18 votes

Video-A Gift For All The ANTI: 9/11 Truth, OKC, Aurora, Sandy Hook, Boston, Waco, Phoenix & Alex Jones Hatin’ Folks

Rachel Maddow LOVES You!

Visit NBCNews.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

http://www.nbcnews.com/id...




Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

(This is still just investigative speculation.)

(This is still just investigative speculation.)

In the ninth image down in this video image series, Is that the Cowboy hat and hand flag guy on the ground behind the black metal fence adjacent to the two rectangular brown tables with the big black duffel bag?

Then appears cowboy hat and flag in hand guy by the brown wooden picket fence before it was pulled away, in front of the guy with the bone sticking out of his leg on the ground.

How did the cowboy hat hero guy have the presence of mind in all that turmoil to grab his American flag and cowboy hat from his duffel bag before he ran to the help of the minimally bloody legless guy?

http://revolutioncarbadges.com/2013/04/24/high-resolution-se...

Also behind the guy in the red jacket helping the lady up, you see a woman with part of her yellow undershirt showing, spilling the red liquid on the ground behind him.

What kind of clothing to Hollywood directors use that blow off with high pressure air without cutting through the skin? The people who had their cloths blown off had hardly any physical wounds.

http://educate-yourself.org/cn/bostonbombingdidyouthink20apr...

That looks like a woman to me, judging by the thighs

Men don't usually have thighs like that unless they are overweight. Cowboy man didn't seem to be overweight.
I could be wrong.
The blood squirting lady. That could be anything, but I do see where you can think that...and the blood left behind her does seem a brighter red than the blood in other spots.

If you look at the offical footage of the two planes hitting the

twin towers on 911 you can clearly see that there is no windows on the twin sides and no markings so it was not commercial planes. There was a pilot 2 years ago who filmed himself with his cellphone going at the altitude and speed that the cellphones calls were supposedly made at by the people on the two planes and found that and filmed himself not being able to connect his call at that speed and altitude. Also there is technology that is available in 2001 patented by the military and government that allows you to have computer generated fake voices that makes it appear that it is coming from a plane when it is not if you use this software when the plane is landed. Craft International" (Military Contractors) Photographed at Bombing Location Before Attack. It’s been revealed that at least two men, possibly a third man with them, were photographed at the bombing scene in Boston wearing matching military grade boots and khaki pants and carrying large black backpacks that match the description of the ones the bombs were in.: http://educate-yourself.org/cn/craftinternational17apr13.shtml

jhon

I like turtles

(only response worthy of this "journalism")

"We are not human beings having a spiritual experience; we are spiritual beings having a human experience"—Pierre Teilhard de Chardin

WTC South Tower Attack Was Not A Commercial Flight

there are many eye witnesses' accounts that confirm that the planes that hit the twin towers did not have any windows and they were both totally grey (no commercial markings) making them sound more like government cargo carriers: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P0iImMhJSuY
Pod Under Flight 175? Military Plane Hit South Tower! Proved by CNN Footage!: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V38SlquOjvE

jhon

For DECADES the MSM has had a free ride to be the ...

Gatekeeper/PowerBroker of information. They have become so secure in that position that I personally don't think they understand what has happened.

Now with free fall ratings, the desparate attempt to rachet up the bag of tricks that worked in the past is truly comical.

Just as comical as the 9/11 Comic Book to explain the 'official story'.

Pathetic

Question

Why does the mother need a script?

The mother of the Boston Marathon bombing suspects ranted on

Thursday that her sons were being framed for the terrorist attack, describing the scene of carnage as a 'really big play' with 'paint instead of blood'. A large newspaper in boston called the boston globe on their own twitter page one hour before the boston bombings said that the police are going to do a controlled explosion in a certain location they gave in one hour. One hour later two bombs went off at the boston marathon exactly where and at the location that the boston globe said on their twitter page that the boston police were going to do a controlled explosion. This fits the possibility that no one actually got injured since it was a controlled explosion which means that yes the victims had to have been fake.

jhon

I imagine Maddow received some mail

re what she said about "truthers." Polls like one by the U. of Ohio (2006) showed that truthers are predominantly on the LEFT. See article, Republicans Have Birthers, Democrats Have 9/11 Truthers. This was among various questions on the subject:

"How likely is it that the collapse of the Twin Towers in New York was aided by explosives secretly planted in the building?

