87 votes

It's Time to Put This 9/11 Conspiracy Thing to Rest Once and For All

There is a lot of hearsay and folklore surrounding this event which may or may not be true. So we're going to need to sift through some news-clips, firsthand testimony and whatever else that can provide credible information on this important topic. There comes a point that you learn too much and you can't revert back to ignorance. In a way it's very much like when you first realized that Santa Claus is really a fiction. At that point there is really no amount of logic that can resurrect your belief in Santa again. So when did you quit believing in Santa Claus?

As kids we believed in Santa Claus. Our parents were the gatekeepers of information and, though benign, our environment during that formative time was a controlled one. We were taught to believe in Santa Claus. Initially we accepted all the information that we received at face value. However, as time progressed, we gained bits and pieces of information that led to a cognitive dissonance which, in turn, led us to question our image of Santa Claus. These “bits and pieces” led to questions such as “How could Santa Claus fit through my chimney” or “How does Santa Claus leave gifts in millions of homes during a single night”? Armed with all these bits and pieces of information, we began to get a different picture that caused all the previous illogic that we had learned to come crashing down. This finally led to an epiphany that Santa Claus really isn’t anything like what we had first thought!

There are other things in life that we have always taken for granted as “fact” that later prove to be only an illusion as well. It’s only a matter of getting more information. As in the case of the Santa Claus myth, it is only a matter of time as new evidence unfolds that we are forced to rethink our view on what the truth is.


Please watch this first video linked here. It’s only one minute. You’ve read this far into my article so please take just one small minute and watch this first video. You’re going to be impressed. This is a local news video of a witness named Kenny Johannemann testifying to explosions that happened in the basement of one of the WTC towers. While he is testifying you still see both of the twin towers burning behind him in the background. This was live footage and it's only ONE minute long. Go ahead and watch this here:


The explosions in the basement were separate independent events which had nothing to do with where the airplanes hit some 80 to 100 floors above. Those explosions were from charges that were set up to weaken the structure preparatory to pulling the tower.

You say, “wait, this doesn’t fit anything I know, maybe there is some other explanation for those explosions in the basement.” True. This is just one piece of evidence, but it’s a piece of evidence that raises a lot of questions. You didn’t see this on TV either. Does that prick your interest?

The government has promoted a “theory” that maybe the fuel from the jet trickled down the elevator shafts into the basement and subsequently exploded. Could this be? Let’s continue and look at other evidence. Barry Jennings was another witness that got stuck in Building Seven during 9/11. Remember, Building Seven was NEVER hit by a jet. In Barry's case an explosion blew out a stair well below him leaving him hanging and stranded for hours until the fire department got him out. Both the twin towers went down during the time he was stranded. Building Seven, a tall building in it’s own right (47 stories tall), came down at around 5:20 (later that day). Fortunately, he was saved. Watch his account here:


Again, the explosions he talked about were from charges that were set up to weaken the structure preparatory to pulling down this building. You say, “Hold On! Building Seven housed the FBI and the CIA offices, so who would have access to set up explosives in there? There has got to be another explanation.” True, but realize that building seven was never hit by a jet. Still, this is just one more piece of evidence which raises even more questions. Again, you didn't see Barry’s testimony on TV.

William Rodriguez, head janitor at the towers, was meeting with some people in basement level #1 (the highest of several basement levels) when an explosion from below pushed everyone upwards, causing ceiling tiles to fall and walls to crack. Just as William started to express to others what he thought that explosion might be, an airplane hit and shook the building from above. His story begins at 9:31 here:


Now, let’s look for other different kinds of evidence. Steve Jones, a physicist, obtained WTC dust samples from the collapsed WTC towers from people who lived nearby. He analyzed it and found that the dust contained residues of explosives. Steve Jones first became famous when he became known as the “voice of reason” during the Pons / Fleischman "Cold Fusion" debacle of 1989, if you remember that. For a Nuclear Physicist, like Steve Jones, analyzing dust samples for explosive residues is a relatively simple task. It may be similar to asking a PhD mathematician to do arithmetic. He reported his detailed findings here in Boston:


In this lecture, you recall, he offered other scientists to take parts of his samples in order to analyze the "red chips" that he had recently discovered. That was December 2007. These specks have now, in fact, been confirmed to be unexploded “nanostructured super-thermite” particles. That confirmation is not just a smoking gun, it is the gun. See the article here:


The actual scientific paper in its entirety can be found here in PDF form. Be sure to click the “download” link here:


If you get into the actual paper, you learn that the explosives may actually have been sprayed into position like paint or insulation!

