Proof of Election Fraud likely in NH for all you naysayers read this. For everyone else read this
For the people that keep saying stop with the conspiracy stuff, how does this grab you.
Don't tell me a doctor by profession and international business owner to keep my mouth shut unless you have hard facts to prove me wrong.
In Nashua NH ward 5 there is already huge decreases in the vote count for Clinton and edwards and guess what? actual vote counts increase for Obama after the hand count in 1 ward of 1 county.
Diebold count Hand Count Total votes
Clinton 1030 959 - 71
Edwards 405 377 - 28
Obama 673 678 + 5
Now for those of you that think this may not be a big deal let me put it in perspective for you nay sayers.
This in itself should be enough to toss out EVERY DAMN ELECTRONIC MACHINE ON THE PLANET PERIOD.
the percentage of votes lost makes a huge difference in the actual percentage they receive. For instance Clinton beat obama by only 3% over all right? In just this one county clinton lost yes LOST 7.4% of the total percentage she has received in just this 1 WARD IN 1 COUNTY while obama gained .73 % now keep in mind that edwards also lost 7.42% of what he had. THAT IS MORE THAN A 15% SWING in just one ward people on machines that are supposed to be error proof which we all know is a load of crap and has been proven time and time again.
These machines and all the so called votes are counted in secret with no paper trail for humans to see WHY IS THAT?
I am really pissed off right now and will post more numbers soon for everyone
For those that wish to do thier own research can go to the official NH recount website here http://www.sos.nh.gov/
As a doctor
you should know it takes more than one data point or sample to establish a trend.
This proves nothing. Once all the data is established then I will comment but not until then.
Something tells me that if the boxes were exactly accurate you would be saying something about vote plants
Watch this
Video Proof!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PKQEQ7qHvgM
Your title leads in a different direction than the good article
Change it to "Vote count fraud in NH likely"
the perfect fix for these machines
a pocket size degaussing coil, step with a few feet flip a a switch one dead machine.
rinse and repeat
The Abuse of Greatness is when it disjoins remorse from power. - Shakespeare
Paper ballot fraud is simple in one phrase:
.
CHAIN OF CUSTODY
.
Period.
.
It's really simple. In the vast majority of the cardboard boxes that held the paper ballots in the NH primary, the boxes had slits through which the boxes were easily stuffed with false paper ballots with just the right numbers in order to bring up the ballot numbers in the boxes to approximate the election "results". Easy.
.
That means that one cannot have ANY confidence in neither the paper ballot system, nor the privately-managed/owned computer-based system.
.
The entire election is a train wreck. Vote count challenges really ought to be mounted in every single state in the Super Tuesday election day. The revelations of the total train-wreck messes in every aspect of the elections, combined with the very obvious alive and kicking Ron Paul candidacy over the dead mainstream-supported ones, may lead to a successful brokered convention in which Ron Paul could actually win the nomination, afterall.
.
Hmmm, I like that: Ron Paul getting the nomination because of massive doubts of the entire voting process and the enthusiasm of people continuing to support Ron Paul and continuing to give $ to his campaign--may lead Ron Paul to a nomination victory in a brokered convention in which the delegates would realize that Ron Paul really was the favored, voted choice all along.
.
So that means that we all must keep on chugging along with our efforts to get the word out and support Ron Paul in as many ways as possible.
.
Thank you ALL who are still plugging away with this awesome Ron Paul Revolution!
.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
A Ron Paul supporter since the 1980's!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
A Ron Paul supporter since the 1980's!
Gosh, got excited in re-post, and BHAM! NOT SPAM!!!
Must take time for it to post!
Wish you well and keep the info coming!
You better believe i will
You better believe i will
www.buckforchuck.com
www.whokilledtheconstitution.com
www.revolutionbroadcasting.com
Dr. Steve Parent
If this trend continues...
Okay, when the recount is finished, if Clinton has lost 7.4% of her statewide vote (which would make Obama the winner), I will eat my keyboard.
