Collection of 27 photos immediately taken seconds after the explosion
The bombing has been determined to be an "act of terror", making them the "actors".
definition of actor
1 one that acts : doer
a : one who represents a character in a dramatic production
b : a theatrical performer
c : one who behaves as if acting a part
3 one that takes part in any affair
Examples of ACTOR
-my sister went to drama school to become an actor
-Benjamin Franklin was a major actor in many of the events leading up to the founding of our nation.
Yeah I didn't see almost this exact same post below before I posted it, oh well guess you get the idea.
Odd slip, since only intelligence services usually use the word that way.
And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes and our sacred honor.
Other definitions of the word "actor":
1) "one that acts; a "doer".
2) "One that takes part in any affair."
EXAMPLE: "Benjamin Franklin was a major 'actor' in many of the events leading up to the founding of our nation."
I don't think he meant "stage actors". He meant a person who ACTS (takes action, does something, etc.)
Take the Red Pill at www.redpillphilosophy.com New Videos, Articles, and More!
ie. bombing in this scenario
Saying they are actors in this sense means they were the ones "doing the action".
I am Ron Paul
read any court case. A person who commits a crime is an actor. As in they act on a crime. it is common law enforcement term.
2. a person who does something; participant
Give up on your black flag fairy tale.
pretty funny slip, though
Has anyone posted this? It IS the same woman.
is the woman's name. had they put the name up and it was the same, this wouldn't be an issue, but was edited out for the video for propoganda. if they used different names, then there would be concern, but that would have definately been on the video.
conclusion: this woman either gave her contact information to cnn for futher statement, or, she stayed in the area all day (or was a local resident) and different news crews at different times of the day asked her for interview.
and her hair is not fixed. It was different day interviews. Where is the video showing her name? Are you for sure it was edited out?
that cnn and every other news organization interviewed the same people more than once.
If you watched any news that day, the same person was interviewed multiple times, as multiple people were. This means nothing other than cnn was able to get ahold of the woman for a second statement, not some crazy wack job theory.
edit: found it funny
bruh. The truth shall set you free...or it will free itself.
If you don't know your rights, you don't have any.
Grasping at straws is what i keep returning to when it comes to the "theories" about the Boston bombings, like if people are purposefully pushing idiotic videos with idiotic conclusions. Use your own fucking brain not just some morons close minded view.
But then again i think that there are people organized to try to discredit the non-mainstream media.
Boston bombing, it happened, they got them, charge them and get it over with. All this shows is that no matter the legislation if someone wants to hurt someone else they can, and will, succeed. Even with paramilitary support like there was at Boston
"Use your own fricking brain not just some morons close minded view."
You say that, then you just regurgitate what we've all heard the TV report.
"Boston bombing, it happened, they got them, charge them and get it over with."
No warrants were issued for arrests. No judge found reasonable cause so they sent in the Imperial Stormtroopers to joyride through the city, disturbing the peace and forcing entry at their pleasure violating and destroying property.
Does getting over it with mean prosecuting those guilty of criminal behavior?
Or does getting it over with mean abandoning the Rule of Law for the Fog of War?
Two hundred and Thirty-six years ago Bostonians rejected the Fog of War in favor of the Rule of Law and defended their Personal Property Rights.
The eyes of the world are on Boston yet again. Much is at stake.
We sing about the Land of the brave and the home of the free. Why?
Free includes debt-free!
"these are the droids you are looking for"
“Let it not be said that no one cared, that no one objected once it’s realized that our liberties and wealth are in jeopardy.”
― Ron Paul
Open and shut huh? Sort of like the 93 WTC bombing?.
You should really pull up a chair and listen to the FBI telephone conversations that Emad Salem recorded. Hours and hours...over 900 pages of transcripts.
If someone is caught lying to you enough times...at what point do you call that person a liar and no longer believe a word coming out of their mouth?
Could have been an honest slip-up and he might have been meaning to say "actors" in the context that these two people acted to carry out the bombimgs.
It is a notable piece of video either way you look at it, though.
is a term law enforcement uses to describe the person who "acted on the crime". he said the term, realized it was a technicaly term, and then changed it for the layman.
Yes, that's what I made of the statement too
If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land, it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy.
Want DP delivered to your inbox daily? Subscribe here: