33 votes

Massachusetts Governor Was Asked If Marathon Attack Was A 'False Flag'

During a press conference intended to provide updates regarding the investigation into the bombing of the Boston Marathon, one individual present asked Massachusetts governor if the bombing was a "false flag" attack.

A false flag is a war term that refers to perpetrating an attack under the guise of the enemy for the purpose of making them look bad.

Senator Elizabeth Warren and Governor Deval Patrick were both in attendance.

"Why were people in the audience telling people to be calm moments before the bomb went off," the person asked, "Was this another false flag staged attack to take our civil liberties and promote Homeland Security by sticking their hands down our pants on the streets?"

"No," the Governor said, "Next question."



Trending on the Web

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Debbie's picture

"No next question" was obviously just a pat answer given to

dismiss the question as quickly as possible and "move on". It's funny how quickly and positively he answered "No" when they hadn't even done an investigation yet!


When False Flags don't Fly Anymore


When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign: that the dunces are all in confederacy against him. ~J. Swift

No in political terms means you do not get to know

Mayor how can you deflect such a valid question. The proper answer, At this time we are investigating the situatin and nothing is ruled out.

Exactly how can he just simply say NO it wasnt a false flage. nineoneone happened just around the corner from there.

The real question now seems to ask him if he was in on it or not.


Governor's Response Was Pretty Quick

considering very few facts were available at the time of this interview. I'd suggest his terse response was part of a script, not factual. Not only is the governor deflecting valid questions with a terse response, but the FBI isn't even responding to legitimate questions as well. Crimes occur where criminals rule.

I'm still wondering... and perplexed on a daily basis...

isn't even responding to legitimate questions as well.

Is this a surprise? Really? ...and is this just the FBI or can we apply this to pretty much every "official" in this organized crime syndicate many are fond of calling "the government."

Let me know when you notice a pattern.

any drills or FBI plots ?

i am waiting for more info to come about whether any similar drills were planned or in operation while this happened.
maybe we will get some info on some shady FBI informant who helped get these bombs, but any info related to him will be wilfully ignored by the investigating team.
i wonder if the perpetrator would be a anti-Govt and anti-Federal reserve type right wing extremist ?

Dr.Ron Paul's 2002 Predictions

Wait.. How did the governor know the answer to the question?

A "I wouldn't know." or we have no information at this time. working with authorities blah blah.. etc. would be honest answers. This guy knows its "no" this early means he's fucking aware of something. It may indeed be a false flag.

sharkhearted's picture



Norfolk, VA

Time to INVESTIGATE the investigators of 9/11. PROSECUTE the prosecutors. EXPOSE the cover-up.

This question makes it HARDER to challenge "official" version

Jokers like this either don't get political strategy, don't care about political strategy, or are deliberately trying to make it HARDER to question the dominant version of events by being their own "false flags" of critique.

It makes us look bad that one of the first places our discussion goes in a time of tragedy is toward a conspiracy.

We should all resist the patriotic fervor that typically follows such an event. But I would definitely wait until the dust settles before engaging in speculation that could make us look bad.

I'm not trying to be the discourse police. I'm not saying "don't be skeptical" or "never raise questions." I'm saying that PUBLIC speculation can, at times, be viewed by the masses as insensitive and damage our credibility. Let's be patient. Let's be willing to ask tough questions and challenge flawed assumptions. But let's be SMART about it. This guy was anything BUT smart.

sharkhearted's picture

Discourse police? Yes you are. You are very much "them".


You are duplicating your statements from other threads...trying to water down this topic.

Yeah, I saw your revisions.

And the fact that you would side with the establishment even after this guy would ask a daring question using the FORBIDDEN term of "false flag."

Wow. Your cover is blown. Better look for another government subsidized position soon before your luck and hot air can run out.

Norfolk, VA

Time to INVESTIGATE the investigators of 9/11. PROSECUTE the prosecutors. EXPOSE the cover-up.

So...your point is what? You lie and claim my posts are similar?

For starters, you're a liar. That's been documented below. There are statements of opinion (e.g., "you are a disgrace"). And then there are statements of fact (e.g., "you were institutionalized for mental illness").