Steve Jones’ findings may not fit the stories that you have heard in the news but it does lend support to what Johannemann, Jennings and Rodriguez testified that they saw. You say, “The news media isn’t going to shoot itself in the foot by making something up.” So how do we rectify all the contradictions that we were told in the news? Could Steve Jones and these witnesses be glory-seeking kooks trying to make a name for themselves?

Well, then take a look at this:

Here is a BBC report announcing the collapse of the Solomon Building (the official name for Building Seven). There is only one problem. The reporter standing at the scene and announcing this didn't realize that, in fact, you could still see Building Seven still standing off to the right. It actually collapsed within about 20 minutes after that live report. Watch it here:


How did the BBC know in advance that Building Seven would collapse? The fact that it was announced in advance is strong support that the flow of information on this tragedy was being controlled (but in a more sinister way than how information about Santa Claus was controlled in your life).

Were the people at the BBC the only people privy to this information? Probably not. Larry Silverstein was the leaseholder of Building Seven. In a 2002 PBS documentary he talked about how he discussed the Building Seven situation with the fire department and he suggested to the fire department that they pull it. He then stated that the fire department made that decision to "pull it" and then, as he put it, "we watched the building collapse". Well, there is one problem with his testimony that you may want to consider. It takes at least a week to rig a building like that with explosives before you pull it. So are buildings constructed with built-in explosives just in case they need to be blown up in a hurry? Building Seven went down that same day. Whoops! Watch Larry's testimony from the PBS documentary here in this short clip:


Incidentally, luckily for Larry, he insured his property in the nick of time just six months before September 11th! It was a sweet deal. So who orchestrated this terrorist event anyway? They had to get past the FBI and CIA and prepare at least three buildings for demolition as well as direct the activities of men with box cutters (if they even existed). It’s clear from the evidence presented here so far that at least some of the media was in on this. What else could explain the BBC blunder? They had to control the information to those of us who might not like the idea that a few thousand people had to be killed in order to fulfill some kind of agenda. So what’s in it for these people that were “in the know?”

Aaron Russo was a famous movie producer (Remember “The Rose” and "Trading Places" starring Eddie Murphy?) who became best friends with one of the Rockefeller family members. This is the same Rockefeller family that is a large shareholder of the Federal Reserve Bank -- a private company that loans money to our government and contributes to our huge national debt. You see the name “Federal Reserve” at the top the dollar bill. Yes, we're talking about that Bank! Anyway, the upshot of this friendship was that in the year 2000 (11 months before 9/11) Aaron Russo learned from his Rockefeller buddy that there was going to be an "event". He was told that out of this event the U.S. would go into Afghanistan and look for Bin Laden in Caves and then the U.S. would go into Iraq. His fascinating testimony about this "event" and how it fits into their agenda starts at 26:45 here in this interview (If you have the time watch the whole thing - chances are you have never seen an interview quite like this one):


Another thing. In April 2013 a 40 story skyscraper in Chechnya caught fire and thoroughly burned into a crinkling cinder [see the video within the next link below]. However it did not collapse. By comparison WTC Building Seven had a few small fires and was never hit by a plane. It did collapse. See that article here:


Now see this:

Amazingly, all this evidence is only the tip of the iceberg. Each of these are separate independent pieces of evidence from unconnected sources. When taken together they paint a clear picture.

You are a juror in a court of law. What would be your verdict? Remember, the word “conspiracy” is not in the dictionary to describe a fiction.

Trending on the Web

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

I'm mainly talking about the

I'm mainly talking about the people who add nothing to the debate but insults and personal attacks.
I understand frustration with people who seem to not even consider evidence you provide them to support your point, but I still don't see a need to go the insult/personal attack route if they haven't with you. Hey, as soon as someone starts throwing out insults at me, I drop the politeness myself. But as long as they are being civil and debating the topic I try to be civil as well.
Also I think people mistake and disagree on what is "irrefutable evidence".

firefighter john shroader also speaks of same explosions

he was there, and aside from underground explosions long before tower collapsed - the stairways were blown up and the lobby was destroyed. his interview corroborates with the groundskeeper who saved his life, willy rodriguez. they had to escape using the only stairway that had not blown up - a maintenance stairway that only willy knew about.

also, in his interview he talks about trying to find a way out in the smoke, and stepping over dead bodies and finding a dead body in a closet.

