8 votes

Oh No! Oh My! OMG! Bombing Suspects Didn't Have License for Guns! Politico

The comments are hilarious. Lots of pro 2nd Amendment folks commenting with some witty ones.

"But wait a minute, in 1998, Massachusetts passed what was hailed as the toughest gun-control legislation in the country. Among other stringencies, it banned semiautomatic “assault” weapons, imposed strict new licensing rules, prohibited anyone convicted of a violent crime or drug trafficking from ever carrying or owning a gun, and enacted severe penalties for storing guns unlocked.

Doesn't that mean that these people would have been UNABLE to get those weapons? I mean they were banned! They can't exist anymore!"

"Man and those little signs on the freeway that say 65?? I thought that was supossed to guarantee nobody would drive 70?? Man none of these laws work.."

"I guess somebody needs to give them a ticket!"

"Funny thing, the law only works with those that follow it."


Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

They like to talk about

They like to talk about banning guns, but they dont like to talk about the details, the martial law like action needed in order to effectively ban them in any effective way from those who have it in mind to use them against people, by banning ALL, to get the FEW, where your rights are "temporarily" non existant......

take an inch today, take a mile tommorow

You ask a government to take the guns, and keep their own....while ignorantly slamming the constitution thats suppose to hold them into account......yeah, ok, how could i ever refuse such a tempting offer

But More Anti- Bomb Laws Would Have Stopped Them


Posted on the Politico

Posted on the Politico article comments section;

Prohibitions on private behavior and ownership only hinder the law abiding.

Drugs, guns, seat belts, it makes no difference, the federal government should have no role, nor does it under the prohibitions on government in the Constitution. The federal government is to be restricted not the people is the clear intent.

It amazes me that people are brainwashed enough finally today to believe that the federal government has magic powers to keep them safer then free neighbors and local autonomy under their natural rights and protected by the US Constitution and its bill of rights .

As we ignore basic truths, I prefer my neighbors armed so that they may protect me and my rights as I can protect theirs. Gun control is a tool of the State not free people.

What percentage of your neighbors do you believe to be good people that share your values and the values of a free society? 0% 80% 99.8%? If your number like mine is high, why would you want to disarm your neighbors and empower the corrupt few controlling the dialog in Washington and through their corporate cronies and by the sword of the solely owned media propaganda tool they wield at us daily.

We must wake up friends and neighbors. Look at these fools and please do not let yourself become one of them destroying us all in the process.

"An educated citizenry is a vital requisite for our survival as a free people."

"If a nation expects to be ignorant & free, in a state of civilisation, it expects what never was & never will be."

-Thomas Jefferson

“Any man who thinks he can be happy and prosperous by letting the government take care of him better take a closer look at the American Indian.” ― Henry Ford.

We need to pass a law

We need to pass a law to make it illegal to be illegal and not have a license.

That will fix it.

And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes and our sacred honor.

HuffPo too


Some people will never get it.

Exercise Your Rights. If You Don't Use Them, You Will Lose Them.
My News Twitter http://twitter.com/sharpsteve
My YouTube http://www.youtube.com/user/sharpsteve2003