A full 15.9 percent of all voters bought that; the number rose to 24.8 percent among Democrats." http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/republicans-have-birthers-d...

That skew continues to hold according to a more recent poll by Fairleigh Dickenson U. http://www.scribd.com/doc/120815791/Fairleigh-Dickinson-poll...

When we try to pick out anything by itself, we find it hitched to everything else in the Universe.
~ John Muir

this reeks of desperation.

what she's REALLY saying is "no! don't listen to them! listen to us! WE are the only ones that will tell you the truth! THEY are crazy"

they are losing the war on information and they know it. i have facebook friends that have never posted anything about "conspiracy" this or that, ever. but they're posting stuff about the boston bombings on a daily basis.

As I watched this yesterday,

As I watched this yesterday, I was thinking to myself....wow....she is only making more people curious about Jones. Then she turned around and said you have to pay 19.95 a month for a subscription. Obviously an attempt to discourage some people from looking into him. All that debunking and no word of building 7. The mainstream media is definitely afraid of people waking up.

Wow. Where to begin?

I guess all i can really say is I love the way the mother who lost her son over Pennsylvania told us DEFINITIVELY how the Boston suspects were self "radicalized," and learned how to make bombs from Al Qieda, as she looked down to read from her script.

'Nuff said.

~ Engage in the war of attrition: http://pacalliance.us/redamendment/

REMINDER: PewStudy: MSDNC sells more bullshiite than FauxNews

Pew Research: Study finds MSNBC is 85% Opinion Commentary, not 'News'! Out-'foxing' FOX!

Here's the hilarious part: FauxNews is 'only' 55% in pure Onion opinion commentary! And CNN? 'Only' 46%!

The Changing TV News Landscape

by Mark Jurkowitz, Paul Hitlin, Amy Mitchell, Laura Santhanam, Steve Adams, Monica Anderson and Nancy Vogt of Pew Research Center

The news programs that Americans watch on national cable channels and their local television stations have changed significantly in recent years while the network evening newscasts have remained remarkably stable, according to a new study from the Pew Research Center.

On cable, the news structure of the three channels—the mix of interviews, packaged segments and live coverage—has changed. After relying on significantly distinct formats five years ago, the three rivals now look strikingly similar.

At the same time, some of the differences that demarcated daytime cable from prime time have also eroded in the past five years. Traditionally known for its attention to breaking news, daytime cable’s cuts in live event coverage and its growing reliance on interviews suggest it may be moving more toward the talk-oriented evening shows. This transition may cut the costs of having a crew and correspondent provide live event coverage.

CNN, which has branded itself around reporting resources and reach, cut back between 2007 and 2012 on two areas tied to that brand—in-depth story packages and live event coverage. Even so, CNN is the only one of the three big cable news channels to produce more straight reporting than commentary over all. At the other end of that spectrum lies MSNBC, where opinion fills a full 85% of the channel’s airtime.

Oh they "Lean[-ed] Foward" alright, to pure 100% Edward Bernays & Josef Goebbels la la land!

Not that we 'needed' any hard statistics to prove what all acute political observers have known, but here's just some data to backup what y'all have always intuited.

Predictions in due Time...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zGDisyWkIBM

"Let it not be said that no one cared, that no one objected once it's realized that our liberties and wealth are in jeopardy." - Dr. Ronald Ernest Paul

Analyzing the Madcow hit piece......

I know most of you got the the main objective of this piece, but I wish to point it out to make sure.

The main objective is to ensure that sheep stay sheep.

That is, to trigger mental blinders or barriers to engauge in the minds of those who do not yet understand or "get it" when exposed to the truth of things. The purpose is to actually cause anyone who may be brought to the truth to be repelled from the light of it.

I'd like your take. Being THIS has been the MAIN OBJECTIVE all along it must be countered. What do you think is the best way to accomplish this?

Because: Some animals are more equal than other animals. -Animal Farm-

What the? > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6MTIwY3_-ks

Yes, this is about creating a

Yes, this is about creating a mental "firewall" around these issues by creating emotional trigger words and ideas. When these trigger words or ideas come up the mind basically shuts down.

