5 votes

Is there any recourse against SCOTUS making unconstitutional rulings?

Is there any remedy /legal sanction available against SCOTUS if they make unconstitutional rulings?

Let's say 90% of the population disagreed with a law and a ruling, could anything be done about it?

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Options exist.

Historically the first effort to undue an unconstitutional law was in response to the Alien and Sedition Act of 1798 which was signed into law by John Adams who had learned that citizens were criticizing him when he was President.

Thomas Jefferson and James Madison wrote the Kentucky Resolves and the Virginia Resolves which are spelled out on Wikipedia. Essentially they hold that the states could interpose themselves between the central government and the citizens by declaring the law to be unconstitutional. This was also done regarding the Fugitive Slave Act of 1850 and on other occasions.

As we speak thirty some odd states are working to enact legislation to prevent citizens from being forced to purchase health insurance which would render the Patient Protection and Affordability Act from being viable and might lead to its repeal.

Check out the www.tenthamendmentcenter.com

Read Tom Wood's book Nullification

From now on attend debates among those running for office at the state and federal levels and ask them what they are going to do to keep their oath of office. Ask them what their understanding is of Article 1 Section 8 and what the founders had in mind.

read Atlas Shrugged and go on to read Ayn Rand's The Objectivist Newsletter, Capitalism:The Unknown Ideal and The Virtue of Selfishness.

Support www.YAL.org and www.SFL.org

No Man's need constitutes an obligation on the part of another man to fulfill that need.

Is there any reason People

Is there any reason People could not draft and ratify by popular conventions in the several states a new constitution at any time to expressly eliminate and prohibit rogue branches or agencies of government?

None that I can think of

but trying to get it ratified - especially with all those blue states, would be quite a feat.
Madison et all just had to convince 9 of 13 states, we'd need what? 38? or 37... my math isn't very good. And who gets to choose the reps to the conventions? Madison was duping the reps by saying there was a convention to amend the AoC... how many would have shown up if it was known that he was going to introduce a brand new document called a 'Constitution'?
There are people in this country who don't even know where states are located let alone can name all 50 states. I think education needs to be revived and spread first before anything like that is attempted.

Here's a game for you!
http://www.sheppardsoftware.com/states_experiment_drag-drop_...

If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land, it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy.
James Madison

It's called nullification!

It's called nullification!

But doesn't the State government

have to start the nullification process? What recourse do the people have if they are under the tyranny of the State? As we know, it's very difficult to throw the bums out. There's no such thing as 3 strikes when it comes to politicians.

If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land, it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy.
James Madison

A Bill of Particulars starts in the House

and Passes in the Senate to impeach a supreme Court Justice. When the court started legislating from the bench, the Congress should have impeached those who overreached.

The post above mine wisely pointed out that the Tenth Amendment allows for states to nullify the Federal overreach, Mea-culpa, AtlantaIconoclast is right, a Bill of Particulars was not the only remedy.

"Hence, naturally enough, my symbol for Hell is something like the bureaucracy of a police state or the office of a thoroughly nasty business concern." ~~C.S. Lewis
Love won! Deliverance from Tyranny is on the way! Col. 2:13-15