18 votes

Video-A Gift For All The ANTI: 9/11 Truth, OKC, Aurora, Sandy Hook, Boston, Waco, Phoenix & Alex Jones Hatin’ Folks

Rachel Maddow LOVES You!

Visit NBCNews.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

http://www.nbcnews.com/id...

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Whore?

That's the least I could think up. But, in respect for the site, I won't go there.....

Because: Some animals are more equal than other animals. -Animal Farm-

What the? > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6MTIwY3_-ks

LOL: Sarcasm only works if you're informed and

understand the definition of 'irony.'

So grab yourself a dictionary, and a literacy magic potion, fella, because if that's all you got out of that lengthy verbosity, you clearly have not read it (not that you should, but if you ARE going to reply, I'd appreciate it if you'd reply AFTER actually having read it; if 'insensitive' words are your personal barrier to entry to info, you're gonna be left out, on pretty much all real geopolitical discussions, but c'est la vie) you clearly have no clue WhoTF MADCOW is, where she came from, what she represents, or whom she represents.

I followed her career since 2004. Have you? How much do you know of, or about her, again??

but as for this?

Where do you get off calling
Submitted by godsfavson on Thu, 04/25/2013 - 01:19. Permalink

Where do you get off calling her a whore? Are you mad? Should I talk about your mother or sister that way?

That's nice, but who says you'd ever get away with calling one of mine, that??

LOL.

Aw cute. If you want to be the sole DP member known to vehemently defend the 'honor' of the General Electric's war propagandist and murder apologist, go right ahead.

Just so we're clear, yes, she's a WHORE for the military industrial complex, a WHORE for the warfarists. A WHORE for the Federal Reserve charter member banksters.

Did I stutter?

LOL.

Yes, Madcow = a WHORE.

Any questions?

Predictions in due Time...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zGDisyWkIBM

"Let it not be said that no one cared, that no one objected once it's realized that our liberties and wealth are in jeopardy." - Dr. Ronald Ernest Paul

Oh I could get away with it

Oh I could get away with it alright. But I don't go around calling women slanderous names.

What did your Christ have to say about that? Something like let he who is without sin cast the first stone?

Does a literacy potion get you 336/340, 6/6 on the GRE? Then I don't need it thank you very much.

Just because you're typing from behind the safety of your computer screen doesn't make it right to call women whores. It detracts from whatever else you may have to say.

Okie Dokie Mrs. Goebbels-defender, I'll bite, lightly, seeing as

how it's obvious that your current raison d'etre seems to be fixated on me not hurting your feeble semantics protectionist emotive sentiments.

And here, I thought you were simply exercising your own brand of sarcasm, but alas...

So let's dance Mr. Sensitive:

What did your Christ have to say about that? Something like let he who is without sin cast the first stone?

Sorry, don't follow Christ.

Next.

That said, I only respect those who live as a Christian. NOT, hypocritical moral high-horse-rs, who make it a point in life to annoy others by imposing their brand of morality while invoking a greater power whom no human can make liable, to make his case, to conflate as if to allude whatever he states is what Christ commands.

But let us elaborate: the actual point of the parable of Pericope de Adultera from John 7:53-8:11, is to recognize the sin, but forgive the sinner, if repentant, but still not excuse the nature of the sin, itself.

By your own 'logic,' Maddow is STILL engaged in sin, and in fact is gleeful of it: she continues to happily make millions as a mouthpiece for the sinner GE, who is engaged in the moral sin of poisoning the Hudson River (just one among many), but evades liability, who engages in insider trading and theft, corporatist bail-outs via their Fed. Reserve. member charter (GE Capital), and worst of all, they continue to profit off of illegal wars that always result in the very UnChristian, unjustifiable homicide, aka. murders??

So, you Mr. Morality, is of the mind that the word-'sin' of calling a rightful, definitional WHORE, who WHOREs for the murderous banksters, is a bigger sin, than the actual SINs??

Sorry, do you own a discernment baseball cap?

Also, do you see me about to stone her? Chances are, considering the moral superiority expressed here, you probably WOULD have no problems watching Maddow be stoned to death for being born a lesbian.

