14 votes

UN approves first global arms treaty

While people on DP sit and argue over things that won't really change anything the UN and banksters are hard at work trying to attack our freedoms. For anyone who is interested you might want to read this.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/apr/02/un-approves-glob...

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

The point of the DP is to argue politics, what did you expect?

"While people on DP sit and argue over things that won't really change anything the UN and banksters are hard at work trying to attack our freedoms."

There are over half a dozen topics on the UN Arms Treaty passage on The Daily Paul that predate this one. I think most of the folks on the DP are aware of what the UN and Banksters are up to.

“Politicians are like diapers; they need to be changed often and for the same reason.” ― Mark Twain

"Give a man a gun and he can rob a bank. Give a man a bank and he can rob the world."

This Executive Branch

would have voted yes regardless of what was said or done from the people on the Daily Paul. It is not law here. It has to be ratified by the senate. 60 votes. With traitors like McCain it might be doable. Time to contact them again.

. . . . . . _ . . . _ _ .
. _ . . _ _ . . . . _ _ . . . . . . . _ . . _ . .
. _ . . _ _ . . . . _ _ . . . . . . . _ . . _ . .

While people on DP sit and

While people on DP sit and argue over things that won't really change anything...

Wow, you should write for the NYtimes or CNN.

Southern Agrarian

Kind of like Waco or Ruby Ridge?

Iran and North Korea are under UN arms embargoes over their nuclear programmes, while Syria is in the third year of a conflict that has escalated to civil war and is under US and EU sanctions.

Amnesty International said all three countries "have abysmal human rights records, having even used arms against their own citizens".

An embargo should be installed around all of Manhattan Island as well as all the other New York Boroughs. Shut down the bridges and tunnels, close off flights to any other place in the U.S. and allow them to have their own little world were all can be made warm and fuzzy alright by big brother Bloomberg. Just keep the infection contained to their world that they chose. Perhaps the native Americans who were robbed of Manhattan could consider taking over the U.N. building and turn it into a casino.

If not us than who?

They will use this politically

against nations the NWO wants to control like N Korea, Syria, Iran. In the end they will attempt to disarm the people of the world, citing this treaty as justification. The sanctions will not prevail. There will be a black market for guns as there was for alcohol and as there is for drugs.

"The treaty will NOT CONTROL

"The treaty will NOT CONTROL THE DOMESTIC USE OF WEAPONS IN ANY COUNTRY, but it will require all countries to establish national regulations to control the transfer of conventional arms, parts and components and to regulate arms brokers".

Please show me the specific language in the treaty that threatens the 2nd Amendment. From everything I've read, the treaty is about arms trade betwen countries, not enforcement of weapons control domestically.

“Let it not be said that no one cared, that no one objected once it’s realized that our liberties and wealth are in jeopardy.”
― Ron Paul

Will Control

You have answered question yourself. Control over the transfer of arms will result into registration. Registration will open possibilities to seize or confiscate guns in the future.

What is going to happen is change in US laws citing US commitment to honor international treaties.

Engage in Secure Exchange

The treaty deals with

The treaty deals with inter-country arms trade...it deals with one government buying arms from another government. I still don't see how this relates to domestic gun laws within any country.

I'll be the first person to believe our government is up to no good and trying to take the 2nd Amendment away...but they are trying to do that through legislation, not an international treaty.

“Let it not be said that no one cared, that no one objected once it’s realized that our liberties and wealth are in jeopardy.”
― Ron Paul

Look at the bigger picture.

If you can't see how this could affect our domestic rights then know this:

The end game is centralized world government. The U.N. is the blueprint for this and is slowly centralizing the power to govern the world one small step at a time. This is yet another step in eroding the sovereignty of nations.

"In short, the "house of world order" will have to be built from the bottom up.... An end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece, will accomplish much more than the old-fashioned frontal assault."

-Richard Gardner, CFR member and adviser to President Carter

link is broken

Or was taken down

Homeland security statement: patriotism is now considered terrorism.
I love www.isidewith.com shared it with everyone I know. If anything they realize its not just a red and blue idiot running for reelection.