60 votes

Mother Of Boston Bombing Suspects: "He was controlled by the FBI, like for three, five years"

Zubeidat K. Tsarnaeva, the mother of Boston bombing suspects Dzhokar and Tamerlan Tsarnaev, suggested Friday that the FBI had been surveilling her older son for several years prior to Monday's attack.

In an interview with Russia Today Friday, Tsarnaeva said that Tamerlan Tsarnaev got involved in "religious politics" five years ago, and that the FBI had previously contacted her about her son's activities.

"He was controlled by the FBI, like for three, five years," she said. "They knew what my son was doing, they knew what actions and what sites on the Internet he was going [to], they used to come...and talk to me...they were telling me that he was really a serious leader and they were afraid of him."

"How could this happen?...They were controlling every step of him, and they are telling today that this is a terrorist attack," she added.

http://www.businessinsider.com/tsarnaev-brothers-mother-fbi-...



Trending on the Web

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

The FBI knew

about the older brother since 2011. Matt Lauer was asking the questions this morning about what the FBI knew

I don't believe the

I don't believe the government would have involved the parents. It not their style. They especially would not have said that "they were afraid of him"

“Any man who thinks he can be happy and prosperous by letting the government take care of him better take a closer look at the American Indian.” ― Henry Ford.

Her English is probably not good enough

for her to adequately convey the meaning of what they actually said.

EXCELLENT response she had---SHOW ME THE PROOF

She wanted only to see the VIDEO EVIDENCE of them putting a backpack bag down in a clear video where the faces were totally recognizable. Then, within a few seconds the bomb going off IN the bags they left. The Police are not forthcoming. How come they have no problem showing thieves in a 711 store but can't put our a video of these two young brothers??

Otherwise, ANYBODY, including a special ops man, could have put the bags down.

What if they didn't know what was in the backpack, but were suspicious and didn't want to leave them off in the crowd, so a Special Ops guy had to do it. THAT would explain why we haven't see a real video of these two young guys---because THE factions within the FBI DON'T HAVE ONE---they are just lying!

The FBI has two choices----if he lives---GO TO COURT, or LET HIM GO.

Father of the suspects

stated that the FBI had visited their home five times.

Sorry I don't have a link. I saw it on last nights breaking news after the second suspect was apprehended.

So now we know the FBI was not only aware of these guys...

but had been for quite a while. Not just aware but were talking to them. Now we know why the FBI said these are the only credible pictures of suspects. Now we know why the search took place where it did. Did the FBI shoot the young MIT officer? (ala. J.D. Tippit) Did these guys realize they were entrapped?

The FBI has a post 9/11 history of this kind of "investigation"

A quick search of the internet reveal several stories about government entrappment.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/nov/16/fbi-entrapment-f...

http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/blogs/national-affairs/...

And there are more.

I still want to know who this guy with the exact backpack that was blown up is?

http://i.imgur.com/SxEK5lS.jpg

to control = to monitor

In Russian, to control (kontrollirovat') means "to monitor."

girl in sweater

I noticed the girl in the yellow-green sweater, following them, had a backpack large enough to be carrying the same thing! It is very interesting to see the guy appear to pull an earpiece from his collar and put it in his ear? We'll have to see if this plays out. Though, I am extremely skeptical.

English is her second language

and obviously she is not using the word "controlling" in a context that suggests she has a full grasp of its meaning.

"They were controlling him" and "they were afraid of him" are mutually opposed.

How hard would it be to walk

How hard would it be to walk around with a pressure cooker full of nails and ball bearings in a pack hanging off your shoulder by your side? Note that the younger brother caries his pack almost along side him. Also note that his pack disappears while he is walking at some points, especially in last part. Watch this clip then look at the photo I have posted in next comment box.

http://youtu.be/M80DXI932OE

its obvious the FBI knew about this.

watch the FBI agent reaction when he sees suspect 1 ... the agent immediately turns away as if surprised or to prevent him from being notice than 2 seconds later looks at the suspect for confirmation and immediately grabs his ear piece to notify he has located the suspect.

The Feds knew and the evidence is right in our face. Amazing.

Blurred federal agent also

Blurred federal agent also

Now look at the photo out by this authorities

aiming to prove that the younger bro is absent of pack. He is walking the same way as before with pack hidden from view. Next point: How could a pack with a pressure cooker disappear from view when he is so thin? You can zoom in with magnifying glass, then press Ctrl and + to zoom further.
http://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/images/user5/im...