Hey, I see no sin in postulating, seeing as all you've been doing is postulating about me and even Maddow.

Oh I could get away with it alright. But I don't go around calling women slanderous names.

LOL. Oh really, did you? Could you? Here's the most hilariously ironic part: you just contradicted yourself in the same narrative flow, in consecutive sentences.

So...you don't believe in "slandering" 'women,' yet you're proud, at the prospect of getting away with slandering women, as long as they're related to me?

Do you even read your own stuff, before clicking "save?"

So really, how do you exactly plan to "get away with it alright"?? WhoTF says, I'm gonna let you? I dare you to say that about my own, to my face. So, you're supposedly the more 'moral' one here, who defends a modern day Goebbels who is publicly spreading lies, and you ridiculously ponder the prospect of maligning women in my life, for pointing out the obvious about an actual propagandist WHORE?

You're not altogether, are you?

Tell you what, I have a quick solution: send me your email and address, I'll give you mine. Let's see how serious you really are about calling my mother or sister a "whore," to my face.

When you come over, since I'm a civil man, we'll have a chat over a nice southern BBQ. No venom, just talk and some beers; we're gonna gaze each other in the eyes, figure out if you're truly as Christian (all of my family members are) and moral as you say or feign to be, or at least as your avatar seems to eponymously allude.

Then, we can settle whether you simply got carried away with your SuperID, anonymously talking shiite on an online forum, or you really are dickish as you're coming off right now, and are seriously incapable discerning what a propagandist whore does, looks and sounds like. Well...if the latter were so, the only 'danger' would be, I'd feel bad about picking on a ne'er do well, and simply let you be.

NO, really. I double dare you.

Does a literacy potion get you 336/340, 6/6 on the GRE? Then I don't need it thank you very much.

Well, that doesn't mean much, considering that you've clearly expressed a consecutive-sentence contradiction, already. Not to mention the fact that I have no way of verifying whether you're telling the truth or not. But frankly, after reading a few of your comments, I really don't care.

You act as if you're serious about 'defending' Maddow's 'honor,' without even knowing who she really is, when you actually HAVEN'T read the verbiage, nor have you actually researched who MADCOW is enough to even defend her properly, if indeed that was your goal.

Yet you are, for whatever reason, fixated on the term "WHORE," but NOT the fact that she lived/lives off racist imperialist Cecil Rhodes and his eponymous scholarship fund, and all the academic and professional pedigree attached with being considered a "Rhodes Scholar," yet, she hypocritically accuses Rand and Ron Paul of racism? Not to mention, the utter unimpeachable hypocrisy of writing about those who make money off wars, when her own bi-weekly salary comes from her employer General Electric, who makes 'money' off of those very same illegal wars that she cites, with zero irony, in her own book?

Are you friggin' kidding me?

Seriously, can you fathom the concept of "applicable proportionality?"

Just because you're typing from behind the safety of your computer screen doesn't make it right to call women whores.

LOL, I already did, so WTF do you think you actually can do about it?

Let me ask you, Mr. self-proclaimed GodsFavSon (seriously, how DARE you use his name as an avatar, as if to allude invoking his name in vain would be akin to Jesus himself approving its usage and such arrogant proclamation!): was I supposed to be frightened by that statement?

No wait...

Wait for it....

Wait for it......

Uh, nothing??

Nope...still nothing. Nope. Nada.

LOL.

Email and address. Come meet me, if you're actually serious, Mr. Yappy Yap Yap.

But, aside from that obviousness, you mean you're not also "typing from behind the safety of your computer screen"??

LOLOLOLOL I'm sorry (actually not, just being rhetorical, but feel the need to clarify with you, seeing as how you seem to be overly sensitive about semantics), I must have missed the SKYPE option here at DailyPaul.

'Cause, you know, when two people write anonymously at the same online forum, only one must be doing it behind the 'safety of your computer.'

LOLOLOL

It detracts from whatever else you may have to say.

Psst, hey God's homie, you know what does detract from everything you have to say? Well...EVERYTHING you've already said! LOL.

