16 votes

Dr Ben Carson compares homosexuality to beastiality.




Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Because it's a lie.

Because it's a lie. Marriage is between a man and a woman. It doesn't matter how many times you scream 1 + 1 = 3, or whether you write it down on a piece paper and defend that equation with force. It's still just a lie.

There's NOTHING I can do to stop two homosexuals from swearing an oath to themselves, each other, and to God, but that's not what homosexuals are interested in. They know their oaths to each other are just as worthless as their oaths to God. They want that piece of paper to legitimize what their oaths couldn't. They want the legal privileges associated with marriage and I say let's get the government out of the marriage business.

I say pay your own way in the world and owe no man anything, and from there, people can begin to see each other for what they are rather than a source of plunder. Be productive and generous and nobody will care that you swore an oath to stick with your domestic partner through thick and thin. They may even find a way to respect homosexuals and see the good in it rather than begrudge them thinking all they wanted was a piece of paper and legal privilege.

Without rules in society, where do you draw the lines?

Liberty doesn't mean you can shoot somebody, if you don't like them. It doesn't mean you can steal from Cypriot bank accounts either, just because you want their money. And, it doesn't mean that a minority can inflict injury on the institution of marriage.

Marriage is a fundamental core of our society, and it is vital we maintain this concept, "as is". If we don't, and if we pursue having the lusts of a pagan society replace a Christian society, then, we can expect that we will lose all of God's protection.

The Founding Fathers knew that the underpinnings of our society was their Christian beliefs of right versus wrong, and all the 10 commandments, including THOU SHALT NOT COMMIT ADULTERY. You have to understand that these BANKING ELITE CONTROL FREAKS are interested only in themselves. They want to mix up our society, confuse our children, confuse everyone, because they know that it will cause a broken society and render us impotent.

This is why you should choose a mate that you have more in common with, because you have a better chance at success than otherwise. And, too, our beloved America has a better chance of succeeding against the VERY EVIL ELITISTS if we all stick together in our fundamental beliefs in ONE GOD and his commandments.

If you are a sodomite, then, you should expect kindness and fair treatment from your brethren, but NOT AT THEIR EXPENSE. You can't expect your brethren to give up everything they believe in, and then, hope the society survives. We cannot survive with a move towards this paganism. WE will not. Please, leave our children alone, mind your own business, most corporations give you benefits, and any attorney can draw up a will to make anybody your beneficiary, so there should be no problem.

And, that's all I have to say on this...

I'm not interested in spreading injustice.

I agree. I'm a staunch social conservative, but that's not how I vote, because it won't serve my ends. Government is force. There are better ways. Peaceful ways.

There's no justice to be served by using force against two homosexuals who take a vow to themselves, each other, and to God. They have that right. It would be an injustice for me to use force against them, and I'm not interested in spreading injustice.

To: Awl19.....Jesus said, "Go & sin no more"...

He didn't say go ahead and continue sinning and sleeping with other men (if you were a man), or to a woman doing the same. There are numerous quotations in the New Testament, as well, as the Old Testament, rebuking the idea of this type of sexual sin!

Our Founding Fathers were ALL CHRISTIANS.....I suggest the young people on Daily Paul start studying the history of Christianity, starting with the Catholic Church history.

Even the Orthodox Jews & the Islamic people believe the SAME WAY----face it, it is a perversion, and these sodomites represent only 3% of America. Let's get real here, folks, but they are acquiring way, way too power to lord it over the rest of us, and ESPECIALLY the heinous adoption of innocent children who HAVE NO CHOICE. How do you like them apples?!

.

He said it, but he didn't enforce it. Because God gave people free will. What would be the point of giving people a choice between Heaven and Hell if God expected His people to force others to follow one path or the other?

Just one quick tip: If you're trying to get people to come your way, it's typically a bad idea to try and force them because they will resist.

I said in a previous post:

There's a line between restricting your child from actions and telling them of the negative effects to be wrought from them. Restricting them usually means rebellion. Jesus was more respectful, more understanding, more loving than today's Christians.

Today's Christians would have homosexuals locked in a cage from the rest of the world if they could, but is that justice? Is that moral? Is that Christian?

witness for God...

...or dictate in God's place? This is why the Divine Right of Kings didn't work out, we're not above His laws.

You tell me what I'm doing...I'm strongly endorsing the NATURAL standard, not some opinion or vain philosophy....there can be no tolerance for telling the Creator how His creation should work in total contradiction to His laws, that's lunacy, foolishness, a level of insanity that begs for destruction..liberty doesn't thrive there; because it is God-given.

Okay

There can be tolerance for how people live their lives because God does not dictate how people should do so. All he does is provide a path for the misguided to come to him.

People like you think you have the righteous means to dictate how people live their lives. This is in direct contradiction to God's natural law of free law.

Liberty thrives in allowing people to pursue their lives in the path they see fit; not telling them they must pursue Christ, Buddha, or Muhammad. This is the mistake with those who have a strong conviction in their religion.

