-35 votes

I Think A Missile Strike Appears To Have Destroyed West Texas Fertilizer Plant

Missile Strike Appears To Have Destroyed West Texas Fertilizer Plant

With everyone’s attention on the Boston Marathon bombings there have been a few events that occurred last week that have flown under the radar. On Wednesday April 17th 2013 there was an explosion at a fertilizer plant in West Texas that killed several people and injured hundreds. Raw video footage showing the plant on fire and the subsequent explosion shows what looks like a missile blowing up the complex. A very distinct sound can be heard right before the blast indicating that some sort of object traveling at a very high rate of speed was fired into the area. The corporate media has claimed that something inside the plant set off the larger explosion but if you carefully watch the footage it is obvious that this was not the case. The explosion was reported to have been felt up to 50 miles away and even registered 2.1 on the Richter scale creating an enormous mushroom cloud. This is similar to the Oklahoma City bombing of the Alfred P. Murrah federal building which resulted in a 3.0 reading on the Richter scale. The blast left a crater 30 yards across and 15 yards deep. Barry Murry a local resident who lives a mile away from the plant compared the blast to a bomb going off when speaking with CNN and this is just one of several eyewitness accounts comparing it as such. Common sense would dictate that this type of seismic activity and the crater size could have only occurred with the use of a powerful missile or bomb and the video evidence certainly supports it.

http://www.blacklistednews.com/Missile_Strike_Appears_To_Hav...

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

pfft!

YOU OBVIOUSLY WORK FOR DA GUBMINT

HOW MUCH ARE THEY PAYING YOU

I CHALLENGE YOU...TO A DUEL!

http://youtu.be/hjE2sxCQ_rU

A signature used to be here!

Yeah, I remember going down this road before...

...with Armyfree.

You accuse people of "hiding behind a computer" (while hiding behind one) and accuse them of insulting you (when you start the insults), and then you declare that your downvotes must be the result of a tiny gang of neocons/agents/shills whatever.

When I posted at you last night, it was to get you to think about how you approach people, but now I just think you're no longer worth my time. I'm done feeding you, troll.

Have fun in la la land.

A signature used to be here!

sharkhearted's picture

FUCK YOU YOU LIAR!

And you have been blocked.

~Chris
Norfolk, VA

Time to INVESTIGATE the investigators of 9/11. PROSECUTE the prosecutors. EXPOSE the cover-up.

Joη's picture

are you going to stop this approach or not?

It's getting pretty offensive.

"You underestimate the character of man." | "So be off now, and set about it." | Up for a game?

deacon's picture

have the rules here changed

and not been updated?
specifically #1,#5 and #7
I know at times i am no saint,but it is not
a reoccurring theme as with sharkhearted
there just might be people here to read who do not want to read words such as has been posted
and they are for all to see (it is true,we eat our own)
deacon

If we deny truth before your very eyes,then the rest of what we have to say,is of little consequence

I can see how sharkhearted

I can see how sharkhearted might be an asset in a crisis, given his obsession and fanaticism but I think for his own good, he needs to be benched for about a week.

Being on this site seems to reinforce his delusions.

sharkhearted's picture

When I posted you now...I was responding

...to your false accusations.

I have no idea what your "army free" accusations are.

Never heard of that.

So...let me get this straight. You will accuse somebody but not be MAN ENOUGH to come out from behind your computer and deal with them face to face??

Dont be a coward.

And yeah...these rare downvotes are a tiny gang of AIPAC neocons, shills, and trolls. Pathetic bunch they (you) are.

AGAIN I CHALLENGE YOU. Meet me face to face and air your grievances that way....as opposed to being a coward and hiding behind email. Wah wah.

Email and blogs are for PUSSIES.

Talk to me face to face, my friend.

~Chris
Norfolk, VA

Time to INVESTIGATE the investigators of 9/11. PROSECUTE the prosecutors. EXPOSE the cover-up.

Dude. Chill out before your

Dude. Chill out before your anger consumes you. It doesn't make sense to get on a comment thread and then call everyone names that are doing the same thing you are. If you don't like the swarm/trolls/disinformation agents then you don't have to be a part of the conversations. You can go out and public and speak to people face to face about anything you choose.

sharkhearted's picture

You would be a good disinformation agent as well. Are you?