If you're so concerned about fraud, then prevent it in Florida and Feb 5th states. NH is over and no recount will change the perceptions it left.
Do any of you not understand
Do any of you not understand that if this action can happen in NH that it can and probably will happen everywhere?
If you think i can stop it i can't for the memory cards and the programming code is not available to anyone not even officials of the state and county.
www.buckforchuck.com
www.whokilledtheconstitution.com
www.revolutionbroadcasting.com
Dr. Steve Parent
Diebold Machine
I wonder if Bev Harris at Blackbox Voting knows how to get her hands on a an actual Diebold voting machine?
A Baseball Bat Voting Machine Tea Party, taking swipes at any big metal thing that can stand-in as a voting machine, could be staged on the steps of every Registrar of Voters office in every county that uses electronic voting machines. Alert the media, get some press coverage...and instead of a fundraiser for Ron Paul, the $1 could go to the nonprofits that are trying to make headway in this fight. It's for America and all of the candidates.
Could also be tied in with screenings of the new movie "Uncounted" which is touring the country right now. I just watched it...amazing movie.
Breaking the machines
Would be a lot of fun.
_________________________________
Freedom - Peace - Prosperity
i bet we could get
huckabee to help break those machines. i've heard he's pretty good at destroying computers and the like.
http://micahdriscoll.blogspot.com
There is no room for "voter innacuracies"
Humans make errors, so if there is an error during a hand count, the safety net is a second person counts and they cross-reference their findings for accuracy. If their numbers don't match perfectly, start again. We all know this is NOT the method that was used.
Machines don't make errors... they are programmed incorrectly, or are hacked. Considering what is at stake, I sure as hell hope Diebold programmed the things correctly. If they didn't, I say that they INTENDED not to, and purposefully dictated which candidates would be helped and which would be hindered by the inaccuracies. If the machines were hacked, someone (the hacker) surely INTENDED it.
Mistakes made on something this important are INEXCUSABLE... if errors were made, you have to assume they were made purposefully.
This was exactly my
This was exactly my point.
You will never convince me that when the secretary of state of NH makes a publice statement to the media in NH that there was no problem with the DIEBOLD vote counts and we can see with our own eyes on thier government web site that the clearly IS A PROBLEM.
THAT IS FRAUD END OF STORY.
We SHOULD HAVE EVERY VOTE COUNTED CORRECTLY NE EXCEPTIONS EVER.
DIEBOLD HAS BEEN CAUGHT LYING AND HAVE ACTUALLY SETTLED LAW SUITS WITH STATES FOR MILLIONS OF DOLLARS BECAUSE OF THE BLATENT LIES ABOUT THE SECURITY OF THIER SYSTEMS.
DOES NO ONE ELSE SEE THIS AS FRAUD BY THE COMPANY THAT COUNTS OUR DAMN VOTES IN SECRET?
www.buckforchuck.com
www.whokilledtheconstitution.com
www.revolutionbroadcasting.com
Dr. Steve Parent
Private Company with Secert
Private Company with Secert Software and Secert Source Codes administering a Public Election!!! Enough Said!
Pinpointing Republican Towns
Hi
I just got hold of some great information about Massachusetts. You might want to see if you can get similar statistics about your state from the Election Board. A news ad salesman was happy to provide the info to me. The towns with the most Republicans are rural and here they are:
Barnstable County: CHATHAM, Orleans
Essex: Boxford, Hamilton, Manchester, Topsfield, WENHAM
Norfolk: Cohasset, DOVER, Norolf
Plymouth: Duxbury
Worcester: Bolton
Towns in bold letters are the top three Republican towns. In all cases they are still outnumbered by Democrats. However it's important to locate places in Massachusetts where folks are even willing to consider voting for a Republican, otherwise you are just barking at the moon.
I want to raise $900 to place some Ron Paul cartoon - ads in local papers in these exact locations, with the dual purpose of increasing Ron Paul awareness and recruting some precinct leaders in those locations. Wanna chip in? We need you!
www.pauliticalpress.com
Instead of Tea Party - I'm thinking more like "Office Space"
I've got an aluminum bat to donate. Now we just need a Diebold machine and a polling place here in FL next week that'll have some media....