Liberty means letting people pursue their own paths regardless of what you think they should do. You have a right to make them aware of the path you think they should follow, but not forcing them follow it. Disallowing gay marriage is a form of force. It's fine if you disapprove of it, but disallowing it is absurd as you have no right to dictate what God considers right or wrong. He will decide that for himself.

the origin of marriage...

...man.+ woman = procreation is NOT man, it is man's Creator....the government has ZERO authority creating "gay marriage" in order to polarize a society that obeys God's natural laws by FREE WILL because it's normal...

Your defense of the promotion of the unnatural, disgusting, and destructive is "there is no authority higher than Caesar" for man to go to for a STANDARD; therefore, your standard is a rubber ruler that bends with each successive generation(progressivism)...I reject this based on HISTORY...the rule of law is therefore necessary as a deterrent to keep free men restrained from violating another man's health, wealth, and prosperity by sound reason and respect for the LIFE God gives.

The government also has

ZERO authority creating a ban on "gay marriage."

One of the main reasons gay couples want gay marriage is because of the tax benefits the government has created for married couples. Any libertarian will tell you those sorts of benefits are complete bullshit and shouldn't exist in the first place and taxes should be non-existent.

My defense is not of gay marriage inherently, but the right for people to do as they wish as long as they are not harming or defaming anyone, i.e. you and me, which they aren't. That's libertarian philosophy 101.

If they're violating your religious doctrines, they can take it up with God when they die, not you.

Nor can they ban you from marrying your dog.

Giving you a piece of paper that says you're married to your dog doesn't make it a marriage.

I think Homosexuals know how God feels about homosexuality and it's reinforced every time they shoot their seed into a S@#$ hole. Really homosexuals shouldn't even exist if you hold them to their own talking points. If homosexuality is as they say, genetic, the only way they can continue to procreate is by preying on woman and using them like a cum-dumpster in a fraudulent and loveless union.

Can a homosexual love the woman he knowingly uses as his Cum-Dumpster while he commits fraud pretending to be something he isn't?

Nobody can stop two people from swearing an oath to themselves, each other, and to God. There's no way to ban Gay Marriage, just like there's no way to keep people from from marrying their cocker spaniel. The problem is that Homosexuals know the oaths they take to themselves and each other mean even less than the Oaths they take to God.

They want that piece of paper, and I believe you understand why they want it. Legal privilege. It's not about equality. We already live in a state of marital equality. I can't get away with calling my dog my wife either and no piece of paper will make people respect that marriage as legitimate. It's about objective reality and truth. Marriage is between a man and a woman.

the 45 communist goals of 1963

25) Break down cultural standards of morality by promoting pornography, and obscenity in books, magazines, motion pictures, radio and TV.
26) Present homosexuality, degeneracy, and promiscuity as "normal, natural, and healthy.": http://www.uhuh.com/nwo/communism/comgoals.htm

jhon

You have to understand his viewpoint as a doctor.

The little bit my daughter has learned (Nursing) about the physical repercussions of that lifestyle is very eye-opening. Doctors and nurses have to deal with it constantly. Same goes for people who are straight and promiscuous. Health problems galore.

Read here: http://www.frc.org/get.cfm?i=Is01B1

And consider:...life expectancy at age twenty for gay and bisexual men is eight to twenty years less than for all men...

Doesn't sound like alternate lifestyle to me - it sounds like suicide.

The law cannot make a wicked person virtuous…God’s grace alone can accomplish such a thing.
Ron Paul - The Revolution

Setting a good example is a far better way to spread ideals than through force of arms. Ron Paul

When I was in high school in the 60's,

there were three venereal diseases. There were a few others but they were only found on the tiny, crazy fringe of society, and normal people didn't know about them. Now there are over 50 last I heard, and they are everywhere. We have lost our collective mind.

Doesn't this include anyone

Doesn't this include anyone who's sexually active with multiple partners? And the reason gay men are whores is not because they're gay, it's because they're MEN. You don't hear about whoring lesbians haha. Okay, everything I just wrote is entirely politically correct but it's largely true.

How america went gay by Charles Socarides M.D.

Charles W. Socarides, M.D., (1922-2005) was clinical professor of psychiatry at Albert Einstein College of Medicine/Montefiore
Medical Center in New York. Over 40 years, he treated hundreds of gays and helped about one third of them return to heterosexuality. The classic 1995 essay by the psychiatrist who pioneered the treatment of homosexuality."Normalizing" homosexuality was the first step to supplanting heterosexuality: http://henrymakow.com/2013/03/how-america-went-gay.html

jhon

He very specifically said

that one is not the same thing as the other.

he is still comparing the 2

even if he states they are not the same. People compare Ron Paul to romney. They are not a like at all in any respect, but people still compare the 2.....

Will be used as a stick to beat all republicans.

that said, some on here will think he was right.

some? lol

I simply pointed out that a comparison is still comparison regardless of the results and got down voted 7 or 8 times.