Seriously, in closing, let's recap: so your main point of contention is your inability to spot a lesbian (not that there's anything wrong with it, as she had no genetic control over how she'd be born) WHORE propagandist for the Ruling Class, that even when confronted as to the nature of your shoddy geopolitical acumen, instead of at least looking into her background as to why someone would 'dare' call a 'woman' a "WHORE," with such an un-'Christian' judgement...you resort to fixate on the 'wrongness' of someone whom you know nothing about, calling a rightful definitional whore, a "WHORE"??

Did I summarize correctly?

Well, now I'm gonna tell you exactly what I personally think of, and 'cast the first stone' to condemn, regardless of the level of my sins or perceived sins in the eyes of an arrogantly indignant individual:

1. Your own lack of applicable proportionality kinda made all your responses irrelevant: anyone who is more concerned about defending the 'honor' of a known propagandist WHORE, but not whom she works for, or what she does on a daily basis, is not worth discussing geopolitics with.

2. You're someone who professed to excel at reading comprehension citing standardized test scores as a 'proof,' (at a forum populated by non-statists who value principles, real-world comprehension and discernment skills, as if invoking some state-approved academic metric/test-score result is going to impress them), yet hilariously ironically, proceeded to destroy his own supposed-'reading comprehension credibility' by actually proudly writing a narrative contradiction.

3. You're defending the 'honor' of a propagandist, a definition-befitting WHORE for a Corporatist Banskter funded WarMachine, GE. And, you're more concerned with me hurting your sensitivity and her feelings, for calling her out as the obvious WHORE, that she is??

4. You're defending the 'honor' of a Bankster WarMachine Propagandist!

Let me repeat that: You're defending the 'honor' of a Bankster WarMachine Propagandist!

Didn't hear that the last time? Let me repeat that again: You're defending the 'honor' of a Bankster WarMachine Propagandist!

You're defending the 'honor' of a Bankster WarMachine Propagandist!
You're defending the 'honor' of a Bankster WarMachine Propagandist!
You're defending the 'honor' of a Bankster WarMachine Propagandist!
You're defending the 'honor' of a Bankster WarMachine Propagandist!
You're defending the 'honor' of a Bankster WarMachine Propagandist!

Does that compute?

5. I cannot take anyone seriously, who is so intellectually lazy as to not even bother clicking publicly available links that document her propaganda for the whole world to see, in one convenient single post. Yet, DO bother to take the time to state that basically if anyone calls an actual propagandist-whore, a "WHORE," he cannot be bothered to look at actual facts, because the prospect of continuing damage to his ego and sensitivity far outweigh the possibility of finding out he's been wrong about a publicly known propagandist, whom he embarrassingly publicly professed his attraction to, without even realizing the fact that she as a lesbian, and that she will just not be that into him?

Step FIVE alone, disqualifies you in my book! LOL

No really. No offense, but I frankly cannot trust the judgment skills of any 'man' who cannot tell a lesbian apart, regardless of how much TV-production quality makeup they put on her. What's more, it's not like someone's asking you to deploy your gaydar after getting drunk with your friends at a bar as a dare; Maddow is a public MSDNC talking head personality/wonk-celeb for the politicos, who's on TV everyday (even if you got rid of your TV, MoxNews uploads her clips almost daily).

At least Eddie Murphy knew what he was chasing, intentionally, on the Santa Monica Blvd. yrs ago; WTF is your excuse, dude?

It is the year 2013, and really, no seriously, you really can't tell??

Your very lack of gaydar aside, which frankly is an irrelevant moot point, but you as a DailyPaul member and what I assume to be Dr. Paul supporter (most of whom I'd like to assume are more politically aware than the rest of the general populace), the prospect of you being not aware of who or what Maddow is, in the year 2013, post TWO Ron Paul POTUS cycles, is frankly, embarrassing.

Oh yeah. Back to my point: WHORE. Did I stutter?

Are you mad? Should I talk about your mother or sister that way? Crazy the kind of people there are on this website.

Thanks for admitting what you see and what you tell yourself daily, when you look at yourself in the mirror.

Seriously, by any metric, whom between the two of us, would seem more silly to a relatively objective stranger watching this 'discourse' play out, right now?