She makes the statement that these conspiracy theorist believe their conspiracies only because Alex Jones or some other source told them to (trying to expose it as an appeal to authority fallacy but actually masquerading it as a shoot the messenger fallacy). And then has the clever slight of hand to use the same appeal to authority fallacy with the whole 9/11 commission and popular science sources. Then she rolls out the mother of a victim that supports the official story in an attempt to appeal to emotion. Its really hard to watch, it'd be interesting to watch if I didn't realize that 90% of the public actually fall for this kind of (non)reasoning.

Well said fio....

While thinking about how you described the intentions of MadCow & Co. and my attempts on how to articulate to others, it's all in how the dots get connected. I don't believe I saw her connect any dots to reality, only to insanity. Yes they are gettting very desparate.

They're unsatible urge for the sacrifice of others must be pretty intense.

Because: Some animals are more equal than other animals. -Animal Farm-

What the? > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6MTIwY3_-ks

And there you go...

How many times did you hear the phrase: "Conspiracy theory?" Or: "Crazy people."

So, for those who watch RM on a loving and daily basis who begin to question any "official 'conspiracy' theory" they will recoil in horror because of the stigma of being called a conspiracy theorist and a crazy person. doesn't matter that they are presented with no logical arguments. Did RM provide the viewer with any evidence to prove her point? Of course not. And there you go.

~ Engage in the war of attrition: http://pacalliance.us/redamendment/

LOLZ

I loved this hit piece! Goes to show you that questioning these liars is working. Truth Strong!

Let us disappoint the Men who are raising themselves upon the ruin of this Country. John Adams

I like how

when she's about to finish the sentence -

"They say our government did this in order to.... 'enslave' us..."

She always finishes with -

"...or whatever"

She knows well, had she mentioned the rationale behind staged attacks, they'd start to sound too plausible for MSNBC.

Alex Jones is the pretty Girl

Meant to distract you from what the magician is really doing.

The Rumor mongers here love their theories of what happened. But you need to throw those away and go with questions. If you want to ask if there was a bomb drill at the Marathon, ask the question and STFU about a false flag. The whole purpose of that question was not to actually get an answer, it was to promote Alex Jones' radio show.

The whole purpose of the Maddow rant was to give her followers a reason to ignore legitimate questions about the investigation.

BTW a friend tells me that anti-terrorist military units always are pre-positioned during large events, and always train during them, since there is no other way to get realistic training for an attack on such large crowds.

So I listened to an Architect

So I listened to an Architect describe how it was physically impossible for a plane to make the buildings collapse, and how the designer of the building said he made it strong enough to withstand a much larger 747 impact....and I just had to stand up and say that's crazy..why that's not what CNN told me....Then he showed me a bunch of graphs and videos of the thermate burning thru steel columns and spoke in technical terms...

Then he mentioned about how the de-bunkers of 911 Conspiracy Theories (Popular Mechanics) will not debate the Architects & Engineers for 911 Truth in a public forum so they can go over the science behind the collapses. And I just said well I wouldn't either...trying to understand all those FACTS gives me a headache... so I had to watch Dancing With The Stars. And have you seen America's Got Talent...Ohhhh so thrilling. I told them that it's so much easier to listen to MSNBC tell me the facts as they have been told by their handlers so there is no need to goto alternative websites and get uncensored information when censored information works just as well. By the way that reminds me...I have to TIVO the Kardashians...after she has her baby I think she's gonna get married...so thrilling.

When he called me from the plane and introduced himself to me...I thought. Hmmmm...I'm on a hijacked planed that terrorists have just taken over...I'm going to call my mom and introduce myself to her because I have to do that as part of my job and I wanna be formal and it's my mom and....Good grief..poor lady.

U can't argue with them because once they learn the TRUTH, and see/understand all that technical stuff those scientists and experts in their fields were were depicting, it's like Monica Lewinsky's lips...they lock on and don't let go. I try to tell them the facts aren't as important as what you Rachel Maddow and your co-workers here at Operation Mockingbird, tell us they are.

U also notice Rachel Maddow, when mentioning the Mrs. Obama headline, provides no details...however:

Kurt Nimmo
Infowars.com
April 24, 2013

"Saudi national Abdul Rahman Ali al-Harbi, who was briefly held as a “person of interest” in the Boston bombings and then downgraded in less than 24 hours to a witness, visited the White House on numerous occasions since 2009. The startling allegation follows an earlier report indicating that al-Harbi was visited in the hospital by First Lady Michelle Obama after he allegedly sustained injuries from one of the explosives placed at the Boston Marathon..."

