-174 votes

To the Minions of Alex Jones

Are there any terrorists in the world or is every single act of terrorism a plot by the New World Order?

And, if there are no terrorists, then how can any of you be a Ron Paul fan when Ron Paul believes that 9-11 was a terrorist attack. Does anybody remember when Ron Paul took on Rudy Giuliani by saying 9-11 was a derivative of our foreign policy? Kind of proves that he doesn't believe Dick Cheney did it, doesn't it?

That being said, I ask the question again. Are there any terrorists out there?

Are Ron Paul and the rest of us still "sleeping?"



Trending on the Web

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

I'm pro profit...

Through free-market capitalism...What is wrong with AJ also being of the same frame of mind...And nobody marginalizes me...Except myself...

Bad food, worse weather, please rEVOLution the states so I can bring my family back home!
Rosa Koire for for President!

So

You don't mind if people profit off of the death of children?

U r correct...

As far as free market goes...I do not mind if people freely spend their money to support someone who can "profit off the death of children"...Which, by the way, is the most lengthy reach of a correlation I have heard from you yet...I now know that you are quite foolish in your arguments and I will now stop giving you attention...

Bad food, worse weather, please rEVOLution the states so I can bring my family back home!
Rosa Koire for for President!

Its not a lengthy correlation

It simple.....A kid died in the Boston attacks, and Alex Jones is currently calling it a conspiracy and making money doing it. Simple and easy, the way I like it.

Like CNN & Fox aren't making money...?

Like CNN & Fox aren't making money off these events, by calling them terror attacks?

PEOPLE OPPOSING TYRANNY - Real Grass Roots!
Are you a POT or a PET - Person Embracing Tyranny?

That's my point

He's no different than those from MSM.

The difference is...

The difference is the content f the information, and the conclusions drawn in the analysis & opinions.

If there is no difference, then you are apparently against ALL press, and that is unconstitutional ;)

PEOPLE OPPOSING TYRANNY - Real Grass Roots!
Are you a POT or a PET - Person Embracing Tyranny?

Not True

Alex Jones, CNN,FOX, and MSNBC are not the only options for information.

Yep...

And if you call that AJ profiting from the death of a kid...Then so be it...I agree with him profiting from that...If people want to pay for something then so be it...On the other hand I see him as reporting news, as he does 6 days a week, and making money on that, the way he does 6 days a week...And just because of you...I sent him 100 dollars USD today...I asked that he take half and give the other half to Dan Bidondi (sp)..

Bad food, worse weather, please rEVOLution the states so I can bring my family back home!
Rosa Koire for for President!

LOL

You sure as hell showed me!! :)

You're still trying to make this about Jones and it's not.

He is not your obstacle. YOU are. You are letting your pet peeves fill you with hatred and distort your perception. That is obvious from your victim mentality where you claim you're being marginalized, when YOU'RE the one who is doing the marginalizing and picking fights.

You think it's your place to decide who can or can't like RP, or be a fan of him as you put it? Do they have to agree with him on everything, or do they just have to agree about who was responsible for the atrocities of 9/11?

RP is not a collectivist. Using the logic in your OP, how can YOU be a Ron Paul fan when Ron Paul does not share your collectivist mindset?

And before you are too hasty to begrudge Jones, or others, for making a living with broadcast and news programs(not sure why you think they owe it to everyone to do it for free), consider that Ron Paul keeps going on Jones' show...and he does it despite the fact that they don't share the same publicly stated views regarding 9/11. *gasp*

If you don't believe 9/11 was an inside job, that is your choice. If you don't like to listen to Jones or read the articles from his site, then don't. That is your choice. That doesn't make everyone who does a less intelligent, brainwashed minion.

Not every RP "fan" is a Ron clone, and not everyone in this movement shares the same views on everything. Do not let the collectivist views of others define you or trick you into falling into that same trap yourself. ;)

No

Try reading my post before making conclusions. How can you make a judgement on my victim mentality from a single post? And if you don't see how the conspiracy theories marginalize the movement, i don't know what to say. Alex Jones on Piers Morgan created months of anti-firearm programming.

I don't think it's my place to decide anything. I'm pointing out hypocrisy. Nothing else.

And I don't think you quite understand what collectivism is. What the hell are you talking about?

I'm not begrudging Jones for making a living. I begrudging him for how he's makes a living of off murder, anti-gay, and anti-choice propaganda.