Well, a family that gives a damn about thier kids.

They should have picked on some American kids, their family would never stick their neck out like that.

Love or fear? Choose again with every breath.

Here is my only question

Here is my only question about the narrative of the story, and if this guy ever gets a lawyer, they should hear this question.....

If only he and his brother are the only people that did this. If the authorities found more than two bombs. How many crockpots can you fit into two regular sized backpacks?

Maybe that's why they had to change the story...

...to say that NO unexploded bombs were found
http://www.boston.com/news/local/2013/04/16/mass-gov-unexplo...

...despite the earlier reports of as many as 5 found
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2013-04-15/five-more-undetonat...

I've got more than one

but that one is the place to start. Perhaps they came downtown with several backpacks - lets see the pics of that...

Love or fear? Choose again with every breath.

What are yours?

What are yours?

I'd like toxicology reports.

Check for any mind altering drugs, but especially scopalomine.
I want to know how the first suspect died, I still have not heard a full explanation.
I'd like to know if either of them were on SSRIs.
I'd like to know if either of them were under psychiatric care, or participants in any "clinical trials."
I'm sure I have others, those are just the ones on the top of my head.

Love or fear? Choose again with every breath.

My only issue with this

Is that she gave numerous interviews beginning from the time the photos were released and became widespread.

I followed her interviews closely and for the large part (unless it was edited out) she never mentioned FBI contacting her or anything of the sort. Did she actually know at the time or only since learned of it?

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-201_162-57580534/fbi-interviewed...

I need more information to reach any conclusion, so until then I will reserve judgment.

An alternative to the MSM Machine http://freedombroadcastingnetwork.com/
Ron Paul friendly news: http://www.newsetal.com/

Hmm Not sure if you realize this...but

The FBI isn't involved in the nasty MK-Ultra mind control programs that the CIA is happy to do.

AND..... The CIA is smart enough to use 3rd party companies to cover the paper trail.

Anyway ...the cover story sounds like BS to me. That's just an educated opinion. take it for what its worth.

____

"Take hold of the future or the future will take hold of you." -- Patrick Dixon

sharkhearted's picture

Worth a spat of shit out the backside of a seagull!

If you think the FBI is not involved in the same illegal and highly immoral mind control techniques of the CIA then you are sadly misinformed and mistaken.

Not to worry. Truth is not relative. It is ABSOLUTE.

The truth will come out. It always does...in the wash.

~Chris
Norfolk, VA

Time to INVESTIGATE the investigators of 9/11. PROSECUTE the prosecutors. EXPOSE the cover-up.

You might want to whipe the white (seagull shit) off yourself

Your the one who is sadly misinformed.

FBI doesn't have handlers for assassinations/false flag/ terrorist attacks. Their not allowed to do the nasty deeds of the CIA.

Yes the FBI tries to entrap people into staging false bombing attacks, but the're not part of live attacks, like the one that just happened.

____

"Take hold of the future or the future will take hold of you." -- Patrick Dixon

Too vague

I realize she's distraught, and I feel very sorry for her, but I can't accept her claim as credible. "I'm their mom I'd know" is the opposite of credible.

When did the FBI visit her? How many agents? What were their names? How many meetings? Where did he meetings take place? What exactly was discussed?

At this point, what can she lose by revealing the details?

sharkhearted's picture

No you don't feel "sorry for her".

You are just taking up for the establishment in control.

She has LOST ONE SON AND ANOTHER ONE WILL LIKELY DIE.

Have you no heart, no soul??

Or have you lost them both??

~Chris
Norfolk, VA

Time to INVESTIGATE the investigators of 9/11. PROSECUTE the prosecutors. EXPOSE the cover-up.

who are you to say how I feel?

Details are required for investigation. I'm not saying I'm 100% sure she's lying either. Just need more details.

A Conspiracy Nuts forum topic needs to be created in the DP

for nutty bastards like yourselves.

What's happend to DP?

It's very odd that so many conspiracy nuts have invaded this site. It didn't used to be that way.

deacon's picture

it didn't used to be that way?

its been this way as long as i have been here

If we deny truth before your very eyes,then the rest of what we have to say,is of little consequence