Oh my...even if those are facts I really liked those shoes Michelle was wearing...I don't want to hear anymore facts about these bombers.

Poor lady...good grief.

P.S. - I do feel for her and and the loss of her son.

I wish

I wish I could give you alot more up arrows. This was the best comment. Thanks

Cyril's picture

Her presentation is very biased, in a very subtle way.

Her presentation is very biased, in a very subtle way.

Too bad it doesn't work with me. But whatever.

I don't the-freaking-care if it's false flag, psy-op, or real foreign terrorism. Or Santa Claus gone postal who did it.

Irrelevant, IMO. Same roots of Evil anyway.

"Cyril" pronounced "see real". I code stuff.

http://Laissez-Faire.Me/Liberty

"To study and not think is a waste. To think and not study is dangerous." -- Confucius

In the ninth image down in

In the ninth image down in this video image series, Is that the Cowboy hat and hand flag guy on the ground behind the black metal fence adjacent to the two rectangular brown tables with the big black duffel bag?

http://revolutioncarbadges.com/2013/04/24/high-resolution-se...

Also behind the guy in the red jacked helping the lady up, you see a woman with part of her yellow undershirt showing, spilling the red liquid on the ground behind him.

http://educate-yourself.org/cn/bostonbombingdidyouthink20apr...

ecorob's picture

Don Henley said it the best...

"Get the widow on the set. Give us dirty laundry".

In this case, get the mother (from 12 years ago) on the set.

For your enjoyment:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fHIJJKKiJGs

I guess it was too late to parade the kids out so they got the mother.

Dispicable.

its 'cos I owe ya, my young friend...
Rockin' the FREE world in Tennessee since 1957!
9/11 Truth.

just a bit of a reminder on whom MADCOW truly is:

NEVER assume that she is a 'misguided, well-meaning progressive.'

What she really is, is a cynical, malicious, EVIL propagandist mouthpiece for the Ruling Class, whose livelihood literally depends on her MSDNC's parent company GE, to keep sending her salary checks dipped in the blood of innocents, worldwide.

She literally IS a whore, for the Military Industrial Complex contractor that is General Electric.

=================================================================


Thanks Jack, for pointing out this clip for reference purposes.

Submitted by AnCapMercenary on Wed, 06/20/2012 - 11:34. Permalink

That said, the plain truth of the matter is that Rachel Maddow is THE first beneficiary of the the 'weirdly at peace with perpetual war,' as her 51%-parent employer of MSNBC, General Electric (GE) is a DIRECT beneficiary of the very WarFarist corporatist fascist policies she speaks of.

Not to mention the fact that Jeff Immelt, the former head of GE, is now on oBUSHma econ team, along with the fact that GE's real 'other' business: finance & credit, in which Fed.Reserve all too happily bailed out.

It's time to put the final nail in the coffin of 'Oh look, those MSDNC hacks like Rachel Madcow are finally coming around'-nonsense, once and for all.

Rachel Maddow is NO FRIEND to Dr. Ron Paul, nor Dr. Rand Paul, nor to us, the R3VOLutionaries or the Liberty/Freedom Movement as a whole.

In case you were wondering, 'then, why the heck did Doug Wead make TWO recent appearances on her show?'

1of2: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9x28_I9oIVg
2of2: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BXYIXkCX8wk

Doug strategically targeted MSDNC like Maddow, Alex Witt, and Mrs.Greenspan's shows, BECAUSE many disaffected liberals and independents still watch MSDNC for info, and many within the R3VOLution were getting weary and beginning to doubt the 'shadow delegate strategy.'

Do you guys realize that the entire official RP2012 campaign took a significant calculated risk when they publicized part of OUR delegate strategy, to rest of the world?

Sure, for our activists on the ground and our adversaries who are having to succumb to it, that reality was beginning to become clear, and a known fact. However, even with such already-public-info, being on TV has the effect of overtly publicizing it, even more, even if that MSM mad-dash is brief. Remember, we do live in a nation with 2sec attention span. How else do you think 51% of the population have already forgotten and ignored how we got into Iraq with lies in the first place, are openly calling to be lied to, again, to go into Iran?