And I'm sorry, but the belief of something without evidence takes a major amount of brainwashing.

Your collectivist mindset is evidenced throughout this thread.

This is not a Where's Waldo puzzle here.

And since you're all over the place here and can't make up your mind what you're upset about, I think I'm done.

You go from insulting people over Jones to 9/11 with regard to RP's blowback theory to Jones making a living with his broadcast show and news site and now to Jones on Piers Morgan and firearms.

Your thread here was manipulative with its false premise that is designed to take the anti-Jones sentiment some have here and direct it toward marginalization of people who don't align with RP's 9/11 blowback theory or others you see as conspiracy theorists.

I'm not a Jones apologist. Some of his things I like, some I don't. Regardless, it's too bad the anti-Jones/anti-conspiracy theory camp lets you and some others use them in your little game of trying to foment an us vs. them or ~you're either with us or you're against us~ sentiment to create division.

Not sure if you just have delusions of self-righteousness in trying to purge the movement of what you see as undesirables, or if you just seek attention and a bar room brawl. Either way, ends do not justify the means.

I have no intentions...

I'm just giving my opinions. If you don't want to listen to them, then don't. I'm not trying to divide, I'm trying to debate. I'll give you that I was a little, "all over the place" on this part of the comments. But there's a lot of comments on this thread, and a lot of debate to be had. I was trying to answer as much as I could.

In my opinion, Jones is a manipulative son of a gun who profits off of the tragedy of others. I also think he is a radical Christian, and very homophobic. If you don't agree, that's fine. More power to you.

I don't have any intentions other than what I wrote, which you think is nonsense. No worries, it very well could be nonsense. Wouldn't be the first time I was wrong about something.

How about debating the Facts...?

How about debating the facts and holes in the official story that point to a 9/11 conspiracy that turns the entire outlook on the war-on-terror upside-down?

Attacking the messenger is a by-the-book subversion tactic the Nazi's and Commies and todays MSM use(d) regularly. It only works on weak minded &/or ignorant individuals. You are on the DailyPaul, it's mostly intelligent people here. If you want to peer pressure people into tuning out conspiracy theories, go to foxnews.com or huffpost or something and post there.

PEOPLE OPPOSING TYRANNY - Real Grass Roots!
Are you a POT or a PET - Person Embracing Tyranny?

Fact:

A thing that is indisputably the case. (definition)

I'm not attacking the messenger, I'm simply pointed out how the message the messenger is sending is illogical. There are no facts that prove an inside job on 9/11. Its all speculation, some of it is very good speculation. Hell, I would support an independent investigation. I'm on your side with an independent investigation. But I don't go around like an arrogant "know it all" telling everybody what the "truth" is.

Just the name "truther," in itself, is ridiculous. Being a skeptic is great, but as soon as you think you know the "truth," that's when the problems begin. You talk about Nazi tactics, but tactics don't matter. What made Nazis scary is that they thought they were right. Pentagon officials think they are right....Radical Islamist think they are right. The one thing in common with all of them is that they thought they had found truth. There is no truth we can grasp with this. This is not science, its politics with layers upon layers of obfuscation. Once you think you know the truth with politics and philosophy, you've gone off the deep end.

fireant's picture

A little honest introspection please.

Here is a slight re-word of your accurate observation:
Attacking the messenger is a by-the-book subversion tactic the Nazi's and Commies and todays controlled demolition faithful use(d) regularly. It only works on weak minded &/or ignorant individuals.
The tactics you describe are exactly what I experience whenever I point out facts which do not support CD. Is that a sign of truth seeking, or a sign of silencing an alternative view?

Undo what Wilson did

Terrorism is an intangible

Terrorism is an intangible subjective thought tactic idea. It is impossible to win a war against terror because every human is capable of this type of cognitive thought and planning tactics in their mind. To wage a war against an idea is stupid because this type of war never ends and rights can constantly be violated under the illusion of waging a war on terror.

Exactly...

.

PEOPLE OPPOSING TYRANNY - Real Grass Roots!
Are you a POT or a PET - Person Embracing Tyranny?

yes

there are terrorists, and most of them are called CIA, FBI, NSA, MOSAD, MI5, most of them work for organizations in western governments.

The Abuse of Greatness is when it disjoins remorse from power. - Shakespeare