I say we charge $1 a whack and donate it to the campaign!
Who's got the means to get hold of one of these vote-thieving pieces of crap?
Diebold Card Reader on Ebay
http://cgi.ebay.com/Diebold-Card-Reader-39007155-CARD-RDR-SW...
Well there you go but i
Well there you go but i sound like a nut as someone called me earlier.
www.buckforchuck.com
www.whokilledtheconstitution.com
www.revolutionbroadcasting.com
Dr. Steve Parent
I am all for that
I am all for that
www.buckforchuck.com
www.whokilledtheconstitution.com
www.revolutionbroadcasting.com
Dr. Steve Parent
Love IT!!!
That's great -- sign me up.
Voting Machine Tea Party !!!
Wninja...that's the best idea I've heard in a long time ! How? When? Where?
What is the story
on the Republican recount?
Famous Quote from Justice William O. Douglas
"The Constitution is not neutral.
It was designed to take the government
off the backs of people."
Boycott Fox. Boycott PayPal. Boycott ChipIn.
Famous Quote from Justice William O. Douglas
"The Constitution is not neutral.
It was designed to take the government
off the backs of people."
Fraud describes intent
You're using the wrong term. Fraud implies someone, or some people are intending to sway the results one way or the other.
Intent.
Voter inaccuracies have to do with mistakes, human error, machine error, etc...
Learn the difference so you stop sounding like a conspiracy nut.
Basically you're arguing that Hillary should have more votes than she did already. Big whoop.
Fraud is when the secretary
Fraud is when the secretary of state claims there is no problems with the vote counts pal when there clearly is a problem. What do you call that?
2nd if you knew how to read you would see my post was that Hillary has received more votes by machine than she actaully received.
BY OVER 7%
Call me a nut all you want for i have facts what you have are theories get it straight.
www.buckforchuck.com
www.whokilledtheconstitution.com
www.revolutionbroadcasting.com
Dr. Steve Parent
How about this
How about before you get yourself in a tizzy, we wait until the vote count is completed and then we can see how insignificant the differences are between the two counts.
And when you see that the new count doesn't sway the percentages per candidate in any shape or form, maybe you'll stop yelling voter fraud and conspiracy.
Or maybe not...
First error does not equal fraud
Now there were two precincts that had 10 % or so errors, and the errors were found during the recount, and were traced to explainable mistakes - this is a Proven FACT.
The rest of the machine count was within 0.5 % -generally this is not considered a problem. What error rate should we expect ? (remember it is IMPOSSIBILE to have a zero error rate. ) I suppose 0.1 % is better, given the recent elections, but there is nothing sinister here.
If you don't understand these things, you should educate yourself, before you start screaming fraud. It is just this attitude that costs RP votes.
Imagine yourself as an undecided voter. You like RP's economic policies, but you are concerned because of the accusations you heard from Fox News. You log on to DailyPaul to check this out, and you see someone ranting on incoherently about election fraud, distorting facts, and making wild accusations. They will leave thinking Faux was right.
I agree with you completely
It does no good to scream for no reason until the count is completed and you see the final results.
You'd actually have to prove that each county is conspiring with one another to sway the counts.
And that is simply an insane idea.
How about
you two go back to sleep. Imagine all the future Ron Paul supporters that are going to go somewhere else because of this persons post..LOLOL What a crock! There are voting issues and people are waking up to that fact. If you want to hit the snooze for a few more generations go ahead but most of us aren't. To bad we can't be the "perfect supporters" that you guys claim to be. Goodness they will all think we're crazy for saying there are voting issues..LMAO! Tonight when I start counting sheep, I'll start with you two.
voting issues are not fraud
Most people understand that.
Most people understand human error, and machine error, and how it is different from fraud.
and most people can recognize paranoia when they see it.