Doug's appearance on her show was Doug simply masterfully playing her, not the other way around. He said just as much and as just as little as what was needed to be said. Notice how Wead did not go back on Maddow's show, even after 'he mistakenly' stated that Dr. Paul 'won' the Washington County in ME in 2008?

This is precisely why Doug is our best weapon. He instantly disarmed her with minor flattery, dropped some facts, knowledge, and meme, and let nature take its course. She bit, and ran with it, 'ALL ON HER OWN.'

Now most of Maddow's subsequent segments about the GOP nomination process, caucuses and the delegate count is that NO ONE really knows what's going on:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yJuuU2gd7S4
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8PnOhxNISHo
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y4ZMWIckZE4

This is Wead's masterful political Aikido at work: you let your enemies do the work for you.

And you want to know just how Rachel Maddow became one of the LAST to leave Air America Radio and got a TV show out of it, along with Thom Hartmann, another fake-ass 'empathy liberal?'

Just listen to her evolution from an informed 'team player' to behind the scenes kiss ass within a bankrupt organization.

http://www.youtube.com/user/OFrankenFactor/videos?query=Unfi...

Unfiltered was a show on Air America Radio with Lizz Winstead, the original creator of Comedy Central's the DailyShow when Craig Kilborn hosted it, and Chuck D of the rap legend Public Enemy.

I would know, because I used to listen to that show and Garofalo's Majority Report with Same Seder, almost daily, throughout the entire 2004, the sole year that AAR was on the air with its original staff full time, all the while listening to Alex Jones show at the same time! LOL

Yes, she's one of 'those' kids y'all hated in Middle School; you know, those who kissed ass to survive while feigning empathy for her 'friends' after they got fired, while she saved her own ass, not out of merit, but because she 'played the game.' She never really said a peep to 'defend her buddies' when AAR fired her co-host Lizz Winstead, and later on when their marquee talents Mike Malloy and Randi Rhodes also got fired.

Yup, too much inside baseball, but regardless.

She's a survivor. Nothing wrong with that per-se, but is indicative of how she also survived the Keith Olbermann axing at MSDNC, when she used to be Keith's 'substitute teacher.'

Maddow has long broken our olive branch, and spat at us, as she clearly chose to do so when she interviewed Rand, on the night of his primary victory.

1of3: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hqnHVYUZGYw
2of3: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EQ61qYT3Pe8
3of3: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YQIruPUw8Mc

That interview wasn't just about her having anywhere near shape or form a major gripe with Rand on policy issues, but pulling the racecard, fully aware that Dr. Paul may run again in 2012, to build THEIR case that 'see, the Pauls are generationally "racist"'-meme in prep for their full-on newsletter smear campaign in Nov-Dec 2011 and Jan 2012 portion of the RP2012 campaign.

Not to mention, she destroyed ANY chance of L-R coalition against corporatism & bailouts, illegal wars, imperialism, and civil rights violations at home, when she basically ambush-smeared Rand.

Why the all out venom against Rand, then, but not Ron?

As a Senator, Rand is the ONLY ONE of the Pauls who can single-handedly stop any legislation from moving forward, as witnessed time and time again in his short stint in Senate.

THAT is why they maligned Rand so viciously. Representatives on the most part are 'easier to ignore.' But Senators, you cannot ignore. They HAVE to pay attention to him, because even if liberals despise him, the outcome of those legislation affect their own agenda.

So, Maddow instantly killed the chance of a broader L-R coalition with that single act. And if anyone thinks that, that interview was anywhere near 'organic' in nature, that person has not been paying attention to politics or TV for very long.

Rachel Maddow is unfortunately still an influential faux-intellectual for the Left. That's why the smear against the Pauls have been more pronounced than it should've been. I mean you guys didn't think that Maddow kept inviting Dr. Paul on after 2008 election cycle without knowing about the 'newsletters' did ya? If she truly did and put it into context and knew that RP had NOTHING to do with writing them, do you think she would've still pulled the racecard on Rand?

Remember 'betrayal' has a lingering effect.

And no, her audience weren't the ones betrayed, WE the R3VOLution were, as she feigned cozying up to Dr. Paul, all the while prepping the ambush. Why else do you suppose it was on HER show that Rand announced his Senate run?