When you offer up a statement of fact, you'd better have the truth on your side. Prove that I hold a "government subsidized position." Oh, right, you can't prove that which isn't true. Nice try.

As for the claim that I've been "duplicating...statements" from other threads, prove it. Oh, right. You've already conceded that I've revised it and that it is not entirely the same. So it's not duplicated at all. I'll do you one better. I took one comment on another thread, put it in my Notepad, and tweaked it for this thread. I did that once. So I didn't duplicate "statements" (plural). There you go again, distorting.

Finally, I never made anything "forbidden." I gave my opinion on what's smart strategy. Frankly, smart strategy at a rally would be to leave you at home, bound and gagged in your basement so you wouldn't embarrass us. That's just my opinion. I'm not calling for terms to be "forbidden" anymore than I'm calling for you to be falsely imprisoned. I'm just giving strategic advice, which is an opinion you're welcome to disagree with. But seeing as how you're a liar and a flake, I really don't value your opinion, tough guy.

I've seen that guys

I've seen that guys psychological tactics before too. He's not very perceptive.

sharkhearted's picture

Ignore him.

Even though he is funded and paid for by the US government, he is still just a person. Nothing significant.

Time to pull back the curtains and show what they are really doing.

Norfolk, VA

Time to INVESTIGATE the investigators of 9/11. PROSECUTE the prosecutors. EXPOSE the cover-up.

Lies and idiocy from sharkhearted

It's one thing to question narratives without a foundation. That might just get you written off as a flake or a fringer.

It's another to out-right lie without evidence.

Yes, I am a person. I am a person you just libeled. Whether I'm "significant" or not isn't really a factual claim (I make more of an impact in the real world than you, I'd speculate. But a pissing contest isn't really what I'm after.).

But saying "he is funded and paid for by the US government" is not an opinion or an interpretation. It is a claim you're making without a shred of evidence, and it is a flat-out lie.

Yes. You are a LIAR. You are worse than any faceless, hypothetical bureaucrat who manipulates the truth. You attack an actual person with lies. You are the enemy.

And I demand an apology for your factually inaccurate claims.

No. The question is now in

No. The question is now in the MSM. First time ever.

Infowars Reporter Asks if Boston Bombing was False Flag at Press

Infowars Reporter Asks if Boston Bombing was False Flag at Press Conference


When the American find out

When the American people find out some people in America are deliberately killing their family members, there is going to be a lot of revenge killings.

Wow. Good question and at

Wow. Good question and at least he answered it.

Questions like this should be

Questions like this should be the first ones asked every time now.

"No. Next Question"

I guess that's good enough for me! I mean, if the government says something, we should totally believe that and not investigate anything for ourselves, right? Baah.

Of course, it's pretty dumb to ask a government official if it was a false flag attack. What do you expect them to say?

the peoples official record

the peoples official record

Note BI Australia says 'obnoxious troll'

This from the country where the Gillard thugs have banned tweets disparaging her or the Greens party's actions


If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land, it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy.
James Madison

Fireworks in the EU

Fireworks in the EU Parliament Over “The Pause” in Global Warming

YT Link


"I, __________, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic."


There is no duration defined in the Oath

thanks for the YT Link johncarter

I appreciate it. I added it to the post.

I think it was an info wars

I think it was an info wars guy.

Dan BiDondi!!!!!!!


my man took the PR BS conf. over!

good for him, for getting the meme out there, as a subconscious vox populi counter, to all the branwashed sheeple drones.

seeds have been sewn.

Drills! Drills! Drills!

and what does that spell??

Predictions in due Time...

"Let it not be said that no one cared, that no one objected once it's realized that our liberties and wealth are in jeopardy." - Dr. Ronald Ernest Paul

The question in and of itself

The question in and of itself makes me feel a whole lot better.

People know what's up. Kudos to the man who had the cajones to ask this question. I love questions!

To ask a simple, yet obvious question can often times be an act of genuine defiance against tyranny.

Never be afraid to ask simple questions.

sharkhearted's picture

Indeed, Zoo. I agree 1000%


Norfolk, VA

Time to INVESTIGATE the investigators of 9/11. PROSECUTE the prosecutors. EXPOSE the cover-up.


So glad that was made public

Ron brought the Liberty movement together, Rand is expanding the crap out of it! :)