2 votes

Rand Paul's drone furor: Poor paraphrasing

It seems so much furor has been created by Rand Paul's recent statements, and upon further inspection, it seems to be little more than poorly paraphrasing a previous example laid out during his filibuster.

The statement that caused all this goes as follows...

"If someone comes out of a liquor store with a weapon and fifty dollars in cash. I don't care if a drone kills him or a policeman kills him."

If we look to his filibuster, the same situation is outlined as follows....

"If some guy's robbing a liquor store two blocks from here and the policemen come up and he comes out brandishing a gun, he or she can be shot. They once again don't get Miranda Rights, they don't get a trial, they don't get anything. If you come out brandishing a weapon and people are threatened by it, you can be shot."

Recent interview:

Filibuster clip:

Filibuster transcript:

Trending on the Web