It's because Dr. Paul and Maddow have built-up a good rapport. But, what does she do with that good faith? She signals and propagandizes that 'see this guy, heck, their entire family is not to be trusted! and you my dear audience have all been 'betrayed!''
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z9SbWvjkn2U
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=967gN_nygzg

I'd say she is a prime example of someone who feigns indignantly for moral justice, even though hypocritically when the complainant is a chief beneficiary of such 'injustice.'

Of course, anyone is welcome to buy or promote her book, as long as y'all are fully aware of the hands that feed her. But, I maintain that the best use for such CYA (Cover Your Ass) pulp fiction from a statist scribe and actor (because all political wonks on TV are actors. As Gerald Celente so often says, "Politics are ShowBiz for Ugly People." And that includes commentators, not just politicians) is, if the book is thick enough, to fuel your wood-burning stove or fireplace with. Or, if thin enough, as a toilet paper.o)

Not saying you or the mods are actively praising Maddow for beginning to 'waking up,' but nevertheless, putting a link to buy her book is like putting a link to sign up for neocon AEI, American Enterprise Inst. membership.

Or, more apropos of her purported leftist leanings, a membership at the Center for American Progress, and its internet advocacy arm, Think Progress, ALL setup by John Podesta, Bill Clinton's former Chief of Staff who set up the very 1998 Saddam Hussein decapitation policy that Dr. Paul was so adamantly warning the entire country against.

Podesta didn't stop there. Before March 2003 Iraq Invasion, he was all over the airwaves 'reluctantly' PUSHING FOR Iraq Invasion, including, on OPRAH!!! -- (hard to find clip on that, Oprah's copyright & all)

Oh it gets better: now Podesta wants Iraq War, the very war that he pushed within the Bowels of WH in 1998, again in 2003, TO END!

Guess we all must seem like a bunch of historically amnesic pliable peons to them.

Yes, THOSE 'peaceful' liberals.

So while Ctr4Am.Progress/Think Progress occasionally edits anti-RINO clips, they're not 'catching' them in the act because they're principled, they're doing so because their agenda is to perpetuate the partisan divide by simply catching Republicans and shine a negative light on anyone who call themselves a "conservative."

If one were to go through ALL of MSNBC and ThinkProgress' archives on Dr. PaulS, both Ron and Rand, see if there are more positives or more significantly, non-QUANTITATIVELY but higher volume of QUALITATIVELY more negative type of significant smears and maligning against the Pauls.

Then you be the judge, and tell me if you think these partisans like Maddow is for real, having a revelation, a catharsis, or simply CYA moment.

I would've bought the 'building coalition' before her treatment of Rand. If you guys actually track the initial media attacks against the Tea Party, this should be all too obvious.

For most on the Left, they had NO CLUE as to what "libertarianism" at large were, until Jane Mayer's August 30, 2010 'exposé' on the Koch Bros.

That article was solely done to smear libertarianism as "heartless and utopian."

And, who is the most famous libertarian alive? Dr. Ronald Ernest Paul.

So essentially, they've built up a phony enemy: astro-turf TeaParty, to knock down, while surreptitiously, subconsciously driving the propaganda agenda that "Ron Paul and his libertarians are the REAL enemy!"-meme.

Frankly, however disgusting, as far as evil ploys go, it's been pretty successful. Just look around, even the stolen primaries and caucuses.

Until that article, you've never heard MSM talk so much, so feverishly trying to smear anything 'libertarian' from Ayn Rand (remember all the 'Ron Paul named his own son after Ayn Rand!-meme?), to F.A. Hayek, to 'irrelevant' Ludwig von Mises.

To which I say, whoTF? Robert who??

http://www.slate.com/articles/arts/the_dilettante/2011/06/th...
http://www.economist.com/blogs/democracyinamerica/2011/06/sm...

The liberals NEEDED to malign libertarianism, as frankly that and the Freedom Movement as a whole IS the ONLY real political movement in this country. That is why they had to make Tea Party as what it is today post-TeaPartyExpress/Nation corporatist astroturf: as a mere outgrowth of Koch Bros' empire.