Looks like the

Looks like the Jew IDF trolls have targeted the DP.

Was bound to happen.

Hey rabbi what you spraying!

Luke 3:38
Isaiah 43:3-5

ecorob's picture

Every time race-baiting people like you say something...

like this you wake more people up.

Thank you. Please keep it up.

its 'cos I owe ya, my young friend...
Rockin' the FREE world in Tennessee since 1957!
9/11 Truth.

Good stuff, but why no

Good stuff, but why no discussion of Israel's involvment in 9/11? There is police audio of the arrests of the "dancing Israelis" who had two different vans, one packed with explosives, and the other had traces of explosives. Watch War by Deception, 2013 and see how Israel did it and the Anthrax scare.

Watch "Missing Links"!!!

I've had this in my sig(bottom of my posts) for ages. We've all seen the how, but haven't had the why/who spelled out as clearly as "9/11 Missing Links" shows. I'm not sure how anyone can watch this and not understand it, with the mountains of evidence shown. The dancing Mossad agents later admitted they were sent here to document it when they were quietly released from jail here and later appeared on Israeli tv.

There is also a well done part in Missing Links about the USS Liberty which the 9/11 deniers will probably want to deny as well. This is an ongoing pattern they have done since their inception, including 9/11 and beyond. Watch for yourself and tell me if you still can't see it.

hurricane hush up

did you know there was a hurricane headed for ny on 9-11?
as big as katrina?
was it talked about on the "news" weather segments?
uh, no

Finally someones brings up the only person....

i have respect re: this subject matter. I noticed there wasn't one reference to the work of Dr. Judy Wood in the original poster here. The sub-floors/basement were never damaged nor was there any "collapse" of buildings what so ever.

Anyone who has ever used a backyard grill...

and believes fire can melt iron without being force-directed are missing the forest through the trees on this topic.

Go dump some kerosene in the bottom of your grill... light it on fire... that's what jet fuel is - kerosene basically. You can confirm or rebut this theory yourself with a bit of backyard scientist testing.

Or let's Burn Up Another Skyscraper to a Crinkling Cinder...

and see if the steel melts. Here's one in Chechnya (40-story building) that went roaring in flames on every floor just yesterday. It did not collapse:



You do know that iron and

You do know that iron and steel have very different physical properties right?

Besides That

How could a jet blow up and there still BE ANY jet fuel left to burn anything? It all blew in the first explosion. Does a Molotov cocktail sling gas everywhere to be ignited at a later date or does it ALL burn at once?! Those jets were just big Molotov cocktails! Trickle down the elevator shafts to the basement? REALLY? How gullible do people have to be to buy that?


A molotov cocktail made with jet fuel would make you wet and

stinky, nothing else. Fill a bucket with kerosene and throw a lit match in it, it will go out. Jet fuel is kerosene with a slightly different sulfur level. People think jet fuel is like gasoline but it's a far cry from it. Even if it trickled, it will not burn close to hot enough to weaken steel and certainly not hot enough to disintegrate all those core columns.

I Won't Argue With You On That

I saw a HUGE fireball when the planes hit the buildings and I am just saying that after an explosion like those there wouldn't be any fuel left to "trickle" down to the basement to cause the explosions there. If people believe that could happen then they are REALLY gullible! Am I wrong?


I agree with you fully

I really think it's a way to rationalize something very painful to the brain. It's easier to think jet fuel is magic than the buildings were pre-wired for demolition.


This BBQ experiment doesn't emulate the massive weight pushing down, from the top floors, on the heated steal. Also is my BBQ aluminum?

My point: I don't think your comment will change anybodies mind.

Support the Daily Paul by using this link when you visit Amazon.com... http://www.amazon.com/?_encoding=UTF8&tag=bullnotbull-20&lin...

Daily Paul will earn a commission on all of your purchases.

There should be a stack of pancakes 104 units tall.

