-17 votes

I think Ron Paul is running in 2016!

How do I know this?

I'm using the laws of common sense, deduction and rational;

1. He has run for president three times -- each time he has been clear about what his "chances" are of winning the nomination. (Slim)

2. He has run for president three times -- each time he has been clear about his intentions of using the debate stage as an opportunity to educte his fellow Americans.

So, if the above is true -- why would he NOT run in 2016?

Can you image Ron, Rand, Judge Nap and Gary Johnson all on the stage at once?

Think about it.



Trending on the Web

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Now THERE'S a candidate I'd

Now THERE'S a candidate I'd stand with!

"It is difficult to free fools from the chains they revere".
--Voltaire

It's hard not to be a menace to society when half the population is happy on their knees. - unknown

The '08 campaign funded the creation of CFL...

'12 funded many more projects.

In '16 he would get the respect he deserves from the Inane-Stream Media because by then they will be desperate to increase their viewership from the by then 4 people who will still be tuning in to their hoo-ha.

Daily Paul cured my abibliophobia.

Is my logic flawed?

Why would Ron Paul spend so much of his time and energy spreading the cause of Liberty in the way he is currently doing it (college campuses, homeschooling, foreign affair thinktanks etc.) but yet pass up on an opportunity to advocate that same message on a MUCH bigger pulpit? (The Presidential debates) This is EXACTLY what he has been doing every chance he gets for several decades now. I dont see Rand and Ron running "against" each other -- I see them running "with" each other to fortify the same message.

What am I missing?

"The church says the earth is flat... but I know that it is round. For I have seen it's shadow on the moon and I have more faith in a shadow than I do in the church." - Magellan