8 votes

Mother of Alleged Boston Bombers: FBI contacted My Son Just AFTER the Bombing, Before They Killed Him!

Son AFTER Bombing, Before Fatal Shootout

British media [Channel Four] reports claim that FBI spoke with Tamerlan Tsarnaev and said they knew he’d carried out bombing

Steve Watson
Infowars.com
April 22, 2013

In a report released by Channel Four news in Britain, a reporter has revealed that the mother of the suspected Boston bombers has claimed that FBI officials contacted her eldest son after the bombing had taken place and before the shootout that claimed his life.

Speaking with the suspects’ father, Anzor, reporter Nick Sturdee says that the father claims Tamerlan contacted his mother, Zubeidat Tsarnaeva, two or three days after the bombing.

According to Sturdee’s report, “Tamerlan told her the FBI had just rung him and accused him of being behind the attacks, and that he had responded by saying ‘that’s your problem’”.




Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Courage, Mom!

Buncha Boy Scouts on here? I was the kid who picked semaphore.

"Timid men prefer the calm of despotism to the tempestuous sea of liberty" TJ

I wonder what she'll say...

...when the video of her "precious" son putting his backpack down and calmly walking away is shown as part of the prosecutor's case in chief at trial, as it most assuredly will be:

http://www.therepublic.com/view/story/cd15347ca35b46b8b18f10...

robot999's picture

I wonder WHEN

we'll get to SEE THE VIDEO???

"Government is the entertainment division of the military-industrial complex". - Frank Zappa

Again, probably during the trial.

I can't imagine why they'd release the video before the trial. As it is, they're going to have a tough enough time finding an impartial jury.

Did you know we are not

Did you know we are not entitled to see evidence?

I wonder

what people will say they see that the FBI probably set this whole thing up as a sting and it went bad? How could these kids plant this bomb in the middle of a huge military/police presence WITH bomb sniffing dogs?! C'mon.. someone from the FBI should be fired or charged with at least negligence

The most likely events......

Radicalization done by FBI informant/employee.

They gave the kids the idea, the materials and coached 'em through it. Something went wrong in the plan, or the plan changed last second to live explosives.

It's not uncommon, unusual, and has happened before.

It's almost ALWAYS the FBI, I don't need to post ref links here, you guys all know this stuff.

So who is responsible? My opinion, the FBI. But we don't know yet, do we?

Familiar line

"My little Tamerlan would never do such a thing."

I've seen blind parents before but this one takes the cake.

All that I have to say is

All that I have to say is this, -.-. --- ..- .-. .- --. . --..-- / -- --- --

ecorob's picture

very nice...

made me look it up and I liked it!

its 'cos I owe ya, my young friend...
Rockin' the FREE world in Tennessee since 1957!
9/11 Truth.

The judiciary needs to dip the FBI's feet in hot water

it's time to start getting answers and god knows a citizen can't get an answer, but the courts can.

Whether you think you can or you can't, you're right. -Henry Ford

Joel Skousen is on Alex Jones Show now, and he asserts that

the younger one did NOT have a gun on him, utterly destroying the lie that he shot himself, or the fact that it was a 'firefight': more like one way free-fire zone.

http://www.infowars.com/listen

also, Skousen asserted the fact that it is now proven fact that FBI has known about the brothers and been tracking them for FIVE years, proves the fact that at the least, the Govt LET the bombing happen on purpose.

I side with Joel, the Survivor.

Nuremberg 2.0!
Nuremberg 2.0!
Nuremberg 2.0!
Nuremberg 2.0!
Nuremberg 2.0!
Nuremberg 2.0!

well... one of these days...

Predictions in due Time...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zGDisyWkIBM

"Let it not be said that no one cared, that no one objected once it's realized that our liberties and wealth are in jeopardy." - Dr. Ronald Ernest Paul

I didn't know that Joel

I didn't know that Joel survived a recent crash so thanks for posting that information! Yeah, this tragedy is looking like a sting operation that went awry or allowed to occur for some nefarious purpose (immigration bill, perhaps). Some of the alleged details sound so absurd that the proceedings in court ought to be revealing.

Joel... yup, talk about a miracle.

Even if one weren't a faithful person before, I would find it hard to discount the very likelihood of them at the least 'entertaining' the notion of the existence of something beyond in the Cosmos, or even perhaps something of the Cosmos; considering the sheer mathematical improbability of surviving such crash, where serendipitously Joel remembered recently reading about precisely THE article on stall-mitigating techniques that will actually save his life...as it was happening????? Where the cockpit literally sheared off nearly in half, after tumbling like a cartwheel after crashing to the ground, for a man of Joel's age to come out, for all intents and purposes, unscathed!!!

Holy Friggging F'ng F'ng Cow!!!

Wowsa!

Simply, wow.

'The Force' was definitely strong with him that day!

Truly, a Miracle. A Sublime Miracle!

Destiny, Serendipity, whatever. But 'something'...heck, call it 'extreme efficacy of mathematical improbability in action' (for all you strictly deductionist atheist humanists. lol), whatever was working with him, or for him, or through him, truly, a miracle of miracles!

Sure, people say "It's a Miracle!" as a rhetorical semantics vernacular in passing, but an actual miracle that saves your own LIFE?? Wow! Truly, one would have to open up about the universe!

Truly, a miracle, of miracles!

Predictions in due Time...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zGDisyWkIBM

"Let it not be said that no one cared, that no one objected once it's realized that our liberties and wealth are in jeopardy." - Dr. Ronald Ernest Paul

ecorob's picture

immigration bill, maybe?

more like, "GUILTY of WAR CRIMES"!

just sayin'

lets talk about that...cheney, bush, obama ALL guilty of WAR CRIMES and that has been all but forgotten

BASTARDS!

its 'cos I owe ya, my young friend...
Rockin' the FREE world in Tennessee since 1957!
9/11 Truth.