Frankly, I could care less about what you say, or think of me. But I'm actually more saddened that you do NOT value 'not being conned,' more, that you'd instead fixate on someone calling a statist propagandist whore for the warmachine, a "whore," rather than learn more about the reality of how a slick propagandist like Maddow operates. Or, explore in depth what her real academic and professional background are, if nothing else, to at least warn those most close to you, be cognizant of her modus operandi.

The fact that you cannot discern that, leaves me no choice, but to stop wasting time with you, and bid you adieu.

Cheers Lad; My "Stone is cast," and shall remain that way, for the foreseeable present, and future.

Predictions in due Time...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zGDisyWkIBM

"Let it not be said that no one cared, that no one objected once it's realized that our liberties and wealth are in jeopardy." - Dr. Ronald Ernest Paul

ecorob's picture

she's a media whore...

if she were your mother and thats what she is then, so be it

i don't make the truth, i just relay it

she is a presstitute, a media whore

my sister, my mother, your sister, your mother are, i'm sure, not media whores...get over it!

its 'cos I owe ya, my young friend...
Rockin' the FREE world in Tennessee since 1957!
9/11 Truth.

What punishment do you think

What punishment do you think would suffice for all her crimes?

WHAT??! Only THREE UpVotes?!!

BUMP THIS, Please!
-Thanks Ralph, say hello to Anton's House o' Blues in Austin 4me.

"Beyond the blackened skyline, beyond the smoky rain, dreams never turned to ashes up until.........
...Everything CHANGED !!

First they ignored us.

Now they're fighting us.

Soon we'll win.

Any press is good press. The fact that the mainstream media is acknowledging the likes of Alex Jones means they are really starting to get scared. It's character assassination time.

What's unfortunate is that they're throwing Matt Drudge under the bus with him. Drudge is popular and therefore a threat, I just hope he's powerful enough to survive their attacks on him or hope he doesn't give in to them, or even worse, hope they don't Aaron Swartz him.

What I don't like about this and what we're likely to see more of is they are piling those who question things (us), or as they like to call us "conspiracy theorists," with the establishment Republicans. Using those Fox News clips juxtaposed with Alex Jones clips makes it seem like AJ and his readers also subscribe to the anti-Islam sentiment, when it's in fact quite the opposite.

Btw, I don't trust Glenn Beck, and also find it disconcerting that they are lumping him into the mix.

On a side note, that was one of the worst pieces of journalism, no investigation at all, just acceptance of what others (government) say, and denial of opposition without properly assessing counterarguments (she didn't even finish reading the quotes?!). But we're used to this already.

Anyways, in conclusion, we're winning b*tches!

ecorob's picture

glenda beck will give them...

the "provable" lie.

They will clump him in with us and point to his outlandish narrative (which will be false, of course) and then, when he is proven wrong he will apologize and that will be the end of it, as far as the lame street idiots go.

As for me, thats not how it will end. Not with a glenda beck apology.

Laughable.

its 'cos I owe ya, my young friend...
Rockin' the FREE world in Tennessee since 1957!
9/11 Truth.

.

She's got the liar Charlie Veitch in her video, who's already been exposed as a fraudster put on act that he is.

She proudly displays the fraudster Shyam Sunder NIST trash report, without thinking of a single relevant topic: Like Building 7, melting point of steel, post mortem investigation of steel debris etc.

She randomly throws out neocon Zionist trash in the middle, like O'Reilly or whoever. That stuff has got absolutely nothing to do with any reality.

And as an obligation, highlights fraud liar Glenn Beck (who himself is a Mossad double agent, providing controlled opposition) as a centerpiece of her story.

All in all, a statist hit job to confuse the masses and nothing else.

Immoral funding of Military Industrial Complex by Federal Reserve and US taxation system must stop!!!! End illegal/unconstitutional wars! Preserve US currency!
http://facebook.com/NoPropagandaZone
http://twitter.com/the_chiefe71

ecorob's picture

OK, which is it Ms. Maddow...

Do all of us out here in the "fly over" states hate and mistrust the government or do we want to kill muslims?

Please explain this to us in your infinite, boxed up, cabled, and poorly written narrative? I'm quite sure you don't know. And, if you are choosing between one of those two examples as to why we are "blowing up the airways" with questions then I KNOW you don't know.

