Constitutional amendmentsSubmitted by Liberty81 on Tue, 04/02/2013 - 23:28
With all the talk of gun legislation, gay marriage, and numerous other proposals that clearly go against the constitution. Why are we, as liberty oriented individuals, not using the argument that the only way certain measures can be put into law is through a constitutional amendment? Do our positions think these processes set forth are too burdensome and want to get away with an easier method? (Rhetorical) We should frame the argument that certain proposals need to be sent through the amendment process in order to be enacted. They are winning this debate in the sense that there is an actual debate on a given topic and bypassing the amendment process. Thoughts?