What do you do for a living?

And please cite where I have "called everyone names".??

Don't put words in my mouth, though.

I just get tired of this STUPID psy-ops bull shi-t

As far as what I am here on the Daily Paul. I have a storied history. And my biggest concern is the truth. I HATE spin and disinformation.

~Chris
Norfolk, VA

Time to INVESTIGATE the investigators of 9/11. PROSECUTE the prosecutors. EXPOSE the cover-up.

But you don't know what is

But you don't know what is and what isn't spin or disinformation in most cases, like the rest of us. We are all doing our research and searching for the truth. You don't know anymore or any better than the rest of us what is and what isn't true. We have our information, we have our opinions, and that's it. And yes, of course you've been calling people names on here. All I have to do is scroll up or down a bit on this thread to see them.

All one needs to see

is where they work the hardest.

A swarm, indeed.

sharkhearted's picture

Ignore the swarm of disinfo psychos here.

Yeah...go ahead you mother f-u-c-k-e-r-s....go ahead and downvote.

Will see you all in hell.

Haha. This is fun.

~Chris
Norfolk, VA

Time to INVESTIGATE the investigators of 9/11. PROSECUTE the prosecutors. EXPOSE the cover-up.

The Crater

at the Oklahoma City bombing was tiny, not at all what you described.

hmmmm

Weird, this was posted on April 23rd, as opposed to April 1st... guess it's not a late April Fool's joke then.

Folks, it's a plant with tons of flammable and explosive gases on site. When it's already burning, a missile wouldn't be that bad. It's really not, there are the equivalent of huge bombs on site ready to explode already. A missile is totally unnecessary.

As for the "doppler" that looks to be about completely busted below by Jon, so I don't even need to go into how silly that is. I'm saying wind.

Eric Hoffer

sharkhearted's picture

So how does it feel to work for the government?

How does it feel, dude? You discredit....soviet style...everyone else.

So how does it feel to work for them?

I dunno. You explain it. I am not going to.

~Chris
Norfolk, VA

Time to INVESTIGATE the investigators of 9/11. PROSECUTE the prosecutors. EXPOSE the cover-up.

Said it once

And I'll say it again:

If there's some sort of government check that gets said out to people for debunking your garbage, I'm in need of some SERIOUS back pay.

Eric Hoffer

sharkhearted's picture

Ah...so you didn't confirm or deny that.

And effectively, you imply that government pay for debunking someone's "garbage" is warranted.

Really??

Come clean.

And no, you havent debunked ANYTHING.

Dude...try as you may....you will not defeat me or shut me down...no matter how hard you try...no matter how your swarm of downvote trolls vote my comments down.

Just gives me fuel for the fire.

And a pity to you who can't be man enough to address me or contact me in person as opposed to hiding behind his laptop and delivering below the belt jabs.

PUSSY!

~Chris
Norfolk, VA

Time to INVESTIGATE the investigators of 9/11. PROSECUTE the prosecutors. EXPOSE the cover-up.

Again

I've addressed it again and again:

Why do you continually resort to this absurd "we need to meet in person" point? You realize being in person won't make your points valid, it'll just give you the opportunity for the shouting match you so desperately desire.

Being loud =/= being right.

Eric Hoffer

Not Another Missile in Texas Thread!!

You don't need a missile to blow up a fertilizer plant that is already fully engulfed by fire. The fire did the job, the "mission" was complete, the building was completely destroyed.... Not to mention that a fertilizer plant has thousands of gallons of explosive material. It is FARRRRRRR more likely the fire caused the explosion than to believe a missile was launched into it. Stop watching Hollywood movies its clearly messing with your ability to separate fiction from reality.

That's right I did it

And I would've gotten away with it if it hadn't been for you meddling kids and your talking dog.

Check out the Laissez-Faire Journal at LFJournal.com


"The State is a gang of thieves writ large." - Murray Rothbard

sharkhearted's picture

I don't have a Scooby Doo video here but I have a beloved

SNOOPY video:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iTssF_NYusQ

So cute!