Folks, these lame street guys are REALLY worried! They are coming right out and mentioning their madness as to, somehow, defend themselves!

They DO know this, and this bubble head proves it, they have to try and stop this avalanche of questions coming from the American public because only SO MANY false flags can be perpetrated before people everywhere will say what we are saying now; "STOP THIS MADNESS! We KNOW its NOT real. There are FAR TOO MANY inconsistensies."

Here's a BIG plus for us...the word; Conspiracy.

Conspiracy, whenever it is alluded to and no matter the way it is directed, conjures up the mother of all conspiracies, the JFK assassination. And this is where the lame street idiots fail! Most Americans, now an overwhelming percentage, believe there WAS a conspiracy to kill JFK. Not ONLY do they believe that there was a conspiracy to kill but they also understand why he was killed and why it matters. They have connected the dots.

So, Rachel, please, you keep right on bringing up how EVERYTHING is a conspiracy because people already believe that, anyway, and you are just reinforcing their truths. Witness, the Drudge Report. Witness, infowars. Witness, the DailyPaul. Witness, the slow and agonizing death of the main street media.

They are beyond ignoring us now, wouldn't you say, folks? They are beyond ridiculing us. They are now fighting us. In fact, with all these false flags, they are, literally, fighting and killing us.

Soon, very soon, the dam will bust and we, the people will win. They, the killers, the warmongers, the global elitists who control the mass media, will be overwhelmed and proven wrong. It is only a matter of time. And when we, the people do win may God have mercy on all of their souls that killed all of the innocents the world over.

The clinton's, the bush's (both of them), the cheny's, the rumsfelds, the rockefeller's, the obombya's, they will all burn in hell and we, the people will sit in judgement on their juries.

its 'cos I owe ya, my young friend...
Rockin' the FREE world in Tennessee since 1957!
9/11 Truth.

Comic Book Propaganda

I took a tour through a branch of the Federal Reserve that is in Salt Lake City, UT (it is a dispensary of the San Francisco branch.) When we were exiting the building at the end of the tour we were given literature to take with us. I didn't bother opening it up for fear of missing something within the building. When I got home I took a look at them and they were cartoon illustrations similar to the book that Rachel was promoting. That type of propaganda is simply laughable. My favorite is one were captain FED has to fight of the giant inflation bubble. I swear I am not making this up. I was unable to find the exact comic online but this is similar in style. http://www.newyorkfed.org/education/addpub/Comic_FRS.pdf

I understand the motivation

I understand the motivation of people turning a blind eye to the truth. Casting the US government in a bad light is a reflection on you. Saying anything critical of the Federal Government is a reflection on each and every one of us that we are bad people too. They would rather not know about the bad things their government does so they can sleep better at night. These are week minded people and the country is full of them.

You can change the semantics for the motivation involved in the crime to Islamic Terrorist, and you get the the whole country in a state of panic and hysteria.

What if it were just a couple of Christians out for revenge on some people they knew that would be there, or a couple of gamers testing their skills? Would the entire city go into lockdown in those situations? What special skills do Islamic Terrorists have that make them Super Criminals?

Indisputable Photo Evidence That the Boston Marathon Bombing

was staged: http://educate-yourself.org/cn/bostonbombingdidyouthink20apr...
There is a psychologist who in 1956 wrote an essay explaining that the cause of homosexuality is over abuse at a young age and this psychologist said that the purpose of gay marriage is to normalize homosexuality and this psychologist had a 100 percent success rate in reversing homosexuality.
Boston Bombing: "Craft International" (Military Contractors) Photographed at Bombing Location Before Attack. It’s been revealed that at least two men, possibly a third man with them, were photographed at the bombing scene in Boston wearing matching military grade boots and khaki pants and carrying large black backpacks that match the description of the ones the bombs were in. They were photographed just feet away from where one of the bombs was detonated before the attack: http://educate-yourself.org/cn/craftinternational17apr13.shtml
Undeniable new 9/11 DRONE ATTACK PROOF, visual and testimony evidence + proof of bombs: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dgM6hjNedE0

jhon

And the injured were actors

And the injured were actors too?