Wanna know the most hilarious part? Most liberals haven't got a clue that NPR/PBS' largest donors are the Kochs, not to mention, BigOil as a whole. You almost can't watch a show not sponsored by Exxon-Mobil, BP or Koch Bros, and these idiots have the nerve to accuse those of us who simply do not buy their control-freak meme that does nothing to address pollution: Peak Oil Carbon Tax.

Oh yeah, they've been at this for a long time.

Maddow is a mouthpiece for THE largest corporatist corporation in the world, not to mention, despite what recent SIPRI study conveniently omitted in their Top 10 list (they placed them at 18th), THE BIGGEST Military Industrial Complex contractor in the world is still GE, General Electric who still owns 51% of MSNBC, despite post-Comcast merger.

So for all her talk, Maddow's bi-weekly salary check is literally dipped in blood of innocents that her parent company's bomber jet-engines aided in.

Not only that, for all her feigning moral righteousness and maligning Dr. Paul and Rand on Civil Rights Act and the newsletters, her entire adult career is predicated on the fact that she's a Rhodes Scholar.

Who is Cecil Rhodes of the scholarship's eponymous sake? He was basically a corporatist viceroy for the British Crown, who made his fortunes in blood diamonds (founder of DeBeers monopoly), slavery, concentration camps against Dutch settlers/outlanders/Boers & their descendants, and made money on both sides of the conflict.

http://www.directessays.com/viewpaper/106143.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_African_Wars_%281879%E2%8...

'The other side's version' on Cecil: http://www.cecilrhodes.co.za/

Sound familiar? It should, the Nazis based their concentration camps modeled after Cecil Rhodes' and US Fed.Govt's version against the Native Americans.

Frankly the entire Viceroy/"Round Table" model since the days of the British Dutch East India Company colonial corporatist fascist were in full effect in South Africa, and decidedly in the American South.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cecil_Rhodes

Cecil John Rhodes PC, DCL (5 July 1853 – 26 March 1902[1]) was an English-born South African businessman, mining magnate, and politician. He was the founder of the diamond company De Beers, which today markets 40% of the world's rough diamonds and at one time marketed 90%.[2] An ardent believer in British colonial imperialism, he was the founder of the state of Rhodesia, which was named after him. In 1964, Northern Rhodesia became the independent state of Zambia and Southern Rhodesia was thereafter known simply as Rhodesia. In 1980, Rhodesia, which had been de-facto independent since 1965, was granted independence by Britain and was renamed Zimbabwe. South Africa's Rhodes University is also named after Rhodes. He set up the provisions of the Rhodes Scholarship, which is funded by his estate.

Historian Richard A. McFarlane views Rhodes "as integral a participant in southern African and British imperial history as George Washington or Abraham Lincoln are in their respective eras in United States history... most histories of South Africa covering the last decades of the nineteenth century are contributions to the historiography of Cecil Rhodes."[3]

...Rhodes wanted to expand the British Empire because he believed that the Anglo-Saxon race was destined to greatness. In his last will and testament, Rhodes said of the British, "I contend that we are the first race in the world and that the more of the world we inhabit the better it is for the human race."[25] He wanted to make the British Empire a superpower in which all of the British-dominated countries in the empire, including Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and Cape Colony, would be represented in the British Parliament.[26] Rhodes included American students as eligible for the Rhodes scholarships. He said that he wanted to breed an American elite of philosopher-kings who would have the United States rejoin the British Empire. As Rhodes also respected the Germans and admired the Kaiser, he allowed German students to be included in the Rhodes scholarships. He believed that eventually the United Kingdom (including Ireland), the USA and Germany together would dominate the world and ensure peace.[7]

Most hilarious part?

"Confusingly for the modern reader, self-government of the type Rhodes supported was known as "colonialism". The opposed policy, direct control of a colony from London, was known as "imperialism". This should be kept in mind when reading documents from this time."

You gotta love a true bigot who rationalizes eugenicist racial superiority nonsense and slavery as "colonialism" (you know, over the African natives, and 2nd generation European settler 'colonists') vs. "imperialism." All that says is that they TOO wanted to have a bunch of subjects to lord over, but just not be told how to do it from London.

Ever wonder WHY it is that the Ruling Class always introduced the first post-'civil rights'-era police forces to be a native of the formerly outwardly oppressed population, be they Native Americans, or blacks?

