13 votes

Updated: Did Agents Shoot Dzhokhar Tsarnaev After He Exited Boat? Photos

I noticed something last night that seemed quite nefarious to me. CNN and other news reports just confirmed my suspicions.
It is reported Dzhokhar was shot in the throat and may not be able to talk for a while. http://fox8.com/2013/04/20/throat-injury-may-keep-bombing-su...

Notice the blood stains on his shirt when he is exiting the boat. The dark markings on his shirt are blood stains. There are no dark markings towards the top of his shirt in the first photo.
Then notice the picture of the ATF Agent attending him. Look at his face. What would his shirt look like if he had been shot in the throat the night before or in the firefight before he exited the boat?

This still frame from video shows Boston marathon bombing suspect Dzhokhar Tsarnaev visible through an ambulance after he was captured in Watertown, Massachusetts. Photograph: Robert Ray/AP



Trending on the Web

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

26 year old had shrapnel wounds.

http://youtu.be/z5aPVfzczW4
In the above video the doctor says the 26 year old had uncountable number of gun shot wounds AND shrapnel wounds. Execution firing squad style death by the entire Key stone cop army?

So if these boys planted the bombs why would he stand near one of them and end up with shrapnel wounds? This does not add up.

The contractors in uniform moved away from the blast area before the explosion. But the 26 year old just stood there and let himself get sprayed with shrapnel. http://www.globalresearch.ca/contractors-at-boston-marathon-...

and wasnt there 3 bombs? how

and wasnt there 3 bombs? how did these two boys with two backpacks plant 3 bombs?

Here is a photo

of dead 26 year old. Saved in case it disappears. (always open to whether it is a valid photo)

BUT Even the doctor who examined him said he had shrapnel wounds. Wonder about the very large gashes and facial damage. http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=c0e_1366394274

guns : pistols , rifles , shotguns , BB guns ?

Has anyone heard anything about what kinds of guns they had?

It is hard to imagine a more stupid or more dangerous way of making decisions than by putting those decisions in the hands of people that pay no price for being wrong.
Thomas Sowell

No information about wounds to his upper body...

can be learned from that grainy, overexposed, low resolution video grab.

Check out the Laissez-Faire Journal at LFJournal.com


"The State is a gang of thieves writ large." - Murray Rothbard

look at this

This still frame from video shows Boston marathon bombing suspect Dzhokhar Tsarnaev visible through an ambulance after he was captured in Watertown, Massachusetts. Photograph: Robert Ray/AP

http://i.imgur.com/uYSVVdL.jpg

Yes, we know he was shot in the throat.

But, the first image you posted is too overexposed to prove your claim that he was not shot in the throat before he left the boat.

In fact if your belief that he was shot in the throat after he exited the boat is based entirely on that first photo, then you don't have a leg to stand on, because it is overexposed and no information about wounds from the overexposed area can be learned from it.

Check out the Laissez-Faire Journal at LFJournal.com


"The State is a gang of thieves writ large." - Murray Rothbard

The top of his shirt is over-exposed, but his

face isn't.

You can go ahead and make a fool out of yourself if you want...

but let it not be said that no one tried to reason with you.

Please enlighten me, as to what can be discerned from this pixelated blob which I have enlarged for your convenience:

P.S. I thought he was shot in the neck ( his neck can not even be clearly seen in the photo) and not his face (which is in fact also overexposed)

Check out the Laissez-Faire Journal at LFJournal.com


"The State is a gang of thieves writ large." - Murray Rothbard

Some people have problems with their depth perception and

can't see things like other normal visioned people. It's actually quite common, but sadly there is not any eyeglasses or surgery to help it. You are probably part of the population that has a depth perception problem. I won't argue with you anymore since I don't like to pick on people with disabilities.

My vision is just fine, thank you.

Your case on the other hand, is only getting flimsier.

Check out the Laissez-Faire Journal at LFJournal.com


"The State is a gang of thieves writ large." - Murray Rothbard

What the Hell?

What are the ATF police doing there? Was there any agency on Tax Dollar payroll that didn't show up for the event?

Federal aid doled out for this event....how many hundreds of millions? Yo Obomb'ya.....you broke man, you already spent the nation's money ten times over....slow down...it was just two boys.

fireant's picture

Makes no sense.

Why wait until he got out of the boat? If they wanted to shoot him, one shot while he's prone. They had infra red guidance. The only reason this guy is alive is because they wanted him alive.