yes the injured were actors to you can clearly see from the phot

o evidence from my first link on it being staged that they put fake blood paint on themselves the so called victims because they were not bleeding and did not have blood on them right after the bombing like they were supposed to.

jhon

A large newspaper in boston called the boston globe on their

own twitter page one hour before the boston bombings said that the police are going to do a controlled explosion in a certain location they gave in one hour. One hour later two bombs went off at the boston marathon exactly where and at the location that the boston globe said on their twitter page that the boston police were going to do a controlled explosion. This fits the possibility that no one actually got injured since it was a controlled explosion which means that yes the victims had to have been fake.

jhon

Jeff Baumann must be really

Jeff Baumann must be really dedicated to his art then. Not to mention the people who died.

What does homosexuality have to do with your links?

Your whole post, for that matter...?

rachel madows guest mentioned she was for the gay marriage

which is why I mentioned homosexuality.

jhon

Cyril's picture

But what about the kids, reported boy killed and other injured?

But what about the kids, reported boy killed and other injured, then?

:(

"Cyril" pronounced "see real". I code stuff.

http://Laissez-Faire.Me/Liberty

"To study and not think is a waste. To think and not study is dangerous." -- Confucius

Cyril's picture

Thanks for downvoting. Care to share an answer to my question?

Thanks for downvoting. Care to share an answer to my question?

Hint 1: the question was genuine.

Hint 2: I sure wish it can be a staged psy-op and nobody got killed or injured. That's all I asked - something helping me to accept more easily the idea.

Hint 3: I consider the gov't guilty ANYWAY. With or without people injured. With or without real "terrorists".

Hint 4: the real terrorists are destroying your language and dwell in Congress. Destroy language and anything is possible in deathcraft with the help of millions of TVs (and fake money managed by planners). I thought more people had understood that?

Sorry for the bad news, if I revealed any.

But, okay, thanks.

"Cyril" pronounced "see real". I code stuff.

http://Laissez-Faire.Me/Liberty

"To study and not think is a waste. To think and not study is dangerous." -- Confucius

Cyril's picture

And now a downvote on this. I guess I did bring bad news.

And now a downvote on this. I guess I did bring bad news.

Now I get it.

"Cyril" pronounced "see real". I code stuff.

http://Laissez-Faire.Me/Liberty

"To study and not think is a waste. To think and not study is dangerous." -- Confucius

That picture Popular Mechanics used....

In this video, makes me believe 9/11 was a hoax. Pause and look at it, come on....MISSILE!

can you all see the thunderstorm that is the SPLC over head?

I see it coming in and it is trying to label every libertarian crazy and lump them in with Alex Jones' worst manic freak outs.

I could foresee this not being good

Whether you think you can or you can't, you're right. -Henry Ford

Rachel Maddow is a nut

the media is a shell and it is cracking

has she heard of building 7? does she look into anything she says?

Whether you think you can or you can't, you're right. -Henry Ford

Alex Jones is going

Alex Jones is going mainstream. Any publicity is good publicity. Numerous mentions on FOX yesterday too. I wish I had stock in his company.

I like her =) Her delivery

I like her =)

Her delivery and sense of humor are very attractive.

oh.... now I 'get' it:

"Her delivery and sense of humor are very attractive."

You mean, you actually don't know that she won't be that into you??

She's gay, capice?

And no, you can't make her, go straight. Doesn't happen in the real world; only in the fictional Chasing Amy, perhaps; even in fiction, it was only temporary. Should really take that to heart.

In fact, other than Ellen, she is probably the highest paid, openly lesbian MSM talking head on TV.

...and you knew nothing about that, but you're actually offended by someone calling a WHORE, a whore??

LOL.

See what you do, when you're uninformed?

Sorry if calling a murder-apologist/banksker-mouthpiece a "WHORE" offends your sensibilities, more than actual actions and evils she and her employer GE represents.

grab a chair.

Predictions in due Time...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zGDisyWkIBM

"Let it not be said that no one cared, that no one objected once it's realized that our liberties and wealth are in jeopardy." - Dr. Ronald Ernest Paul

How unfortunate. That's all I

How unfortunate. That's all I can say. Well, that and the fact that I'm terribly disappointed that I gave this video one extra hit.