5 votes

Stock Act Rollback happened while Boston bombing "incident"

We all have our opinions on how the event was a false flag, staged, etc. In every tragedy there's ways to benefit. I usually go here and people are on top of what the government does and am suprised no one here is talking about this.

The Stop Trading on Congressional Knowledge Act of 2012 was created in response to public outcry when it was revealed members of Congress were legally allowed to engage in insider trading.

Passed last April,
the STOCK Act explicitly said members of Congress and their staffs are not exempt from the prohibition of insider trading placed on everyone else.BUT
Obama signed the STOCK Act rollback the same day the Boston bombing happened, when everyone was distracted...

Key provisions stripped from the Act include:

Creation of searchable, sortable disclosure of the information contained in reports even for Congress, the president, vice president, the president’s cabinet and congressional candidates.
Required electronic filing for Congress, the president, vice president, the president’s cabinet and congressional candidates, as well as high-level executive and congressional branch employees. Even images of the staffers’ filings will not be available for viewing on the web.

I believe time is running out for the corrupt and they are trying their best to not get caught. What do you DPers think? Could this be one of the reason why Boston incident was staged?? Im trying to follow where money goes. Where money goes usually leads you to the truth.



Trending on the Web

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

No. But who sponsored the rollback and who voted for it?

No. Let's get real. People have short memories and it didn't really bother anyone that their Congressmen were making millions on insider trading in 2009 while the rest of us lost half our net worth. My Rep, Congresswoman Rosa DeLauro, scored $4,000,000 from the corrupt practice, and defended it by saying "No law was broken at the time." That was good enough for a 76% victory in 2012! Not the usual 82% but hey, nobody gave a damn.

Question is, WHO sponsored the rollback and who voted for it? What was the bill number?

ANSWER: We'll never freakin know, because both house and senate bills were passed by unanimous consent votes (anonymous cowardice, if you ask me).

The claim is, the federal employee unions twisted legislator arms to protect the 28,000 federal workers whose investment info was required to be made public.

But that's even worse: not only is the shady practices of our legislators covered from view, but taxpayers are blinded from seeing just how incredibly wealthy federal employee union members are becoming at our expense.

"Cowards & idiots can come along for the ride but they gotta sit in the back seat!"

Sad

Sad

Southern Agrarian

Cyril's picture

BUMP.

BUMP.

"Cyril" pronounced "see real". I code stuff.

http://Laissez-Faire.Me/Liberty

"To study and not think is a waste. To think and not study is dangerous." -- Confucius

Cyril's picture

Thank you for posting this.

Thank you for posting this.

I didn't miss that, I commented about this convenient coincidence same day or day after the bombing.

The plunder and organized dissimulation go on, no matter what other horror happens otherwise... Indeed.

"Cyril" pronounced "see real". I code stuff.

http://Laissez-Faire.Me/Liberty

"To study and not think is a waste. To think and not study is dangerous." -- Confucius

BUMP

BUMP

I think I have an idea about

I think I have an idea about this. The disclosure complaints about the bill supposedly are based on some national security hogwash. Reading between the lines it seems that this is more about the corporatist hiring for key positions in the government.

You know, not the elected fools, the ones that do the actual work of running the country and the interest of the banksters around the world. Many of these positions were included in the disclosure requirements in the Stack Act as well.

In the competitive world of top employee talent, how are the banksters going to convince people to leave their jobs in the private sector to go into the government to do the dirty work there for less money? It seems this must have worried TPTB so they changed it.

Having reporting for the elected officials I am sure bothers them a lot less because they don't really matter that much to the real workings of the government. They are just the buffer between TPTB and the people. Sacrificial lambs if you like to blowback from the public on wars and bad policy. The cost involved in getting morons elected is just a cost of doing business when you are running the American (Federal Reserve)empire.

“Any man who thinks he can be happy and prosperous by letting the government take care of him better take a closer look at the American Indian.” ― Henry Ford.

Boston was a botched rushed false-flag flop

... which supports the theory it was thrown together or rushed as a "distraction with benefits"

Obaaaaaaama sure seems worried about whistleblowers. What is he hiding??

http://www.madcowprod.com/2013/04/24/boston-bombers-uncle-ru...

http://www.thecommonsenseshow.com/2013/03/01/the-obama-admin...

http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/esp_sociopol...

http://www.thecomingattack.com/the-invisible-enemy/