Never once did I see a 34 ft stack of 4" Concrete floors lying about.

I did see falling floors propelled by unknown forces hundreds of feet and burning with a thermite like somke.

Pulverized debris covered that area of Manhattan.to the dept of many inches. What force could pulverize and eject material for blocks?

Free includes debt-free!

Neither Will Yours

Watch the first part of this video and explain it.



I have a friend who is a black smith

He uses charcoal to melt steel. Its just carbon, like furniture and papers, and bodies. Large fires cause significant air flow, like a belows.

Yes, steel can deform and

Yes, steel can deform and even melt, but the temp of the fires in those towers was not hot enough, nor did they burn LONG enough to explain the total collapse.

Yes, steel can deform and

Yes, steel can deform and even melt, but the temp of the fires in those towers was not hot enough, nor did they burn LONG enough to explain the total collapse.

My grill just melted and scattered plane debris everywhere

Oh, wait... I just found a Passport fully intact too.

Thanks for the tip, Vince. Nothing to see here.


"We are not human beings having a spiritual experience; we are spiritual beings having a human experience"—Pierre Teilhard de Chardin

Dr. Judy Wood

book is amazing and worth a look.


Prepare & Share the Message of Freedom through Positive-Peaceful-Activism.

100+ years of black project development of Tesla technology

makes her theories VERY plausible, especially if people are also familiar with the work of John Hutchison.

"We are not human beings having a spiritual experience; we are spiritual beings having a human experience"—Pierre Teilhard de Chardin

Her book is amazing

it is a text book, extremely well done and sad that is ignored.

Prepare & Share the Message of Freedom through Positive-Peaceful-Activism.


Isn't this the, "dustification" lady?

Eric Hoffer


Wait, from the downvotes, this isn't the "dustification" lady?

No one actually said it wasn't or was her.

Eric Hoffer

Best compilation I have read thus far:


The Truth
Like any good criminal investigation, the story begins with the obvious questions; who had the means, the opportunity, and the motive? Our inquiry starts at the scene of the crime. The World Trade Center towers at once give us our first important clues as to the identification of some of the principle characters who must figure so prominently in this event. The twin towers were nicknamed "David" and "Nelson" Rockefeller, because they were financed initially by the Rockefeller family. The WTC towers were losing money. Many tenants had already moved out, knowing that these aging buildings were laced with asbestos which required them to be upgraded at a potential cost of billions. Six weeks before they came down, the towers were purchased by Larry Silverstein, who put up $14 million of his own money, along with the Blackstone Group's $111 million, headed by Pete Peterson, in order to secure the purchase of the lease from Lewis Eisenberg, then chairman of the Port Authority of New Jersey. Although most people might naturally think that the Port Authority is owned by the City of New Jersey, they are in actuality a private front organization owned by David Rockefeller. Along with the purchase came a double indemnity insurance policy, which guaranteed a massive payout should the property suffer as a result of a terrorist attack. The twin towers were an asbestos bombshell.

Read the rest: http://amchron.soundenterprises.net/articles/view/78575

The law cannot make a wicked person virtuous…God’s grace alone can accomplish such a thing.
Ron Paul - The Revolution

Setting a good example is a far better way to spread ideals than through force of arms. Ron Paul

Let me take you even further down the hole

First of all, this is necessary viewing: Researchg all you can about Dov Zakheim.. (the sick thing is, you'll hear him as a comentator on NPR occasionally)


In that video you will see some disturbing facts that are rarely discussed with regard to the event.

Then find yourself information on "Urban Moving Systems"


The Mossad font group that was caught by NYPD jumping up and down on top of their van hi-fiving while video taping the twin towers disintegrate. The suspects were apprehended and then later released.

Then research Kurt Sonnenfeld, he was the only FEMA photographer after the 911 events allowed to document the scene. He now lives in exile in Argentina as he is perused by the US for the evidence he has collected. He even wrote a book called "El Persugido" Argentina granted him asylum from the US.

Theses are some of the greatest pieces of evidence I have to open an investigator's mind to the depth of this event, and to the real source (of evil).

Yes, it drives me crazy how

Yes, it drives me crazy how so many Truthers are unwilling to look at the elephant in the room: Israel's involvement in 9/11! The evidence is overwhelming.