Undo what Wilson did

have you guys seen this video

nevermind

Ron Paul 2016

fireant's picture

Notice from the second photo his shirt is dark colored.

That means the color was washed out in the first photo due to police spotlights, and what you claim are blood stains are actually shadows.

Undo what Wilson did

Then what are the dark wet spots on the police photo?

Greasy chicken stains?

fireant's picture

Seen only in the second photo.

You must have missed my point. The first photo is no good for comparison because you can't see any stains, color, or texture due to overexposure.
In the second photo, stains are visible, but most of the shirt is not visible. The obscured left shoulder and chest may well be stained. You have no case sir. It would be totally stupid for the cops to shoot him after he stood up with cameras rolling and lights on.
Not to get on a rant, but move on. There indeed are questions which scream for answers. This is not one of them.

Undo what Wilson did

Look at the lower right arm sleeve in both photos.

Explain that and then You can move on. Blood stains show up in BOTH photos.

fireant's picture

Read my first sentence again.

It's an invalid comparison. That means you can't use it to prove or even indicate anything regarding color and texture. Look up "invalid".

Undo what Wilson did

Read your second sentence again

"The first photo is no good for comparison because you can't see any stains, color, or texture due to overexposure."
The stains are obvious in both pictures.

I don't see any blood stains

I don't see any blood stains while he is exiting. They shot him or whatever after he exited.

I don't really understand all the grainy photos. we live in the high def age - these things look nothing like real photos. Looks like 256 shit from the 90s.

The dark markings on his shirt are blood stains.

There are no dark markings towards the top of his shirt in the first photo.

That is after he exited. The

No shit but the photo on the bottom is after he exited. The top picture shows nothing, but I can't tell if it just can't be seen due to the shitty picture.

I got down-voted because people can't read or look at photos.

I would suggest something, but

let's just say I hope the ONE person who can shed some light on this DOES...

Some police officer must have taken this photo.

It's really hard to tell, because the 1st photo is not clear, but it doesn't look like he had been hit at the moment of the photo.

The 2nd photo appears he'd been hit in the head. THIS IS AWFUL....LAWSUIT TIME...lawsuit. I mean he had no gun!

Joη's picture

what are you talking about? He fired at them.

He had a gun. Volleys were exchanged at the boat. Are you claiming they're lying about that too, that they just shot up the boat after telling him to leave it?

"You underestimate the character of man." | "So be off now, and set about it." | Up for a game?

Where is the evidence he had

Where is the evidence he had a gun and was shooting?

They had a fire fight. Then they talked him out

He was strong enough to get out of the boat. The photo was taken from a helicopter, I think. You don't see blood on his big nose in the boat pic. You see blood on his nose in the cop pic.
Also I commented last night about seeing a stretcher being rolled out for a spit second and the camera broke away real fast. http://www.dailypaul.com/comment/3046222
There was no mention of it.
They said he lost lots of blood from previous night fire fight.
That is FRESH blood on his nose and not seen in the boat pic and he has a large nose.

I think I put this on the wrong post...

sorry.

Actually...

This afternoon, CNN provided additional details that made that impossible (without meaning too, the idiots). In an extended segment about how the government used heat-detecting FLIR photography via helicopter to detect the younger brother hiding under the boat cover, they described how:

1) a gun fight ensued with the younger brother firing back;
2) the heat-detecting camera showed him still lieing prone under the boat cover, which was still in place after the alleged gunfight;
3) after 20 minutes, they rolled in a robot to cut away and pull back the boat cover to reveal the suspect;
4) the younger brother stood up, pulled up his shirt to show that he was unarmed;
5) They captured him.

Do you see anything wrong with this sequence of events?

If the boat cover was still secure enough to require a robot to cut it away to reveal the suspect, how did the suspect engage in a firefight with police prior to the robot cutting it away? And why did the FLIR photos on CNN show him in the same prone position under the undisturbed boat cover after the alleged gun fight as before?

The government's tale is preposterous from start to finish.

Joη's picture

the robot was used in case he had more explosives

Not because it was so hard to remove.

The boat cover being torn & blood stains on its side were what tipped off the owner.

If you're claiming the cover was somehow keeping him in and them out, how did he get in there in the first place? That makes no sense. The cover was torn for him to enter, surely he could have stuck something out through there.

"You underestimate the character of man." | "So be off now, and set about it." | Up for a game?