Because when 'one of your own' is policing you, it SEEMS 'less racist,' even though they're still carrying out the racist policies of the Ruling Class, ON BEHALF of the Ruling Class.

Or in case of Africa, ever wonder why it is that post-colonial era rulers are always native African dictators, who almost always end up being much more brutally violent against 'their own people' than their former European colonizers? It's the generational brainwashed self-hatred, translated into taking out all the pent up energy of the colonial era, with much of their former Euro rulers gone, they simply take it out on 'their lessers,' all the while still being funded to do so by the SAME European fascist corporatist imperialist colonial ruler, behind the scenes. It is to propagate the Euro-colonial centric meme of 'see we were better rulers than your own current dictators.'

Examples are endless: Mao, post-English colonialism, Pol-Pot post-their Indo-French-Chinese rulers.

The psychology behind EVERY form of mind slavery is that the oppressed seeks out another group TO oppress. Just look at what Israelis are doing to Palestinians, post-their own oppression at the hands of the Nazis.

Or in our case, black cops in black communities. They are often far more brutal against 'their own people' than a typical racist cop patrolling their neighborhood in the 1960's. Of course, it is a different era, so a current black cop's violations 'against their own people' seems proportionally, obviously seems even more pronounced today.

But is this really any different behavior than the statistically higher number of VICTIMS of child abuse and domestic violence, whom unfortunately grow up to be child abusers and wife-beaters themselves? Plus what is almost always the common denominators with serial killers? Bad, abusive childhood.

Likewise, Rhodes and his scholarship are just an 'intellectual' policy extension of the same imperialist slave mentality meme.

Rhodes Scholarship is nothing but a program to essentially educate the next generation of sycophantic policy lackeys and groom viceroys for the English Crown, and continue the march of imperial colonialism. Is there any doubt that Bill Clinton, another Rhodes Scholar, were fully living up to Cecil Rhodes' last will and testament?

But, just like how forming the USO as a consolation prize by the convicted WAR CRIMINAL Sen. Prescott Bush can NEVER erase his crimes, nor can Cecil's Rhodes Scholarship.

In fact there are no worse disgusting individuals than the entire roster of actors on MSDNC from Maddow, to Larry O'Donnell, and Ed 'PsychoTalk' Schultz, the other MSDNC douchecbags who feigned niceties to Dr. Paul in the past, just to get him on in an attempt to smear him.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PhkkGWAjXu4
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FwGHfaDP6S8
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zu9eTNgPItA
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rr1ga6GQ4oE

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bAGl31mQZi0
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=INuvc1p_koY
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hP_7ePK773Q
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8MNNWlODdZA
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9vXZ2mnYzfM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q1tot08HMI0
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kV4imh3rMEA
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sa1QlbqwQH4
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q8dTd0Hgi18

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xIO2Zflqrrs
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DfuvndfA1jw
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oZ3tCeBaNik
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O8GbTk_MmMk
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tplKHqVEzyY
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UX4pZJJUuSA

It's like how many more clips does one need to see, to 'get' what the REAL GE's MSDNC and their lackeys like Maddow, Crazy Ed and Larry O'Dunno's agenda is??

Indeed, Maddow is a good place to start, if you want to teach someone about how a sophisticated propaganda works. Just look at her entire career, as a whole, along with the clips of incessant smear campaign waged by ALL her colleagues on MSDNC.

So I kindly ask that you or the mods, to please take this thread off the frontpage, if not, at the least, please take the link to 'buy her book' off, unless you also want to place a link to buy works of Joseph Goebbels, or John Maynard Keynes on the frontpage, too.

Thank you.

Predictions in due Time...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zGDisyWkIBM

"Let it not be said that no one cared, that no one objected once it's realized that our liberties and wealth are in jeopardy." - Dr. Ronald Ernest Paul

Nice

Thank you

quite

welcome.

Predictions in due Time...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zGDisyWkIBM

"Let it not be said that no one cared, that no one objected once it's realized that our liberties and wealth are in jeopardy." - Dr. Ronald Ernest Paul

Where do you get off calling

Where do you get off calling her a whore? Are you mad? Should I talk about your mother or sister that way?

Crazy the kind of people there are on this website.

A whore

: to debase oneself by doing something for unworthy motives, typically to make money:

Yepper, sounds about right