I wouldn't be surprised if an Agent walked back there

and pulled the trigger. I know I wouldn't be able to straddle the side of a boat (as the picture illustrated) with a bullet hole going through my head.

Whether you think you can or you can't, you're right. -Henry Ford

yup,

but supposedly the accused younger boy was alive and walked off the boat??

either way, if the kid were shot in the head with a rifle round, he'd be gone by now, so, either it was a lucky sub-25yd pistol caliber-shot (considering what sounded like hundreds of rounds in the above linked video), or someone snuck one in, later, after he was seen walking off the boat.

you know, even understanding their malice, I used to think how pathetic it is that almost ALL govt-sponsored false flags tend to be sooooo obviously full of holes. And, I used to think that it was unintentional sloppiness.

Now... I'm of the mind that most false flags are full of holes, on purpose. The 'looser' the details, the more room the perpetrators have to manipulate and inject, interject, and 'call audibles' along the way as situations develop and change.

When details are too tight, it's actually a lot easier for skeptical observers to refute; as all of these things still have to operate on some level of logical progression, so anything 'out of place' sticks out even more pronouncedly.

Often, the more ridiculous some details are, it's easier to paint the skeptics with disinfo and as 'conspiracy theorists,' to dismiss their legitimate scrutiny, altogether.

So, in fact, now I'm 100% of the mind that the more intentionally 'loosely' designed a false flag op is, it's actually better for the malicious planners. Plus, it actually gives them more room to dictate via their MSM channels their own narrative, along the way.

Besides, observing public response to more recent false flags or at the least, most questionable 'terrorist' attacks, it frankly doesn't matter for the moron sheeple populace anyway; Bostonians, especially their youths actually CHEERED "USA! USA!" at the loss of their Bill of Rights.

So for the Ruling Class, they must be saying 'holy shiite, with these idiots, we can literally get away with ANYTHING!'

I'd like to think at least 30% of Americans are truly awake. But who knows for certain if we actually already reached critical mass of awakened citizenry; unless something happens and VISIBLY massive response countering the Ruling Class narrative can be seen and observed, there is no 100% certain way for the 'good guys' to count just exactly how many of us there actually are.

If gut feeling is the barometer, I truly feel it's already way beyond 25% of the population. Then again, it is just a feeling, whatever that's worth...

Time is nigh? Then again, I also thought that in back during the RP2008 cycle: I'm constantly amazed at the depth of human capacity to become willfully, both consciously and subconsciously, accustomed to tyranny, however fast or slow it's approaching, or already there.

Normalcy Bias is a sickeningly incredible human psychological phenomenon, IMO.

Other than keep on informing those I meet, sewing the 'Drive-By Red Pills' along the way, it really is the most anyone can do, as all lasting changes are personal, and individual. There's only so much you can 'logic' someone to change; unless one finds a deep internal reason TO change, they won't. So what else is new... yikes.

Predictions in due Time...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zGDisyWkIBM

"Let it not be said that no one cared, that no one objected once it's realized that our liberties and wealth are in jeopardy." - Dr. Ronald Ernest Paul

wow,

"When details are too tight, it's actually a lot easier for skeptical observers to refute; as all of these things still have to operate on some level of logical progression, so anything 'out of place' sticks out even more pronouncedly."

WELL PUT.

I think we are somewhere around 10% of the population, just a guess. I have little faith that people nowadays are anything like the olden days when nobody could dare mention to the public a lie without fearing the public.

today, the public is not scary to the bank bosses at the FED, in fact, the public is complicit in using the same lies against each other to keep the public "safe".

this country has done a 360 since the Progressives rewrote the constitution

Whether you think you can or you can't, you're right. -Henry Ford

yup, Hope... the most dangerous, and most beautiful human

attribute.o)

I HOPE there are more than 10%! hell, I believe (another dangerous human attribute.D ) there are almost 30%

but... who knows...

I truly hope so though.

cautious optimist, as they say.

but, indeed:

the public is complicit in using the same lies against each other to keep the public "safe".

why the Ruling Class expend 90% of their time, effort and FRN's leveraging mass brainwashing: they're a few, we are many: they have to convince us to police ourselves and each other for the con to continue...though, barring existence of our yet unwritten about progenitors, you'd think about 10,000+ yrs of written history would be enough for humans to finally 'get' the age-old command-control con, but alas, it seems even in the Age of Google, where we humans have more info available to us than at any time in history, with a single mouse click, people are still easily conned.

Though, perhaps BECAUSE of Google, which simply allows one to indulge more of what each person has always liked, that one gets lost in one's own Ocean of 'Misinformia:' if one had erroneous or misinformed worldviews before, perhaps he/she'll simply find more excuses/rational to believe it deeper.

But, even if so, as with all human discernment decisions, no matter how passionately we feel we're right about something based on observable history, at the end of the day, the human mind is that dangerously beautiful paradox: we don't 'see' anything, technically, the eye is only a visual censor, our brains are actually what 'sees' the world. In point of fact, EVERYTHING we 'see' is an interpretation of images 'received' via a set of weird squishy mushy photon receptors.

So suppose, one is only truly correct to claim that everything, is always in the eye of the beholder; humans, as subjective beings, it is patently absurd for any of us to factually claim anything to be 100% purely "objective," and so the cycle of history repeats...oy veh!

Help. I need a new photon receptor! lol. yikes!

Predictions in due Time...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zGDisyWkIBM

"Let it not be said that no one cared, that no one objected once it's realized that our liberties and wealth are in jeopardy." - Dr. Ronald Ernest Paul