~Chris
Norfolk, VA

Time to INVESTIGATE the investigators of 9/11. PROSECUTE the prosecutors. EXPOSE the cover-up.

sharkhearted's picture

NO.

This argument from authority fallacy argument of "frequency analysis" is bull$hit....in the sense that, we have the video. Video and audio...do not lie. (Unless they have been manipulated...a definite possibility)./

Missels that break the sound barrier...are hard to analyze.

Under such microseconds, which the human brain cannot detect...the Doppler Effect is clearly audible, though faster than we can detect it.

~Chris
Norfolk, VA

Time to INVESTIGATE the investigators of 9/11. PROSECUTE the prosecutors. EXPOSE the cover-up.

deacon's picture

that noise could be

from the second explosion,and the camera couldn't handle it all
as it goes right along with the bright light that the camera couldn't handle

If we deny truth before your very eyes,then the rest of what we have to say,is of little consequence

Joη's picture

How is showing sound data pitch down an argument from authority?

(referring to this)

Equally perplexing, if "it's too fast" and "the brain cannot detect this", what organ did you use to arrive at your Doppler effect conclusion?

"You underestimate the character of man." | "So be off now, and set about it." | Up for a game?

Because

Because you understand it and he doesn't. It's the same as attempting to use math or science. Completely intolerable in discussion, obviously.

Eric Hoffer

sharkhearted's picture

The only intolerable discussion....

IS YOU WITH ME.

You fucking coward.

Come out from your email pussy barricade and talk to me personally.

My email is sharkhearted at gmail and I will give you my number.

Or are you going to be like most of these cowards on here and completely ignore al that and continue to hide behind your email jabs while not really taking me on man to man, face to face.

The invitation is out there.

Talk to me IN PERSON and I guaranfuckingtee you we will work this out.

CHRIS

~Chris
Norfolk, VA

Time to INVESTIGATE the investigators of 9/11. PROSECUTE the prosecutors. EXPOSE the cover-up.

Sorry guy

I'm not into dudes and have no need for your phone number.

Talk to me IN PERSON and I guaranfuckingtee you we will work this out.

Yes, because that doesn't sound like you'll try and use violence to prove your point or anything. Why must we be in person? Why can't you explain your positions logically here?

Use your words sharkhearted. Use your words.

Eric Hoffer

sharkhearted's picture

Don't flatter yourself. Not asking you out on a date LOL

Just asking you to have a man to man discussion with me as opposed to your hiding behind your little barricade of words.

Your argument is bizarre about words. Are you not aware that for thousands of years before email and blogs...that differences were NOT sorted out via letter to letter...using "words, sharkhearted, words" .waiting on the latest letter to arrive....on the contrary....they were sorted out face to face.

I realize you think you are "properly" addressing each thing that I am saying with "responses"...yeah but what if your responses are based upon manipulation, fallacy, misinformation, and disinformation??

What do you do then?

Well, in real time dialogue, debate, and either face to face communication....or phone to phone...you don't have the chance to calculate your response.

Again...email and blog responses are fine. But if they are used alone without personal discourse, then thats where the cowardice creeps in.

You know I am right. And no, in a liberty world, MAJORITY DOES NOT RULE...so I could not give a f-u-c-k about the downvotes.

~Chris
Norfolk, VA

Time to INVESTIGATE the investigators of 9/11. PROSECUTE the prosecutors. EXPOSE the cover-up.

Sigh

you don't have the chance to calculate your response.

What you mean is, "to think." What you're hoping for is a debate in which heated emotion means something, and in the text based world, your heated emotion comes across as off-putting and illogical, which it is.

I'm sorry, but I don't think a debate in which the parties aren't given time to think and compose responses is conducive to debate. It's conducive to name calling and emotional coloring, which is obviously what you need. Look how mad you get just reading the text. You can barely control yourself at your keyboard. Why do you think anyone would trust you with their personal details or to meet up in public?

Eric Hoffer

You are a fool

Jon is clearly using the 'argument from evidence' fallacy =D