11 votes

Janet Napolitano Responds to Report of Deportation for Former ‘Person of Interest‘Not Worthy of an Answer’

A visibly irritated Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano refused to answer a Republican congressman’s questions about the possible deportation of the Saudi national questioned as a witness in the Boston Marathon bombings.

Napolitano called South Carolina Rep. Jeff Duncan’s question “so full of misstatements and misapprehension that it’s just not worthy of an answer.”

“We have someone who’s being deported due to national security concerns,” Duncan had said during a Capitol Hill hearing Thursday. “We’ve got this guy who was there, we know he was there…and yet we’re going to deport him? We’re going to remove him from the scene?”

“If I might, I am unaware of anyone who is being deported for national security concerns at all related to Boston,” Napolitano said.

“He is being deported,” Duncan said.


Trending on the Web

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

She appeared very upset!

She is very condecending. Glen Beck has proof that the Saudi man had his visa revoked since April 2013. And, that someone in the government signed off on deporting him. This is a person of great interest and he shouldn't be deported.

Is that really

Lindsey Graham in drag?

Ron Paul Was Right

How on earth did that slug of

How on earth did that slug of a less than average type human ever get into a position of immense power?

Janet. Dolores Umbridge's evil twin.


Free includes debt-free!

Heyyyy Janettttt! I see someone acting suspicious.

Refusing to answer questions, pretending to be insulted by rational questions..... verrrry, verrrry, suspicious.
Anybody know what made Duncan so curious? That is an uncommon trait in DC. Here's a song for you, Mr. Duncan. Take it to heart, please:

Get to the truth.

Love or fear? Choose again with every breath.

Perhaps a Distant Relative...

Of you know who that died over 10 years ago or is fish food.

Posted yesterday Sen. Rand Paul vs Big Sis:


"I, __________, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic."


There is no duration defined in the Oath



their narrative is completely falling apart!

way to go BiDondi! Way to go AJ! Way to go Drudge, for culture jamming them with false flag, and other citizen crowd-sourced open data!

Predictions in due Time...

"Let it not be said that no one cared, that no one objected once it's realized that our liberties and wealth are in jeopardy." - Dr. Ronald Ernest Paul