are to pronounced, integration becomes impossible. That is why it is better for many cultures to stay relatively separate and homogenous. Studies have shown a base culture can absorb up to 10 percent of another diverging culture without to much conflict, but when the invading culture begins to compete for dominance and majority rule, conflict is certain and violent. Look at Palestine, the Balkans and Europe.


Another one

for disposal list...

"Sturmbannfuhrer" Coulter

You are out of uniform!

Ron Paul on illegal immigration

Ron Paul’s six point plan puts a stop to illegal immigration:
Physically secure our borders and coastlines. We must do whatever it takes to control entry into our country before we undertake complicated immigration reform proposals.
Enforce visa rules. Immigration officials must track visa holders and deport anyone who overstays their visa or otherwise violates U.S. law. This is especially important when we recall that a number of 9/11 terrorists had expired visas.
No amnesty. Estimates suggest that 10 to 20 million people are in our country illegally. That’s a lot of people to reward for breaking our laws.
No welfare for illegal aliens. Americans have welcomed immigrants who seek opportunity, work hard, and play by the rules. But taxpayers should not pay for illegal immigrants who use hospitals, clinics, schools, roads, and social services.
End birthright citizenship. As long as illegal immigrants know their children born here will be citizens, the incentive to enter the U.S. illegally will remain strong. [Current U.S. citizens will not be affected. Instead, babies born to illegals after a future cutoff date will no longer gain automatic U.S. citizenship. They will still have citizenship in their parents' home countries.]
Pass true immigration reform. The current system is incoherent and unfair. But current reform proposals would allow up to 60 million more immigrants into our country, according to the Heritage Foundation. This is insanity. Legal immigrants from all countries should face the same rules and waiting periods.
Ron Paul on immigration: http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=OfJFc...


I heartily agree with ending birthright citizenship

for the children of illegal aliens. However, I am in favor of rescinding such citizenship retroactively, not just disallowing it after a future cutoff date.